logo
A Pompeii Mosaic, Taken by a Nazi Captain, Is Returned

A Pompeii Mosaic, Taken by a Nazi Captain, Is Returned

For decades, the mosaic remained hidden in Germany, until investigators searching for looted art identified it as a work taken from the ruins of Pompeii.
This week, the vivid piece, depicting an intimate bedroom scene, went on display in Italy near the site of the ancient Roman city, the Pompeii Archaeological Park said in a statement. The artifact is among thousands of objects, looted from Pompeii over the centuries, that in recent decades have been returned to the site.
A Nazi Wehrmacht captain serving in Italy and in charge of supply chains somehow acquired the mosaic during World War II, perhaps through looting or theft, and transported it to Germany in 1944, where he presented it as an extravagant gift to an unnamed civilian, according to the Italian police. It remains unclear who had the mosaic before the captain took possession of it or where it was.
Decades later, a relative of the last German owner, who had inherited the mosaic, contacted the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Italy, a police squad that has traced and returned thousands of pieces of art and looted artifacts, and asked how to return it. The police have not identified the heir.
Checking against a database of more than a million artifacts, many of them stolen, the unit's investigators confirmed that the panel had originated from Pompeii's ruins and then reached out to the Pompeii Archaeological Park, which manages the site and its antiquities, according to Gen. Francesco Gargaro, who leads the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage.
The mosaic was officially returned to Italy through diplomatic channels on Sept. 16, 2023, and is now being exhibited at the park.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peated Scotch Whisky At Risk Of Ban Within Five Years, Expert Warns
Peated Scotch Whisky At Risk Of Ban Within Five Years, Expert Warns

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Peated Scotch Whisky At Risk Of Ban Within Five Years, Expert Warns

Are your favourite smoky whiskies living on borrowed time? Mark Littler LTD "Peated whisky is absolutely at risk of being banned. There's a significant risk within the next five years, and a high risk within ten years. As climate pressures intensify, politicians may see peat use for flavoring alcohol as an easy target," said Alastair Collier from A Healthier Earth. It's a bold statement. But the numbers speak for themselves. Peat in the UK stores the equivalent of 20 years of all UK CO2 emissions. To put peatlands in context of other more traditional carbon sinks, the peatland in the UK stores the same amount of carbon as the forests of the UK, France, and Germany combined . These figures have led the UK government to ban peat usage in other industries. So why is it still being used to flavour a drink? Peat has been a part of scotch whisky heritage since the birth of the industry. It is used to dry the malted barley, and in doing so adds depth of flavour to one of the world's favourite spirits. It's not just a few minor whiskies either; Johnnie Walker, the biggest internationally sold whisky in the world, is renowned for its layers of sweetness and smoke. Up until the recent bans the scotch whisky industry has accounted for just 1% of peat usage in the UK. But that figure is expected to rise to around 40% over the next three years as further bans are introduced in other industries. Scotch's usage won't increase, but its share of total usage will grow significantly. Peat smoke is used to dry the malted barley. It gives the whisky a distinctive smoky flavour. getty "Burning peat is horrendous. It should be considered a climate crime because of the carbon emissions and impact on the ecosystems where the peat is harvested from' said Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth, a company that builds and delivers large-scale sustainability solutions. In an interview with me to discuss the use of peat (and potential alternatives) his opinions on the use of peat in the whisky industry were clear: We ran some calculations, and burning peat for whisky creates around six to ten kilograms of CO₂ per bottle—that's the equivalent of 15 minutes of a short-haul flight every time you open a bottle. Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth Alastair went on to point out that while the quantity of the CO2 released isn't huge it comes from a storage that has developed over millennia, isn't renewable and has untold damage on ecosystems reducing biodiversity and negatively impacting water cycles. It's pretty crazy when you hear those kinds of numbers. And it's not hard to imagine how this could become political very quickly. Picture a future where Glasgow hits 40°C in March, private motorists face heavy taxes for driving petrol or diesel cars, and the pressure to cut emissions is coming from every direction. In that kind of climate—literally and politically—the idea of burning a critical carbon sink just to flavour a drink starts to look like an easy target. Laphroaig's iconic smoky profile depends on peat, but sustainable alternatives like biochar could help preserve its character. Mark Littler LTD A Luxury Target In the argument against banning peat there is a potential consideration for heritage, and for economic importance. The Scotch Whisky Association reported that in 2024 scotch whisky exports were worth $7.25 billion (£5.4 billion) and were 2% of all UK goods exports. Those are numbers that need to be respected. Which is fine, because there is an alternative. There are already carbon neutral alternatives to peat for other uses, and Alastair Collier is confident that one could be created to replicate the compounds that give whisky its smokey/peaty flavours. "With intent, investment, and around one to two years of trials, a food-grade biochar, which is a form of captured carbon, could be developed to replicate peat's flavor profile in whisky production. It would allow the same smoky character while moving from a carbon-intensive process to a carbon-neutral one." Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth Any government looking to ban peat in whisky is likely to see push back; whisky makes money and also people love it. Even Alastair Collier, knowing the issues, enjoys the result: "I drink whisky and really love the medicinal notes that peated expressions like Talisker. But at the same time, I'm fully aware of the environmental cost of using peat." Personally, I believe that much like ivory in the antiques trade, peat will become a target because it is a high-profile, high-emission luxury. Because luxury will always be first in line for regulation when emissions cuts need to look visible. The Future Of the World's Favourite Whisky Let's be clear; I don't want peated whisky to disappear, but I do think that it's a big elephant in the room. When you have the likes of Diageo, one of the world's largest premium alcohol drinks companies, developing the lightest glass bottle in the world to save transport costs and carbon, but also owning what is soon to be the largest peat extraction site in Scotland, it begs the question of when tradition fades into outdated? I reached out to Diageo for comment on the use of peat and potential alternatives in whisky. They declined to comment directly, insisting it was an industry topic better suited to the Scotch Whisky Association and I should contact them. I'm inclined to disagree given their peat extraction activities. However, when they're actively working on the world's lightest bottle, whilst also pushing the boundaries of whisky making at their new distillery at Port Ellen, I would be astounded if they are not also aware of the potential social and political pressure on their peat usage. Some distilleries are already making the switch away from peat. In 2024 Glenturret, the oldest distillery in Scotland announced that they would be stopping the use of peat in their whisky making in 2025, although their reasoning behind this wasn't purely environmental. 'Our decision to step away from peat in the core range was part of a deliberate move to refine and focus our signature house style here at The Glenturret. It's not a rejection of peat, rather, it's about clarity of direction,' said Ian Renwick, Distillery Director at Glenturret, over an email with me about Glenturret's use of peat. 'Peated Scotch whisky holds a special place in the world of single malts. It offers distinctive character, deep complexity, and emotional connection for many whisky lovers,' added Renwick. 'There will always be a place for peat in scotch, especially when it's used with intention and skill. It may evolve in how it's produced or sourced, but its role in the whisky world is far from over.' The important question remains, would large scotch brands like Glenturret consider an alternative to peat if it existed? 'We're always open to innovation, especially where it supports quality and sustainability. If a credible, environmentally responsible way to create a peat-style profile emerged, we would certainly explore it with curiosity.' Just as Coca-Cola survived the cocaine ban in 1922, and the antiques industry survived the banning of ivory, scotch whisky can adapt to a life beyond peat. A few weeks ago the EU announced plans to cut carbon emissions 90% by 2040, and last month it was announced the world may hit the symbolic 1.5oC global warming in as little as three years—the time it will take this year's batch of whisky to be legally classed as scotch. As climate pressure and challenging targets continue to emerge, the pressure will shift to focus on emissions that even three years ago may have appeared too small to bother with. Smart brands will lead the change. Whether it's now or in three years time—in my opinion it's when not if—the question distillers need to ask themselves is simple: can we adapt. The risk of doing nothing remains to get legislated out and no one wants to see their favourite whisky brands disappear from the shelves.

Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time
Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time

The number of pupils in England reported to have been given extra time in their exams was significantly overstated, the exams regulator has admitted. Ofqual has announced it is withdrawing a decade's worth of statistics on pupils being granted special access arrangements in their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams after identifying issues with the data. It comes after data from the exams regulator last year suggested that nearly a third (30.1%) of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams in 2023/24. The original figures, published by Ofqual in November, suggested that 41.8% of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools. But with just weeks to go until A-level results day, Ofqual has admitted that its published figures led to a 'significant overstatement' of access arrangements. A new analysis from Ofqual suggests that the proportion of students receiving access arrangements is 'much more closely aligned' with the proportion of students with special educational needs (Sen) in the school population. Figures released by the Department for Education (DfE) last month suggest that 14.2% of pupils in England had Sen support in 2024/25. Ofqual said the 'problem' has been with the way the data was recorded and reported rather than how the access arrangements system has been used. For example it included arrangements for students who did not sit exams that year, and duplicate applications for the same student were not filtered out. Schools and colleges apply to exam boards for access arrangements to ensure that those students can sit their exams without being unfairly disadvantaged. Education leaders have suggested that more pupils are seeking support due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues since the pandemic. Requests for 25% extra time in exams is the most common exam board-approved access arrangement for pupils. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said there are no issues with the access arrangements system itself and no student should be affected. In a blog on Thursday, he said: 'The approach to access arrangements remains unchanged.' Ofqual is withdrawing its official statistics on access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-levels from 2014 to 2024. Revised statistics will be published later this year, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards, and they will be 'official statistics in development'. Mr Bramley said: 'In 2023 we started considering trends in access arrangements data and began research into how the arrangements were used and perceived in the education sector. 'As part of this work we requested more detailed data from exam boards, which we received at the end of 2024. 'We have always recognised that there are limitations to these figures. 'Our analysis has now revealed that they have led to a significant overstatement of approved access arrangements in place for the exam cohort in each year.' Earlier this year, Ofqual said it would 'take action' if it found that the higher proportion of private school pupils being given extra time in exams was due to unfairness. In February, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, told Tes magazine that the regulator was doing 'extra work' as he was 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements. It came after the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson asked the exams regulator to look into the access arrangement data. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We're pleased that Ofqual has conducted a thorough review of this data to understand why there have been very significant increases in access arrangements. 'Clearly, having identified issues which indicate that this is in fact overstated in the statistics it is the right thing to do to withdraw and correct the data. 'This will lead to a more accurate understanding of trends around access arrangements. 'It is, however, frustrating that the data was apparently incorrect in the first place.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.'

Classic aircraft to take to skies for Yorkshire Air Museum anniversary
Classic aircraft to take to skies for Yorkshire Air Museum anniversary

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Classic aircraft to take to skies for Yorkshire Air Museum anniversary

Three classic aircraft are set to take flight as part of a special anniversary event. The Yorkshire Air Museum will mark its 40th anniversary with a day of celebration on Monday, August 11. The Yorkshire Air Museum and Allied Air Forces Memorial was incorporated as a charitable trust in 1985 and held its first open day on August 11 of that year. The museum is located on a site formerly occupied by RAF Elvington. The derelict and overgrown site was cleaned up by volunteers during months of hard work. Volunteers cleared the museum site - which was formerly occupied by RAF Elvington - in preparation for the museum's opening in 1985 (Image: Supplied) The highlight of the day will be a flying display featuring three classic aircraft: the Blackburn B2 biplane, the Miles Messenger, and the Bucker Jungmann. Each aircraft will perform a display lasting approximately seven minutes. The Blackburn B2 took part in a display as part of the museum's first event in 1985, when it was flown by the late trustee Robert Sage - who had previously piloted a Halifax bomber from RAF Elvington in 1943. The museum in 1986 as it looked from the air (Image: Supplied) The anniversary event will also feature 1980s-era vintage cars and a new exhibition telling the story of the museum. Yorkshire Air Museum communications manager Jerry Ibbotson said: "After very humble beginnings, literally being built from the ruins of an old airbase, Yorkshire Air Museum has grown over the last four decades. "This is a way to celebrate that past, just as we are looking forward to the museum's future. "We hope people will join us on August 11 to enjoy the flying display, as well as the new exhibition on our own history. The museum as it looked from the air in May 2025 (Image: Supplied) "It's also a chance to see what we're up to in 2025, with recent acquisitions such as the Tucano trainer, as well as the freshly repainted Victor." Standard admission applies, but as a special gesture, anyone born in 1985 will be admitted for just £1, which was the original entry price.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store