Blackbeard ‘Cheap' Hypersonic Strike Missile Being Developed For U.S. Army (Updated)
In its proposed budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year, the Army is asking for $25 million to support work on the Blackbeard Ground Launch (Blackbeard GL) effort. The funding request is somewhat confusingly contained in a line item that has been used for elements of the Dark Eagle Long Range Hypersonic Weapons (LRHW), as well as HIMARS Extended Range Demostration (HERD) work, in the past.
'As of June 2025, the program office is pursuing a Middle Tier of Acquisition for Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP) pathway, with the goal of transitioning the system to Program Executive Office Missile and Space if successful and deemed cost-effective,' the Army's Fiscal Year 2026 budget request explains. 'To accelerate development and leverage innovation, the program office is pursuing acquisition under a Fixed-Firm-Price (FFP) sole-source Other Transaction Authority for Prototyping (OTAP) with Castelion Corporation, a non-traditional defense contractor.'
Castelion was founded in 2022 by a trio of individuals who left space launch and services giant SpaceX to form their own company, which is focused on the development of high-speed, but also relatively low-cost and readily producible strike weapons. As of January, the company had raised more than $100 million in funding from private investors and had secured tens of millions more in U.S. military contracts, according to The Wall Street Journal. Those contracts are something we will come back to later on.
Rapid development schedules and affordable, mass-produced defense hardware are the keys to deterring future wars. Castelion is here to build them. pic.twitter.com/DUjoylYvrt
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) October 5, 2023
'The mission of Blackbeard Ground Launch (GL) is to attack/neutralize/suppress/destroy using hypersonic missile delivered precision fires (seeker based) against time sensitive moving targets and hardened targets at a much-reduced cost per missile than currently exists in the Army inventory,' according to the Army's proposed budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year. 'Blackbeard Ground Launch (GL) is an affordable, mass-produced hypersonic weapon designed for mid-range precision. The Army will leverage advancements in technology, materials, and cost-effective production methods to provide superior capabilities through fast, iterative design cycles, flexible hardware development, and modern manufacturing practices.'
'Blackbeard GL is not a replacement to [sic] the Long Range Hypersonic Weapons (LRHW) as it will not reach similar velocities nor range,' the line item also makes clear. 'The goal of Blackbeard GL is to deliver approximately 80% of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Increment 4 capability at a significantly reduced cost.'
PrSM is a short-range ballistic missile. The Army is in the process of fielding the baseline Increment 1 version now, which can be fired from both wheeled M142 HIMARS and tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) launcher vehicles. The Increment 2 missile, which is in development now, features a new dual-mode seeker system that allows for the engagement of moving targets on land or at sea. Increment 3 is focused on new 'enhanced' payloads, which might include small precision-guided glide bombs or kamikaze drones. Increment 4 seeks to increase PrSM's range from 310 miles (500 kilometers) to 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), and could include the addition of a ramjet or some other form of air-breathing propulsion.
At least in terms of range, a Blackbeard missile offering 80% percent of the capability of an Increment 4 PrSM could therefore be able to reach targets out to just under 500 miles (800 kilometers).
Hypersonic speed is also typically defined as anything above Mach 5, which would then be the minimum peak velocity for the Blackbeard missile. It is important to note here that traditional ballistic missiles travel at very high speeds, with many types often exceeding the hypersonic threshold in the terminal phase of flight. However, the term 'hypersonic missile' generally refers to weapons designed for sustained hypersonic speed across a far shallower and even maneuvering trajectory. This can include missiles that release unpowered hypersonic boost-glide vehicles, like the aforementioned Dark Eagle, as well as air-breathing hypersonic cruise missiles. Exactly how Blackbeard is expected to be 'hypersonic' is unclear.
What kind of unit cost the Army is eying for Blackbeard is unknown. PrSM Increment 4 is still very much in the conceptual stage, so there is no price point there to compare against. Per its latest budget request, the Army is now paying around $1.6 million for each Increment 1 PrSM, but is also spending some $5.35 million per Increment 2 missile with the new guidance package.
TWZ has reached out to the Army and Castelion for more information.
Castelion has already conducted numerous launches to date of test articles with different designs, which could reflect multiple concepts under development. They all look, at least in very broad strokes externally, like small ballistic missiles. Some of the company's experimental designs also look to feature tail sections that are at least heavily inspired by, if not lifted directly from Standard-series surface-to-air missiles still in service with the U.S. Navy and other navies globally.
The U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force have awarded Castelion contracts for work related to long-range strike weapon concepts in the past. The company has also said previously that it is aiming to have a more finalized design by 2027. The Air Force connection may also help explain the apparent existence of an air-launched design that the Army plans to use as the basis for the first phase of the Blackbeard project.
Phase 1 'will deliver a prototype proof-of-concept, including a fixed-fin flight demonstration of the existing air-launched, extended-range Blackbeard design from a modified Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Multiple Launch Rocket System Family of Munitions (MFOM) pod,' according to the Army's latest budget proposal. 'Following the demonstration, Blackbeard-GL Minimum Viable Product (MVP) prototypes will be fabricated alongside a custom Blackbeard-GL launcher pod, culminating in an MVP flight test launched from the M142 HIMARS Fire Control system.'
All current munitions for the M142 HIMARS and M270 MLRS come in standardized MFOM pods. The pods can each hold six 227mm guided artillery rockets, a single Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) short-range ballistic missile, or two PrSMs. It's unclear how many Blackbeards the Army expects to fit inside the standard pod architecture.
'If Phase 1 is successful, this option will be exercised to develop and demonstrate the full capability of a production-representative weapon,' according to the Army's budget documents. 'This includes delivering 10 missiles integrated into the M142 HIMARS launcher platform and fire control system, as well as integrating a Flight Termination System (FTS).'
A munition that would allow a HIMARS launcher to precisely engage stationary or moving targets 800 miles in any direction from where it is located, and do so very quickly and at relatively low cost, would be a major boost in capability. Even just with a hypersonic peak speed, Blackbeard would offer additional flexibility against pop-up threats and otherwise present additional challenges for enemy forces.
As mentioned at the start of this story, the Army says that Blackbeard is also a direct companion to work on new uncrewed launcher vehicles capable of firing munitions from MFOM pods, as well as bespoke canisters. The service is currently looking toward a future that could include a potential family of so-called Common Autonomous Multi-Domain Launchers (CAML) of various sizes. It has already tested an uncrewed derivative of the HIMARS, as well as a separate design from Raytheon.
Castelion has been using launchers loaded on 10×10 Oshkosh MKR18 Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR) trucks, as well as static launchers on the ground, during its testing.
Another flight test in the books – this time @Spaceport_NM. Our second flight in the past 30 days.The best way to stay ahead of your adversary in a prolonged competition is to have faster learning cycles than they do. pic.twitter.com/9n776j8XWr
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) February 19, 2025
Welcoming our new LSVR MKR18 to El Segundo this week. We'll be making upgrades to convert this vehicle into a launcher system for our upcoming flight tests – and it's a fun ride. pic.twitter.com/xNfktSAc7i
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) April 10, 2024
In general, uncrewed launchers would help the service expand its overall rocket artillery and ballistic missile launch capacity without the need for significantly larger numbers of personnel. The launchers could also be employed with less risk to human operators, even when pushed further forward. This could be a particularly potent combination when paired with Blackbeard's range and other capabilities.
Beyond the operational capabilities it might offer, Blackbeard represents a steadily growing U.S. military-wide interest in lower-cost precision munitions that are also relatively easy to produce, as well as leveraging non-traditional defense contractors to develop and build them. This is widely seen as vital for bolstering stockpiles in an economically viable way ahead of a major contingency, such as a large-scale conflict in the Pacific against China, and keeping adequate supplies of those weapons flowing in the event of a drawn-out fight.
On top of all this, hypersonic weapons have historically been notoriously complex and expensive, which in turn limits their potential impact in future operations. At the same time, the U.S. military has consistently touted the importance of hypersonic capabilities to success in future conflicts, especially against global competitors like China.
'I think the types of sensing capability that quantum sensing is going to deliver, the cross domain sensing opportunities from space to air, for example,' and 'the sophistication of sensor fusion and track using AI [artificial intelligence] and other techniques – I don't think we're going to be able to hide in any operational sense, in a realistic way,' Rob McHenry, deputy director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), warned during an online talk hosted by the Air and Space Forces Association's (AFA) Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies last week. McHenry had also explicitly posited whether the 'stealth era' might be coming to an end.
'And so what are the implications of that? You know, if you look historically, there are things like using speed and maneuverability,' he added.
The U.S. military is also trying to improve its contracting processes to manage risks differently to encourage innovation while avoiding sinking significant resources into efforts that ultimately don't provide useful results. The 'phased approach provides the Army with a clear 'off-ramp' should the technology prove immature, ensuring responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars,' the line item for Blackbeard in the service's latest budget request makes clear.
Whether the Blackbeard missile project delivers on its promise or not, it could serve as a model for future Army munition development efforts.
Update: 7/1/2025 –
In response to our queries, Castelion has now told TWZ that the designs seen in the imagery it has released to date show 'arerepresentative of the low-cost internally developed test vehicles we use to enable rapid subsystem design iteration and to ground our performance models in real-world test data.'
'Castelion's approach to development focuses on getting into hardware-in-the-loop and flight testing early in development to support learning cycles across design, production, and test,' the company added. 'As such, flight vehicles shown on social media are not representative nor intended to be representative of our final weapon systems.'
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. SpaceX has reportedly moved parts of its Bitcoin holdings after a long period of dormancy. Cryptocurrency intelligence platform Arkham said Tuesday on X that a wallet linked to the Elon Musk-led space exploration and technology company had moved about 1,300 BTC worth over $153 million, marking the first time the wallet has been touched since June 2022. 'SPACEX JUST MOVED BITCOIN FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 3 YEARS,' Arkham wrote. 'They sent 1.3K BTC ($153M) to a fresh address this morning.' Don't Miss: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics— — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The report has raised questions about the purpose of the transfer, with moves like this typically indicative of a wallet custody adjustment or an impending sell-off. SpaceX did not immediately respond to a Benzinga request for comment. According to Arkham data, the SpaceX-linked wallet still holds nearly 7,000 BTC worth over $830 million. Meanwhile, at last look, the transferred 1,300 BTC has not moved from the recipient address. The recent asset movement comes as SpaceX's lucrative government contracts have reportedly come under scrutiny from the Trump administration following Musk's row with President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, amid this uncertainty, the firm is seeking to raise over $1 billion to secure a $400 billion valuation. Trending: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . SpaceX's Bitcoin Exploration Musk first disclosed that SpaceX had added Bitcoin to its balance sheet in July 2021, without revealing how much the firm had invested in the asset. But reporting from blockchain sleuths suggests that the firm purchased nearly 26,000 BTC for about $860 million in 2021 at an average price of $33,000 per coin. Sometime down the line, however, the reporting suggests that the firm reduced its holdings to just over 8,000 BTC. This aligns with Wall Street Journal findings in August 2023, indicating that the firm had sold the asset. Similarly, Tesla purchased over 43,000 BTC worth $1.5 billion in February 2021, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The firm cited a need 'for more flexibility to diversify and maximize returns' on its cash as the reason for its decision. Like SpaceX, Tesla has also significantly reduced its Bitcoin holdings to just over 11,500 BTC, worth $1.4 billion at last his firms have significantly reduced their Bitcoin holdings in recent years, Musk in 2022 said that he intended not to sell his holdings. He said this while discussing inflation concerns. 'It is generally better to own physical things like a home or stock in companies you think make good products, than dollars when inflation is high,' he said on X at the time. 'I still own & won't sell my Bitcoin, Ethereum or Doge fwiw.' Recently, Musk has stoked speculation that he has been quietly accumulating the asset by liking a post suggesting so. He has also said his proposed political party, the 'America party,' would 'embrace Bitcoin,' slamming fiat as 'hopeless' in the wake of his disillusionment with the government's decision to pass the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill." The act's provisions could add over $3 trillion to the national deficit in the next decade, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office in May. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
SpaceX launches 24 satellites to polar areas to boost internet access
1 of 2 | SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket Saturday night from Vandenberg Space Force Base near Lompoc, Calif. Photo courtesy of SpaceX July 27 (UPI) -- SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket Saturday night from Vandenberg Space Force Base near Lompoc, Calif. The mission put 24 Starlink satellites into low Earth orbit. It will deploy the satellites into a polar orbit to boost internet service in polar regions. The Starlink 17-2 mission launched from Space Launch Complex 4 East at 9:31 p.m. PDT. The Falcon 9 ship with tail number B1075 took its 19th trip to space, including 16 Starlink missions. About 8 1/2 minutes after liftoff, the ship landed on the droneship "Of Course I Still Love You," in the Pacific Ocean. It was the 142nd landing for this vessel and the 481st booster landing for SpaceX. There are more than 8,000 Starlink satellites in orbit, according to astronomer Jonathan McDowell. On Thursday, Starlink users reported a rare full network outage of internet service. It began at 4 p.m. About 2 1/2 hours later, SpaceX announced most service had been restored. Then, 1 1/2 hours later, full service was back, Starlink reported.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
SpaceX is getting into the cosmic manufacturing business
Having revolutionized the space launch system and space-based telecommunications, SpaceX has fixed on a new industry to conquer. Elon Musk's company is developing a business called Starfall which will facilitate space-based manufacturing. SpaceX's approach is something of a departure from other companies such as Vast and Axiom which envision private space stations serviced by spacecraft such as the Crew Dragon. The Starship would take a number of capsules outfitted as miniature labs or factories to low Earth orbit. After a period of research into high valued products such as pharmaceuticals or computer chips or their outright manufacture, the capsules would return to Earth independently. SpaceX is already in talks with potential customers for Starfall. The company envisions the new business beginning at the end of the current decade. A recent piece in Forbes has an excellent rundown about the state of play in regards to space manufacturing. Experiments on the International Space Station by companies such as Merck and Redwire have shown the promise of products that use the unique properties of the space environment, including microgravity, hard vacuum and even radiation is very real. The question is, when will the promise become reality: decades from now, or sooner? The author of the Forbes article thinks that a space manufacturing sector is decades away, say in the time of our grandchildren. A number of companies building private space stations are betting that the time will come much sooner, perhaps as early as the 2030s. What kind of products might be created in space that can't be manufactured on Earth? Redwire, a space manufacturing and infrastructure company first founded in 2020 and most famous for deploying a 3D printer on the International Space Station, has a few ideas. Pharmaceuticals, particularly in regards to 'uniform crystal production and formulation' important for developing new drugs. Tissue bioprinting, which could lead to the production of transplantable organs derived from a patient's stem cells. Manufactured products, including fiber optics, laser components and turbomachine parts. The timing of the Starfall business is interesting in that the International Space Station is scheduled to end its operational life by 2030. Companies like Redwire will be able to switch over to the SpaceX-derived business seamlessly to continue their research and perhaps start making things for paying customers. Starfall will have several competitors in the space manufacturing game. Vast Aerospace is likely to be the first out the gate with its Haven-1 space station, a small-scale facility capable of hosting four astronauts for 30-day stays. Haven-1's launch has been pushed back to May 2026. Haven-1 could be followed by Haven-2, a much larger facility to be built between 2028 and 2032. Axiom Space is planning a space station, starting no earlier than 2027 with construction to conclude in the early 2030s. Axion has already mounted four private space missions to the International Space Station. Orbital Reef is a joint venture between Blue Origin and Sierra Space. The facility is not only designed to facilitate research and space manufacturing, but tourism as well. Operations may begin in 2027 or later. Starlab is a commercial space station envisioned by Starlab Space and is planned for launch no earlier than 2028. It will consist of a service module and a habitat/laboratory module. Starlab will specifically not cater to the space tourism market. It should be noted that however each of these and perhaps other commercial space stations come to fruition, SpaceX is likely to make money on them, as well. The company currently possesses the only commercial means to send people to and from low Earth orbit in the form of the Crew Dragon. NASA and Boeing are trying to fix the problems with the Starliner, a long, difficult and expensive process. How fast the process of space-based manufacturing proceeds is an open question. Blue Origin's Jeff Bezos dreams of a time in which all heavy industry moves off planet, leaving Earth relatively free of pollution and human-caused climate change. That development, if it happens at all, is likely to take many decades if not centuries. SpaceX was at the center of the first two commercial space industries, space launch with its Falcon family of rockets and telecommunications with its Starlink system. Whether the company decides to build its own space station based on the Starship or just stick with Starfall, it is likely to also be at the center of the next great space commercial development, the manufacture of products in low Earth orbit. No wonder Musk is the richest man on the planet.