
Birds And Bats Provide Natural Pest Control To Vineyards
There are ways to grow food crops without poisoning the soil and landscape with chemical pesticides – by relying on the help of birds and bats!
Vineyards and village church in Aszofoe at Lake Balaton, Hungary.
Intensive agriculture increases food production but it also damages land through habitat loss, deforestation, and soil degradation. As farmers work to meet the needs of a rapidly growing – and hungry – human population, natural ecosystems such as forests and grasslands are converted into agricultural production and farmland, dramatically reducing biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Vineyards – although not essential to feeding hungry humans – are economically and culturally important farmlands that are under threat from the attentions of numerous pests and diseases. Yet only a small number of vineyards are managed using sustainable practices. Further, climate change is enhancing the threat of arthropod pests and diseases, thanks to the increase in unusual weather patterns.
Some vineyards respond to these threats by using more chemical pesticides to keep these pests under control. But outside of breeding pesticide-resistant arthropod pests, these methods don't work well in the long run and, in fact, these chemicals end up accumulating in the landscape and poisoning more than just wildlife and people: they actually accelerate climate change (more here).
Meanwhile, vineyards can support diverse and abundant communities of arthropod-munching predators that deliver effective natural pest control services. Birds and bats, in particular, play a key role by consuming large quantities of insect and arthropod pests. But peculiarly, their contribution to biological pest control – especially in European permanent crops, such as vineyards – remains understudied.
An international study was recently published that makes some progress towards understanding the contributions of birds and bats to natural arthropod control in vineyards. This study was conducted in Hungary, in the western part of the Transdanubian Mountains (Tapolca Basin and Balaton Uplands) and the southern part of the Little Hungarian Plain (Marcal Basin). To conduct this study, the research team selected 12 vineyards (which grow 10 grape varieties; one or two varieties per plantation), six with organic management, and another six with integrated pest management (IPM).
IPM, also known as integrated pest control (IPC), uses both chemical and non-chemical methods for the control of pests. According to the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, the goal of IPM is to 'keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimize risks to human health and the environment. IPM emphasizes the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems and encourages natural pest control mechanisms' (ref).
For IPM vineyards, limited chemical inputs are based on monitoring to maintain pest populations below crop injury levels (ref).
In contrast to IPM vineyards, organic vineyards which, according to the Hungarian Central Statistical Office, only comprise 3.2% of all Hungarian vineyards (ref) were managed without any applications of herbicides, synthetic insecticides or fertilizers. These organic vineyards typically had smaller areas and yields, and supported a greater diversity of vegetation.
F I G U R E 1 : (a) Spatial arrangement of plots, bat acoustic recorders, bird observation points ... More and pheromone traps within vineyards; (b) grape plants used for arthropod sampling and leaf herbivory, fruit damage and predation measurements within plots.
The researchers classified the study vineyards as either 'forested' or 'non-forested' according to their composition and configuration within 500 and 1000 m radius buffers (Figure 1). At both spatial scales, forested landscapes had the highest share of deciduous forests and the greatest connectivity of forest patches, hedgerows, and large groups of trees, whereas non-forested landscapes had a relatively large proportion of arable lands and the greatest vineyard-forest distances. Altogether, the researchers identified three vineyard replications for each factor combination (i.e. organic and forested, organic and non-forested, IPM and forested, IPM and non-forested). The distance between study vineyards was between 1 and 38 km (Figure 1).
The researcher team used exclosures in study vineyards to investigate the effect of birds and bats on arthropod pests affecting ecosystem functions and crop yield considering the local management schemes and contrasting landscape heterogeneity of the vineyards.
Grapevines inside a cage used for the exclusion of birds and bats. (Credit: Dávid Korányi)
The team also collected abundance data of the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana, a key grape pest, alongside insects that feed on plants and predatory arthropods in the grapevine canopy, and quantified fruit and leaf damage and other sorts of damages associated with these groups.
Grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) specimens caught with a pheromone trap. (Credit: Dávid Korányi)
As you might expect, vineyards located near forested landscapes had greater bird and bat activity in spring. Although management practices had no measurable effect on the numbers of birds and bats, organic vineyards hosted more canopy-dwelling arthropods and faced greater leaf herbivory – although there was higher predation pressure on caterpillars in organic vineyards.
Did birds and bats reduce fruit damage? Yes: the fruits and leaves on the vines grown in the exclusion treatments consistently showed higher damages, highlighting the ecological and economic value of birds and bats as natural pest control agents.
The numbers and diversity of insectivorous birds and bats were greater in vineyards located close to forested areas.
'The presence of these predators can be promoted by maintaining connected landscapes with native deciduous forest patches, hedgerows, and small groups of trees that offer abundant food sources and suitable nesting or roosting sites,' the study's lead author, landscape ecologist Dávid Korányi, said in a statement. Dr Korányi is a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre for Ecological Research at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
The study also underscores the importance of local vineyard management in pest control, particularly when the vineyard is organic, since such practices support both beneficial arthropods and natural pest predation in vineyards.
Eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops) is a widespread bird that can be found throughout Europe, Asia, North ... More Africa and northern Sub-Saharan Africa. This bird feeds mainly on arthropods and their larvae. (Credit: Artemy Voikhansky / CC BY-SA)
Source:
Dávid Korányi, Sándor Zsebők, András Báldi, Mattia Brambilla, Máté Varga, and Péter Batáry (2025). Forest cover enhances pest control by birds and bats independently of vineyard management intensity, Journal of Applied Ecology | doi:10.1111/1365-2664.70094
NOTE: questions emailed to the study's lead author, Dávid Korányi, were not unanswered.
© Copyright by GrrlScientist | hosted by Forbes | LinkTr.ee
Socials: Bluesky | CounterSocial | LinkedIn | Mastodon Science | MeWe | Spoutible | SubStack | Threads | Tumblr | Twitter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Japan launches GOSAT-GW on 50th and final liftoff of the H-2A rocket (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Japan launched a dual-purpose satellite to monitor sea temperature and greenhouse gases. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) on Saturday (June 28) conducted its 50th and final launch of the H-2A rocket, taking the GOSAT-GW dual-purpose satellite to space. The mission lifted off from Yoshinobu Launch Complex (LP-1) at the Tenegashima Space Center in Japan at 12:33 p.m. EDT (1633 GMT; 1:33 a.m. June 29, local time in Japan). The Greenhouse Gas and Water Cycle Observation Satellite (GOSAT-GW) is the latest in Japan's efforts to observe changes in water cycles and greenhouse gases. GOSAT-GW has joined its predecessors in Earth orbit: GCOM-W2, which launched in 2012 and is known as "SHIZUKU," and GOSAT-1, which launched in 2009 and is known as "IBUKI." GOSAT-GW is equipped with two main instruments. The first is known as the Advanced Microwave Radiometer (AMSR), and will measure water cycles and fluctuations in sea surface temperatures. The second is the Greenhouse Gases Observation Sensor (TANSO), and will monitor components such as carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere to measure climate change. Related Stories: — Japan launches navigation satellite on nation's 1st mission of 2025 (video) — New Japanese rocket engine explodes during testing for 2nd time in 16 months — Japan's wooden satellite deploys from ISS to demonstrate cleaner spacecraft tech (photo) Japan's H-2A rocket, built for JAXA by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, was capable of launching payloads into a geostationary orbit around Earth and to orbit around the moon. It also launched the Akatsuki spacecraft to study Venus in 2010, though the spacecraft failed to properly enter Venusian orbit. H-2A first launched in 2001. During its nearly 25 years in operation, the rocket experienced only a single launch failure, giving the vehicle a 98% success rate. After 50 missions, the launch vehicle is now being retired to make way for Japan's H3 rocket, which offers comparable performance at a lower cost.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers warn of catastrophic consequences from rapidly intensifying threat: 'As a species, we have never confronted anything like this'
Sustained higher-than-average temperatures and warming seas are projected to severely disrupt agriculture, CNN reports, and scientists are concerned about how to "ensure future food security" in a changing climate. Americans born today could "live in a world where the U.S. can only produce half as much of its key food crops," CNN's recent headline read. The ensuing reporting focused on a groundbreaking study recently published in Nature — one of the most widely cited scientific journals globally — and the outlet described its findings as "stark." Study authors examined the impacts of rising temperatures through a universally understood and relevant lens: the global food supply. Put plainly, the researchers' calculations were grim: Every 1°C (1.8°F) increase in average global temperatures will result in a worldwide reduction in food production equivalent to 120 fewer calories per person, per day. Study author Solomon Hsiang of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability broke it down further when discussing their findings. "If the climate warms by 3 degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast," Hsiang warned. It's well-documented that climate-related matters are routinely and misleadingly cast in doubt, framed as a matter of belief rather than settled science. Not everybody lives in a region routinely walloped by extreme weather — such as wildfires or increased coastal flooding — and the issue can seem abstract, localized elsewhere, or more of a problem for the distant future. However, food is a great equalizer, something all humans require to survive — farmers have long been ringing the alarm about the impacts of unpredictable weather and temperatures on crop yields. Professor and food policy expert Tim Lang told CNN that adaptations to fortify the global food supply are halting and insufficient. "The data pile up. The politicians turn a blind eye … Land use is not altering fast or radically enough," he lamented, addressing the speed at which agriculture is adapting to changes in the climate. Do you worry about how much food you throw away? Definitely Sometimes Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "This is a major problem. It's incredibly expensive. As a species, we have never confronted anything like this." Experts reiterated that "adaptation" and "mitigation" were critical steps to safeguard crops in an increasingly unpredictable climate, one in which the United States could lose half its crop yields. Growing your own food is one approach to guard against food supply instability at a personal level, whereas donating to climate-related causes is a good way to make a broader impact. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Imperfect climate models can still help us immensely, Yale says
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. The fight against climate change is ongoing, and while we're still a long way from finding an actually sustainable solution, researchers at Yale say that imperfect climate models may actually be far more helpful than many think. While the UN has warned time and again that we're losing control of climate change, a lot of the research into how the world is changing and temperatures are rising has remained a bit of a mystery itself. That's because no matter how hard we work on it, we always seem to come up with models that don't quite line up. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 In fact, some have even said that what's happening on Earth right now can't be explained by climate models. So, where does that leave us? Well, according to scientists at Yale, those imperfect climate models are actually giving scientists very important information to work with. That's because when you have highly idealized models, they don't bother to take into account all of the information, like every gust of wind, ever drop of rain, etc. Instead, they take a broader look at everything. This broader look lets scientists focus on the more abstract aspects of climate change, instead of having to worry about the minute details all the time. Of course, there's still something to be said for those more detailed models, but even an imperfect model that is too broad can provide useful information for scientists to build on. The downside here is that if we always have imperfect models, how much progress are we actually making overall? The answer, the Yale scientists say, is that models must be built for a purpose. Without a purpose, we aren't going to be able to hone in on the issues. The challenge, though, is making a model that is actually fit for purpose. Without that purpose, we're just consistently creating imperfect models that eventually will cease to teach us anything. You can read more about the scientist's arguments in a post shared to Yale Climate Connections. It's an eye-opening read for anyone trying to keep up with the latest in our fight against climate change. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the