logo
8 vehicles involved in fire in south Las Vegas valley hotel parking garage

8 vehicles involved in fire in south Las Vegas valley hotel parking garage

Yahoo09-06-2025
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Several vehicles were involved in a fire in the South Point Hotel parking garage in the south Las Vegas valley Sunday, according to the Clark County Fire Department.
Around 3 p.m., CCFD responded to reports of a vehicle on first at 9777 South Las Vegas Boulevard. When fire crews responded to the scene, they found that the fire involved a vehicle parked on the top floor of the South Point parking garage.
CCFD successfully extinguished the fire, however, in total eight vehicles were involved in the fire.
No injuries to civilians or firefighters were reported, according to CCFD.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASCAR Cup Series at Iowa odds, predictions: Kyle Larson, Ryan Blaney, Christopher Bell favored. How likely is an upset?
NASCAR Cup Series at Iowa odds, predictions: Kyle Larson, Ryan Blaney, Christopher Bell favored. How likely is an upset?

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

NASCAR Cup Series at Iowa odds, predictions: Kyle Larson, Ryan Blaney, Christopher Bell favored. How likely is an upset?

The NASCAR Cup Series is in Iowa this weekend, with just four races left before the playoffs commence. Drivers on the points bubble will be extra hungry for a win to clinch their playoff spot, and hoping that another new winner doesn't emerge from the field to push the cut line down. There's a lot to unpack about the Iowa race, the standings, the controversies around the playoff format and more. So, ahead of Sunday's race, we're bringing those questions, as we always do, to our resident NASCAR experts, Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi. Take it away, guys! We've talked about Bubba Wallace a lot — what a thrilling way to see him finally clinch a win! Can you frame this from a historic standpoint for NASCAR and a career standpoint for Wallace? How much of an upset was this? Jeff: It feels like it was an upset simply in the sense that the Brickyard 400, barring some fluky weather or fuel-saving situation, was going to be about the best of the best on the top teams. And ultimately, you had a second-tier team (23XI Racing) with its B driver (instead of Tyler Reddick) beating everyone straight up — then holding off Kyle Larson on two overtime restarts when Wallace could have choked it away. When you consider Wallace had never won a regular-season race at all (his two victories came during the playoffs when he was a non-playoff driver), let alone one of NASCAR's crown jewels, this felt pretty significant for a driver who has been trying to break through. Advertisement Jordan: There's always pressure, but when you drive for a team co-owned by Michael Jordan, that pressure is amplified considerably. Then, when you factor in that Wallace hadn't won in 100 races, all while teammate Tyler Reddick has won multiple times and nearly the 2024 championship, Wallace needed that victory in a big, big way. And that he won at Indy of all places, and in the manner that he did, only enhances his accomplishment. This was huge. Now the perhaps-unanswerable: Do you think he pushed through a mental block with this win? Should we expect a better trajectory/focus? (Jeff said in early June that 'Maintaining track position up front and avoiding miscues are the two areas Wallace's No. 23 needs to improve upon.') Jeff: Wallace has been very vocal about his own confidence issues and mental weaknesses, which he has been working on over the years. Even after Indianapolis, Wallace said he spent the last 20 laps telling himself he couldn't get it done; at times, he can be his own worst enemy. But after a moment like Sunday, you would think going head-to-head with the best and not coughing it up — I personally thought he would lose the race once his lead was erased and it was headed to an overtime restart against Larson — has to be a major boost for his psyche. Next time he's in a clutch situation like that, he'll know for sure he can execute and deliver a win. Jordan: You'd think out-dueling Larson on multiple late-race restarts would give Wallace all the confidence in the world. It should. But a similar sentiment existed in 2022 when he won at Kansas, seemingly sticking it to all the naysayers. Then he went another 100 races between victories. So while Indianapolis should be a launching pad to bigger, sustained success, let's see what happens going forward. Nonetheless, let's again acknowledge how impressive Wallace was on Sunday in earning a win he certainly deserved. You wrote about a NASCAR playoff committee this week, noting that, at one point, the playoff format seemed certain to change for next year, but now it may not. One question: Is anyone in NASCAR still in favor of keeping the current one-race championship format? Jeff: There are certainly some on the TV side, the racetrack side and perhaps a few in the driving corps who like the format as-is and don't want to change it. I've spoken to them, at least privately. The argument is that the current format maximizes drama and excitement and forces drivers to step up, and they think it has created incredible moments (which is fair). But when it came time for anyone to vouch for it in the second meeting of the playoff committee in May, no one raised their hand to make their case for retaining it. That's not to say no one likes it privately, just that no one in the room spoke up for it. Advertisement In June, I did a poll on X that received more than 30,000 votes, and only 8.5 percent of fans voted in favor of keeping the current format. You can see the results here. Similarly, NASCAR Hall of Famer Mark Martin did a poll, and only 7 percent voted for that option. Among fans, I'd confidently say it is the least desirable option — and that opinion is shared by the majority of the committee. The bottom line is the one-race format hasn't felt credible enough as a championship, and the playoff committee members are seeking a way to add more legitimacy to such an important part of the sport. Jordan: (Pours a drink. Then another. Long sigh.) The current playoff format deserves to be thoroughly dissected and examined. And if, from that, a better playoff format can be conceived, then wonderful. But to sit there and say with broad strokes that this format is primarily about luck and diminishes the championship feels a bit disingenuous. Last year, Joey Logano rose to the occasion when it mattered the most, effectively willing himself to the championship. Yet, instead of praising this as would've likely happened had it been a fan-favorite driver, he's cast as an 'undeserving champion' by a large swath of people. That's ridiculous. And if you look back on the history of this format, a valid case can be made that the eventual champion in most years was deserving. How likely is it that this race puts a new race winner in the playoffs? Jeff: I would have said the Brickyard only had a 20 percent chance or less — and I was wrong — so I'll go with 30 percent for Iowa. It's the second time NASCAR has raced at Iowa Speedway, but look at last year's inaugural race: Ryan Blaney dominated and won it, Larson led 80 laps and William Byron, Chase Elliott and Christopher Bell all finished in the top four. No surprises there. That said, we haven't seen a track like Iowa yet this season — it's sort of a hybrid short track — so you can't count out a surprise driver hitting on something. But I don't think it's very likely at all, personally. Jordan: Unlikely. Expect a repeat winner on Sunday as Iowa is just not the kind of track conducive to producing an upset. When the checkered flag waves, bet on a familiar face celebrating in victory lane. Advertisement Who do you like to win this Sunday? Jeff: Before I looked at the odds, I thought I was going to have a sneaky little pick for you: Christopher Bell. Then I realized he is already the No. 3 favorite (+475), just behind Blaney and Larson (who are tied at +450). So I guess my pick isn't exactly going out on a limb. I just thought, given Bell's two self-spins while racing for the lead at Dover two weeks ago and then his huge gaffe at Indianapolis that cleaned out Zane Smith, maybe bettors would have soured on Bell a bit. After all, he's gone winless since winning three straight races (Nos. 2-4 of the season) — which seems like a lifetime ago. But Bell is a terrific short-track racer, and he won at Phoenix, which is probably the closest thing we've seen to Iowa so far this year. So I'll go with him. Jordan: Having broken out of his mid-summer swoon, Kyle Larson is back to having a consistent presence toward the front of the field. He was fast at Dover two weeks ago and nearly won last week at Indy. He's long due for another win, and Iowa is the place it happens, setting up a late-push run to the regular-season championship. Who is a long shot you like? Jeff: Shout it from the rooftops: Ricky Stenhouse Jr. at +15000. The long-shot talk heading into the Iowa race last year was about Stenhouse, who once won three straight Iowa races during his Xfinity Series days. Then at the inaugural Iowa Cup race, Stenhouse went out and finished fifth — his only top-five finish on a paved non-superspeedway in the last three-plus seasons. Heck, Stenhouse is +350 to even finish in the top 10 at Iowa. Sometimes drivers just click with certain tracks, and it feels like Iowa could be one of those for Stenhouse. Jordan: Ty Gibbs is listed at +4400, which is too high for a driver at a top organization that has had speed to win a handful of races this summer. The same applies to Alex Bowman, who's at +5000. Neither of these drivers is a likely winner on Sunday, but it certainly wouldn't be a shock if it happened. And for a deep sleeper, go with Erik Jones (+20000). He and his Legacy Motor Club team have been much improved to the point that he's both qualifying and racing better, and if he can get a little luck, Jones could turn some heads. Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Kyle Larson: James Gilbert / Getty Images)

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) Reports Production and Sales Report for June 2025
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) Reports Production and Sales Report for June 2025

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) Reports Production and Sales Report for June 2025

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) is included in our list of the . Image credit: Wikipedia/Public Domain Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) released its June 2025 production and sales report on July 30, 2025, highlighting both strategic shifts and obstacles. In June 2025, the company's total worldwide output came to 287,783 units, a tiny 0.6% year-over-year (YOY) decrease led by a 2.4% decline in production outside of Japan. However, Japan experienced a robust recovery, with 60,804 units produced, an 8.5% year-over-year increase. Japan's production increased by 9.7%, contributing to the overall trend. The Japanese market also experienced difficulties, with sales falling 16.9% year over year to 49,263 units, the third consecutive month of declining sales. Sales of mini-vehicles fell 8.3% year over year, continuing their poor performance. Despite a robust 190.7% year-over-year growth in June shipments, which came to 12,012 units, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) faced difficulties with its export operations. The 472.4% increase in shipments to the USA, which made a substantial contribution to the overall export rise, was a noteworthy highlight. Despite these conflicting figures, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) is steadfast in its commitment to sustainable technologies, emphasizing environmentally friendly options. Notably, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) revealed a new plan on June 30, 2025, for the production of fuel cell modules in Moka City, Japan. The strategy aims to maintain the company's long-term commitment to hydrogen technology while reducing initial manufacturing capacity. Meanwhile, Macquarie downgraded Honda from 'Outperform' to 'Neutral' on June 25, 2025, indicating a more cautious stance in the face of global manufacturing challenges. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) makes motorcycles, automobiles, and power products in Japan. It is included in our list of cheap solid state battery stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of HMC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

2 No-Brainer Industrial Stocks to Buy With $100 Right Now
2 No-Brainer Industrial Stocks to Buy With $100 Right Now

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

2 No-Brainer Industrial Stocks to Buy With $100 Right Now

Key Points Industrials have outperformed the S&P 500 in 2025, with strong earnings growth expected through 2027. Archer Aviation is a high-risk, high-reward eVTOL bet with blue-chip backers and growing momentum. UPS is cutting costs, narrowing margins, and sporting a hefty dividend. 10 stocks we like better than Archer Aviation › Industrial companies are often called the backbone of the economy. Year to date, they've also been the backbone of the stock market: As of late July, the sector has handily outpaced the broader S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) with a 15% gain, almost double the index's return. Analysts from FactSet have also put the sector at the very top for revenue growth through 2027 and second only to the energy sector in EPS growth. Although even the best industrial stocks are cyclical and volatile at times, they're certainly not a sleepy corner of the market right now. If you didn't have a lot of money available to invest (say, just $100), but you were interested in buying into this sector, which industrial stocks should you consider? Here are two companies I'd give closer consideration to. 1. Archer Aviation Archer Aviation (NYSE: ACHR) is a California-based start-up building electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. The company's goal is to bypass congested city streets with air taxi services that are fully electric. Think The Jetsons, except instead of flying cars that fold into your pocket, you get a battery-powered aircraft that cruises over traffic at about 150 miles per hour. Pretty cool, right? The market seems to think so. The stock is trading up 150%-plus over the last 12 months, riding a wave of optimism around eVTOL technology. In June, the company raised $850 million following a Trump administration executive order that calls for an accelerated rollout of eVTOL aircraft in the U.S. The company also has several partnerships with several heavyweight companies, including United Airlines, which hopes to fly its aircraft from airports into cities and back as part of its overall services to high-end customers, and Stellantis, which hopes to partner in the manufacture of Archer aircraft. And to top it all off, Archer was named the official air taxi service for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. All this seems to suggest that Archer could be changing how people taxi from select locations. But before you get too excited, it's fair to point out that the company isn't profitable. Not even close. It's pre-revenue, burning cash, and still hoping to get through a complex regulatory environment. And even with powerful partners in its corner, flawless execution is needed to turn its prototypes into real, profitable air taxi routes. With a $6.8 billion market cap (as of this writing), Archer's valuation nearly matches its supposed $6 billion order backlog, which it reported at the end of Q3 2024, signaling strong demand but pricing in a future that hinges on delivering these "contracts" without any hangups. Still, it's an industrial stock I'd watch closely, as one breakthrough -- like a major route deal -- could be what sends it soaring. 2. United Parcel Service United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) is a logistics giant that's navigating choppy economic waters at the moment. The stock price is down over 18% in 2025, trailing the S&P 500's 8.3% gain. After a rough 2023, which included a costly labor deal, and a rough 2024 in which the company reported declining freight volume and cut its guidance, a fresh start in 2025 was much needed. Management has been making tough calls -- ones that have surprised investors but make sound business sense. For one, it's in the midst of a $3.5 billion cost reduction effort, which involves trimming about 20,000 jobs and closing 73 facilities. It's also scaling back its relationship with Amazon, a company that made up about 12% of UPS' 2024 revenue, but has brought in thinner margins than the premium services UPS wants to prioritize. These moves are already starting to show up in the numbers. In Q2 2025, UPS reported a consolidated operating profit of $1.7 billion, up 3.3% from the previous quarter, despite a 0.7% decrease in revenue. At today's valuation, the stock trades at 15 times trailing earnings, a steep discount to its historical average and well below the industrial sector's average of 28. With costs coming down, margins expanding, and a 6.4% dividend yield to cushion the wait, this might be one of the better places to put your $100. Do the experts think Archer Aviation is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Archer Aviation make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,036% vs. just 181% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 855.09%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Steven Porrello has positions in Archer Aviation. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, FactSet Research Systems, and United Parcel Service. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 No-Brainer Industrial Stocks to Buy With $100 Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store