&w=3840&q=100)
Airspace closure: The 1991 India-Pakistan treaty that forbids air violations at LoC, borders
In a move aimed at reducing the risk of accidental conflict, India and Pakistan signed a landmark airspace agreement in New Delhi on April 6, 1991. The primary objective of the accord was to prevent violations of each other's airspace and establish clear operational protocols for both militaries.
As per the document on UN website, under the agreement, both nations' air force headquarters received defined guidelines to regulate aerial activity near the border, minimising the potential for misunderstandings or miscalculations that could lead to military escalation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The pact was designed as a confidence-building measure, ensuring that routine or accidental incursions would not spiral into conflict. By formalising airspace boundaries and communication procedures, the agreement sought to prevent confusion from triggering a war-like scenario along one of the world's most volatile frontiers.
A look at the airspace agreement between India and Pakistan:
The pact between India and Pakistan was signed in New Delhi on April 6, 1991, but it took effect on August 19, 1992, when the papers of ratification were exchanged.
There are nine articles in the agreement.
Article 1 (Air Violations )
Both India and Pakistan would take appropriate precautions to ensure that no side violates the other's airspace.
However, if any inadvertent violations occur; The event will be thoroughly investigated, and the results will be communicated to the other Air Force's Headquarters (HQ) via diplomatic channels as soon as possible.
Article 2
Subject to Articles 3, 4 and 6, the following restrictions are to be observed by military aircraft of both the forces:-
Combat aircraft (to include fic'nter, bomber, reconnaissance, jet military trair.er and armed helicopter aircraft) will not fly within 10 kms of each other's airspace including ADIZ. No aircraft of any side will enter the airspace over the territorial waters of the ether country, except by prior permission.
Unarmed transport and logistics aircraft including unarmed helicopters, and Air Observation Post (AOP) aircraft, will be permitted up to 1000 metres from each other'sairspace including ADIZ.
Article - 3
(Aerial Survey/ Supply Dropping, Mercy and Rescue Missions)
In the event of a country having to undertake flights less than 1000 metres from the other's airspace including ADIZ, for purposes such as aerial survey, supply dropping for mercy missions and aerial rescue missions/ the country concerned will give the following information in advance to their own Air Advisors for notification to the Air HQ of the other country:
Type of aircraft/helicopter
Height of flight within Plus/Minus 1000 ft
Block No. of days (normally not to exceed sevendays) when flights are proposed to be undertaken
Proposed timing of flight, where possible
Area involved (in latitude and longitude)
No formal clearance would be required as the flights are being undertaken within own territory
Article - 4 (Air exercises near border)
In order to avoid any tension being created/ prior notice be given with regard to air exercises/ or any special air activity proposed to be undertaken close to each other's
airspace including ADIZ/ even though the limits as laid down in Article 2 are not likely to be infringed.
Article - 5 (Communication between IAF and PAF)
In matters of safety and any air operations in emergency situations/ the authorities designated by the respective governments should contact each other by the quickest means of communications available.
The Air Advisor shall be kept informed of such contacts. Matters of flight safety and urgent air operations should promptly be brought to the notice of the other side through the authorities designated by using the telephone line established between the Army Headquarters of the two countries.
Article - 6 (Operations from air fields close to the borders)
Combat aircraft (as defined in Article 2 a. above) operating from the air bases specified below will maintain adistance of 5 kms from each other's airspace:
Indian Side
Jammu.
Pathankot
Amritsar
Suratgarh
Pakistan Side
Pasrur
Lahore
Vehari
Rahim Yar Khan
Article - 7 (Flights of military aircraft through each other's air space)
Military aircraft may fly through each other's airspace with the prior permission of the other country and subject to conditions specified in Appendix A to this Agreement.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1 of this Article, each country has the sovereign richt to specify further conditions, at short notice, for flights of military aircraft through its airspace.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Article - 8 (Validity of agreement)
This Agreement supersedes all previous understandings in so far as air space violations and over flights and landings by military aircraft are concerned
Article - 9
This Agreement is subject to ratification. It shall come into force with effect from the date on which the Instruments of Ratification are exchanged
Appendix A
Conditions for grant of flight clearance for military aircraft of both countries
The aide requesting permission for their military aircraft to fly through the air space of the other country or for landing(s) by such aircraft at airfield(s) in the other country will approach the respective Air HQ through their Air Advisor for clearance to undertake the flight, at least seven days before the scheduled date(s) of the flight(s). If, due to unforeseen circumstances this notice is less than seven days, the other country would, as far as possible, make all efforts to accommodate the request. The following details of each flight will be intimated to the concerned Air Headquarters:
* Aircraft type * Aircraft registration number * Aircraft call sign * Name of the Captain of the Aircraft * Number of the crew * Cruising level * General nature of cargo carried and number of passengers who are on board the Aircraft * Purpose of the flight * Standby aircraft number and call sign * Name of standby Captain and air crew * Flight plan for outbound and return legs including air route, Flight Information Region (FIR) entry/exit points and times, Expected Time of Arrival (ETAs)/Expected Time of Departure (ETDs) and flight levels etc * Type and quantity of fuel required at various airfields landing
All flights approved will be valid for 3 days within plus/minus three hours of the given time schedule of each day, provided flight details remain unchanged. Any subsequent changes of the flight plan will require fresh clearance from Air HQ, for which advance notice of 72 hours will be essential.
Routes to be followed by aircraft will be specified by respective countries at the time of requesting flight clearance. If the route proposed by the originator country is, for any reason, not acceptable to the other country, the latter would, if possible, suggest a viable alternative route at the earliest.
The aircraft will not fly below 8000 ft or over 40,000 ft Above Ground Level (AGL).
The concerned Flight Information Centre of the other country will be contacted by the transiting aircraft during the flight before entering the airspace of the other country.
Flights across each other's airspace will normally be completed between sunrise and sunset. Over-flights by night may be permitted, on specific request, under special circumstances.
No war-like material e.g. arms/ammunition, explosives (except escape aid explosives), pyrotechnics (except emergency very light pistol signal cartridges), nuclear/fissionable material, Nuclear Biological and Chemical (NBC) materials, photographic material (whether or not installed), electronic devices other than required for the normal operation of the aircraft, may be carried in the aircraft.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
on-professional cameras belonging to the passengers and which are not capable of aerial photography may, however, be carried but photography at airports or of defence installations, bridges and industries etc. is not permitted.
Normally, both countries shall permit overflights to transit across the other's airspace along approved international Air Traffic Services (ATS) routes without the aircraft having to make a technical halt. However, each country has the sovereign right to insist on such a halt if the country being overflown so desires.
Special care is to be exercised by the transiting aircraft to stay within the ATS routes and not to stray outside the limits of the route.
Visas for the crew and passengers will be issued by the respective Embassy with utmost promptness.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US Promises Gaza Food Plan After Envoy Visit
President Donald Trump's special envoy promised a plan to deliver more food to Gaza after inspecting a US-backed distribution centre on Friday, as the UN human rights office said Israeli forces had killed hundreds of hungry Palestinians waiting for aid. The visit by Steve Witkoff came as a report from global advocacy group Human Rights Watch accused Israeli forces of presiding over "regular bloodbaths" close to US-backed aid points run by the private Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The UN human rights office in the Palestinian territories said at least 1,373 people had been killed seeking aid in Gaza since May 27 -- 105 of them in the last two days of July. "Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military," the UN office said, breaking down the deaths into 859 killed near GHF food sites and 514 along routes used by UN and aid agency convoys. Witkoff said he had spent more than five hours inside Gaza, in a post accompanied by a photograph of himself wearing a protective vest and meeting staff at a GHF distribution centre. "The purpose of the visit was to give POTUS a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza," he said, referring to Trump. Trump himself echoed this in a phone call with US news site Axios touting a plan to "get people fed". "We want to help people. We want to help them live. We want to get people fed. It is something that should have happened long time ago," Trump said, according to Axios. The US leader repeated Israeli claims that Hamas is responsible for stealing much of the aid that makes it into Gaza, but did not say whether his plan would involve reinforcing GHF or a whole new mechanism, the report said. The foundation said it had delivered its 100-millionth meal in Gaza during the Gaza visit by Witkoff and US ambassador Mike Huckabee. "President Trump understands the stakes in Gaza and that feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority. Today he sent his envoy to serve as his eyes and ears on the ground, reflecting his deep concern and commitment to doing what's right," GHF spokesperson Chapin Fay said. Gaza's civil defence agency said 22 people were killed by Israeli gunfire and air strikes on Friday, including eight who were waiting to collect food aid. The GHF largely sidelined the longstanding UN-led aid distribution system in Gaza just as Israel was beginning to ease a more than two-month aid blockade that exacerbated existing shortages of food and other essentials. 'Beyond Imagination' In its report on the GHF centres on Friday, Human Rights Watch accused the Israeli military of using starvation as a weapon of war. "Israeli forces are not only deliberately starving Palestinian civilians, but they are now gunning them down almost every day as they desperately seek food for their families," the watchdog's associate crisis and conflict director, Belkis Wille, said. "US-backed Israeli forces and private contractors have put in place a flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths." Responding to the report, the military said the GHF worked independently, but that Israeli soldiers operated "in proximity to the new distribution areas in order to enable the orderly delivery of food". It accused Hamas of trying to prevent food distribution and said it was conducting a review of the reported deaths, adding it worked to "minimise, as much as possible, any friction between the civilian population" and its forces. After arriving in Israel on Thursday, Witkoff held talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu has vowed to destroy Hamas and free the remaining hostages seized in its October 2023 attack, but is under international pressure to end the bloodshed that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians and threatened many more with famine. Following his discussions with Witkoff, Netanyahu met Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul of Germany, another staunch Israeli ally, who nonetheless delivered a blunt message. "The humanitarian disaster in Gaza is beyond imagination," Wadephul told reporters after the meeting, urging the government "to provide humanitarian and medical aid to prevent mass starvation from becoming a reality". "I have the impression that this has been understood today," he added. Hostage Video The Hamas-led October 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to a tally based on official figures. Of the 251 people taken hostage, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 declared dead by the Israeli military. The retaliatory Israeli offensive has killed at least 60,249 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP cannot independently verify tolls and details provided by the civil defence and other parties.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority,' says US envoy on rare Gaza visit
President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy has visited a US-supported aid site in Gaza, which the United Nations has refused to work with, calling it unsafe. It was the first visit by a senior US official to Gaza since the war began last October. Steve Witkoff, who leads Trump's Middle East team, toured a site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in Rafah on Friday. He said the visit was part of efforts to develop a new aid plan for Gaza. 'The purpose of the visit was to give President Trump a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza,' Witkoff said on social media. At @POTUS's direction, @USAmbIsrael and I met yesterday with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza — level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with @GHFUpdates and other… — Special Envoy Steve Witkoff (@SEPeaceMissions) August 1, 2025 Soon after the visit, Palestinian medics reported that Israeli soldiers shot and killed three Palestinians near one of the foundation's aid points. It was not immediately clear if it was the same site Witkoff had visited. The Israeli military said it was still investigating the incident, in which troops fired warning shots at what they called a 'gathering of suspects' hundreds of metres from the aid site. The UN has accused the GHF of delivering aid in a way that puts civilians at risk. It says more than 1,000 people have been killed while trying to get aid from GHF points since the group began operating in Gaza in May. Most were reportedly shot by Israeli forces near those sites. 'We will not partner with operations that violate humanitarian principles and put people in danger,' said the UN, which has refused to work with GHF. GHF denies any deaths have occurred at its sites. Its spokesperson, Chapin Fay, said the foundation is 'protecting aid better than the UN' and has delivered 100 million meals. Fay added: 'President Trump understands the stakes in Gaza and that feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority.' US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who accompanied Witkoff, shared an image of Gazans behind razor wire near a GHF poster with the American flag. Witkoff's visit came a day after he met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel has been facing growing criticism over the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war began, according to Gaza's health ministry. The war started after Hamas fighters attacked southern Israel in October 2023, killing over 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages. On Friday, in addition to the three killed near a GHF site, medics said Israeli strikes across Gaza killed at least 12 more people. The Israeli military declined to comment on those reports. Aid groups say hunger is worsening. Medics in Gaza report dozens of recent deaths from malnutrition. The UN says the hunger crisis grew after Israel cut off supplies for nearly three months earlier this year and continues to allow only limited aid to enter. Israel says it has increased aid entry by pausing fighting in certain areas during parts of the day and designating routes for trucks. It also began food air drops this week, though the UN says that is not enough. 'If there is political will to allow airdrops — which are costly and limited there should be will to open road crossings,' said Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian aid agency. The Israeli military said 200 trucks entered Gaza with aid on Thursday. However, the UN says thousands of trucks are still waiting to be allowed in. Some Western countries, including France, Britain and Canada, have responded to the crisis by saying they are considering recognising a Palestinian state.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Fire vs lamp': China torches US for hypocrisy; 'why can you trade with Russia but not us?'
Amid escalating trade tensions, China on Thursday lambasted US for its hypocritical nature after it accused Beijing of being "the most important supplier" of Russia's war efforts against Ukraine. In a sharp rebuttal, China said that US continues to engage in trade with Russia to this day by only allowing itself "to set fires while forbidding others from lighting lamps." China STUNS Trump By 'Secretly Helping' Friend Iran; Uses Dark Fleet To Buy Iranian Oil | Report This came after a US representative at a security council meeting on Ukraine accused China of being "the most important supplier" of Russia's war efforts. Drawing a sharp criticism, Geng Shuang, China's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, dismissed the claim and said that such remarks from US are completely unacceptable. He noted a heavy flow of weapons and ammunition into the battlefield and no sign of an end to the war. "I would like to reiterate that while weapons may win wars, they cannot bring lasting peace. The reckless transfer of arms to the battlefield will only intensify the conflict, prolong the fighting, increase the risk of proliferation, and inflict more casualties and suffering on people in both the conflict zone and the broader region," Geng said, according to Global Times. Terming the US's allegations as "completely unacceptable," he said that China has responded to such accusations on multiple occasions in past meetings. According to Global Times, in a strongly worded response, Geng said that China is not the creator of Russia-Ukraine conflict and "has never provided lethal weapons to any party". He asserted that China has always "strictly controlled the export of dual-use items, including drones." Noting that UN security council has not imposed sanctions on any party to the conflict, he said that China maintains normal trade with both Russia and Ukraine. Slamming the US, Geng said that Washington itself "continues to engage in trade with Russia to this day." "Why should it be acceptable for the US to do so, but not for others? Isn't this 'only allowing oneself to set fires while forbidding others from lighting lamps?'" Geng asked, according to Global Times. Geng underscored the need for a resolution. While criticising US, he said that Washington, on one hand, cannot ask China "to play a constructive role in ending the war, while on the other hand continuously smear and pressure China." He then urged US to stop playing blame game, scapegoating others and work seriously to stop the war. "It is the US that repeatedly engages in smearing, slandering, and attacking other countries in the UN Security Council chamber. Does the US not recognise how different its behaviour is from that of other Council members?" Geng said.