
Natal family violence against women remains largely underreported: Study
Swayam, a feminist organisation which has worked across seven districts of West Bengal for the past half a decade worked with over 50 survivors of natal family violence and found that 75% of the women faced verbal and emotional abuse, and 68% faced physical abuse, and 20% faced child abuse. Their research also found that most of the perpetrators of abuse are fathers, brothers, male relatives, followed by mothers and grandmothers in some cases.
'Women were denied education, mobility, healthcare, and even nutrition. Decisions about their lives were taken without consent. Girls were burdened with care work and restricted in clothing, movement, and relationships,' the study found. They also came to the conclusion that violence is normalised, internalised, and transmitted across generations as discipline, family honour, and concern by the perpetrators.
The researchers said that cases of natal family violence were largely invisible in mainstream conversations on domestic violence which mostly talks about marital family violence and the community institutes fail to recognise this as a legitimate claim against violence.
'Violence that women face in their natal families is huge. It starts even before birth through female foeticide and continues in many ways through discrimination, control, abuse, and forced marriages,' Anuradha Kapoor, the primary researcher of the study 'The Natal Family: A Neglected Site of Domestic Violence Against Women' said during the launch of the study on July 17, Thursday.
Ms. Kapoor highlighted that each case of natal family violence is looked at as individual cases and the structural, cultural, and direct nature of the violence is largely ignored. She also said that many women who have sought help from Swayam in such cases have also refused to go public about the issue or even file cases against the abusers.
'I was sent to my maternal grandparents' house when I was one year old, three months before my brother was born, and lived there till I was 10. My grandfather would throw me on the ground and kick me. My grandmother would pinch me, bang my head against the wall frequently. My uncles beat me up and smashed my head against the wall when I was little. Eventually, my brother also began beating me up,' a survivor stated while recounting her experience of natal family violence.
After their study, Swayam has recommended that there is a need to recognise natal family violence as a key dimension of domestic violence. 'Strengthen laws and legal aid mechanisms, ensure access to property, education, and livelihood, train frontline workers and institutes to help support the survivors of abuse,' the researchers said. They also called for intersectional research on the subject across the nation to bring police level changes and help find survivor-centered solutions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
2006 Mumbai train blasts case: Hours after Bombay HC verdict, eight released from different jails
Hours after Bombay High Court acquitted the 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, eight of them were released from different jails in the state. While two were not released due to pending cases against them, one of the accused had died due to Covid -19 and another was already released on parole. The HC on Monday morning had ordered release of all accused forthwith in case they are not required to be detained in any other case. The court had directed them to execute personal bonds of Rs 25,000 each. Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui, who was earlier on death row and Mohammed Ali Alam Sher Sheikh, who was on life-term, were released from Nagpur Central Prison around 8 pm. Moreover, other accused including Tanveer Ahmed Mohammad Ibrahim Ansari, Mohd Majid Mohd Shafi, Suhail Mohammad Sheikh, and Zamir Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh were released from Amravati Central Jail around 9 pm. Asif Khan Bashir Khan was released from Yerawada Jail in Pune and Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh was released from Nashik jail. The two accused were not released due to pending cases against them. The two include Mohammed Faisal Attaur Rahman Shaikh lodged at Aurangabad Jail and Naveed Hussain Khan Rasheed lodged at Nagpur jail. Moreover, Kamal Ahmed Mohd Vakil Ansari died due to Covid- 19 in 2021 at Nagpur Central prison, while another accused Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari was already released on parole. 'Two of accused from 7/11 Mumbai blasts case were lodged at Yerawada prison. Of the two, Asif Khan Bashir Khan alias Junaid was released on Monday night. Second accused, Mohammed Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh has not been released since he has another case against him,' said a senior officer from Prison Department. Anjum Inamdar, Pune-based activist with Muslim Mulniwasi Manch said, 'Asif was released around 8.30 pm from Yerawada Prison and was received by his brother. His brother and Asif both expressed their feeling of truth having prevailed and justice being delivered to them.' Suhail Mohamed Shaikh, after being released from Amravati Central Prison around 9 pm, told media persons outside the jail premises, 'Today we are released after 19 years. We had complete faith in the court and the establishment and it has worked. There was nothing in the case against us. We should have been acquitted by the special court itself, but now the High Court has done it. We are thankful to the lawyers who worked for us and the judges.'


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Rs 3 cr jewellery heist in Suryapet: Burglars cut through washroom wall to loot store
Hyderabad: In a scene straight out of a heist thriller, unidentified burglars tunnelled through a washroom wall to gain access to a jewellery store in Suryapet and made off with an estimated Rs 3 crore worth of gold and Rs 5 lakh in cash in the early hours of Monday. The daring break-in took place at Santoshi Jewellers, located inside the bustling Mahatma Gandhi Market. The crime came to light in the morning, when neighbouring shopkeepers noticed a gaping hole in the common washroom wall behind the store and alerted the jewellers. "We received a call from the neighbouring shop owner who noticed the hole in the wall. When we rushed in, we were shocked to see the store had been looted," the store management told the media. According to Suryapet police, the gang entered the premises from the rear side of the building, where an unlocked door led them to three shared washrooms. Using crowbars, gas-cutters, and other tools, the burglars created a hole through one washroom, which led into another washroom inside the jewellery store. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad "Opposite to this washroom was the storeroom secured with a shutter," a senior officer explained. "They used gas-cutters to slice open the shutter and access the room where the ornaments were kept," he said. Interestingly, the gang did not enter the main showroom. Instead, they targeted the storeroom attached to the showroom, bypassing the front completely. A CCTV camera inside the storeroom recorded the burglars at 12.45 am, but was soon covered with a plastic mug to obscure further footage. Police said a locker inside the room was left untouched, suggesting the burglars knew exactly where to look. After the heist, the gang retraced their path through the same hole, disappearing into the overgrown vegetation at the rear of the building. Santoshi Jewellers initially claimed that 15 kg of gold, Rs 18 lakh in cash, and 400 grams of gold biscuits were stolen. However, by Monday evening, police said the owner was still auditing the inventory to ascertain the exact loss. While initial claims from the shop owner pegged the loss at Rs 15 crore, police said the number was based on panic and not verified. "The owner is still auditing the stock against records. As of now, the confirmed loss is around Rs 3 crore," a senior police official said. At least five persons are suspected to be involved in the burglary. Suryapet police have formed special teams and are probing whether it's the handiwork of a Jharkhand-based gang known for executing similar operations. "We are analysing the modus operandi, reviewing CCTV footage, and matching fingerprints lifted from the scene," the police official added. A Clues team was pressed into action to assist with forensic evidence. The shop, which had been closed over the weekend, was in the process of shifting to a new location, a detail police believe the offenders might have known. The gold ornaments typically kept on display had already been moved to the storeroom, making the burglars' strike eerily precise and well-timed, police added.


India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Top court denies bail to corporator's murder accused, orders fast-track trial
The Supreme Court has refused to grant bail to an accused in Maharashtra's Bhiwandi-based corporator, citing the gravity of the allegations and ongoing trial proceedings. The Court instead directed that the trial be fast-tracked with a strict bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi were hearing a bail plea filed by Prashant Bhaskar Mhatre, who is accused of murdering his cousin Manoj Ananta Mhatre (53), who was a Congress corporator from is facing trial under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), in a 2017 FIR which alleges that he, along with a co-accused, attacked the victim with firearms and sharp weapons over political rivalry. According to the prosecution, Prashant Mhatre was allegedly requesting a ticket for contesting elections. Having been denied, he is said to have unsuccessfully tried to kill Manoj Mhatre first in 2013, but on the fateful day, Prashant Mhatre along with his co-accused brutally assaulted the victim with a firearm, sickles and chopper – causing him grievous prosecution claimed that the weapons used in the 2013 offence were recovered from Prashant Mhatre's for Prashant Mhatre, senior advocate Prakash Deu Naik contended that the petitioner has been in custody for over eight years and sought bail on grounds of parity with 17 co-accused who are already out on the State, represented by advocate Deepak Salvi, argued that Mhatre's case was distinguishable due to his direct role, criminal antecedents, and threats to pointed out that 24 witnesses have already been deposed in the case and about 30 vital witnesses are yet to be examined, while the total number of remaining prosecution witnesses is above submitted, "the depositions of witnesses will have a direct bearing on the outcome of the trial. The principle of prolonged incarceration is inapplicable in the instant case, since the delay has been caused by the petitioner and his co-accused, who did not allow the Court to frame charges for a period of 5 years."Advocate Satish Maneshinde appeared for the widow of Manoj Mhatre, who pointed out that two witnesses had been specifically threatened, and they had been given police protection, apart from the alleged threats extended to the family of the Court directed that the trial in the case conclude by January 31, 2026 and, if there is a delay, then the Principal District Judge will have to submit an explanation to that effect to the Supreme clarified that Prashant Mhatre could renew his bail plea if the trial isn't concluded within the stipulated period.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court