Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing.
Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws.
The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion.
The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion.
The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.'
But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach.
'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.'
Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity.
The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday.
In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments.
The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures.
CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sila Realty Trust Completes Acquisition of a Two-Property Medical Outpatient Building Portfolio for $16.15 Million
TAMPA, Fla., August 04, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: SILA) (the "Company", "we", or "our"), a net lease real estate investment trust ("REIT") with a strategic focus on investing in the growing and resilient healthcare sector, today announced the $16.15 million acquisition of two medical outpatient buildings ("MOBs") located in Southlake, Texas, an affluent suburb in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA (the "Portfolio" or "Southlake Healthcare Facilities"). The Portfolio is comprised of one gastroenterology center and one ambulatory surgery center ("ASC") with an overlapping physician group and patient population, benefiting from strong operational synergies due to their complementary uses and proximity to each other. The gastroenterology center is leased to GI Alliance, the largest gastroenterology group in the United States and a subsidiary of investment grade-rated Cardinal Health. The ASC is leased to a joint venture between a partnership comprised of Baylor Scott & White Health and United Surgical Partners International and a group of physicians. "The operational integration of the Southlake Healthcare Facilities paired with the strong institutional support of the tenancies are key characteristics that we seek in the triple-net lease healthcare facilities that we endeavor to own," stated Michael A. Seton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. "The ASC's affiliation with Baylor Scott & White Health and the tenants' focus on the best possible outcomes for patients result in strong operating performance and, consequently, durable income streams for Sila." About GI Alliance & Cardinal Health GI Alliance is the largest gastroenterology group in the United States with over 1,000 physicians across the country. Partnering with the nation's premier independent gastroenterology physician practices, GI Alliance supports operational management, ancillary service development, and patient engagement, enabling practices to focus on providing the highest quality patient care while maintaining clinical autonomy. In January 2025, Cardinal Health acquired a 73% majority stake in GI Alliance for approximately $2.8 billion. Cardinal Health is a publicly traded, global healthcare services and products company that serves nearly 90% of all U.S. hospitals. The company provides customized solutions for hospitals, healthcare systems, pharmacies, ambulatory surgery centers, clinical laboratories, physician offices and patients in the home and is the 14th highest revenue generating company in the U.S. It is also the largest distributor of medical supplies and surgical products across the country. About Baylor Scott & White Health and United Surgical Partners International Baylor Scott & White Health ("BSWH") is the largest not-for-profit healthcare system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States with more than 7,200 physicians and over 57,000 total employees. BSWH operates at 52 hospitals and over 1,300 clinics and care sites across north and central Texas, with the nearest hospital, the 302 bed Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, approximately two miles from the Southlake Healthcare Facilities. United Surgical Partners International ("USPI") is a for-profit subsidiary of Tenet Healthcare, operating as the largest ambulatory surgery service provider in the United States. USPI serves as a platform for partnerships with physicians and not-for-profit health systems, offering high-quality, convenient, outpatient surgical care. Today, USPI has over 535 ASCs and surgical hospitals across 37 states. About Sila Realty Trust, Inc. Sila Realty Trust, Inc., headquartered in Tampa, Florida, is a net lease real estate investment trust with a strategic focus on investing in the growing and resilient healthcare sector. The Company invests in high quality healthcare facilities along the continuum of care in the pursuit of generating predictable, durable, and growing income streams. Sila's portfolio comprises high quality tenants in geographically diverse facilities, which are positioned to capitalize on the dynamic delivery of healthcare to patients. As of March 31, 2025, the Company owned 136 real estate properties, and two undeveloped land parcels, located in 66 markets across the United States. For more information, please visit the Company's website at Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained herein, other than historical fact, may be considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of trends and uncertainties. No forward-looking statement is intended to, nor shall it, serve as a guarantee of future performance. You can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "outlook," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "seek," "should," "will" and other similar terms and phrases. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations, and you should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond the Company's control and could materially affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance or future achievements or events. Additional factors include those described under the section entitled Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of Part I of the Company's 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 3, 2025, a copy of which are available at The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. View source version on Contacts Investor Contact: Miles Callahan, Senior Vice President of Capital Markets and Investor Relations833-404-4107IR@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swiss Face 72-Hour Race to Lower Trump's ‘Absurd' 39% Tariff
(Bloomberg) -- The Swiss government held crisis talks on Monday to come up with a proposal that might dissaude US President Donald Trump from imposing 39% tariffs on the country in less than three days. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance With the rate — the highest among industrial nations — set to go into effect on Aug. 7, President and Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter convened an emergency meeting of the governing Federal Council on Monday to discuss how to proceed. Separately, negotiators with the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs have reached out to their US counterparts to try and find a way forward. The agency, which hammered out a far more favorable tentative deal with the US more than a month ago, also held a briefing with business leaders on Monday. Keller-Sutter, who was criticized in the Swiss press over the weekend for allowing Trump to blindside her without a backup plan, said she would be willing to make a last-minute trip to Washington if she thought there was a chance a deal could be made. 'I don't rule out such a visit, but first, the two sides should come closer together in their positions,' she told the newspaper Schweiz am Wochenende. It's not clear what, if any, response there has been from the US government. 'It's unfortunate that the Swiss took so much time' to react, says Thomas Borer, a former Swiss diplomat who now runs his own consulting firm, echoing the criticism made in the press. Despite the backlash, the Swiss president doesn't face any immediate danger of losing her job. The system is designed for continuity, and the presidency rotates on an annual basis, meaning her term running the country will come to a close at the end of the year. The Trump administration justified Friday's move by claiming that Switzerland had in essence stolen money from the US and should therefore be hit with a tariff rate commensurate with the trade deficit — a notion Ketter-Sutter dismissed as 'absurd.' Switzerland ran a $38 billion bilateral trade surplus with the US last year, according to US Census data, which was the 13th biggest for the world's largest economy. While Swiss exports to the US collapsed after the introduction of tariffs in April, they rebounded in June, suggesting that trade between the two countries remained robust. What Bloomberg Economics Says... 'We estimate that this represents a tariff shock of around 23 percentage points for the Swiss economy, putting roughly 1% of its GDP at risk over the medium term.' -Jean Dalbard, economist. For full React, click here There are not many routes available to Switzerland, but one is to offer to buy liquefied natural gas from the US. While the landlocked country is focused on hydroelectric and nuclear power, it does use a small amount of gas, primarily in the winter to cushion swings in its energy supply. Should Switzerland choose to import more gas, it would have to travel through neighboring countries, which could potentially increase transit costs. So far, the expectation appears to be that Keller-Sutter and the government will secure a better deal. The Swiss market benchmark SMI was down just 0.43% as of 11:37 a.m. on Monday. 'We expect negotiations to bring the 39% Swiss tariff rate closer to the 15% agreed with the EU,' Lombard Odier investment strategists said in a research note. 'In the unlikely event that this trade dispute is not resolved,' they added, they will revise their forecast for gross domestic product. Given the 'volatility of decisions we've seen from the US,' there's hope that a solution may be found, Franziska Ryser, a lawmaker of the Green party, told Bloomberg. 'On the other hand, we must draw political conclusions from the situation and acknowledge that — at least under the Trump administration — America is no longer a reliable partner,' she said. 'This means that we should strengthen cooperation with the EU and coordinate more closely with our European partners.' --With assistance from Dylan Griffiths and Anna Shiryaevskaya. How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Nancy Mace launches South Carolina governor bid
Rep. Nancy Mace (R) launched her run for South Carolina governor early Monday, joining a crowded Republican primary field to succeed Gov. Henry McMaster (R-S.C.). Mace posted a video that concludes with a graphic that reads 'Nancy Mace For Governor.' 'Do you like our X header?' she asked in a post on the social media site with the same image. Mace reportedly has an event scheduled at her alma mater, The Citadel, at 7:30 a.m. EDT Monday. The firebrand South Carolina congresswoman had teased a potential run in recent days. Last Monday, she released a video highlighting the governor's race and President Trump's praise for her. The video included the caption 'Coming soon.' According to Fox News, Mace told a crowd at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics over the previous weekend that 'not only do you pick presidents, maybe you can pick the next South Carolina governor too while we're here today, because we're going to be announcing a run very shortly potentially for that as well.' Mace joins fellow Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), state Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, and state Sen. Josh Kimbrell (R) in the primary. Mace told Fox News that if she launched a gubernatorial bid, it would be a 'two-man race' between her and Wilson. 'If I get in, I will fight to the finish, and I will take out South Carolina's attorney general, because he's turned a blind eye on women and on children and on the state for a lot of reasons. He might force me to do this,' Mace said. The congresswoman accused four men of sexual misconduct in a speech on the House floor earlier this year and accused Wilson of not prosecuting the men. 2024 Election Coverage Wilson has denied Mace's accusations, saying they were not made to him or his office. A poll released by the South Carolina Policy Council showed Mace narrowly leading Wilson in the primary among Republican identifying voters.
