
Delhi High Court seeks NIA's response on MP Abdul Rashid's plea in terror funding case
The court also called for the trial court record in the matter and listed the plea for further hearing on October 6.
Mr. Rashid has been lodged in Tihar Jail since 2019 following his arrest by the NIA under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in connection with a 2017 terror funding case.
On March 21, the trial court had dismissed his second regular bail application.
In his appeal against the order, the Jammu and Kashmir MP submitted that he had already spent over five years in custody and that the delay in trial, which was unlikely to conclude soon, entitled him to bail.
The bail plea also contended that the allegations against him were unfounded, asserting that he had never been involved in secessionist or terrorist activities.
'The appellant is a mainstream political leader of J&K having been elected twice as an MLA and recently as an MP. Due to his passionate engagement in mainstream politics, he became a potential target for those who preached separatist ideologies including militant outfits, labelling him as a traitor,' the plea submitted.
'A mere political comment made on the hanging of Afzal Guru showing disapprobation of the measures of the government or criticising a judgement of the courts cannot be construed to mean as an association with terrorists much less any association which has a nexus with the commission of any unlawful or terrorist activity,' it submitted.
Mr. Rashid also sought interim bail to attend Lok Sabha sessions, contending that his presence was imperative as he represented 45% of the Kashmir valley and had been 'assigned the role to act as a bridge between Parliament and the people of his constituency'.
The Baramulla MP, who defeated National Conference leader Omar Abdullah in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, is facing trial in a case alleging that he financed separatist and terrorist groups in Jammu and Kashmir.
According to the NIA's FIR, Mr. Rashid's name had emerged during the interrogation of businessman and co-accused Zahoor Watali.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Retired police officer claims he was ordered to arrest RSS chief
MUMBAI: A day after a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted former BJP MP Pragya Thakur, Army officer Lt Col Prakash Purohit and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, a retired police officer stirred fresh controversy on Friday, claiming former Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh and his seniors in the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad had asked him to arrest Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat while investigation was underway, to bolster the 'saffron terror' narrative. Mehboob Mujawar Singh, who was then an additional commissioner of police with the Maharashtra ATS, denied the charge and said the officer, Mehboob Mujawar, was never a part of the ATS. On Friday, speaking on the phone from his residence in Solapur, Mujawar told HT that while he was working with the ATS, Singh and his seniors had directed him to arrest the RSS chief and the two wanted accused in the case, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who allegedly planted the bomb in Malegaon that killed six people. Both Kalsangra and Dange have been at large since 2008. 'Singh and his seniors had asked me to arrest Bhagwat to create a 'saffron terror' narrative. But I did not obey the order as it was issued orally, and there was no written communication,' he said. Param Bir Singh, however, denied the allegation. 'He (Mujawar) is a disgraced policeman who is being opportunistic,' he told HT. 'Names of RSS leaders never came up in our investigation. The NIA had also examined him (Mujawar) but his claims turned out to be totally bogus.' Singh also claimed that Mujawar was never part of the ATS. 'Mr Hemant Karkare (then ATS chief) got him involved on the recommendation of then Solapur superintendent of police to help with detection (of the bomb blast case). But he never participated in the investigation and indulged in some criminal activities. I remember that some offence was registered against him in Solapur and the commissioner of police, Solapur had sacked him.' Singh added that Karkare was leading the investigation of the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, and he was additional CP, ATS, only for Mumbai. 'This investigation was not under my supervision ever. I was only assisting Mr Karkare whenever asked by him,' he said. The NIA court, in its order on Thursday, stated that Mujawar was very much 'a member of ATS team' and he had investigated the Malegaon blast case 'as per the directions of his superior officer'. Mujawar conceded that he was booked under the Arms Act and accused of having disproportionate assets, but said he was implicated in those cases after he refused to obey Singh's instructions. 'Apart from arresting Bhagwat, I was asked to show that Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who were both killed by ATS officers and shown among the victims of the 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai, were still alive,' he said. In his statement before the NIA, which took over the investigation into the Malegaon blast in 2011, Mujawar had sought a probe into the post-mortem reports of 26/11 victims and suggested that DNA samples from the two dead bodies be obtained for verification. Both Kalsangra and Dange, based in Indore, were aides of former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. Ramchandra used to work with his brother Shivnarayan as an electronic contractor while Dange was associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and had completed a course in information technology. According to the ATS, they had planted the bomb on the motorcycle parked outside the mosque in Malegaon, which killed six people and injured 95 others. Even as the NIA has got red corner notices issued against the duo, and declared a ₹10 lakh reward for anyone who provided information relating to them, their family members have lost hopes of seeing them again. 'My elder brother Ramchandra (Ramji) Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange were detained by Maharashtra ATS on October 10, 2008. We have no information about them,' said Ramji's brother Shivnarayan Kalsangra, who too was arrested in the Malegaon bomb blast case, but was later discharged. He now works as a real estate agent in Indore. 'It was a completely fabricated case. I was arrested and was behind bars for 34 months. They planted timers at our home claiming that we had supplied timers for the bomb,' said Shivnarayan, who was arrested by ATS along with Pragya Singh Thakur. He got bail in 2011 from the Bombay high court due to lack of sufficient evidence and was discharged by the special NIA court in 2017.


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Judgement in Malegaon blast case highlights contradictions in probe by NIA and ATS
Mumbai: The special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, in its acquittal order in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, has highlighted a running battle between the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) and the NIA, pointing out stark contradictions in their probe. (Shutterstock) The Maharashtra ATS, which probed the case from 2008 to 2011, alleged that Lt Col Prasad Purohit and the other accused formed Abhinav Bharat as a terror outfit to attack Muslims, and invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The ATS claimed that meetings to plan the blast were held in Bhopal and Nashik, and that Purohit had sourced RDX from Kashmir, assembled the bomb at his residence in Pune and handed it over to an absconding accused who fitted it on a motorcycle. The NIA, which took over the investigation in April 2011, dropped the MCOCA charges, sought discharge of several accused, and introduced significant doubts about the ATS's timeline, witness credibility, and evidence collection. It also did not support key ATS allegations regarding conspiracy, ideology, and explosive procurement. For instance, the NIA claimed that the bomb was fitted to the two-wheeler in Indore, and it was then brought to Malegaon, the 1,000-page order pointed out. 'Two parallel investigations cannot proceed on divergent foundational premises,' the court said. 'The contradiction between the approaches of the ATS and the NIA creates serious doubt on the prosecution's reliability and coherence.' The court criticised the NIA for failing to prosecute hostile witnesses for perjury and not rectifying defects in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) sanction process. 'The NIA, despite having ample opportunity, did not take any steps against the hostile witnesses for giving false evidence before the court. This inaction raises serious questions on the commitment to secure justice,' the court observed. The lack of harmony between the two premier investigative agencies had 'made the entire case speculative,' the court concluded.


Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
India all set to get new V-P on Sept 9
New Delhi: The election for the post of Vice President will be held on September 9, the poll authority announced on Friday. The notification for the vice presidential election will be issued on August 7 and the last date for filing nomination papers will be August 21. The polling, if required, shall take place in room number F-101, Vasudha, on the first floor of Parliament building on September 9 between 10 am and 5 pm. The results will be announced on the same day. The post of the vice president fell vacant after the resignation of incumbent Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21. The Election Commission has appointed the Rajya Sabha Secretary General as the Returning Officer and two officials of Rajya Sabha Secretariat as Assistant Returning Officers for the vice presidential election. The Electoral College for the vice presidential election comprises members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The nominated members of the Rajya Sabha too are eligible to vote in the vice presidential election. The electoral college for the vice presidential election comprises 233 elected members of the Rajya Sabha, 12 nominated members of the Rajya Sabha and 543 members of the Lok Sabha. There are five vacancies in the Rajya Sabha and one in the Lok Sabha, pegging the effective strength of the electoral college at 782. The ruling National Democratic Alliance has a comfortable edge in the ensuing poll. The 543-member Lok Sabha has one vacant seat -- Basirhat in West Bengal -- while there are five vacancies in the 245-member Rajya Sabha. Of the five vacancies in the Rajya Sabha, four are from Jammu and Kashmir, and one from Punjab. The seat from Punjab was vacated after Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjeev Arora quit following his election to the state assembly in a bypoll last month. The effective strength of both the Houses together is 782 and the winning candidate will require 391 votes, considering that all eligible voters exercise their franchise. In the Lok Sabha, the BJP-led NDA enjoys the support of 293 of the 542 members. The ruling alliance has the support of 129 members in the Rajya Sabha (effective strength 240), assuming that the nominated members vote in support of the NDA nominee. The ruling alliance has the support of total 422 members. A person cannot be elected as the vice president unless he is a citizen of India, has completed 35 years of age and is qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha. A person is also not eligible if he holds any office of profit under the government of India or a state government or any subordinate local authority.