Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan warns employees: Customers are giving Intel failing grades, we are not in ...
Intel's new CEO
Lip-Bu Tan
delivered a stark assessment of the company's position in the
semiconductor industry
, telling employees in a global video broadcast that
Intel
has fallen from its former dominance. "Twenty, 30 years ago, we are really the leader," Tan said during the session, according to OregonLive. "Now I think the world has changed. We are not in the top 10 semiconductor companies."
The blunt remarks came as Intel began implementing massive layoffs worldwide, cutting 529 jobs in Oregon alone with thousands more expected globally. Tan's comments, reviewed by OregonLive, represent a rare glimpse into his strategic thinking since taking over from ousted CEO
Pat Gelsinger
in March.
AI race already lost, says Intel CEO
The CEO acknowledged Intel's struggles extend beyond traditional markets into the crucial artificial intelligence sector. "On training I think it is too late for us," Tan admitted, referring to
Nvidia
's commanding position in AI chip development. He described Nvidia's market position as "too strong" to challenge directly.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
After 35 Years, Her Jewelry Is Nearly Gone
The Heritage Journal
Read More
Undo
Intel's market capitalization has plummeted to around $100 billion—roughly half its value from 18 months ago—while Nvidia recently became the first company to breach the $4 trillion threshold. An Intel spokesperson later clarified that Tan's "top 10" comment referred specifically to market value rather than technological capabilities.
Intel's manufacturing push faces uncertain future
Despite the challenges, Tan outlined Intel's path forward through its upcoming
18A manufacturing process
and a shift toward edge AI applications. "Our number one priority is to make sure that our 18A is robust for our internal customer," he said, as reported by OregonLive.
The CEO emphasized that Intel's turnaround would be a "marathon," requiring the company to become more agile like competitors
AMD
and Nvidia. "We have to be humble," Tan told employees, urging them to listen to customers and respond to their needs.
Intel plans to focus on bringing AI capabilities directly to PCs and exploring agentic AI—systems that can operate independently without constant human direction. Tan hinted at additional executive hires, saying "Stay tuned. A few more people are coming on board."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO fires back at NVIDIA's Jensen Huang sparking explosive AI ethics clash. Calls his words 'the most outrageous lie'
— BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) A Battle of Beliefs Race to the Top vs. Race to the Bottom A Clash Rooted in Business and Belief In a sharply worded rebuttal that adds heat to an already simmering Silicon Valley rivalry Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has accused NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang of twisting his words and intentions on AI governance and safety. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast, Amodei slammed Huang's claim that Anthropic believes only it should be allowed to develop advanced AI systems.'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard,' Amodei said, visibly frustrated. 'I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology.'The comments come amid a widening philosophical divide in the tech world—between those calling for controlled, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, 'He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,' referring to Amodei's lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI's disruptive has indeed sounded the alarm on AI's capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs.'I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,' Huang said at the the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a 'race to the top'—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. 'When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn't matter who wins—everyone loses,' he said. 'With a race to the top, it doesn't matter who wins because everyone wins.'He pointed to Anthropic's transparent policies, such as their 'Responsible Scaling Policy' and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry.'We've released our work so others can build on it,' Amodei said. 'Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it's worth it for the field to grow responsibly.'There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei's support for semiconductor export controls to China could hinder NVIDIA's massive chip sales, particularly in the AI boom where demand for powerful GPUs is soaring. Huang, whose company stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held back his criticism of however, is adamant that the friction isn't about limiting competition but about fostering responsibility in an industry where mistakes can have global consequences.'It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion,' he said of Huang's the race toward superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights an essential question: who gets to define 'safe' in the age of AI?While Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence , the real divide may not lie in model sizes or compute power—but in values. Should AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it need more control and caution, as Amodei argues?
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Anthropic CEO fires back at NVIDIA's Jensen Huang sparking explosive AI ethics clash. Calls his words 'the most outrageous lie'
AP In a heated exchange, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refuted NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's claims about his stance on AI governance, calling them an "outrageous lie." Amodei advocates for responsible AI development, emphasizing safety and transparency, while Huang champions open innovation and market-driven progress. In a sharply worded rebuttal that adds heat to an already simmering Silicon Valley rivalry, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has accused NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang of twisting his words and intentions on AI governance and safety. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast , Amodei slammed Huang's claim that Anthropic believes only it should be allowed to develop advanced AI systems. 'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard,' Amodei said, visibly frustrated. 'I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology.' The comments come amid a widening philosophical divide in the tech world—between those calling for controlled, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full throttle. — BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) The feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, 'He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,' referring to Amodei's lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI's disruptive potential. Amodei has indeed sounded the alarm on AI's capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs. 'I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,' Huang said at the summit. On the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a 'race to the top'—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. 'When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn't matter who wins—everyone loses,' he said. 'With a race to the top, it doesn't matter who wins because everyone wins.' He pointed to Anthropic's transparent policies, such as their 'Responsible Scaling Policy' and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry. 'We've released our work so others can build on it,' Amodei said. 'Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it's worth it for the field to grow responsibly.' There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei's support for semiconductor export controls to China could hinder NVIDIA's massive chip sales, particularly in the AI boom where demand for powerful GPUs is soaring. Huang, whose company stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held back his criticism of Amodei. Amodei, however, is adamant that the friction isn't about limiting competition but about fostering responsibility in an industry where mistakes can have global consequences. 'It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion,' he said of Huang's the race toward superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights an essential question: who gets to define 'safe' in the age of AI? While Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence, the real divide may not lie in model sizes or compute power—but in values. Should AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it need more control and caution, as Amodei argues?
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Microsoft breaks from 30-year tradition of naming rivals in filings
Tech giant Microsoft has ceased naming its competitors in its annual report in a notable shift away from a common corporate disclosure strategy it had followed for 30 years. The company's 2024 annual filing, released earlier this week, does not mention longtime rivals such as Apple and IBM, nor does it cite emerging AI players like Anthropic or Databricks as its 2023 annual report, Microsoft listed more than 25 companies as direct competitors. The company has consistently identified its adversaries in public filings since at least 1994. The same goes for other players in the space, like Apple, Facebook parent Meta and Nvidia, who name their rivals in Windows and CoPilot maker now describes its competitive landscape with references only to categories like productivity software, PC operating systems, and cloud change was intended to reflect the 'fast-moving nature' of today's technology markets, CNBC reported, citing a company spokesperson, with a focus on broader market dynamics rather than individual the omission in official filings, Microsoft executives continue to acknowledge competitors in other forums. CEO Satya Nadella referenced Amazon during the company's recent earnings call. Scott Guthrie, executive vice president of Microsoft's Cloud and AI group, pointedly noted at a May conference that 'some cloud providers, like AWS, still haven't launched a GB200 offering.' The comment referred to Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 systems, which integrate 72 high-powered graphics processing Microsoft is stepping back from naming names, it's not alone in doing so. Amazon hasn't listed competitors in its reports since 1999. Tesla last did so in 2020, and Google's parent company, Alphabet, halted the practice after recently reported a strong June quarter , posting a 24% jump in net income at $27.2 billion, primarily driven by growth in AI and cloud technology. The stronger-than-expected earnings and bullish guidance propelled Microsoft's share, with market capitalisation briefly crossing the $4-trillion mark , making it the second company after Nvidia to achieve the milestone.
