
Red states have launched a hostile takeover of public universities
Earlier this month, for the first time in its history, the Florida Board of Governors rejected a university's choice of a college president.
Despite unanimous approval by the University of Florida's board of trustees, MAGA activists attacked Santa Ono, a former president of the University of Michigan, for his past support of diversity, equity and inclusion programs; his views on admissions, gender-affirming care and climate change; and his handling of pro-Palestinian protesters and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ono's claim that 'I am here to ensure that DEI never returns to the University of Florida' was too little, too late.
Florida is at the extreme edge of an unprecedented red-state campaign to reinforce and sometimes outdo the Trump administration's efforts to remake higher education.
But Florida is by no means alone. Since 2023, 135 bills have been introduced in 29 states to eliminate DEI offices, ban mandatory diversity training, forbid the use of diversity statements in hiring and promotion and bar colleges and universities from requiring classes that 'promote concepts such as systemic racism, reparations, and racial or gender diversity.' Twenty-seven of those bills have become law.
Educational 'gag orders' restricting instruction about race, gender and sexual orientation have also grown increasingly extreme.
Ohio limits discussion of 'controversial beliefs or policies,' including 'climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, immigration policy, marriage, or abortion,' requires universities to 'ensure the fullest degree of 'intellectual diversity,' and bans or restricts most DEI-related policies and programs.
Florida's Stop Woke Act, which sought to regulate how colleges and universities teach 'divisive concepts,' has been blocked by federal courts as a violation of the First Amendment. Nonetheless, Florida's Board of Governors and State Board of Education have eliminated hundreds of general education courses from the state's 40 public institutions to comply with legislation banning instruction based on 'identity politics' or 'theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States.'
Last week, following criticism of existing accreditation agencies for supporting DEI, the public university systems in Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee decided to establish their own accreditor.
Ohio, Utah and Florida mandate civics instruction focused on a conservative vision of Western civilization. Ohio requires students to read at least five essays from 'The Federalist Papers,' Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'Letter from Birmingham Jail' and the writings of Adam Smith. Multiple states — including Florida, Arizona, Tennessee, Ohio, Texas and Iowa — have established civics institutes intended to be bastions of conservative thought.
At least 11 states have passed laws imposing new levels of post-tenure review or making it easier to dismiss tenured faculty. Indiana, for example, prohibited the award of tenure to faculty 'unlikely to foster a culture of free inquiry, free expression, and intellectual diversity,' and authorized the demotion or termination of faculty who do not, in the board's judgment, help create that culture. In several states, proposals to eliminate tenure have only narrowly failed.
The academic tradition of shared governance is also under attack. A bill in Arizona, vetoed by its governor, would have stripped faculty of the ability to approve academic degrees or programs.
In a law enacted earlier this week that may serve as a model for other states, Texas reserved to the governing board of each public university — whose members are appointed by the governor — the right 'to overturn any decision made by the institution regarding any changes to the general education curriculum'; 'approve or deny the hiring of an individual for the position of provost or deputy, associate, or assistant provost'; 'collaborate with institutions … to set campus admission standards'; and 'overturn any hiring decision for the position of vice president or dean.'
Texas also gave university boards exclusive authority to establish faculty senates or councils; prohibited them from issuing statements not directly related to their educational mandate; and limited them to advisory roles, with the presiding officer appointed by the institution's president. Faculty and staff 'may provide recommendations on academic matters,' so long as 'governing boards and institutional leadership retain clear and ultimate decision-making authority.'
In another sign of the hyper-politicization of higher education, red states are increasingly using ideological litmus tests for prospective trustees and presidents. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, for example, transformed New College from, in his words, a center of 'woke indoctrination' into a conservative haven by stacking the board with right-wing partisans and naming a conservative president.
These campaigns at the federal and state level to undermine academic freedom, weaken faculty authority and impose conservative values are often compared to McCarthy-era initiatives, but what's happening today is far broader and more damaging.
McCarthyites focused almost exclusively on a single issue — the perceived spread of communist influence. Mandates were directed principally at faculty and staff who refused to take loyalty oaths. Professors of economics and political science were pressured to teach the virtues of democracy and the 'free enterprise system.' Even when institutions dragged their feet in complying, neither states nor the federal government imposed anything remotely like the punitive and crippling measures employed against educational institutions today.
Nonetheless, the McCarthy era fostered a climate of fear and intellectual conformity in higher education that took years to dissipate. When, if ever, will public and private institutions recover from the ongoing all-out assault on the freedom of teaching and learning that made American higher education the envy of the world? It's anyone's guess.
Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Emeritus Professor of American Studies at Cornell University. David Wippman is emeritus president of Hamilton College.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Joe Rogan sounds the alarm on dangerous social media trend
Joe Rogan is one of the most popular podcasters in the world, so much so that Spotify recently paid him $250 million to renew his contract. His show, The Joe Rogan Experience, actually has a whopping 19.4 million subscribers and has been viewed more than three billion times, according to On The Fly. One reason why Rogan is so popular is that he has a diverse array of guests, from Donald Trump to Bernie Sanders to Mike Tyson, Edward Snowden, and Lance Armstrong. His guests come from all walks of life, and his hours-long podcast gives Rogan and his visitors the chance to touch upon a wide mix of important issues. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Rogan also pulls no punches, sharing his opinions even when they are controversial, disagreeing with guests when they're not on the same page, and tackling some of the most important issues of the day. Recently, for example, Rogan had some very strong words to share about a very alarming social media trend. In fact, Rogan is so disturbed by this troubling trend that he believes if things continue going the way they are on popular social media networks, it could be the end of the world as we know it. On Joe Rogan's 167th show with Cory Sandhagen, a professional mixed martial artist, Rogan told Sandhagen about one of his greatest fears related to social media. His fear was related to a troubling trend that he said Elon Musk gave him some inside info about. "I'm friends with Elon. I knew what was going on in Twitter behind the scenes. I knew how the government was stepping in and silencing posts. I'm like, this is f*king dangerous, man," Rogan said. Related: Joe Rogan shuts down Bernie Sanders' attack on Elon Musk Rogan was specifically speaking of the censorship that he believes was going on with with previous administration, and he gave a number of examples that he found particularly troubling. "If they get a real grip on social media and you no longer can protest about things and express yourself about things, including a lot of things that happen to be true, like during the COVID crisis, people are getting their accounts banned for posting factual information. Yeah. That was scary to me because that's very, very un-American," Rogan said. (The idea that the President Joe Biden administration was interfering with social media posts remains an unproven conspiracy theory). Since Rogan endorsed President Donald Trump in the last action, it's easy to assume that his concern his a partisan one. However, surprisingly, his fears about the troubling social media trend are not specific to lawmakers on one side or the other, and he's not simply afraid of those on the left having control over social media. His fears are much broader than that. "You know, but the problem is then, what if the f*ing right gets in place and they use the same rules that you used on them? Now we don't have a country anymore. Now we're f*ed. Now we're just like every other dictatorship." Related: Joe Rogan sends blunt one-word message on minimum wage Rogan also made very clear that action needs to be taken to make sure that his fears don't become a reality. "We need to stop these fascists or whatever we want to call them." While he doesn't provide specifics on exactly how he believes that we should do that, it's very clear that Rogan isn't a fan of censorship from either side. And, knowing the renowned podcast host, he's likely to speak out on his show whenever he sees it happening. More on travel: U.S. government issues serious warning for cruise passengersDelta Air Lines makes a baggage change that travelers will likeUnited Airlines passenger incident triggers quick response Given the scope of his audience, Rogan sending up the alert if he believes speech is being censored could, by itself, go a long way toward fighting the very problem he fears. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Russia launches the biggest aerial attack since the start of the war, Ukraine says
KYIV, Ukraine — Russia launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, a Ukrainian official said Sunday, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the 3-year-old war. Russia fired a total of 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. The onslaught was 'the most massive airstrike' on the country since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles, Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told The Associated Press. The attack targeted several regions, including western Ukraine, far from the front line. Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the country's air force said. Three people were killed in each of the drone strikes in the Kherson, Kharkiv and the Dnipropetrovsk regions, according to the three governors. Another person was killed by an airstrike in Kostyantynivka, local officials said. In addition to aerial attacks, a man died when Russian troops shelled the city of Kherson, and the body of a 70-year-old woman was found under the rubble of a nine-story building hit by Russian shelling in the Zaporizhzhia region. In the far-western Lviv region, a large fire broke out at an industrial facility in the city of Drohobych following a drone attack that also cut electricity to parts of the city. Ukraine's air force said one of its F-16 warplanes supplied by its Western partners crashed after sustaining damage while shooting down air targets. The pilot died. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had shot down three Ukrainian drones overnight. Two people were wounded in another Ukrainian drone attack on the city of Bryansk in western Russia, regional Gov. Alexander Bogomaz said Sunday morning, adding that seven more Ukrainian drones had been shot down over the region. Meanwhile, Russia claimed Sunday that it had taken control of the village of Novoukrainka in the partially Russian-occupied Donetsk region. Russian forces have been slowly grinding forward at some points on the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, though their incremental gains have been costly in terms of troop casualties and damaged armor. In other developments, Russia's foreign intelligence chief, Sergei Naryshkin, said he had spoken on the phone with his U.S. counterpart, CIA Director John Ratcliffe. 'I had a phone call with my American counterpart and we reserved for each other the possibility to call at any time and discuss issues of interest to us,' Naryshkin said in remarks to state TV reporter Pavel Zarubin, who posted them on his Telegram channel on Sunday. Sunday's attacks follow Russian President Vladimir Putin's comments two days ago that Moscow is ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul. Two recent rounds of talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and yielded no progress on reaching a settlement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a decree to withdraw Ukraine from the Ottawa Convention banning antipersonnel land mines, a Ukrainian lawmaker said Sunday. The move follows similar recent steps by the Baltic states and Poland. The 1997 treaty prohibits the use, production, stockpiling and transfer of antipersonnel land mines in an effort to protect civilians from explosives that can maim or kill long after fighting ends. 'This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded,' said Roman Kostenko, secretary of the Ukrainian parliamentary committee on national security, defense and intelligence. He noted that Russia is not a party to the convention 'and is massively using mines against our military and civilians.'


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Israeli court postpones Netanyahu's corruption trial after Trump calls for case to be dropped
The Jerusalem District Court agreed to postpone Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial — just hours after President Trump called for the case to be dropped while suggesting American aid could hang in the balance over the decision. The court revealed Sunday that Netanyahu will not have to testify for the next two weeks due to diplomatic and national security issues, two days after the judge initially rejected the premier's repeated requests to have the trial delayed. The new order came after Trump took to Truth Social and slammed the corruption trial — which sees Netanyahu accused of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three separate cases — as a 'political witch hunt.' 4 President Trump called on Israel to drop the corruption charges against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. AP Advertisement 4 Trump claimed the trial would interfere with cease-fire efforts in Gaza and the truce with Iran, warning that America could stop flowing aid to Israel if the case proceeds. AP 'It is terrible what they are doing in Israel to Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump wrote. 'He is a War Hero, and a Prime Minister who did a fabulous job working with the United States to bring Great Success in getting rid of the dangerous Nuclear threat in Iran.' 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' he warned. Advertisement Trump also claimed that having Netanyahu occupied with the case would interfere with cease-fire and hostage release efforts in Gaza, as well as the fragile truce with Iran. 'Thank you again, @realDonaldTrump. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!' Netanyahu replied. 4 Netanyahu's trial has gone on for four years and has been delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the wars with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran. AP 4 Netanyahu maintains that the war will not end in Gaza until Hamas is eliminated, a goal he has previously claimed supersedes the safe return of the hostages and humanitarian aid to Gaza. REUTERS Advertisement A White House official said Trump identified with Netanyahu and made the personal decision to back the embattled prime minister during the ride back from the NATO summit last week, Axios reported. The latest delay to the trial, which has stretched on for four years, has led to many Israeli officials condemning the prime minister for allegedly using his executive powers to stall the case. The leader of the opposition Democrats party, Yair Golan, said Trump's proposal shows how prolonging the war in Gaza personally benefits Netanyahu, who has refused to end the fighting until the terror group is completely eliminated — a goal with no set timeline. Advertisement 'Trump's proposal proves: The hostages are held by Hamas, but they are captive to Netanyahu's interests,' Golan wrote on X. Netanyahu stands accused of accepting more than $200,000 from wealthy businessmen and granting hundreds of millions of dollars worth of regulatory benefits to a telecom owner in exchange for favorable news coverage.