
What about the bike lanes? Transit advocates say Metro project ignores city's mobility plans
But the scope of Measure HLA — the citywide initiative to follow through on what L.A. City Council had adopted in 2015 — has been at the center of a recent debate between advocates and Metro after the transit agency moved forward on a project for the county's busiest bus route without anticipated plans for new bike lanes.
Transit advocates argue that the exclusion from the Vermont Avenue project ignores voters' mandate to follow the mobility plan, which calls for improved bike lanes on that street; Metro and city officials have countered that the measure applied only to the city of Los Angeles — not to the countywide transit agency.
'We don't think it's legal,' said Michael Schneider, who heads Streets for All, the advocacy group behind the ballot measure. 'HLA is a city measure, and Metro is a county agency, but Vermont is owned by the City of Los Angeles, and the city is working with Metro. They're permitting it, they're providing technical expertise, they're spending staff time and money. This falls under Measure HLA, which requires a bike lane on Vermont.'
Last week, the agency's board of directors voted to approve plans for the Vermont Transit Corridor — a project that will add dedicated bus lanes and 26 stations at 13 locations along a 12.4-mile stretch on Vermont Avenue between 120th Street and Sunset Boulevard. The route sees 38,000 daily bus boardings, according to Metro, and that is expected to increase to 66,000 by 2045.
The project is expected to especially improve transit access for disadvantaged communities and a high number of residents who identify as Black, Indigenous and people of color, according to Metro. The corridor includes a majority of low-income households, including residents without access to a car.
The project is included in the Measure M expenditure plan, which allocated $425 million for construction.
'Metro is supportive of the goals and objectives of HLA, specifically we have worked — and will continue to work — with all local jurisdictions to provide better quality transit and safer streets for all of Los Angeles County,' the agency said in a statement. 'However, HLA does not apply to Metro projects.'
The board vote did not include discussion and ignored pleas from public commenters who asked Metro to reconsider its plans to include upgraded bike lanes.
The project has been under study for nearly a decade. According to Metro, the addition of new bike lanes would delay the project by up to five years, increase the cost and force Metro to acquire properties.
In a letter to Metro Chief Executive Stephanie Wiggins last month, Schneider disputed Metro's assertions and said the addition of bike lanes would not cause delays or affect properties if parking was not prioritized over the upgrades. He warned that the plan without bike lanes would further compromise safety on the route for bicyclists and pedestrians. Vermont Avenue sees one of the city's highest pedestrian death and injury counts, according to Metro and Streets for All.
Metro has maintained its stance. In a letter sent to L.A. City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson last month, an attorney for Metro said that the agency would take legal action if the city forced it to comply with Measure HLA. The attorney cited a letter that the city attorney sent Streets for All in November that said the agency does not need to comply with the measure, a point that was reiterated at an L.A. City Transportation Committee meeting in February.
The attorney also pointed to an agreement between the city and Metro, which acknowledges the agency's 'self-governance authority.'
'The [agreement] simply does not transform Metro projects into City projects,' the letter states.
Schneider and others have said that the agency's plan dismisses residents' needs.
'We have an epidemic of traffic fatalities and injuries,' said Eli Lipmen, the executive director of transit advocacy group Move L.A. 'Some of it has to do with how people drive and reckless driving, but a lot of it has to do with lack of good infrastructure.'
Lipmen said that more people will be hurt if Metro does not allow for new protected bike lanes in its plans and hopes there is still time for conversation.
'Vermont needs to happen and needs to happen as soon as possible. We cannot delay this project another second,' Lipmen said.
The project is expected to be completed by the 2028 Olympics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats explain quorum breaking, Republicans demand arrests to force Trump-ordered redistricting vote
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Several Texas lawmakers left the state Sunday to block a Monday vote on redrawn congressional maps designed to add five Republican seats in the US House of Representatives. At least 51 Democratic state representatives chose to leave Texas on Sunday. Some of those lawmakers said they've gone to New York, and others went to Illinois. The Governors of those states have stated their support for the action. 2021 | Statehouse reaches stalemate as Texas Democrats break quorum and Republicans lock doors Texas Democratic Party Chairman Kendall Scudder issued a statement Sunday in support of the quorum breakers. In it, he said that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott was 'holding disaster flood relief hostage to steal five congressional seats' under orders from President Donald Trump. In June, Trump met with several Texas Republicans. He has also publicly said that he wants Texas to create five new Republican seats. 'Greg Abbott just told flood survivors across Texas that their suffering comes second to Donald Trump's thirst for power … That's not governing, that's gutless,' Scudder said. 'Your right to representation in your government is under attack, and Texas Democrats will protect your rights through any means necessary.' The action puts the legislative chamber at a standstill, as the House's rules require the presence of two-thirds of its 150 members — at least 100 representatives. Since the absences aren't excused, each legislator who has left Texas is subject to a fine of $500 per day. The Texas Republican Party also issued a statement from its chair, Abraham George. He called the Democratic lawmakers 'cowards' while also calling for them to be 'hunted down' and arrested. 'While Republicans are fighting for fair and lawful redistricting that reflects the will of the people, Democrats are abandoning their sworn duty, and trying to silence your voice,' he wrote. 'Those Texas House Democrats who refuse to do their sworn duty and flee to deny a quorum are not above the law … We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law.' Both parties are using the situation to fundraise. Only 12 days remain in the special session. Texas Democrats say why they're leaving In a statement, Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said that the caucus's decision was made 'with absolute moral clarity.' He also criticized Gov. Greg Abbott's decision to include redistricting along with recent flooding in the called session's topics. 'Governor Abbott has turned the victims of a historic tragedy into political hostages in his submission to Donald Trump,' Wu said in a statement. 'He is using an intentionally racist map to steal the voices of millions of Black and Latino Texans, all to execute a corrupt political deal. Apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal.' 'I am ready, willing and able': House Democrat says he'd break quorum to stop redistricting Other Texas Democrats made statements Sunday about their decision to break quorum. Reps. Venton Jones, Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, Ron Reynolds, Gina Hinojosa, Lulu Flores and Sheryl Cole also made statements on social media Sunday. 'The Governor doesn't need us here to help flood survivors — he needs us here to pass Donald Trump's political agenda,' Johnson said. 'We've reached a line I won't cross. Abbott's map is a direct assault on our constitution. If we're not willing to put ourselves in the way of that, we shouldn't be here.' 'This is the rot at the core of our broken political system,' Talarico said. 'We normally redistrict at the beginning of the decade after a new census. But Trump and Texas Republicans are trying to redraw these maps in the middle of the decade to rig the 2026 midterms.' Talarico says he is 'willing' to break quorum to prevent redistricting It's like two football teams coming out of the locker room at halftime, and the team that's ahead changes the rules of the game to make sure they win. It's cheating. Plain and simple. Rep. James Talarico 'We may not be at the Capitol, but we're doing our jobs. We may not be in Texas, but we're fighting for our constituents,' his statement continues, 'We're not just fighting for Democrats — we're fighting for Independents and Republicans too. Because in a democracy, voters are supposed to choose their politicians, not the other way around.' 'This session should be about helping Texans recover — not helping Donald Trump gain power,' Bucy said. 'If Governor Abbott is going to try to quietly redraw maps while families are still cleaning out flooded homes, we're going to make it hurt.' 'Today, I walked out of the Texas Capitol alongside my Democratic peers in protest of the MAGA maps House Republicans are rushing to pass. Our Democracy is being stolen from us, and I am sounding the alarm—it's time for our nation to wake up! It's a stand I'm extremely familiar with—after breaking quorum in 2003 and leading the fight in 2021, I'm ready to dig my heels in and make sure the MAGA extremists know what they're up against. No one should underestimate what the Democrats will do to preserve voting rights and democracy.' Republicans call for the arrest of lawmakers Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said on X Sunday that the quorum breakers should be arrested. House Speaker Dustin Burrows said on X that 'all options were on the table' should the House not make quorum at 3:00 p.m. Monday. The Legislature rules require the House sergeant-at-arms to arrest and secure absent members for attendance. This action can't be done until after the Texas House determines that quorum hasn't been met due to unexcused absences. However, the authority of the sergeant-at-arms doesn't extend outside of Texas, Rep. Brent Money said on July 30. 'This is not theoretical-it was used in 2003 and again in 2021,' Money said. 'Should members flee the state for an extended period, the Governor has the constitutional authority to declare their seats vacant under the Texas Election Code. This would lower the quorum threshold and allow the House to act.' Capitol Context: Abbott waited a record amount of time to fill Texas Congressman's seat, KXAN analysis shows Rep. Nate Schatzline echoed Money's statement on Sunday, hours after gloating on X that the redrawn map draws Democratic US Rep. Jasmine Crockett's residence out of her district. Rep. Jeff Leach responded to Johnson, whom he said was 'trusted and respected and worked well with.' The two are the chair and joint chair of the House Judiciary Committee. 'If Ann chooses to flee the State and to shirk her responsibilities and duties to her constituents and to the people of Texas, she should immediately be stripped of her Vice Chairmanship,' Leach said. Rep. Jared Patterson also called for arrests, but showed a spark of creativity — in a post, he called on Abbott to explore redistricting of Texas House seats to further solidify one-party rule in the state. '[Abbott] reserves the right to add items to the Special Session call, including redistricting Texas House seats. If all options are on the table, ALL options should be explored,' Patterson said. Abbott released an ad Sunday that targeted Rep. Wu directly. The ad doesn't mention redistricting, and instead said that Wu was blocking flood relief legislation. Rep. Brian Harrison, R-Midlothian, told KXAN that Texas Republicans were within their rights to redraw the map to favor the GOP. 'Elected Republicans in the state of Texas should be doing everything in our power to make sure that the United States Congress does not fall into the hands of the liberal extremist Democrats,' Harrison said. National Democrats voice support Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement that President Trump and the Republicans have long engaged in 'rigging the system, breaking the rules, and scheming to hold onto power.' He also said that the Republican lawmakers were attempting to redistrict to 'enrich a handful of elites.' 'For weeks, we've been warning that if Republicans in Texas want a showdown — if they want to delay flood relief to cravenly protect Donald Trump from an inevitable midterm meltdown — then we'd give them that showdown,' Martin said. 'That's exactly what Texas Democrats did today: blowing up Republicans' sham special session that's virtually ignored the plight of flood victims in Kerr County.' He added that the DNC was 'proud to support these legislators in standing up and showing real leadership.' 'Republicans thought they could just rig the maps and change the rules without the American people taking notice. They were dead wrong,' Martin added. 'After this fight is done, we're coming full force for the Republicans' House majority.' U.S. Representative Greg Casar, D-Austin, told KXAN he felt the state representatives were defending democracy. 'Texas Democrats are going around the country to mobilize everyone against this corrupt Trump plan, and by not being in the state capitol, they can continue to delay that plan while we mobilize the country around protecting voting [corruption],' he said. Casar, whose district he represents spans from Pflugerville to San Antonio, said the new map is too extreme. 'Donald Trump's plan is to change our districts — to rig the way these elections will work before anybody ever gets to cast a vote for people,' Casar continued. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Columbia and Brown to disclose admissions and race data in Trump deal
Advertisement But college officials and experts who support using factors beyond test scores worry that the government — or private groups or individuals — will use the data to file new discrimination charges against universities and threaten their federal funding. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Trump administration is using every lever it can to push elite college admissions offices toward what it regards as 'merit-based' processes that more heavily weigh grades and test scores, arguing that softer measures, such as asking applicants about their life challenges or considering where they live, may be illegal proxies for considering race. The additional scrutiny is likely to resonate in admissions offices nationwide. It could cause some universities to reconsider techniques like recruitment efforts focused on high schools whose students are predominantly people of color, or accepting students who have outstanding qualifications in some areas but subpar test scores, even if they believe such actions are legal. Advertisement 'The Trump administration's ambition here is to send a chill through admissions offices all over the country,' said Justin Driver, a Yale Law School professor who just wrote a book about the Supreme Court and affirmative action and who said he believed that the administration's understanding of the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision was wrong. 'They are trying to get universities to depress Black and brown enrollment.' The Trump administration has celebrated getting this data as part of its war on 'woke' university policies such as affirmative action and diversity, equity and inclusion programs that it says discriminate based on race. 'Because of the Trump administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex,' Linda McMahon, the secretary of education, said when the Brown deal was announced, echoing similar comments she had made about Columbia. 'Woke is officially DEAD at Brown,' President Donald Trump proclaimed on Truth Social in announcing the deal. The public release of race-related data on admissions could also be valuable to conservative groups who have become the self-appointed enforcers of the Supreme Court decision. 'If this information were obtainable by a Freedom of Information Act request or made public, it would be of great interest,' said Adam Mortara, one of the lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions, the plaintiff in the Supreme Court affirmative action case. 'If we could get this and analyze it, we would because we are constantly vigilant and looking out for those who seem not to have gotten the message.' Advertisement Columbia and Brown will have to maintain 'merit-based admissions policies,' according to their settlements, which codify the administration's broader aims in legally binding language. The universities 'may not by any means unlawfully preference applicants based on race, color or national origin in admissions throughout its programs,' both agreements state in identical language. 'No proxy for racial admission will be tolerated.' The admissions disclosures will provide the government with data on accepted and rejected applicants broken down by 'race, color, grade point average and performance on standardized tests.' While it is not clear what Brown's and Columbia's data will reveal, general data shows that admissions systems that are focused on standardized tests typically help Asian students and harm the chances of Black students. Of the high school graduates who scored between 1400 and 1600 on the SAT in 2024, the highest possible scores, 1% were African American, and 27% were Asian, according to the College Board, the private organization that administers the test. About 12% of students taking the test were Black, and 10% were Asian. Some experts consider the tests to be unfair because there are score gaps by race and class. Student demographics at Columbia and Brown had already started to shift as the 2023 Supreme Court decision took effect. Among first-year undergraduates entering Columbia in fall 2024, 39% were Asian, and 12% were Black. In the fall of 2023, the entering class was 30% Asian and 20% Black. (White and Hispanic enrollment dropped slightly from 2023 to 2024). At Brown, Asian and white first-year enrollment went up from fall 2023 to fall 2024, while Hispanic and Black enrollment decreased. Not all Ivy League universities, however, showed the same effect. Advertisement Applicants to Columbia have the option of not submitting standardized test scores, complicating any analysis. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, a federal statistical agency, about 61% of first-year Columbia undergraduates in fall 2023 had submitted test scores. Brown has returned to requiring test scores from applicants. In a letter to the campus, Christina H. Paxson, the president of Brown, said that the federal government was already entitled to the new data from Brown or any other university as part of compliance with civil rights laws. She said she was not worried about releasing the material, saying it would 'demonstrate the strong academic qualifications of the classes we admit while remaining committed to welcoming students from a wide range of backgrounds.' Columbia also explained in a recent fact sheet that the data would be anonymized and that it had an obligation to comply with the law. 'We have agreed to provide data to which the government is entitled, and is currently requesting from scores of institutions, including ours,' Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president, said when the deal was announced. The Trump administration already appears to be asking for similar data under subpoena. In March, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division to review admissions policies at Stanford University and three University of California institutions: UCLA, Berkeley and Irvine. 'The Department of Justice will put an end to a shameful system in which someone's race matters more than their ability,' Chad Mizelle, the acting associate attorney general, said in March. 'Every college and university should know that illegal discrimination in admissions will be investigated and eliminated.' Advertisement The language used in the settlements with Columbia and Brown hammers home contested assertions about the Supreme Court admissions case that the Trump administration has been making since February. It insists that the decision goes beyond admissions and bars any consideration of race in university life. Many legal experts disagree with this interpretation and point out that the decision pointedly said that colleges could still consider, on a case-by-case basis, 'an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration or otherwise.' 'The law is clear: Treating students differently on the basis of race to achieve nebulous goals such as diversity, racial balancing, social justice or equity is illegal under controlling Supreme Court precedent,' the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights argued in an official guidance letter to all educational institutions in February. Under this thinking, colleges could not lawfully eliminate the use of standardized testing in admissions if doing so was part of an effort to achieve a desired racial balance or to increase racial diversity. Federal law would also not allow race to be considered in hiring, promotion, scholarships or housing decisions. 'If an educational institution treats a person of one race differently than it treats another person because of that person's race, the educational institution violates the law,' the February letter said. Enforcement of that guidance document was put on hold in April because of a legal challenge. Last week, Bondi made another attempt to make her interpretation of the Supreme Court decision enforceable, providing similar guidance that applies to all entities receiving federal funding. Bondi's guidance states that even seemingly race-neutral criteria, such as asking an applicant about 'cultural competence' or 'lived experience,' or targeting recruitment based on geography, violates federal law if it is designed or applied with the intention of giving an advantage to applicants based on protected characteristics, such as race. Advertisement Even a scholarship program that targets 'underserved geographic areas' or 'first-generation students' would not be legal if those criteria are chosen to increase participation by specific racial or sex-based groups, the guidance states. 'I think transparency is a good thing, and if Columbia is not using racial preferences, they should have nothing to hide,' said Richard Kahlenberg, director of the American Identity Project at the Progressive Policy Institute, a left-of-center think tank. Kahlenberg has pushed for class-conscious rather than race-conscious college admissions. But the data the government is demanding could be misused, he said, to suggest that 'any attempt to create racial diversity even by race-neutral means is problematic.' This article originally appeared in .


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
In race to replace Fernandes Anderson, District 7 candidates debate housing affordability, reparations during forum
Said Ahmed, a nonprofit executive, said if elected he would push to make the lottery systems that distribute affordable units in private developments more transparent. Miniard Culpepper, a lawyer Advertisement Community activist WaWa Bell supported the idea of creating a more localized area median income that would better reflect the demographics of District 7. Area median income is the standard used for determining income eligibility for affordable housing projects. Such a change would require the state Legislature's approval. Advertisement Mavrick Afonso, who works for the state's executive office of housing and livable communities, also supported the idea of a localized area median income for the district, noting that areas like 'Locally in Roxbury, that median income is a lot lower,' Afonso said, 'we're not making housing for Waltham in Roxbury.' The candidates are running in the only open seat on this year's ballot, and would represent a district that encompasses parts of Roxbury, Dorchester, Fenway and part of the South End. The previous District 7 councilor, Fernandes Anderson, The District 7 race is crowded, with a total of 11 candidates on the Sept. 9 preliminary ballot. Only the top two vote getters in that election will move on to November's general election. The organizers of the event only invited the first four candidates who responded to them so that each candidate would get around 30 minutes to answer questions. The other candidates will be interviewed at future events. When asked by an audience member about how he would make sure that Black people from Roxbury could afford to stay in the neighborhood, Bell said reparations were the solution. Community organizations like Advertisement 'I think I can go a step further and establish the infrastructure,' Bell said, 'so that if reparations does happen … we have a dedicated office that will be able to deliver those resources properly.' On reparations, Culpepper said that Black students at Madison Park vocational high school should be able to attend nearby Northeastern University tuition free if they are admitted. 'The little white kids are paying cash right from the money that was made from the slaves on our back,' Culpepper said. Culpepper said that the University developing the land in the area has limited access to students of the long-underinvested high school to facilities like Carter Playground. The high school was set to get a new building, but 'Look at the disparity,' Culpepper said, 'it's amazing how we've given up the city to Northeastern University.' Afonso, who previously worked for the city's parks and recreation department, said a public discussion about past injustices like redlining was needed before deciding on how reparations may be implemented. 'The first step for me is to really do the work to try to understand the damages that happened at the time, a model that was set forth in South Africa with the Truth and Reconciliation trial,' Afonso said, " I can't tell you I have a solution for all of that right now, because we don't know how deep it's gone and how much it's infected and hurt families over generations." Advertisement Ahmed did not directly voice his opinion on reparations, but said he supported efforts to keep Roxbury residents in the neighborhood. Ahmed, who came to Roxbury at the age of 12, as a refugee from Somalia, went on to become a member of the US track and field national team and later, work in the Boston Public School system. He works as a supervisor of attendance for the school system. Ahmed said he became passionate about advocating for Black and brown families when he saw that those families were disproportionately involved in truancy hearings. He said he began working with students, particularly those from low-income and immigrant families, to address attendance issues before the issue escalated to a court hearing. 'No one wins in court,' Ahmed said, 'The judge might not make the decision that's good for our community.' The candidates were also asked about how they would maintain transparency while in office given that Fernandes Anderson resigned after she plead guilty to violating state ethics laws by hiring immediate family members as paid staff and receiving a $7,000 kickback from a staff member's city funded bonus. All four candidates said they would host regular town halls, Ahmed said he would set up a district office in Roxbury for easier communication and Bell said he would continue the Advertisement 'I know single mothers that make more prudent decisions than some of these [city] departments in their own homes,' Afonso said, 'I'm sure they can handle some of our budget issues.' There will be another forum with the remaining District 7 candidates this Thursday at 6 p.m. at the same location, One Westinghouse Plaza, in Hyde Park, also hosted by Speak Boston. Thursday's forum will also be live-streamed Angela Mathew can be reached at