Birmingham bin strike talks break down as council reaches ‘absolute limit' in pay offer
Members of Unite, which is representing the workers, have been on an all-out strike since early March, leading to rubbish piling up in the streets of the city.
The union began the strike after alleging that the council's decision to remove Waste Recycling and Collection Officer (WRCO) roles would mean 170 workers would face losing up to £8,000 a year.
The council said the change was necessary as part of a restructuring effort aimed at improving the service and complying with the Environmental Act 2021.
The city's recycling rate, at 22.9 per cent, is the lowest of any unitary authority in the country with the exception of Liverpool. If it fails to meet the government's target rate of 65 per cent by 2035, it could face a reduction in grant funding.
Council leader John Cotton said in a statement on Wednesday: 'Throughout this process the council has sought to be reasonable and flexible, but we have reached the absolute limit of what we can offer.
'We have negotiated in good faith but unfortunately Unite has rejected all offers so we must now press ahead to both address our equal pay risk and make much needed improvements to the waste service. This is a service that has not been good enough for a long time and we must improve it.
'Unite's demands would leave us with another equal pay bill of hundreds of millions of pounds, which is totally unacceptable, and would jeopardise the considerable progress we have made in our financial recovery.
'We must be fair to all our staff, and I will not repeat the mistakes of the past by making decisions that would ultimately result in further cuts to services and the sale of more council assets.'
Conciliation service Acas has been mediating talks between the two groups since May.
Spokesperson Kevin Rowan said: "It's unfortunate that this round of talks have concluded without resolution. Acas remains available to both parties should the situation change."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Heathrow Airport's expansion plans to cost £49bn, plans reveal
Heathrow Airport has revealed details of its plan to expand and modernise the airport at a cost of £49bn. Thomas Woldbye, CEO of Heathrow Airport, said expansion was "urgent" as the airport was currently working at capacity, "to the detriment of trade and connectivity". The work would be funded by private government has backed plans for a third runway, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves saying it would "make Britain the world's best connected place to do business".However, the plans face opposition from environmental groups, politicians, and locals. London's mayor Sir Sadiq Khan said it would have a "severe impact on noise, air pollution and meeting our climate change targets". The plans come a day after the deadline set by the government for parties to submit plans, which it estimates would be completed within a decade, include:Creation of a third runway, called the "North-Western Runway", which would be up to 3,500m (11,500 ft) long. Heathrow bosses say this will increase capacity to 756,000 flights and 150m passengers a year - it currently serves about 84mA new terminal called T5X, expanding Terminal 2 and three new satellite terminals. It would close Terminal 3Enhancement of local rail connections, plus walking and cycling routesDiversion of the M25, which would involve a new road tunnel under the airport, and widening the motorway between junctions 14-15Creation of two new Heathrow parkways Improvements to Heathrow's bus and coach stationsHeathrow said it would cost £21bn to build the third runway, which includes procuring the land, changing the M25 and other associated infrastructure costs while building the new terminal would be £12bn and modernising the current airport's infrastructure £15bn. Due to rounding, it will total £49bn.A spokesperson added the plans would grow the UK economy by 0.43% GDP. 'Unlock billions' The plans revealed by Heathrow were welcomed by business groups and airline companies. A joint statement from the Confederation of British Industry, British Chambers of Commerce, MakeUK, Federation of Small Businesses and Institute of Directors, said it was "an investment in the nation's future".It added: "The benefits are clear: for exporters, it opens up vital access to major and emerging markets; for visitors, it enhances global and domestic connectivity; and for businesses, it unlocks billions in private investment, strengthening supply chains, creating jobs, and driving skills across the country."John Dickie, chief executive of BusinessLDN, said as the airport was currently operating at full capacity, the expansion would give businesses "better connectivity to overseas markets and support Britain's growth".He added it would also help achieve the government's target of 50 million international visitors per year to the UK. Environmental damage Mr Woldbye said Heathrow's submission was in line with the aviation industry's target to be net zero by 2050. He added that Heathrow was "the airport in the world with the highest uptake of Sustainable Aviation Fuel", and that planning permission would not be granted by government unless legal limits of emissions were adhered to. However, the plans were heavily criticised by groups who called the environmental justifications for the plans as "hopeful marketing spin". Dr Douglas Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK, said the government had "decided yet again to prioritise more leisure opportunities for a comparatively small group of frequent fliers, whilst the rest of us have to live with the consequences of their disproportionate polluting".He suggested a "frequent flier levy", and said no expansion should take place until there was a solution to the "pollution problem". His concerns were echoed by politicians including Sir Sadiq who said he remained "unconvinced" that hundreds of thousands of additional flights each year would not have a "hugely detrimental" added City Hall would "carefully scrutinise" the impact the extension would have on people living in the area and the "huge knock-on effects for our transport infrastructure, which would require a comprehensive and costed plan to manage". A Liberal Democrat spokesperson said: "Heathrow is already the single largest polluter in the UK, and the Climate Change Committee itself has said expansion would put the UK's climate goals at risk."It's also clear we can't rely on the silver bullet of Sustainable Aviation Fuels to save the day," they added. The Green Party deputy leader, Zack Polankski, said the plans were being delivered "regardless" of the environmental impact. "If Labour's environmental commitments were worth the paper they're written on, these proposals would never have seen the light of day," he residents living in Harmondsworth, near the airport, told the BBC earlier this year a third of the village would be destroyed if a third runway was to go ahead. Rival plans Heathrow's plans follow the publication of a rival proposal by the Arora Group, which has outlined a way to expand the airport without needing to redirect the M25. Owner of the group, hotel tycoon Surinder Arora, said the creation of a third runway and a new terminal, under his plans, had a cost estimate of under £25bn, not including the redevelopment of the airport's existing central proposal crucially does not involve an expensive alteration to the M25, as the group said it was possible to build a 2,800-metre (9,200 ft) third runway instead of the full-length 3,500-metre (11,500 ft) runway planned by the Group said its plan, called Heathrow West, could have a new runway fully operational by 2035, while a new terminal would open in two phases, in 2036 and 2040. Moving the M25 When asked about the added expense of altering the M25 to accommodate a new, third runway, Heathrow's CEO said: "The whole conversation about the M25 has been slightly exaggerated", and that disruption to drivers would be minimal. "We will build a new and much better M25, 100m (330 ft) to the west of the current one. It will be wider and it will be safer and it will have more capacity," Mr Woldbye added. He said plans to create a much shorter runway to avoid moving the M25 - like the one proposed by The Aurora Group - would "not provide the capacity that we and the airlines need", but said the airport would be open to a discussion with airlines about building a shorter runway if it could deliver the same benefits. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the two proposals were a "significant step towards unlocking growth, creating jobs, and delivering vital national infrastructure"."We'll consider the proposals carefully over the summer so that we can begin a review of the Airports National Policy Statement later this year," she added. 'Half the battle' BBC London's political editor Karl Mercer said: "History has not been kind to plans to build a third runway, whoever has put them forward, and whichever colour government is in power."Gordon Brown's Labour government supported Heathrow expansion in 2009 - that didn't happen. "Then during Conservative Theresa May's reign in 2018, MPs voted overwhelmingly in support of a third runway - only for a series of court challenges and then Covid to put an end to those plans. "There are plenty of Labour MPs in the capital who are still strongly opposed to expansion - 28 voted against it last time and most are still in the House. "Having bidders interested is only half the battle - the hardest half will be getting it delivered."
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
British businesses 'are facing a cacophony of risk': Labour's sent confidence to an all-time low, bosses say
Business confidence has collapsed to its lowest level on record as firms face a 'cacophony of risk' under Labour, bosses of industry warned last night. In a report that raises fresh questions over Rachel Reeves ' handling of the economy, the Institute of Directors said optimism has evaporated in the face of higher taxes, rising employment costs and red tape. Bosses called on the Chancellor to 'urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn' to help restore shattered confidence – now lower than during Covid lockdowns. Critics argue the £25 billion increase in employer national insurance (NI) contributions and higher minimum wage meted out in last October's Budget have hammered the wider economy – snuffing out growth, costing jobs and driving up prices. While the economy is slowing, inflation is the highest in the G7 at 3.6 per cent and unemployment has surged to a four-year high of 4.7 per cent. Next chief executive Simon Wolfson yesterday said he expects 'UK employment opportunities to continue to diminish' this year following the NI hike. 'We believe that this will increasingly dampen consumer spending as the year progresses,' he added. The IoD's monthly Economic Confidence Index crashed to minus 72 in July from minus 53 in June. That was the lowest reading since the survey started in July 2016. The index stood at plus 7 in July last year – underlining just how fast confidence has collapsed under Labour. IoD chief economist Anna Leach urged Labour to rule out further tax hikes on business. 'Damaging speculation around tax rises in the lead-up to the 2024 Budget caused many firms to pause investment and hiring decisions – contributing to six months of near-zero economic growth,' she said. 'With ripple effects through the economy from tax changes and signs of consumer retrenchment, many firms report that they are struggling to plan amid a cacophony of risk. 'The Government must urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn.' Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said: 'Labour have spent the last year attacking private enterprise with the zeal of a Left-wing student union so it's no surprise IoD members have lost confidence.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Burglars smash their way into Harry Redknapp's £5m home
Harry Redknapp's mansion in Dorset has been raided by masked robbers armed with hammers. The thieves stole jewellery belonging to his wife, Sandra, and other items during the burglary last Friday, it is understood. The pair were out at the time of the raid. A source told The Sun: 'It was clearly organised. The raiders must have known the house was empty.' Their £5 million home near Sandbanks, a beach resort in Dorset, is up for sale and one theory is that the thieves attained details of its floorplan via the property website Rightmove. A source said: 'The criminals would only have to keep watch on the property and break in once the coast was clear, knowing the full layout of the house in advance.' They added that the thieves, who were masked, used hammers and a sledgehammer to break down the front door of the couple's home. They were caught on CCTV rifling the gated property. Redknapp had reportedly been attending a function that evening, while his wife was in London. A spokesman told The Sun that Redknapp did not 'want to make a fuss' and that it was a 'matter for the police'. Dorset Police confirmed it was hunting for the thieves. Redknapp and Harris, both 78, moved into the home in 2021, having lived in several other properties in the area. They are currently waiting for works on another waterside villa in the Sandbanks to be completed. Sandbanks is the UK's most expensive coastal area to buy a house, according to analysis by Rightmove, with an average asking price of £1.28 million. It is the only coastal area in the country where average house prices exceed £1 million. Despite having fallen 3 per cent year-on-year, asking prices remain more than three times more expensive than the national average of £378,240. The resort is also home to the cricketer Sir Geoffrey Boycott and the interior designer Celia Sawyer, whose home suffered an attempted burglary last May.
