Jake Berriman voted in as leader of Powys County Council
Ahead of the council's annual meeting on Thursday, May 15, Cllr Berriman had received the backing of his Liberal Democrat group to take the helm at county hall and lead the coalition which includes Labour and Green Party to the next local elections in May 2027.
But at the meeting a rival candidate emerged to succeed outgoing leader Cllr James Gibson-Watt, as Conservative group leader Cllr Aled Davies also threw his hat in the ring.
In a pitch to councillors, Cllr Berriman said: 'My group may be the largest, but this administration has no overall majority, and, in this fragility, I think lies our strength it means that every voice and vote counts for something.
'There can be no room for complacency and every vote earned if we are to take the tough decisions that lie ahead of us.
'We have more in common than separates us and that is a solid platform on which we can build better collaborative approaches for what remains of our term in office.
'I'm talking about harnessing our collective experience and knowledge, working in communities to make every penny count.
'Neither I nor the administration have the answers to all the difficulties we face in delivering our ambitions and meeting the pressing needs of those we serve.'
He said he would try to strengthen his relationships with all councillors and be a 'listening leader'.
Cllr Davies appealed to councillors by saying that there is a need to 'accelerate' the council's transformation of services.
Cllr Davies said: 'When resources are tight, we need to focus on the council's core business and deliver true value for money at all times, my priorities are our highways, social services and on top of that list our schools.
'We must not pour resources into unachievable targets such as Net Zero by 2030 and other environmental targets unless there is a clear financial case that benefits the residents of Powys.
'Education is number one, Estyn's recommendations are crystal clear, we must get back on track, all our learners deserve an excellent education experience here in Powys, but we are asking our school heads to do the impossible, limited resources are spread too thinly.'
Cllr Davies said that he had 'struggled' with some of the decisions taken by the cabinet over the last couple of years, and was 'frustrated' that progress had been too slow.
But he pointed out successes by the cabinet, with social services, housing and homelessness and planning services singled out for praise.
Cllr Davies said: 'We are all passionate about delivering the best services we can, but we must not shrink away from change.
'It's time to put our communities first, I will lead from the front and want to put together a coalition of the willing and the able and a strong team together from across the council.'
Following the speeches both councillors left the chamber as the vote took place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Migrants will be allowed into UK from France for up to three months
Migrants in France will be handed a visa to live in Britain for up to three months if they apply through Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal. Details of the new Anglo-French scheme published by the Home Office today revealed applicants will be able to come to this country while their final application is considered. Documents said each successful applicant who meets a number of criteria would be 'granted entry clearance to come to the UK for a period of up to three months' after completing an online application. They will not be allowed access to public funds and will also be barred from working or studying during the initial three month period, while the Home Office considers whether it will grant a longer visa. It is unclear where the migrants will be housed, however, opening the prospect of them being placed in taxpayer-funded hotels. Furthermore, it is not known what would happen to migrants allowed into Britain under the scheme if their applications were later refused. The Home Office also confirmed applicants could be penalised of they fail to 'present for travel to the UK, without reasonable excuse, when directed by the Home Office'. The number of people accepted from France will have a 'cap' equal to the number of small boat migrants who are sent back under the deal, the documents showed. But the Home Office was unable to confirm the level of the cap. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'There are scant details as yet but this risks turning into yet another wide open door into the UK. 'It is not clear what will happen if the Home Office accepts people whose applications are rejected later on, and whether they can be removed. 'And what if the Home Office accepts people without being able to remove the same number to France due to legal challenges? 'There are a lot of unanswered questions and this risks descending into yet another Labour borders farce.' It came after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs'. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention. Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The agreement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of the year, up 49 per cent on the same period last year. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. Steve Valdez-Symonds of Amnesty International UK said: 'We anticipate that this deal is likely to face legal challenges from people who quite reasonably will resist being swapped around like mere fodder rather than addressing the claim for asylum they have made. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. 'If and when there is some real detail on how this deal is intended to work, Amnesty will of course consider what further steps we ought to take.' Natasha Tsangarides, of the charity Freedom from Torture, said: 'While this pilot offers a pathway to sanctuary for a small number of refugees, it will rely on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution. 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. 'A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. The first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. The deal was agreed by PM Sir Keir Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron last month after a summit at Downing Street.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
‘Nail in the coffin': Jeremy Corbyn criticises Angela Rayner over allotment sales
Jeremy Corbyn has criticised Angela Rayner for approving the sale of eight allotment sites in England since Labour took power, in order to raise money for councils budgets. The former Labour leader - who launched a new party with Zarah Sultana in July - said the government is putting a "nail in the coffin" for allotment holders. Rayner, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has approved the sale of sites in Somerset, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire, Nottinghamshire, West Sussex, Derbyshire and Kent. Under the Allotments Act 1925, land that is designated "statutory allotment" cannot be sold or repurposed without ministerial consent. Corbyn is a keen horticulturist and has been using an allotment near Islington, North London, for 22 years. Writing in The Telegraph, he said the move will "fill many with dismay". "Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous," he wrote. He added: "Once lost, they never return. Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us. "Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity. These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people." However, Corbyn has argued that "instead of contemplating sales of these wonderful spaces, the Government should be encouraging the growth of allotments, or where there is insufficient land, the growth of community and school gardens." While he acknowledged that social housing is "desperately needed", he disagreed that we should "sacrifice" allotments to build it. "Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on!" Green Party peer Jenny Jones also criticised the decision, saying "it seems there are no green spaces that are safe under this Labour government." "Allotments are valuable spaces to promote physical and mental health, help with local food security, encourage a gift culture amongst allotment holders and their neighbours, and offer a sanctuary for nature," she said in a statement. "Labour should know that they are especially important for people who don't have the privilege of their own garden, i.e. many of those who vote - or used to vote - Labour." She added that councils need to be offered "proper funding by central government, not pushed into selling off these vital community assets." In a statement, the National Allotment Society (NAS) said they wanted to "reassure plot holders and the wider public that no changes have been made to the statutory protections afforded to allotments in England and Wales." They added that statutory allotments cannot be sold or disposed of without following strict legal procedures, and without consultation with NAS. "We are aware of the allotment sites mentioned in the press," they said. "In each of those cases, due process has been followed, and in some instances alternative or replacement allotment provision has been secured as part of the disposal process." A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) spokesperson said: "We know how important allotments are for communities, and that is why strict criteria is in place to protect them. 'The rules on the sale of assets have been in place since 2016 and have not changed. 'Ministerial approvals for the sale of allotments in 2024 were lower than the average for recent years.'
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
'Cities are being short changed': Council leader urges government for a tourism tax in Bath
Plans to introduce a tourism tax in Bath have moved a step closer after councillors voted unanimously in support of it. Councillors at Bath and North East Somerset Council voted in favour of being able to introduce a tourism tax during a meeting on 17 July. The vote was in support of the principle of a tax, not on actually introducing one or how it would work. But what is a tourism tax and why is it being voted on? What is a tourism tax? A tourism tax is a levy on short-stay accommodation in a local authority area. Also known as a 'transient visitor levy', a tax of this kind gives local councils the chance to charge people visiting the area. The tax has been introduced in cities with significant tourism economies across the world including Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Vancouver. It's usually charge per occupied bed or room per night which can change depending on the accommodation providers and time of year. What are councillors in Bath and North East Somerset voting on? Councils in England do not yet have the power to introduce such a measure but authorities in Scotland do after the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act 2024 was passed last year. Bath and North East Somerset Council leader, Kevin Guy, has written to local government secretary Angela Rayner urging the government to give England's historic cities the same power. Mr Guy (Bathavon North, Liberal Democrat) said in a council meeting: 'We are not acting along and all we are doing is asking is for the government to give us a fair deal because, at the moment, English cities are being short changed.' Bath has six million visitors per year, bringing in half a billion pounds in local economic benefit and supporting 8,000 jobs, proposer of the motion Michelle Doherty (Newbridge, Liberal Democrat) told the meeting. She said: 'This motion is not about discouraging tourism. 'We really value our visitors and we want them to continue coming but like many European cities, we think visitors should make a small contribution towards the cost of keeping our city clean and safe and welcoming." She added: 'This isn't about creating a new huge revenue stream — although a modest charge per night could bring in a couple of million pounds per year for the council which would make a real difference given the pressures on our budgets.' How would a tourism tax work? A tourism tax is expected to take the form of an additional charge on overnight stays paid by the visitor to the local council. The letter from Mr Guy and the leader of Cambridge City Council to the government spoke of 'a tourist levy associated with overnight stays.' The letter states: 'The revenue generated could be reinvested into the community, improving facilities and services for both residents and visitors.' Mr Guy said: 'Any levy should apply fairly across all types of accommodation, including short-term lets such as Airbnb.' Some supporters say it would help fund infrastructure and local services in tourist hotspots, including the upkeep of footpaths, public toilets, and waste collections. Critics argue the charge could put visitors off and add pressure to businesses already dealing with costs and staffing challenges. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government said: "There are currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England. "Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through working with their local tourism sector using the Accommodation Business Improvement District model."
