logo
Australian Rare Earth Producer Braces to Take on Rival China With Help From Trump

Australian Rare Earth Producer Braces to Take on Rival China With Help From Trump

Hindustan Times2 days ago
Lynas Rare Earths reported a jump in fourth-quarter production and revenue, and sounded optimistic about benefiting from President Trump's efforts to loosen China's chokehold on critical minerals needed for cars, smartphones and missile systems.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Defense Department agreed to invest in rival producer MP Materials in a deal that included a guaranteed price floor at nearly double recent rare-earth prices.
Lynas Chief Executive Amanda Lacaze said Thursday that the unusual deal sent a clear message that the U.S. is determined to rebuild a rare-earth supply chain outside China, which currently refines around 90% of the world's rare earths.
That should ease concerns among manufacturers about the availability of future supplies, and result in a much larger and more dynamic industry elsewhere in the world, Lacaze told analysts on a call.
'On balance, our view is that developing a vibrant outside-China industry will be good for everyone,' she said. 'But it will be best for us,' she added. Lynas is the largest producer of separated rare earths outside of China.
Western companies have long complained that China uses its control over rare earths to suppress competition, sometimes flooding the market to drive out rivals and at other times imposing restrictive export policies that disrupt manufacturers.
Lacaze's remarks followed Lynas's fourth-quarter production results, in which the Perth, Australia-based miner said rare-earth output rose 68% from the prior quarter.
The company produced 3,212 metric tons of rare earth oxide in the three months ended June 30, including 2,080 tons of neodymium and praseodymium, up 38% from the previous quarter.
Sales revenue rose by 38% to 170.2 million Australian dollars, around US$112 million.
It is the first time Lynas has produced more than 2,000 tons of neodymium and praseodymium, used in permanent magnets for electric vehicles and consumer electronics, in a single quarter.
The rise in output reflects recent investments in its plant, Lynas said, adding that it aims to stabilize production at higher levels while also ensuring output aligns with market demand.
'We continue to be very focused on how we deliver growth in what is an excellent market in which to be participating, and which we expect will continue to be a significant growth market,' said Lacaze.
Lynas said it is experiencing a significant increase in demand from customers and new magnet manufacturing projects. 'We continue to sell pretty much everything that we produce,' Lacaze said.
According to Lynas, its average sales price rose to the highest level since mid-2022. That reflects an ongoing focus on building strategic customer relationships and some pricing agreements independent to the market index, it said.
Lynas also announced a memorandum of understanding with South Korean permanent-magnet maker JS Link to collaborate on a new magnet manufacturing facility in Malaysia. Shares in the company rose more than 3% by mid-afternoon in Sydney.
Lynas recently began producing some heavy rare earths, the first time those critical minerals have been commercially produced outside China in decades. It began producing dysprosium in May and terbium in June.
The company said it has received strong interest from customers for those products. 'Our heavy rare earth production is key to our competitive advantage,' said Lacaze.
She said that the industry has been on 'a rollercoaster' in recent months as rare earths became a key battleground in the U.S.-China trade war. As U.S.-China tensions escalated in early April, Beijing said it would begin requiring licenses for the export of certain rare earths, including dysprosium and terbium.
China's exports of rare-earth magnets last month increased nearly threefold from the previous month after the country lifted some export controls following a truce with the U.S.
Lacaze said that it is unclear how the price floor in the Pentagon's deal with MP Materials will affect the industry's benchmark price index, but she believes a dynamic market should generally support higher prices for the critical minerals.
Lynas, which is developing a rare-earth processing facility in Seadrift, Texas, continues to maintain a very positive relationship with the U.S. government, Lacaze said when asked whether the Australian company is now at a disadvantage to MP Materials.
Under MP Materials's deal with the Pentagon, the U.S. government is committing to spend billions of dollars investing in that company and purchasing its output. The price floor protects the company if China fully lifts its restrictive export policies, which could tank global prices.
A White House spokesman earlier said the deal marked 'a major step in rebuilding America's domestic rare earth industry.'
Lynas is well positioned to sign new supply deals to take advantage of market strength following that agreement, Jefferies analyst Mitch Ryan said in a client note.
'We are today the only scale producer of light rare earth and heavy rare earth,' Lacaze said. 'And I think, as we have seen at times over the past decade in particular, having our assets in place as operational when the cycle turns—and we are looking at some very positive moves in terms of price right now—means that we can take full advantage of that upswing.'
Write to Rhiannon Hoyle at rhiannon.hoyle@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

1 in 3 US smartphone imports now made in India, China's lead shrinks
1 in 3 US smartphone imports now made in India, China's lead shrinks

Indian Express

time6 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

1 in 3 US smartphone imports now made in India, China's lead shrinks

India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. India's growing share — now 1 in 3, driven largely by Apple iPhones — comes amid ongoing trade talks with the US. While smartphones are India's top export to the US by value, President Donald Trump has threatened a 25 per cent tariff on Indian-made iPhones. US smartphone imports from India jumped by over three times year-on-year to 21.3 million units between January and May this year, according to data from the US International Trade Commis-sion (USITC). In value terms (CIF), imports of Indian-made smartphones increased 182 per cent y-o-y to $9.35 billion, already higher than around $7 billion in the whole of 2024. In May, Apple CEO Tim Cook had said the company expects most iPhones sold in the US in the April-June quarter to have India as their country of origin. Roughly 20 per cent of Apple's global iPhone production capacity is now based in India. Meanwhile, China exported 29.4 million smartphones to the US between January and May — a 27 per cent y-o-y drop — valued at around $10 billion. China (49 per cent) and India (36 per cent) were followed by Vietnam with 8.3 million units exported, accounting for a share of 14 per cent. Apple doubled down on production in India in 2020, after the government announced its flagship Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to support smartphone manufacturing in the country. Through its contract manufacturers, the company has been the biggest beneficiary of the scheme, which has helped it move some production away from China. While it started by making some of its older iPhones in India, Apple today produces all models, including the higher-end Pro range, in the country. Apple's pivot to India from China for US-bound exports has drawn criticism from Trump, who, in May, said he's told Apple's chief executive that he does not want the company to expand its manufacturing operations in India. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter,' Trump had said in a social media post. However, Apple is unlikely to overhaul its India expansion plans in the near-term. In May, its contract manufacturer Foxconn informed the London Stock Exchange of a $1.49 billion investment in one of its India units, Yuzhan Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd. The new plant is expected to come up in Tamil Nadu, where Foxconn already has a major iPhone production base. There are some challenges though. Of Apple's latest official supplier list, in 2023, as many as 157 of the company's various vendors and suppliers manufactured in mainland China, up from 151 the previous year. The number of Indian suppliers was 14. People in the know say that number has now risen to 64, marking a slow but steady shift of Apple's supplier base to India. In a Lok Sabha reply on Wednesday, Union MoS for Electronics and Information Technology Jitin Prasada said mobile manufacturing units in India have increased to 300 in 2024-25, from just 2 in 2014-15. At the same time, production of mobile phones increased 28 times to Rs 5.45 lakh crore, while exports increased 127 times to Rs 2 lakh crore. 'Total FDI in field of electronics manufacturing in last 5 years (i.e. since FY 2020-21) is US$ 4,071 mn, cumulative FDI of US$ 2,802 mn has been contributed by MeitY PLI beneficiaries,' Prasada said. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More

Chicago Wins Dismissal of Trump Suit Over Sanctuary City Policy
Chicago Wins Dismissal of Trump Suit Over Sanctuary City Policy

Mint

time6 minutes ago

  • Mint

Chicago Wins Dismissal of Trump Suit Over Sanctuary City Policy

A federal judge dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit against Illinois and Chicago over 'sanctuary' policies that prevent local officials from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. US District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins on Friday said the policies at issue are protected by the US Constitution, which says all powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. It's the first legal setback among several lawsuits the administration has filed against cities and states over sanctuary laws. 'Finding that these same policy provisions constitute discrimination or impermissible regulation would provide an end-run around the Tenth Amendment,' Jenkins said in her ruling. 'It would allow the federal government to commandeer states under the guise of intergovernmental immunity — the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment.' The Trump administration sued Illinois, Chicago, Cook County and local officials including Governor JB Pritzker in February as part of an effort by the US Department of Justice to target local government policies seen as impeding immigration enforcement efforts. The federal government argued the policies are unconstitutional and were obstructing efforts to carry out Trump's immigration crackdown. US Attorney General Pam Bondi filed the suit during her first full day on the job. In the intervening months, the administration sued a handful of other cases, including Los Angeles, New Jersey and San Francisco. New York City became the latest target on Thursday. Jenkins said in her ruling that immigration is primarily the responsibility of the federal government, under US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. She noted that federal law 'merely offers states the opportunity to assist in civil immigration enforcement' and doesn't mandate participation. Therefore, sanctuary policies 'don't make ICE's job more difficult; they just don't make it easier,' she said. The suit was challenging a state law passed in 2017 and strengthened in 2021 that broadly prohibited local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, as well as a Chicago policy and a Cook County ordinance reflecting similar limitations. Sanctuary cities and immigration advocates argue that expanding law enforcement collaboration with federal immigration authorities erodes trust in migrant communities and makes people less likely to report crimes or take advantage of public services like schools and hospitals. Under Jenkins' order, the Trump administration has until Aug. 22 to amend the lawsuit. The case is US v. Illinois, 25-cv-1285, US District Court, Northern District of Illinois . This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims
Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims

News18

time31 minutes ago

  • News18

Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims

Last Updated: Minister of state for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh categorically denied any US role in facilitating the ceasefire Amid claims by US President Donald Trump that he was solely responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) has clarified in Parliament that the ceasefire agreement of May 10 was entirely a bilateral decision reached after direct military-level talks initiated by Pakistan. Responding to a series of pointed questions from Congress MP Mohammed Javed, TMC MP Mala Roy, and others, the MEA laid out a detailed timeline of events. It stated that by May 8, India had successfully achieved its primary military objectives, including dismantling terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir, following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam. From April 22 to May 10, Indian diplomats engaged in consultations with several global partners, including the United States. However, India consistently communicated that its actions were strategic, deliberate, and aimed at avoiding unnecessary escalation. Crucially, on May 9, Indian officials informed US Vice President JD Vance that any large-scale retaliation from Pakistan would be met with a firm and decisive Indian response. In Parliament, minister of state for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh categorically denied any US role in facilitating the ceasefire. He dismissed Trump's repeated assertions as baseless, including the claim that India's restraint was influenced by prospective trade deals with the US. Singh underlined that India's position on Kashmir remains unchanged—that it is a bilateral issue not open to third-party mediation, a message also conveyed to the United States President. The clarification comes after Trump, in numerous public appearances and campaign events in the US, claimed credit for 'bringing peace" to South Asia. He suggested his intervention helped prevent war and hinted that trade negotiations may have influenced India's decision to de-escalate. These claims ignited a political debate within India. Opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, questioned whether India's strategic autonomy had been compromised. In response, external affairs minister Dr S Jaishankar firmly rejected the allegations and reiterated that India's military and diplomatic decisions were entirely self-driven. The ceasefire came after Operation Sindoor, India's swift military response targeting terror infrastructure across the LoC and deep inside PoJK, following the Pahalgam terror attack. The government has emphasised that the ceasefire was declared only after its objectives were met, and not due to any external pressures. view comments First Published: July 26, 2025, 04:04 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store