UK F-35 parts exports to Israel is lawful, High Court rules
Both groups had intervened in the case. "The horrifying reality in Gaza is unfolding in full view of the world: entire families obliterated, civilians killed in so-called safe zones, hospitals reduced to rubble, and a population driven into starvation by a cruel blockade and forced displacement," said Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK."This judgment does not change the facts on the ground, nor does it absolve the UK government of its responsibilities under international law."The two judges said the case was not about whether the UK should supply arms and other military equipment to Israel - because the government had decided it should not.They were being asked to decide on a particular issue: whether the UK "must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK-manufactured parts may be supplied to Israel and used in contravention of international law in the conflict in Gaza."Under our constitution, that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," they ruled.UK industry makes 15% of every F-35, according to the Campaign Against the Arms Trade.Oxfam, which provided evidence to the court, said: "It is unconscionable that the government would continue to license the sale of components for F-35 jets knowing that they are used to deliberately attack civilians in Gaza and destroy their means of survival, including vital water supplies."The case was brought by al-Haq, a group based in the Israel-occupied West Bank, and the Global Legal Action Network against the Department for Business and Trade.The court said that Business Minister Jonathan Reynolds was "faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve out or withdrawing from the F-35 programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue".The government also argued pulling out of the defence programme could undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato.But human rights groups argue that the global rule of law is under threat over Gaza."The atrocities we are witnessing in Gaza are precisely because governments don't think the rules should apply to them," said Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of Human Rights Watch. "Judicial deference to the executive in this case has left the Palestinians in Gaza without access to the protections of international law, despite the government and the court acknowledging that there is a serious risk that UK equipment might be used to facilitate or carry out atrocities against them."The government says it will continue to keep its defence export licensing under review."The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter," a spokesman said.Lawyers for the human rights groups are considering if they can find grounds to appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
Hamas gives 'positive response' to Gaza ceasefire mediators
Hopes for an end to the bloody fighting in Gaza appeared to brighten Friday when Hamas announced that it had given a thumbs-up to the latest ceasefire proposal, but added that further talks were needed. 'Hamas has completed its internal consultations with Palestinian factions and forces regarding the mediators' latest proposal to halt the aggression against our people in Gaza,' the Palestinian militant group said in a statement. 'The movement has submitted a positive response to the mediators,' the statement added. 'The movement is fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations on the mechanism for implementing this framework.' The development came just days after President Donald Trump said Israel has 'agreed to the necessary conditions' to finalize a 60-day ceasefire deal in the Israel-Hamas war. But in his first remarks since Trump's announcement on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not confirm Trump's claim and once again called for the elimination of Hamas. 'There will be no Hamas,' Netanyahu said. 'There will be no Hamastan. We are not going back to that. It is over. We will release all our hostages.' Netanyahu is scheduled to visit to the White House on Monday, where he is expected to discuss the situation in Gaza with Trump. Hamas has been weighing the new ceasefire proposals that it had received from the Egyptian and Qatari mediators for several days. In a statement Wednesday, Hamas said it would be 'conducting national consultations' with the final aim of ending the fighting, ensuring the withdrawal of Israeli forces and delivering 'urgent relief' to the people of Gaza. The war in Gaza erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, after Hamas launched a bloody surprise attack on Israel that left more than 1,200 people dead. Hamas also took 251 people hostage. And of the remaining hostages in captivity, 28 are presumed to be dead. Meanwhile, Israel's attacks in Gaza have killed more than 56,000 people and created a humanitarian crisis in the densely populated Palestinian territory, where most of the 2 million residents have been forced from their homes.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a 'hard enough b*****d' to lead the country... despite collapsing under pressure to own MPs over benefit cuts
Keir Starmer has insisted he is a 'hard-enough bastard' to lead the country – despite capitulating to his own MPs over benefit cuts. In a bizarre aside, the Prime Minister pushed back against suggestions that recent U-turns have wrecked his political authority. Asked whether he was tough enough to drive through change following a series of reverses, he told the BBC 's Political Thinking podcast that he was 'proud' of his record in government. 'We need to reflect on where things have not gone according to plan, and the Welfare Bill was one of them,' he said. 'But we also need to emphasise the very many good things we have done.' The Arsenal fan denied that he had 'lost the [Labour] dressing room'. And when podcast host Nick Robinson revealed that a former football team-mate had described Sir Keir as a 'hard bastard', the PM responded: 'I'm a hard-enough bastard to find out who said that so I can have a discussion with them.' His comments echoed Ed Miliband's much-mocked bravado in 2015 when he responded to questions about his suitability for power by declaring: 'Hell, yes, I'm tough enough.' Downing Street declined to comment further on Sir Keir's words yesterday, but insisted the PM was not a 'pushover' despite caving in to pressure to make huge U-turns on welfare cuts, the winter fuel payment and grooming gangs in recent weeks. Sir Keir did acknowledge an array of blunders, saying caving into Labour rebels on welfare was a 'tough day' and that he regretted a speech warning that uncontrolled immigration could turn Britain into an 'island of strangers'. The PM tried to make a virtue out of U-turns on issues such as the national inquiry into grooming gangs, arguing it was 'common sense' to 'look again' when doubts were raised. 'I'm not one of these ideological thinkers, where ideology dictates what I do,' said. 'I'm a pragmatist. You can badge these things as U-turns – it's common sense to me. If someone says to me, 'here's some more information and I really think it's the right thing to do', I'm the kind of person that says, 'well, in which case, let's do it'.' In a message to Labour MPs, Sir Keir said the Government needed to 'emphasise the many good things we have done'. 'We're only just starting. This in a sense is the toughest year, so we're only just beginning,' he said, adding that he did not 'pretend' that the Labour revolt this week which forced him to neuter his benefit curbs was not a 'tough day'. 'I take responsibility,' he said. 'We didn't get the process right.' But he insisted the Government had 'done some fantastic things' and 'driven through so much change'. The PM said that included bringing down waiting lists in the NHS, as well as 'loads of improvements in schools and stuff that we can do for children'. Sir Keir went on: 'Whether that's rolling out school uniform projects, whether it's school meals, breakfast clubs, you name it – and also [bringing in] a huge amount of investment into the country. 'And of course we've been busy getting three trade deals.' When our political leaders try to 'talk tough' 'Am I tough enough? Hell, yes, I'm tough enough.' Ed Miliband, March 2015, on whether he was tough enough to be PM. 'You worked so hard, you didn't feel you'd drunk ten pints by four o'clock, you used to sweat so much.' William Hague, August 2000, boasting he drank 14 pints a day as a teenage delivery worker. 'I am a fighter, not a quitter.' Liz Truss, October 22, the day before she resigned as Prime Minister. 'I have to confess, when me and my friend, sort of, used to run through the fields of wheat – the farmers weren't too pleased about that.' Theresa May, June 2017, on the naughtiest thing she had done.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Hard man fantasy of a PM losing control
Mad Frankie Fraser, Iron Mike Tyson, Ronnie and Reggie Kray. To this list of notorious tough guys, we must now add Keir Starmer – a streetfighter straight outta Reigate. The genteel Surrey suburbs might not seem a natural breeding ground for bruisers, but friends say the PM's upbringing belies the inner beast. 'He's a hard bastard,' they tell the BBC 's Nick Robinson. Sir Keir humbly agrees. 'A hard enough bastard,' he says. Really? Is he even the hardest member of Cabinet? It would be a brave punter who backed him over three rounds against Angela Rayner, or indeed in an alley fight with his gimlet-eyed enforcer Pat McFadden. All this nonsense is, of course, designed to make Sir Keir out to be a strong and macho leader. In truth, it makes him look silly and desperate. On his first anniversary in power, he appears weaker and more out of touch than ever. A survey this week shows one in three people who voted Labour 12 months ago now regret it. The big surprise is that it's only one in three. The backbench rebellion which shredded his welfare reforms and had his Chancellor sobbing in the Commons was his greatest humiliation. But there have been many other errors, U-turns and betrayals of his manifesto promises. No one voted for a £40 billion tax raid, the scrapping of winter fuel allowance, releasing thousands of dangerous prisoners early or the outrageous surrender of the Chagos Islands. His boast that he would 'smash the gangs' trafficking migrants across the Channel has been an ignominious failure, the growth he promised has flatlined and borrowing has soared. The only people to have really benefited from Starmer's first year are the public-sector unions, whose members have received bumper pay rises and a new workers' charter, which places a raft of stifling obligations on hard-pressed employers. And what are the omens for Sir Keir's second year (assuming he survives it)? For anyone with savings, property, a pension fund, a small business, it threatens to be far worse than his first. He has lost control of his parliamentary party and with it any chance of cutting back the ballooning state. Indeed, his newly empowered MPs, most of whom have never had a job outside politics, charities or the public sector, are likely to demand even higher public spending. For example, they will no doubt push for lifting the two-child benefit cap, which would be a huge payday for those with large families but cost upwards of £3.5 billion – more money we don't have. The only way to pay for this ever-growing financial black hole is for our lame-duck Chancellor to raise yet more tax. As usual, the burden will fall on the hard-pressed families of middle Britain. It would be a betrayal of Labour's central manifesto promise but, as we have learned in this year, Sir Keir is not a man of principle. He may think of himself as a hard man, but he's deluding himself. Every time there has been a genuinely tough decision to be made – on welfare, the grooming gangs inquiry, winter fuel allowance and much else – he's buckled. His fellow tough guy Mike Tyson famously said: 'Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.' This is effectively what's happened to Sir Keir. If he ever had a plan, it's in tatters. And the country will pay the price.
