Gun groups want law reversed on mailing through postal service
Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation, together with Pennsylvania resident Bonita Shreve have filed a lawsuit in the Western District of Pennsylvania against the United States Postal Service. The Pennsylvania resident wants to mail her father a handgun as a gift, according to the filing, but is prohibited by federal law and Postal Service regulations.
In their filing the plaintiffs argue that the Postal Service allows businesses and government officials to ship handgun and that individual Americans should have the same ability. Private shipping companies like UPS and FedEx have policies prohibiting shipping a handgun, the filing states.
"The federal government's Prohibition-era ban on mailing handguns violates the Second Amendment," Erich Pratt, Senior Vice President of Gun Owners of America, said in a statement.
Sam Paredes, with the Gun Owners Foundation, said in a statement that the law was passed in a different time.
"Every day this ban remains in effect, it infringes on the rights of law-abiding Americans who are fully entitled to exercise all of their Second Amendment freedoms," Paredes said.
Mailing a handgun is currently a Class E felony punishable by up to $250,000 fine and two years in prison.
A spokesperson for the Postal Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
LGBTQ+ mental health hotline shuts down
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — The LGBTQ-specific part of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline shut down Thursday following a directive from the Trump administration, drawing bipartisan criticism from lawmakers and mental health advocates who warn the move endangers lives. The specialized LGBTQ+ line, launched in 2022, offered targeted support for individuals in crisis and had fielded more than 1.2 million calls, texts, and chats since its debut. 'There's more than a million of those moments where someone thought it would be better if they weren't here, and they had someone to call,' said Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.). The Trump administration eliminated resources for diversity, equity and inclusion programs, including this crisis line. 'It's been very successful,' said Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.). 'And President Trump has determined to put politics ahead of care, ahead of saving lives.' According to the Trevor Project, about 40 percent of LGBTQ youth seriously considered suicide in the past year. Those with access to affirming mental health services like the 988 line were significantly less likely to attempt it. Even some Republicans, such as Rep. Mike Lawler (N.Y.), are urging the Department of Health and Human Services to restore the LGBTQ+ line. 'To me, this is about saving lives,' said Lawler. 'It is about preventing suicide. And it's something all of us as Americans should be unified on.' Lawmakers say the shutdown not only strips away critical mental health support but also sends a harmful message to vulnerable communities. 'Whether you are part of the LGBTQ community, whether someone in your family is or you have friends that are, every single one of us should be concerned about that,' Davids said. Lawmakers have sent a letter urging HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to immediately reverse the shutdown. As of now, the agency has not announced any changes.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Most think GOP tax bill will help wealthy, harm the poor: Survey
Most Americans think that President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which he signed into law earlier this month, will help those who are wealthy and harm those who are poor, according to a new survey that was released Friday morning. The new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 64 percent of U.S. adults said the Republican-led tax and spending bill, which Trump signed into law on July 4, will do 'more to help' wealthy people. On the flip side, 7 percent said it would do more to hurt them, while 27 percent said it would not make a difference. Just over a quarter, 26 percent, said the bill would benefit middle-class people. Just over half, 51 percent, said it would hurt them, while 22 percent said it would not make a difference, according to the survey. Similarly, 24 percent of respondents argued the legislation would do more to help 'people like you,' while 51 percent argued it would do more to hurt them, according to the poll. Some 23 percent stated the bill would not make a difference. Just 1-in-5 said the tax and spending law would do more to help low-income people. The majority, 61 percent, said the legislation would do more to hurt those people, while 17 percent argued it would not make a difference, the survey showed. Democratic Party voters are more likely to say the legislation would assist the wealthy and hurt the middle-class and the poor, compared to Republicans. GOP voters are more likely to state the 'big, beautiful bill' will aid rather than harm the middle-class, according to the poll. When it comes to the impact on low-income Americans, the sides are divided. Around four-in-10 Republicans think the bill would do more to help low-income people, while just three percent of Democrats said the same. Some 17 percent of independents argued the legislation would do more to help those who are low-income. Trump's massive spending bill would bring new tax breaks for older adults and overtime workers. The legislation includes funding to help hire border patrol agents and officers. The package also reduces green energy tax credits and cuts Medicaid and food assistance programs. A CNN poll released Wednesday found that 61 percent of Americans oppose the GOP's massive package. Only 11 percent said they 'strongly support' the bill, along with 27 percent who said they 'somewhat support' it. A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll, which was published on Monday, found that Americans were split, with 44 percent saying they supported the 'big, beautiful bill.' Another 44 percent said they did not support it. Some 12 percent were unsure. The poll was conducted from July 10-14 among 1,437 adults. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
Buzz Feed
25 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Project 2029: What The People Really Want From Democrats
The Democratic Party is in the process of preparing for the next presidential election, and The New York Times reported at the end of June that they're working on a new policy agenda called "Project 2029," a play on the conservative Project 2025 plan that Republicans began enacting after President Trump took office. We recently asked the BuzzFeed Community what they'd want to see in this Project 2029, and here's what 29 of them had to say: "Tax billionaires their fair share and use that money to subsidize childcare, healthcare, and any other basic life necessities." —dellarock "Abolish ICE, restore abortion rights, implement term limits, and expand the Supreme Court." —ughwhyargh "Take Project 2025 and add a 'no' in front of everything. We need to reverse the damage they've done. Then add provisions for childcare, judicial ethics, education funding, and campaign reform." "Given the defeat we suffered, we can't push through a lot of identity politics until people are more ready. That's where education comes in. We just need to win, please. I can't take another MAGA fiasco."—putzik47 "Maybe not bombing civilians overseas and policing the world like every other democrat and republican party and president has done for decades." —metrofan "Find a moderate middle-of-the-road agenda that ALL Americans can identify with and restore the changes of Project 2025. Organize a 'shadow government group' like Trump did at Mar-a-Lago around a charismatic personality with believable integrity." —goldensorcerer758 "Raise the minimum wage so people can at least try to keep up with the cost of living." —shaboomer "Equal protection means equal protection. Religion is not a basis to deny someone medical coverage at work. It is not a reason not to bake a cake. It is not a reason to discriminate against someone. Reverse Dobbs and protect women at all costs." —Michael, Yahoo "A plan if a president is not reelected and refuses to leave the White House. Bills so that the next president has very limited executive order writing power. Reverse all of the current president's executive orders. All of us know we have internal, state, and federal audits so that everyone is doing their job and not stealing, so hire the federal workers back." —Anonymous, 61, Virginia "They need to undo everything that DOGE took away. I think they need to make requirements that dictate that any member of the president's cabinet needs to be qualified and an expert in the field of that cabinet position." "They should also work on strengthening the requirements (aka no felonies, have a bachelor's degree, and add a maximum age) to be president or any other member of Congress."—Anonymous, 38, Colorado "I think one of the Democrats' top priorities should be increasing taxes on corporations and implementing a significant flat tax rate on the ultra wealthy (something akin to Mamdani's proposed 2% tax on the top 1% of earners in NYC) in order to increase the federal budget for programs like Social Security and Medicare for all." —Anonymous, 29, Allentown, PA "Politicians at all levels need to find funds and prioritize infrastructure projects. Clean air, clean water, ecosystem restoration and preservation, transportation (rails, roads, bridges, rivers), electric and pipeline grids, mail and communication, etc." —Anonymous, 75 Minnesota "Destroy monopolies. And rein in private equity firms." —Anonymous, 32 "National voting should be either: A) moved to Saturday to afford the most people the opportunity to vote, or B) made a national holiday to allow for more voters." —Anonymous, 70 Los Angeles "Use the new executive authority in our favor and against the conservative movement. Conservatives are not going to appreciate the constitution or checks and balances in power until they see such power used against them, so I reject the idea that the next Democrat President should worry about decorum and 'decency' the way Biden did." "I want to see some sweeping executive orders from our side for once. In fact, it should be a goal to make the six conservative justices irrelevant, and for the next Democrat in power to make them regret giving the executive branch so much power. "—Anonymous, 31, Bremerton, Washington "32-hour workweeks and guaranteed vacation time (no less than four weeks per year)." —Anonymous, Mel, Ohio "Restore funding for public media and PBS, renewed funding for research and science, projects aimed at reducing climate change, and creation of sustainable housing plans." —Anonymous, 47, West Monroe, LA "Graduated flat tax with no deductions and balanced budget amendment." —Anonymous, 64 Wilmington, Delaware "Every citizen should be required to register and vote, and be fined if they fail to do so." —Anonymous, 75 Minnesota "I would like to see leaders make decisions that would benefit the younger generations, so policies on climate change, making housing prices more affordable, and equal salaries for men and women." —Anonymous, 21, Ohio "Sign into law that ALL employees, regardless of what they do, are guaranteed a minimum of three weeks of paid time AND 10 paid sick days. This should apply to part-time employees as well, so corporate jerks can't just cut the little guy's hours to get around it. The people who need paid time off the most are usually the ones least likely to have it." —Anonymous, 46, NJ "Plans to overturn the Citizens United ruling. So much of the mess we're in now came about because corporations and lobbyists are allowed to give basically as much money as they want to politicians." —Anonymous, 24, Utah"No more millionaires and corporations donating to political parties."—Anonymous, 70, Milwaukee "No more than $50,000 should be spent on any political campaign. Anyone caught spending over should be immediately disqualified and banned from ever running for any campaign again. Lifetime ban. PERIOD. " —Anonymous, 68 Omaha "Equal rights for everyone. That's it, that's the bullet point in the plan. No asterisks." —Anonymous, 40, Seattle "Define marriage as a legal partnership between two consenting people of adult age, with sexual and/or gender identity not mattering. If we want church and state to truly be separate, making all forms of marriage federally valid on a constitutional level is required. That means a marriage between a gay couple should be just as valid as one between a man and a woman, period." —Anonymous, 33, USA "Considering Roe v. Wade got taken down in federal courts and women are literally dying in certain states due to a lack of medical care while having a miscarriage, make medically needed abortions of any kind a federal right for all women and/or any pregnant human, at a minimum. Furthermore, I want it added as an Amendment to the USA's Constitution." —Anonymous, 33, Illinois "Medicaid for all. Daycare until the age of six. Six months of paid maternal leave for the parents of newborns. Make the Fairness Doctrine law. What Congress funds, no one can suspend. Tax the rich." —SheilaB, Yahoo "Close the loopholes and tax the billionaires... Heavily. Term limits for all. Put a reasonable cap on campaign contributions. Emoluments Clause enforcement. If congressional leaders can't work together and make progress on issues, then paychecks for those leaders also stop. Do the job or find a new job, they work for US." —Crabstar, Yahoo And finally, "Student debt forgiveness." —Anonymous, 48 Dallas, TX Now I'd love to know: what do you think? Do you agree with the ideas laid out here, or are there other things you'd like to add? Let us know in the comments. And if you'd like to remain anonymous, you can use the form below. Comments have been edited for length and clarity.
