Supreme Court lets Donald Trump move forward with firing hundreds of Education Department workers
In an unsigned order, the justices lifted a Boston federal judge's ruling that blocked the firings and ordered the White House to hire back those who had already been dismissed.
All three of the court's liberal justices dissented from the order, which sends the dispute back to the Boston-based 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that allowing the White House to go forward with the dismissals 'hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out.'
'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave.'
US District Judge Myong Joun had ruled May 22 that congressional approval was required for such a large-scale dismissal of staff — and rejected the administration's argument that it was merely reorganizing the department. Joun warned that the layoffs would 'will likely cripple the department.'
On March 20, Trump signed an executive order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to 'take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities'.
Nine days earlier, the department laid off 1,315 employees in what it deemed the beginning of a process to reduce its work force by half.
McMahon applauded the high court's emergency order, and vowed to continue delivering on the 'mandate to restore excellence in American education.'
'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' she said in a statement.
'While today's ruling is a significant win for students and families, it is a shame that the highest court in the land had to step in to allow President Trump to advance the reforms Americans elected him to deliver using the authorities granted to him by the U.S. Constitution.'
To formally abolish the Department of Education, Trump would need the approval of Congress, which appears unlikely given the GOP's razor-thin majority in both chambers and the need to overcome a 60-vote legislative filibuster in the Senate.
Solicitor General John Sauer had decried Joun's May ruling as tantamount to 'wresting of an entire Cabinet department from presidential control.'
'That is a quintessential decision about managing internal executive-branch functions and the federal workforce that the Constitution reserves to the Executive Branch alone.'
A group of Democrat-led states had sued the Trump administration over the move and argued that Trump was exceeding his authority with the layoffs, which were designed to usher in the 'closure of the Department of Education.'
Originally published as Supreme Court lets Donald Trump move forward with firing hundreds of Education Department workers
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
30 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Cambodia and Thailand agree to ceasefire after days of deadly clashes
Singapore: The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of fighting that has claimed at least 35 lives, including civilians, and displaced more than 100,000 people on each side of the disputed borderlands. US President Donald Trump is likely to claim the truce as a personal diplomatic victory after phone calls to both prime ministers on the weekend warning that continued hostilities would hurt their negotiations with his administration over tariffs. As fighting continued in the border provinces on Monday – more than a day after Trump's demands for it to stop – Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet and Phumtham Wechayachai, Thailand's acting prime minister, flew to the neutral ground of Malaysia, this year's chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). They emerged from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's residence in Kuala Lumpur after almost two hours having secured an 'immediate and unconditional' ceasefire. Both countries blamed the other for the fighting, which started on Thursday after almost two months of escalating rhetoric following a border skirmish on May 28 that left a Cambodian soldier dead. Thailand has accused Cambodia of breaching Geneva Conventions by firing heavy artillery at non-military targets, killing civilians, including children. Cambodia denied the claim and hit back with allegations that Thailand had dropped illegal cluster bombs. Thailand responded that it was not a party to the convention covering cluster munitions. The dispute, which is multi-generational with roots in colonial-era mapping, centres on the ownership of several ancient temples and strategic sites along ambiguous sections of the 800-kilometre border.

The Age
30 minutes ago
- The Age
Cambodia and Thailand agree to ceasefire after days of deadly clashes
Singapore: The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of fighting that has claimed at least 35 lives, including civilians, and displaced more than 100,000 people on each side of the disputed borderlands. US President Donald Trump is likely to claim the truce as a personal diplomatic victory after phone calls to both prime ministers on the weekend warning that continued hostilities would hurt their negotiations with his administration over tariffs. As fighting continued in the border provinces on Monday – more than a day after Trump's demands for it to stop – Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet and Phumtham Wechayachai, Thailand's acting prime minister, flew to the neutral ground of Malaysia, this year's chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). They emerged from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's residence in Kuala Lumpur after almost two hours having secured an 'immediate and unconditional' ceasefire. Both countries blamed the other for the fighting, which started on Thursday after almost two months of escalating rhetoric following a border skirmish on May 28 that left a Cambodian soldier dead. Thailand has accused Cambodia of breaching Geneva Conventions by firing heavy artillery at non-military targets, killing civilians, including children. Cambodia denied the claim and hit back with allegations that Thailand had dropped illegal cluster bombs. Thailand responded that it was not a party to the convention covering cluster munitions. The dispute, which is multi-generational with roots in colonial-era mapping, centres on the ownership of several ancient temples and strategic sites along ambiguous sections of the 800-kilometre border.

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Why Australia can't sue if AUKUS delivers dud subs
Australia will be blocked from seeking compensation from the United Kingdom if British-designed nuclear-powered submarines have defects or are delayed, under the terms of the 50-year AUKUS treaty between the two nations. The treaty also gives Britain an effective veto over any Australian proposal for the design of the new submarines, while the pact could be torn up with just a year's notice, amid growing questions over the Trump administration's commitment to AUKUS and willingness to share the crown jewels of weapons technology.