Ghislaine Maxwell's family appeals to Trump amid battle over Epstein files
Maxwell, 63, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022 for recruiting and grooming teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein, several years after he died in jail while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. She is currently being held in federal prison in Florida and has filed a petition with the Supreme Court to vacate her 2021 conviction.
"Her legal team continues to fight her case in the Courts and will file its reply in short order to the Government's opposition in the US Supreme Court," Maxwell's siblings said in a Tuesday statement released on a website dedicated to her case.
The family's statement in defense of Maxwell also comes amid a recent politically charged fight over the release of documents in Epstein's case.
Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, said in the statement that he would be "surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal," referring to a 2007 agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida.
"He's the ultimate dealmaker — and I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it," Markus added. "With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the US government made and broke."
The family, who said they "profoundly concur" with Markus' statement, added that Maxwell's legal team might file a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, which — if granted — would allow Maxwell to appear before a judge to determine if their detention is lawful.
The Department of Justice did not immediately return a request for comment.
Maxwell, who pleaded not guilty to all charges, petitioned the Supreme Court in April to scrap her conviction. Her legal team argued that Epstein's non-prosecution and plea agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2008 protected Maxwell from future prosecution.
"Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein," her attorneys wrote in the petition.
Lower courts have rejected Maxwell's attorneys' arguments, and on Monday, the Department of Justice urged the Supreme Court to follow suit.
The DOJ argued that the non-prosecution agreement in Florida does not protect Maxwell or other co-conspirators from being prosecuted in other jurisdictions around the country. Maxwell was prosecuted on different charges by federal officials in Manhattan.
"The NPA's coconspirators clause, which 'also agrees' to forgo certain prosecution of coconspirators, cannot reasonably be construed as reflecting some 'global' scope broader than the Florida-based state and federal charges that Epstein resolved for himself," the brief states. "It would be extremely strange if the NPA left Epstein himself open to federal prosecution in another district — as eventually occurred — while protecting his coconspirators from prosecution anywhere."
The Florida agreement was in a different jurisdiction and pertained to charges other than those Epstein ultimately faced in New York.
As Maxwell continues to fight to appeal her New York conviction, a contentious battle is brewing within the Republican party over whether the Trump administration should release further information on its case against Epstein.
The case against Epstein ended after he was found dead in a New York City jail cell in 2019. A medical examiner's office ruled Epstein's death a suicide.
But for years, the nature of Epstein's death, the billionaire's high-profile contacts, and the graphic details of his alleged crimes have fueled conspiracy theories and demands that the government release all it knows about the case. Trump himself helped fuel these theories in the past, saying during his most recent presidential campaign that he would have 'no problem' looking into an Epstein client list.
The Department of Justice, however, said last week it would not release any additional files related to the case against Epstein, referred to as the "Epstein files."
In a two-page memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi disputed the existence of a "client list" of powerful individuals who participated in Epstein's crimes. The memo said that there was no "credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals."
The development prompted outrage among some Republican lawmakers and prominent right-wing media figures, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson. Part of the outrage stems from Bondi's past comments that she had a "client list" related to Epstein sitting on her desk.
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in an interview with conservative commentator Benny Johnson on Tuesday that Bondi should come forward and explain why she declined to do so.
Republicans have also been calling for Maxwell to appear and testify before Congress, which the speaker suggested he was in favor of.
"I'm for transparency," Johnson said. "It's a very delicate subject but we should put everything out there and let the people decide."
After years of promising to release the files, President Donald Trump has recently pushed back against Republican criticism and sought to downplay the significance of the documents.
On Wednesday, Trump called the fanfare around the documents a "scam" and "bulls***." (The president previously knew Epstein, but later had a falling out with the disgraced financier. No evidence has surfaced to suggest Trump was involved in Epstein's criminal activity.)
"I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax," Trump on his social media site, Truth Social.
"Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!" he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
19 minutes ago
- STV News
Scottish Government 'exploring all viable options' to save jobs at Alexander Dennis
Scottish ministers are working with bus operators to drum up interest for much-needed orders from Alexander Dennis Limited (ADL), the finance secretary has said. The bus manufacturer is currently consulting on proposals to close operations in Scotland and move to a single site in Yorkshire due to financial concerns, with 400 jobs potentially at risk. Appearing before MSPs last month, Alexander Dennis managing director Paul Davies said the decision was not a 'done deal', but the company would need to see a significant rise in bus orders – between 70 and 100 by the end of the year and 300-400 next year – to remain open. In a letter to Colin Smyth, the convener of Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee, finance secretary Shona Robison said the Government is committed to looking at 'all viable options' and ministers are working with private bus companies. 'I agree about the importance of securing a short-term pipeline of orders,' she said. 'Please be assured that we are therefore liaising with commercial bus operators and local transport authorities to establish the current demand for double-deck buses in Scotland and are working alongside UK Government to identify demand in other parts of the UK. 'I am in full agreement with you about the importance of Alexander Dennis to Scotland and of retaining the jobs of the highly-skilled workers. 'That is why we are continuing to work at pace with Scottish Enterprise and UK Government, and alongside the company and trade unions, to explore all viable options to support ADL to retain bus manufacturing in Scotland.' Robison also suggested ADL could be forced to pay back money it has been given by the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise for skills and technological development, though it would be for the agency to decide how to proceed. The finance secretary also stressed the issues the Government faces due to UK-wide state aid regulations, which govern the level to which ministers can intervene in private businesses. She said the Subsidy Control Act does not allow for subsidies which enforce the use of domestically-made goods and services, which would hamper the Scottish Government's efforts to force bus firms to use Alexander Dennis. 'Scottish ministers and officials consistently make representation on the development of the subsidy control regime for the benefit of Scottish businesses,' she said. 'However, as this is a reserved matter, it is ultimately for UK Government to make the final decision on any changes to the regime.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'The UK is a global leader in bus manufacturing, and around 60% of buses funded through our zero-emission regional bus programme are being built by UK-based companies, supporting jobs and a greener transport network. 'Alexander Dennis has a strong future in the UK's growing zero-emission bus market. Through the spending review, we have committed £15.6 billion to local leaders to boost services and green fleets across the UK. 'We're also giving regional leaders and leading manufacturers a voice on zero-emission plans, through the UK bus manufacturing expert panel, which seeks to put local people at the heart of bus building.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Daily Mirror
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Jess Phillips gives brutal verdict on suspended Labour MPs as huge row erupts
Jess Phillips was pressed on a comment made after four MPs - Neil Duncan-Jordan, Chris Hinchliff, Brian Leishman and Rachael Maskell - had the Labour whip withdrawn A Labour minister has responded to a claim that four MPs were suspended for "persistent knob-headery". Jess Phillips defended the decision to suspend the whip from the left-wingers - Neil Duncan-Jordan, Chris Hinchliff, Brian Leishman and Rachael Maskell. Party insiders said they were suspended for breaches of party discipline, and that there would be a further review. Referencing the sweary assessment that one source made to The Times. Sky News host Matt Barbet told safeguarding minister Ms Phillips: "Don't take this the wrong way, but that sounds like something you would say." She quipped: "I'd probably, not on these particular people, but I think I'd probably be stronger." In a separate interview she said: "I didn't call it persistent knob-headery, but that's the way that it's been termed by some." She said she would have described it as "something much more sweary" because "we are a team, and we have to act as a team in order to achieve something" In a separate interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, she said: "I am a plain speaker, and I will tell you that I disagree often with directions that are going on. And I spend time working with colleagues, both on the back and front benches, ensuring that we discuss those things. "I think that constantly taking to the airwaves, and slagging off your own government, I have to say, what did you think was going to happen?" She said the four MPs should not be surprised by the action. "We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the Government to deliver those things, I don't know what you expect," she stated. "Now I speak out against things I do not like, both internally and sometimes externally, all the time. There is a manner of doing that that is the right way to go about it." Ms Maskell, who earlier this month put forward a motion that would effectively torpedo the Government's watered-down welfare Bill, said Keir Starmer was wrong to suspend the whip. The York Central MP told the BBC: "There's got to be dialogue, and that's how we build bridges. We move forward together, and that's how we've got to move forward as a party, but ensure that our finger is on the pulse of the country. "And I think MPs who went through those lobbies were incredibly stressed, not wanting to vote against the Government, and for some people that didn't vote at all, it was a very stressed vote." Mr Duncan-Jordan has said he remains "as committed as ever" to Labour values, but accepted that voting against the welfare plans "could come at a cost". In a statement, the MP for Poole said: "Since being elected, I have consistently spoken up for my constituents on a range of issues, including most recently on cuts to disability benefits. "I understood this could come at a cost, but I couldn't support making disabled people poorer. Although I've been suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party today, I've been part of the Labour and trade union movement for 40 years and remain as committed as ever to its values." Mr Leishman said he is a "proud Labour member" and remains "committed to the party". Mr Hinchliff said: "I remain proud to have been elected as a Labour MP and I hope in time to return to the Labour benches. "In the meantime I will continue to fight every day for the needs of my constituents and nothing will change in how I engage with and represent those I was elected to serve."
BreakingNews.ie
19 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Paschal Donohoe defends government's plans for upcoming budget
Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe has defended the government's plans for the upcoming budget, including the decision to not repeat the one-off cost of living payments provided last year. Mr Donohoe told RTÉ radio's Morning Ireland that there was a need to rein in spending and to focus on permanent measures to support the vulnerable. Advertisement "Spending in government departments has grown by around 8 or 9 percent each year for the past few years. Is that going to have to be reined in? So we are going to have to reduce the level of current spending growth that we have within our economy." Earlier on Newstalk Breakfast he explained: "We're facing many challenges to the future of our economy. It's not that we don't want to help. It's that we need to help and intervene in a way that we're conscious that we'll be able to afford and that won't create further difficulties for us in the future." "I've never seen the kind of uncertainty we have at the moment. That is generated by economic policy, which is why I want to ensure that the budget that we bring forward is safe, doesn't add to uncertainty we have in the future, and above all, focuses on investment." "I do think it is important to acknowledge that there are things that could happen to our economy that would pose real periods of challenge that we would then need to work together to overcome." Advertisement The Minister told RTÉ about the possible impact of US tariffs. 'We brought forward an economic forecast that said if there were 10 percent tariffs in place within our economy between the US and the European Union and 60 percent tariffs between China and America, it would mean a lower level of growth within our economy and it would mean up to 75,000 fewer jobs being kept or created within our country. 'Progressively the scenario that we now face could involve an even more significant effect on growth. It could involve further effect on the job creation and number of jobs within Ireland. "But that is why we continue to negotiate so hard through the European Union to try to avoid that happening. And thankfully, we are approaching these moments of great challenge with our economic finances in good condition, our public finances in good condition and a record number of people that work in Ireland. 'So we are facing challenges but I'm confident that with the decisions we've made, the hard work of the people of Ireland and further choices we can make, we will rise to this moment and get our way through. Advertisement 'I accept that the removal of one-off measures is going to have an effect on those within our society, of course I acknowledge that, but we have just spent the first half of our interview acknowledging the really big challenges that we could face in terms of jobs, in terms of growth, in terms our public finances, and we need to make decisions now that can help but that won't create further challenges or risks for us in the future. 'And as we speak at the moment we have rolled out measures to help carers, we've rolled out measures to help in the cost of going to school, we rolled out measures with the cost to going to college, we have rolled out measures that help with the costs of childcare. "They were permanent measures that were brought in in recent budgets and what myself and Jack Chambers, working with our colleagues in government, will aim to do is continue to affordably roll out measures we want to be permanent that will help those who are the most vulnerable.' When asked about concerns expressed by Ibec about the impact of the Occupied Territories Bill on Irish businesses, Mr Donohoe said: 'We've always acknowledged that there are consequences in any decision that we make. Advertisement "It is important to be clear that in the bill that we are bringing forward, it's referring to an extremely limited amount of trade that has taken place from the territories into Ireland. 'And I believe that if you look at the enormous trauma and the awful, awful loss the people of Gaza have endured due to the action that has been taken against them, always acknowledging of course the hurt and violence that happened in October, that was also the catalyst of much of this, that it is so important that the Government of Ireland make clear that we are diplomatically acting to try to lessen and weaken the harm. 'When you make a diplomatic decision, there are consequences to that too. But that is why we are doing three things. Number one, we're working within the European Union to bring forward a coalition of countries that feel the same way that we do about what is happening in the Middle East. "Number two, it's why we're acting in a way that we believe is consistent with our law and that of the European Union. And thirdly, it is why we are engaging diplomatically with America to explain what we are doing and why. And we will continue to pursue those three steps because we do believe it is really important that we send a very clear diplomatic and political signal regarding our view of what is happening to the people of Gaza.'
