NASA to lose thousands of employees to voluntary resignation
The exact number of employees can change as NASA reviews applications, reported Bloomberg, adding that the space agency will lose roughly 3,870 people.
Talking about the resignations, NASA told Bloomberg that the agency is focusing on becoming more streamlined, with the main focus on safety. 'More efficient organisation and work will ensure we remain fully capable of pursuing a Golden Era of exploration and innovation, including to the Moon and Mars,' NASA said further.
Through the government's Deferred Resignation Program, NASA gave its employees two opportunities in 2025 to leave the organisation. The agency says that its remaining civil servant workforce is expected to be about 14,000 people after both resignation programs.
Two rounds of deferred resignation
The first round of resignations came at the beginning of the Trump administration when the workers received emails that offered them a buyout. This effort was headed by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. As the offer spread, about 870 people or 4.8 per cent of the NASA employees, took the offer then.
Meanwhile, the second round of deferred resignation began in early June, with the deadline to choose by July 25. This offer was then taken up by about 3,000 personnel, or 16.4% of the workforce, as per NASA.
Deferred resignation as way to avoid layoffs
Executives at NASA have encouraged deferred resignation as a way to avoid layoffs, to reduce the workforce and comply with the trump administration's goal of reducing the workforce.
According to an audio recording obtained by Bloomberg, Janet Petro said during an emergency town hall meeting in June that the reason NASA is doing this is to minimise the involuntary cutback in workforce in the future. 'That is our whole goal, minimising that,' he said further.
In February, NASA sought a 'blanket waiver' to protect the agency's probationary employees from layoffs.
Concerns of NASA losing talent
The prospects of mass cutoffs have raised concerns in the agency, with some experts arguing that this can cause NASA to lose some of the best talent within the agency.
A letter to the newly appointed NASA interim administrator, Sean Duffy, signed by hundreds of former and current employees, warned the agency about the potential harm of workforce reductions. The letter titled 'The Voyager Declaration' stated that the cutback could jeopardise the safety and efficiency of operations.
It talked about the thousands of civil servant employees who have already been terminated, resigned or taken an early retirement, ' taking with them highly specialised, irreplaceable knowledge crucial to carrying out NASA's mission,' the letter said, highlighting the consequences of the workforce reduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Cheater-In-Chief: Watch Trump 'Caught Cheating' In Scotland Golf Game; Meme Fest Erupts Online
A viral video from Trump Turnberry shows Donald Trump's caddie tossing a ball near a bunker—seemingly to improve his lie. The clip reignites long-standing accusations that Trump cheats at golf, a claim famously detailed in Rick Reilly's book Commander in Cheat. Trump, who was golfing with his son Eric and U.S. Ambassador Warren Stephens, has not responded to the latest controversy. Social media is divided, with critics slamming his ethics and others mocking the focus on golf amid trade talks.#TrumpCheating #Turnberry #GolfGate #CommanderInCheat #TrumpScandal #ViralVideo #GolfControversy Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump gets economy he wants, but growth risks may spoil his victory lap
President Donald Trump is getting his way with the world economy. Trading partners from the European Union to Japan to Vietnam appear to be acceding to the president's demands to accept higher costs in the form of high tariffs for the privilege of selling their wares to the United States. For Trump, the agreements driven by a mix of threats and cajoling, are a fulfillment of a decades-long belief in protectionism and a massive gamble that it will pay off politically and economically with American consumers. On Sunday, the United States and the 27-member state European Union announced that they had reached a trade framework agreement: The EU agreed to accept 15 per cent US tariffs on most its goods, easing fears of a catastrophic trans-Atlantic trade war. There were also commitments by the EU to buy $750 billion in US energy products and make $600 billion in new investments through 2028, according to the White House. We just signed a very big trade deal, the biggest of them all, Trump said Monday. But there's no guarantee that Trump's radical overhaul of US trade policy will deliver the happy ending he's promised. The framework agreement was exceedingly spare on details. Most trade deals require months and even years of painstaking negotiation that rise and fall on granular details. High-stakes negotiations break Trump's way Financial markets, at first panicked by the president's protectionist agenda, seem to have acquiesced to a world in which US import taxes tariffs are at the highest rates they've been in roughly 90 years. Several billion in new revenues from his levies on foreign goods are pouring into the US Treasury and could somewhat offset the massive tax cuts he signed into law on July 4. Outside economists say that high tariffs are still likely to raise prices for American consumers, dampen the Federal Reserve's ability to lower interest rates and make the US economy less efficient over time. Democrats say the middle class and poor will ultimately pay for the tariffs. It's pretty striking that it's seen as a sigh of relief moment, said Daniel Hornung, a former Biden White House economic official who now holds fellowships at Housing Finance Policy Centre and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But if the new baseline across all trading partners is 15 per cent, that is a meaningful drag on growth that increases recession risks, while simultaneously making it harder for the Fed to cut. The EU agreement came just four days after Japan also agreed to 15 per cent US tariffs and to invest in the United States. Earlier, the United States reached deals that raised tariffs on imports from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom considerably from where they'd been before Trump returned to the White House. More one-sided trade deals are likely as countries try to beat a Friday deadline after which Trump will impose even higher tariffs on countries that refuse to make concessions. Trump's long-held theory now faces reality The US president has long claimed that America erred by not taking advantage of its clout as the world's biggest economy and erecting a wall of tariffs, in effect making other countries ante up for access to America's massive consumer market. To his closest aides, Trump's use of tariffs has validated their trust in his skills as a negotiator and their belief that the economists who warned of downturns and inflation were wrong. Stocks rose slightly on Monday morning on tariffs that once seemed unthinkably risky. Where are the experts' now? Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on X. But the story is not over. For one thing, many of the details of Trump's trade deals remain somewhat hazy and have not been captured in writing. The US and Japan, for instance, have offered differing descriptions of Japan's agreement to invest $550 billion in the United States. The trade deals do seem to count as a qualified win for Trump, with other countries giving the US favourable trade terms while accepting US tariffs, said Eswar Prasad, a Cornell University economist. "However, certain terms of the deals, such as other countries' investments in the US, seem more promising in the abstract than they might prove in reality over time.' Trump is also facing a court challenge from states and businesses arguing that the president overstepped his authority by declaring national emergencies to justify the tariffs on most of the world's economies. In May, a federal court struck down those tariffs. And an appeals court, which agreed to let the government continue collecting the tariffs for now, will hear oral arguments in the case Thursday. And he's yet to reach an accord with China which has deftly used the threat of retaliatory tariffs and withholding exports of rare earth minerals that are desperately needed for electric vehicles, computer chips and wind turbines to avoid caving in to Trump's demands. The US and China are talking this week in Stockholm, Sweden. Economists remain sceptical of the impacts for US consumers There is also skepticism that tariffs will produce the economic boom claimed by Trump. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said the most likely outcome is slow growth and firm inflation, but not a recession. After all, the 15 per cent tariffs on the EU and Japan are a slight increase from the 10 per cent rate that Trump began charging in April during a negotiation period. While autos made in the EU and Japan will no longer face the 25 per cent tariffs Trump had imposed, they will still face a 15 per cent tax that has yet to appear in prices at US dealerships. The administration has said the lack of auto price increases suggests that foreign producers are absorbing the costs, but it might ultimately just reflect the buildup of auto inventories to front-run the import taxes. Dealers built stocks ahead of tariff implementation, damping the immediate impact on retail prices. That cushion is starting to wear thin, Morgan Stanley said in a separate note. Our Japan auto analyst notes that as pre-tariff inventory clears, replacement vehicles will likely carry higher price tags. Economist Mary Lovely of the Peterson Institute for International Economics warned of a slow-burn efficiency loss' as US companies scramble to adjust to Trump's new world. For decades, American companies have mostly paid the same tariffs and often none at all on imported machinery and raw materials from all over the world. Now, as a result of Trump's trade deals, tariffs vary by country. US firms have to change their designs and get inputs from different places based on these variable tariff rates,' she said. It's an incredible administrative burden. There's all these things that are acting as longer-term drags on economy, but their effect will show up only slowly.' Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the United States' effective tariff rate has risen to 17.5 per cent from around 2.5 per cent at the start of the year. I wouldn't take a victory lap,' Zandi said. The economic damage caused by the higher tariffs will mount in the coming months. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Singapore Air Shares Slump as Air India Loss Hits Earnings
(Bloomberg) -- Singapore Airlines Ltd. share's slumped the most in almost a year after the carrier posted a sharp decline in quarterly profit. The stock fell as much as 8.7% in early Singapore trading, the biggest intraday decline since Aug. 1, 2024. Net income dropped 59% to S$186 million ($145 million) in the three months ended June 30, the carrier said Monday. The weaker performance was largely due to losses at Air India, in which Singapore Air holds a 25.1% stake, and which wasn't part of last year's results. An investigation into the fatal crash of Air India flight 171 in June is ongoing and the fallout is likely to continue to weigh on Singapore Air's performance. The Indian carrier cut capacity in the short-term to deal with operational challenges in the aftermath of the disaster. Despite the profit slide, Singapore Air remained positive about the months ahead, with robust demand across most regions in which it operates, though it did voice caution over geopolitical and macroeconomic volatility. The carrier offers the first glimpse as to how the headwinds are playing out in Asia, with major Western airlines painting a mixed picture. Earlier this month, American Airlines Group Inc. scaled back its earnings outlook after deep fare discounts to entice reluctant travelers, while Delta Air Lines Inc. gave a more upbeat outlook about demand and United Airlines Holdings Inc. said customers have resumed booking flights. Analysts had mixed reactions to Singapore Air's results, ranging from Citigroup Inc.'s Kaseedit Choonnawat pointing to core profit missing estimates to Morgan Stanley's Divya Gangahar Kothiyal predicting passenger yields may soon start stabilizing, helping ease competitive sales pressures. JPMorgan Securities Asia Pacific Ltd.'s Karen Li said the results will likely be deemed a major miss and downgraded the stock to neutral with a price target of S$7.00. It was trading at S$7.02 at 9:20 a.m. local time, having fallen as low as S$6.94. More stories like this are available on
