logo
What your rights are if you aren't given in-person doctor appointment

What your rights are if you aren't given in-person doctor appointment

Daily Record16 hours ago
GP practices provide appointments with various health professionals, which can be in-person, via phone, or online
A medical negligence expert has addressed some common questions that many people in the UK have regarding visits to their GP, including a clear explanation of their rights. This advice comes in light of the GP Patient Survey released by NHS, which has shed light on the challenges patients face when trying to secure an in-person appointment with their GP.
The survey results revealed that one in three participants (34.7%) found it somewhat or very challenging to reach their GP by phone. Additionally, over a quarter (27.7%) of patients had their appointments conducted remotely. More than two in five individuals (42.5%) reported that they never or almost never get to consult with their preferred healthcare provider when they request an appointment.

In response to the survey results, Sophie McGarry, a solicitor at Patient Claim Line, has outlined your legal rights regarding in-person GP appointments. She has also provided guidance on what steps to take if you believe you have been misdiagnosed during a telephone or video consultation with your GP.

Do patients have the legal right to an in-person GP appointment?
GP patients can now request in-person appointments if that's what they want. NHS GP says: "According to new NHS guidance, practices in England must offer face-to-face appointments if requested. GPs who fail to make the necessary arrangements for patients to make an appointment without having to spend hours on the phone or who are not available for face-to-face appointments are, in the strictest terms, breaking the law."
NHS England has provided guidance to practices stating that GP offices need to make sure they offer face-to-face appointments, and they should honour patients' wishes for in-person care unless there are valid clinical reasons against it, such as if the patient shows COVID symptoms.
In England, NHS guidelines say that GP practices should provide face-to-face appointments if you ask for one, but there's no strict legal right to an in-person visit if the GP thinks a remote consultation is suitable. That said, you do have the right to see a healthcare professional within 48 hours if it's necessary. If you believe you need a face-to-face appointment, feel free to ask for it and share your reasons. If they turn down your request, you can take it up with the practice manager or file a formal complaint.
NHS England says: "While the expanded use of video, online and telephone consultations can be maintained where patients find benefit from them, this should be done alongside a clear offer of appointments in person." You can read more about the choices available to you in the NHS on its website.
What to do if an in-person appointment isn't offered?
In a letter to GP Practices, dated May 13, 2021, NHS England states, at a minimum, that clear advice should be provided and maintained on all practice websites regarding:

How to contact the GP and ask for help.
How face-to-face or walk-in services can be accessed.
Ms McGarry says, firstly, you could check your practice's website to see if there is any information about how to access face-to-face or walk-in services. If you are unable to locate this on the practice's website, you could ask the practice to provide you with this information.
She also says that if you encounter resistance from the practice, you could refer them to NHS England's letter, which states that this information should be available on its website at a minimum. Ask your GP Practice to arrange an in-person appointment for an assessment, examination, or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.

Explain that it is your preference to have a face-to-face appointment, and you can quote from the NHS England guidance that GP Practices must all ensure they are offering face-to-face appointments, and practices should respect preferences for face-to-face care.
She added: "If the GPs or receptionists continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could escalate the matter to the Practice Manager and ask them to explain why your wish and request for a face-to-face examination are being refused." You can view what choices are currently available to NHS patients in the NHS Choice Framework.

How to book, change or cancel an appointment
If you think you need an appointment at your GP surgery, you can contact them:
using a form on your GP surgery's website (many surgeries also have a form you can access if you use the NHS App or log into your account on the NHS website)
by phone
in person, by going into the surgery and talking to the receptionist
Before booking an appointment, your GP surgery may ask what you need help with. This will help them decide how soon you need to be seen and help them choose the most suitable doctor, nurse or health professional to help you.

Are in-person appointments 'better'?
Ms McGarry says: "Telephone and remote assessments have their place for certain minor issues, but overall, I believe in-person appointments are safer, and you are less likely to be misdiagnosed than if you had a remote assessment.
"If a GP is assessing someone by telephone, there is no opportunity for them to conduct any tests or examinations. If a GP is assessing someone in person, even if they just want to perform the examinations as a precautionary measure, this is more likely to identify an abnormality than a telephone appointment.
"An in-person appointment also lends itself to any incidental findings which would not be spotted during a telephone assessment. During a remote assessment, a GP is completely reliant on asking the right questions and the patient providing the right answers."

She continued: "People are also discussing difficult and sensitive personal issues. It may be easier for them to open up to a GP in an in-person appointment, where they are receiving face-to-face, hands-on, human care, which is much more personable, rather than speaking to a voice asking questions on the phone.
"Remote appointments can leave patients feeling like there is a disconnect between them and their GP, and like there is less 'care'. In stressful and emotional situations, patients will find comfort in the GP's physical presence and human touch.

"During an in-person appointment, patients are in the room with their GP, solely focusing on the consultation and discussing their symptoms. Telephone GP appointments can catch patients whilst they are at work, driving, or doing the shopping, so the patient may not be able to give the appointment their full, undivided attention."
What are the potential pitfalls of remote assessments?
As outlined by NHS England, without adequate training, support, and process development, staff may struggle to optimise patient care through remote means. In these circumstances, remote consulting could result in:
delayed or missed diagnoses
over or under investigation of patients
increasing the burden on clinicians to make judgements remotely
reduction in the therapeutic relationship between patients and clinicians
increase in the transactional aspect of care over personalisation, where patients experience limited interactions remotely or feel they are unable to see their doctor face-to-face
missed opportunities to pick up on subtle cues during a face-to-face consultation
digital exclusion of certain patient groups
increasing complexity for reception staff when booking in patients to different consultation types
Barriers to technology or simple blockers, such as a poor phone signal, can become problematic for patients being asked to consult remotely

Are there any people who are more difficult to assess remotely?
The solicitor said: "Generally speaking, children, the elderly and those with mental health issues or communication difficulties, can be more difficult to assess remotely. Children can have difficulties expressing themselves and their symptoms so this may require more careful assessment.
"The elderly may be hard of hearing and struggle to hear on the phone, and therefore may be less likely or able to give a full account of their symptoms. They may also be less technologically skilled and be unable to share photographs to evidence issues.
"I believe older people value the face-to-face and human touch more. GPs may be more likely to find incidental findings, conditions and symptoms in older people during an in-person appointment.

"Some people do not feel comfortable speaking on the phone and may find it difficult to express themselves or may benefit from an in-person appointment to feel able to open up about their mental health symptoms. However, it's important to remember that every demographic is vulnerable to health issues, which can be difficult to assess remotely."
Did you know?
If a GP needs to refer you for a physical or mental health condition, in most cases, you have the legal right to choose the hospital or service you'd like to go to. This will include many private hospitals if they provide services to the NHS and it does not cost the NHS any more than a referral to a standard NHS hospital.

You can also choose a clinical team led by a consultant or named healthcare professional, as long as that team provides the treatment you require. Find out more about choosing a hospital or consultant and choosing a mental health service.
You can book your appointment via the NHS e-Referral service. It can be done while you're at the GP surgery, or online, using the shortlist of hospitals or services provided in your appointment request letter. The shortlist is selected by your GP, so make sure you tell them about your preferences during the appointment. You have the legal right to ask for your appointment to be moved to a different provider if you're likely to wait longer than the maximum waiting time specified for your treatment.
The hospital or integrated care board (ICB) will have to investigate and offer you a range of suitable alternative hospitals or clinics that would be able to see you sooner. Read the guide to waiting times for more information.

Are conditions trickier to diagnose when appointments are remote?
Ms McGarry says any condition that requires visual assessment or physical touch is more difficult to assess and diagnose correctly when an appointment is carried out remotely. This can include infections, chest pain, and abdominal pain. It is important for a patient to be able to show the GP exactly where the pain is and for the GP to palpate the area to establish exactly where the pain is.
Assessment of a lump or changes to the skin
The solicitor says it is important to visualise and feel the lump to ascertain where it is located, its size, whether it is hard or soft, and whether it is painful when touched. Then, the solicitor says it is important to compare the visualisation and feel of the affected side of the body with the unaffected side of the body.
All guidance for early detection of cancers revolves around knowing your body, feeling your body and noticing changes, not to look at photographs. The GPs need to see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral, and on what basis that referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two-week suspected cancer pathway.

Visual or physical internal assessments
Ms McGarry said: "An example is a digital rectal examination to assist in diagnosing prostate cancer, or vaginal examinations with a speculum to visualise cervical abnormalities, assisting in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. GPs need to see and feel the prostate or cervix to decipher whether or not there are suspicious features which require further investigation / onward referral. They need to consider on what basis the referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two week suspected cancer pathway."
Do any conditions require intimate examinations?
NHS England says: "It is not advisable to encourage patients to send clinical images of intimate regions or reveal or self-examine intimate areas during a remote consultation. The GMC is clear that all patients should be offered a chaperone. Patients who require an intimate examination should, therefore, be encouraged to attend for a face-to-face assessment."

Limb ischaemia requires assessment of peripheral pulses to determine whether they are weak or absent. Limb ischemia refers to a reduced blood supply to the limbs, potentially affecting the arms or legs. Other conditions that require intimate examination can include:
Any condition requiring the assessment of temperature or blood pressure.
Visual assessment of eyes, ears or mouth.
Assessment of any orifice or skin abnormalities.
What if you feel you've been misdiagnosed over the phone or in a video consultation?
Ms McGarry adds: "If you believe that you have been misdiagnosed over the telephone or in a video consultation at the time of your assessment, you can ask your GP to arrange an in-person appointment for further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
"If that particular GP will not arrange an in-person appointment with you, you can call the surgery to make a further appointment and request an in-person appointment for a second opinion and further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
"For example, you could advise that you are very concerned that the lump you have located is suspicious and you feel a physical appointment is necessary so that the GP can see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral and on what basis that referral should be made. If the GPs continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could ask for the matter to be escalated to the Practice Manager."
If your condition is urgent or deteriorating after a telephone or video consultation, you should take appropriate action by attending a walk-in centre, urgent care centre or A&E, depending on the severity of your condition and your level of concern.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds of cystic fibrosis patients become eligible for ‘life-changing' therapy
Hundreds of cystic fibrosis patients become eligible for ‘life-changing' therapy

Leader Live

time17 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Hundreds of cystic fibrosis patients become eligible for ‘life-changing' therapy

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) has given the green light for the NHS to give patients Alyftrek, a type of modulator therapy which works to tackle the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis (CF). CF is caused by a faulty gene that affects the production of a protein called CFTR. Modulator drugs work by helping to make the CFTR protein work effectively. NHS officials said the treatments can 'transform' life expectancy and quality of life for patients. There are a number of modulator therapies available but some patients with the rarest forms of the disease have been unable to access them until now. Nice approved Alyftrek, which is known as a triple therapy, for patients aged six and over for the most common form of CF as an alternative to another treatment called Kaftrio. And NHS England announced that the treatment would also be made available for children and adults with rare forms of cystic fibrosis, who have not previously been eligible for modulator therapy. NHS England said the move allows patients with the rarest form of the disease to access the latest treatments, including Alyftrek and Kaftrio, for the first time. It said that 95% of people with cystic fibrosis in England will now be eligible for modulator therapy. The new drug, also known as vanza triple, has been found to be as effective as current drug Kaftrio in clinical trials in improving and maintaining lung function in people with CF. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the triple combination medicine – which is also known as deutivacaftor/tezacaftor/vanzacaftor – for use in the UK, for certain patients with CF over the age of six, in March. Cystic fibrosis is a genetic condition that causes thick mucus to build up in the lungs and digestive system which leads to breathing difficulties and serious infections. John Stewart, NHS England's director for specialised commissioning, said: 'This is a major leap forward for hundreds of patients living with the rarest forms of cystic fibrosis, offering fresh hope of a better quality of life. 'Access to a once-daily treatment at home can make an enormous difference to patients and their families – reducing the burden of hospital appointments and allowing children and young people to live more freely and independently. 'For those living with the rarest forms of the condition, this represents the very first time they will be able to access this new standard of care that has been so transformative for many since 2019. 'The rollout of this life-changing therapy demonstrates how the NHS continues to embrace innovation to deliver significant improvements in care for patients across the country at a fair price for the taxpayer.' Helen Knight, director of medicines evaluation at Nice, said: 'CFTR modulators are already revolutionising the way cystic fibrosis is treated so we're pleased to be able to recommend Alyftrek, the latest of this type of treatment that has been shown to be effective, with significant benefits for people with the condition.' David Ramsden, chief executive of the Cystic Fibrosis Trust, said: 'Today's announcements are another positive step in the journey to better treatments for everyone with cystic fibrosis – a lifelong, life-limiting condition without a cure. 'It's thanks to the incredible support and many years of campaigning of the CF community, and the work of all our partners, that modulator drugs are now a treatment option for thousands of people.' Ludovic Fenaux, senior vice president at Vertex International, said the move 'represents a significant milestone in our journey to serially innovate and further improve the lives of people living with this disease'.

Antisemitism report finds increase in anti-Jewish discrimination
Antisemitism report finds increase in anti-Jewish discrimination

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Antisemitism report finds increase in anti-Jewish discrimination

A new report into antisemitism has laid out a number of recommendations, including that the NHS tackle what it found was a "specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism". Launched by the Board of Deputies of British Jews in 2024, the report made 10 recommendations after taking evidence from a range of organisations, including the NHS, the arts industry and the John Mann, the government's independent advisor on antisemitism, who led the review with ex-Conservative cabinet minister Dame Penny Mordaunt, said the commission heard "shocking experiences".He said it was "unacceptable" there had been what he called an "onslaught of antisemitism" in the UK since 7 October. He added that they hoped the recommendations would provide guidance and 1,200 people were killed in a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, while 251 others were taken Israeli military launched an ongoing campaign in Gaza in response to the attack. At least 57,823 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health majority of the recommendations in the report pointed towards antisemitism training in different was the creation of an "Antisemitism Training Qualification" for those who carry out training on what it called "contemporary antisemitism". It explained that Jewish communal organisations wanted to increase knowledge on anti-Jewish discrimination, which could be done if there was a standard training given by a "credible provider".On Jewish identity, it said Judaism "should always be seen and understood... as an ethnicity as well as a religion", which the commission said would ensure antisemitism is dealt with report found many Jewish employees within the NHS felt antisemitism was not being addressed in the workplace, as well as some Jewish patients feeling "uneasy about using the service".Among its recommendations are that the NHS should hold a summit to tackle the "specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism" within the health service. It also suggested that antisemitism should be included in all Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) training, which it said would increase the number of people "educated" about it and "confident in tackling it"."No person should face abuse or discrimination whilst going about their business, whether it is pursuing the career of their choice or accessing public services," Dame Penny education, the report claimed to have received evidence of some Christian primary school teachers "inadvertently using antisemitic tropes" in subjects such as religious said it welcomed an initiative proposed by the Winchester Diocese and the local Jewish community to teach the teachers how to avoid doing so, and recommended that it be evaluated and applied to all faith Board of Deputies said that while it believed "everyone should have the right to express their opinions and beliefs", those in a role of "welfare, safety or security... have an additional duty to ensure people feel able to ask for their assistance".Other recommendations asked that Jewish members of the arts industry and unions be treated key recommendation was on policing and devising a "consistent approach" to dealing with antisemitic of Deputies president Phil Rosenberg said the report could be "summarised as one of a failure to apply the protections rightly afforded to different vulnerable groups equally to Jewish people in the same positions".

Vulnerable mental health service user exposes deadly "crisis" in Glasgow system
Vulnerable mental health service user exposes deadly "crisis" in Glasgow system

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Vulnerable mental health service user exposes deadly "crisis" in Glasgow system

Marius Samavicius, 33, launched his own investigation after a three-year battle for support, which saw his suicidal thoughts referenced as a 'lovely wee email'. A deadly "crisis" over mental health care in Scotland's biggest city has been exposed by a service user who claims they was denied help in their darkest time. Marius Samavicius launched an investigation after a three-year battle for support in Glasgow, which saw the 33-year-old's suicidal thoughts referenced as a 'lovely wee email'. ‌ The artist found almost one in three of the more than 86,000 people seeking help from Glasgow's adult Community Mental Health Teams over the last seven years were rejected for care, while more than 1,100 people died under the service. ‌ The data - branded "heartbreaking" by campaigners - revealed just 6% of those accepted for care were referred for psychology over the period, between 2018 and 2024. The figures come amid a backdrop of shattering cuts to other mental health services across the city and show the number of people seeking help was at its highest over the last two years - as were the number of rejections. Marius, whose mental health battle led to them becoming homeless during Covid, said: 'Asking for mental health support takes courage and many stay silent out of fear or shame. 'I was shocked by the sheer number of people who died in care. How many died before seeking help, or after being rejected or discharged? The NHS doesn't publish this data. 'The NHS mental health system isn't broken - it's already collapsed and patients are left under the rubble. ‌ 'There's no scan that proves mental illness, so people are often dismissed as dramatic, unstable, or 'not ready' for therapy.' Data released under the Freedom of Information Act shows that 86,226 patients sought help through 10 of the city's adult centres during the period. The figures refer to Shawpark Resource Centre in Maryhill, North east Glasgow's Arran, Auchinlea and Springpark centres, the Arndale and Riverside centres in the North West of the city as well as Brand Street, Florence Street, Rossdale and the Stewart Centre in the south. ‌ Nearly one in three people (27,431) were rejected outright for care for various reasons while 9,649 were discharged from care for failing to attend appointments. A total of 1,103 patients died under the care of the service. Across nine of the centres, excluding Shawpark, which could not provide complete data, just 6% (5,310 patients) were allocated to psychology, while 7,135 completed treatment. ‌ The longest wait time for treatment hit 81 weeks - 4.5 times longer than Scotland's 18-week target. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Marius demanded answers after his battle for support through Shawpark. ‌ A subject access request exposed correspondence in which staff handling a complaint from Marius which referenced suicidal thoughts describe it as a 'lovely wee email' in 2023. Marius said there was no subsequent risk assessment or welfare check. The artist claims they were discharged from the service three times through no fault of their own and were never put on the psychology waiting list. ‌ They said: 'When I was finally assessed by Shawpark, I was told that trauma therapy might make me worse. I felt dismissed and written off but charity LGBT Health and Wellbeing responded immediately. They gave me weekly sessions and, despite limited resources, offered around 20 sessions of wellbeing and trauma-focused support.' In March, the Glasgow Integrated Joint Board (IJB) for Health and Social Care services set a budget that included £42 million worth of cuts across a range of services, including lifeline mental health services like counselling, psychotherapy and trauma recovery. Scottish Labour Mental Health spokesperson Paul Sweeney MSP said: 'These heartbreaking figures show the cost of failing to support mental health services. ‌ 'Services like this are stretched to breaking point under the SNP, leaving far too many Scots falling through the cracks. 'With thousands of people being turned away from our health service in their hour of need, it's clear the founding principles of our NHS have been compromised.' ‌ NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde apologised to Marius for any distress caused but insisted that appropriate treatment was offered. A spokesman said: 'Our staff continue to work tirelessly to meet the increasing demands for psychological therapies and to ensure those who need to support of our teams are seen as quickly as possible. 'In line with the national policy, patients referred to our services will be assessed and if appropriate will be redirected or supported to alternative services. Those who are rejected include patients who are given advice about treatment, referred to other services, or in cases where a referral is inappropriate or incomplete.' ‌ The Scottish Government said mental health was an 'absolute priority' and expects its overall spending to be over £1.3 billion for the next year. A spokeswoman said: 'Every death by suicide is a tragedy and our heartfelt sympathies go out to all those affected by suicide. We expect anyone in distress or experiencing suicidal thoughts who presents themselves to NHS or community services to be treated with respect and receive timely access to high quality and safe mental health care, as close to home as possible. 'Whilst one in two people start psychological therapy treatment within three weeks of referral, some people still wait too long, so we will continue to provide enhanced support to those health boards not on track to meet the standard.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store