McDowell County Schools prioritizes school bus safety after several close calls
During the 2024-25 school year, there have been many close calls when kids are getting on and off school buses throughout the county.
Assistant Superintendent, Amanda Peyton explained one specific example where an elementary age girl was trying to cross the road after getting off the school bus. This girl was almost hit by a car that did not stop for the halted school bus.
W.I.L.D. Institute unites women in firefighting for first Women's Firefighter Weekend
'Thankfully, the little girl waited on the signal. So she was trained by the [bus] driver to wait. That [car] driver just sped through, just really exceeding through there. One mile an hour [over] is too much. You know that that car was really speeding. We could have lost a child,' said Peyton.
Peyton told 59News their Transportation Director, Adam Grygiel has been very insistent that they do something to crack down on the incidents.
Cameras were already installed to capture the front-facing view of the bus, but now an additional rear-facing camera has been added to each bus. As soon as the 'stop' arm goes out, that camera starts recording. This captures pictures and camera footage of the driver, car, and license plate. This will be used if the driver decides against stopping for a school bus.
McDowell County Schools have began sending the film and photos to the McDowell County Sheriff's Department. Peyton said McDowell County Sheriff Muncy and his team are working to issue citations and fines for those who try to pass stopped school buses on the road.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
25-07-2025
- CBS News
3 immigration judges speak out about their firings: "It was arbitrary, unfair"
Washington — George Pappas, Jennifer Peyton and Carla Espinoza were all federal immigration judges fired this month by email. The three ruled on thousands of immigration cases in Chicago and Boston. "It was arbitrary, unfair," Pappas told CBS News of his firing. "And it's an attack on the rule of law. It's an attack on judges." Pappas served as an immigration judge in Boston until this week, overseeing more than 2,000 cases during his two years on the bench. Peyton led Chicago's immigration court for nearly nine years, hearing thousands of cases until she was abruptly fired over the 4th of July weekend. Peyton oversaw Espinoza, who was appointed in 2023 and decided more than 1,000 cases in the last fiscal year, double the average for immigration judges. Peyton told CBS News she received no reason for her firing. Immigration judges are under the authority of the Justice Department's Executive Office for Immigration Review. "My email was three sentences," Peyton said. "I had no cause. I had no explanation." "We as judges, were in fear, we were concerned," Espinoza added. "That makes it very difficult to be impartial. We were not succumbing to that pressure but it does feel like pressure." Both Pappas and Peyton disclosed that they were told how they should rule on immigration cases. "They told me: Grant the motions to dismiss," Pappas said. "This is when ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) was roaming the courthouses. Because if we dismissed the case, that person that responded then leaves the court vulnerable to immediate apprehension and expedited removal." CBS News has reported on the numerous cases where ICE agents detained immigrants as they exited their court hearings. "Once they left the courtroom, more often than not, they would be handcuffed and led away by the ICE officers,' Peyton added. According to the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Federal immigration courts now face a backlog nearing four million cases, with about 600 judges left to hear those cases. The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, the union that represents immigration court judges, reports that since the Trump Administration took office, more than 100 immigration judges have either been fired, transferred, or have taken retirement offers. According to the union, immigration judges are considered Justice Department employees, and therefore do not have lifetime appointments like federal judges in the judicial branch. In a Truth Social post in April, President Trump argued that, "We cannot give everyone a trial, because to do so would take, without exaggeration, 200 years." It is my opinion that this administration could give a hoot about the backlog," Pappas said. In defending its immigration crackdown, the White House has repeatedly argued that undocumented immigrants are in the U.S. illegally. And in May, the Trump administration began an effort to halt the immigration court cases of certain migrants in order to fast-track their deportation process, government officials and attorneys told CBS News at the time. Espinoza counters that the court system exists to ensure the law is followed, and attempts to circumvent it could prove to be a slippery slope. "That's why they're in proceedings in court," Espinoza said of the immigrants. "There is law that we're applying, and they might have to go, and they might it's them, it's immigrants. What about tomorrow? Who's going to get due process denied next." "If you're attacking the very judges that adjudicate cases, there's not going to be a rule of law. That should concern everybody, not just immigrants, but U.S. citizens." When reached by CBS News, the Justice Department had no comment on the union's allegations that several immigration judges had been fired without cause. And in response to claims from former judges that the firings are a targeted attack on immigration courts, the Justice Department said, "To the contrary, the Trump Administration is vigorously enforcing our nation's immigration laws." And regarding the allegations from judges who spoke to CBS News that they were pressured to rule a certain way, the Justice Department said, "Although the Biden Administration did pressure Immigration Judges to rule a certain way, including to grant motions to dismiss, the Trump Administration has restored the rule of law and is ensuring that judges are adhering to the law."Camilo Montoya-Galvez contributed to this report.
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
Warrants issued in relation fight after local high school graduation
BECKLEY, WV (WVNS) — Multiple arrest warrants were issued in connection to a fight that occurred after the Woodrow Wilson High School graduation. According to a press release from the Beckley Police Department, the fight occurred on Saturday, May 31, 2025 after the Woodrow Wilson High School graduation at the Beckley-Raleigh Convention Center. Richlands Police Department investigates reported hit-and-run accident involving a pedestrian The press release stated that it was discovered that the fight was allegedly caused by ongoing tensions between multiple people involved in the incident. The Beckley Police Department stated that during the fight, a gun was taken from one of the people involved, although the gun was reportedly never shown at the time of the fight. According to the Beckley Police Department, regardless of the event location, possessing a gun at a school sponsored event is illegal. The press release stated that as of Thursday, June 5, 2025, misdemeanor warrants were issued for: 19-year-old Jalen Marquis Cook: Charged with Possession of a deadly weapon on premises of a school-sponsored function 21-year-old Tayvon Anthony Morris: Charged with Battery 18-year-old Stephon Tyreese Yancy: Charged with Battery 18-year-old -year-old Tommy Lee Payton III: Charged with Battery 21-year-old Tytus Ira Mason: Charged with Battery 21-year-old Ty'Lai Khalis Kimble: Charged with Battery 18-year-old Zachary Lee Pennington: Charged with Battery 18-year-old Brandon Jerrell Burks Jr.: Charged with Battery 19-year-old Latrael Decors Hairston: Charged with Battery 18-year-old Madix Caiden Preast: Charged with Battery Nurse charged in Raleigh County after a child was taken to a hospital with a broken femur According to the Beckley Police Department, all people involved are believed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. In the press release, the Beckley Police Department stated that the people on the list are advised to turn themselves in at the police department. Those who may have information about the location of anyone on the list are encouraged to call the Beckley Police Department at 304-256-1720 or Crime Stoppers of West Virginia using the free P3 Tips mobile app. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
Attorney for pregnancy rights group says West Virginia law protects women who miscarry
BECKLEY, WV (WVNS) — West Virginia state code does not specifically bar a prosecutor from charging a woman who miscarries or has an abortion and then disposes of fetal remains from facing criminal charges under state code that governs disposal of human remains, but an attorney for a New York non-profit said that current laws in West Virginia do not support such a charge. Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman told 59News on Friday that he has spoken with prosecutors in West Virginia who say they are willing to file charges against women who dispose of fetal remains, using state code related to the disposal of human bodies. Truman made the statement when responding to a question posed by 59News and prompted by a case involving fetal remains in Mercer County. He emphasized he would not be willing to prosecute a woman for a pregnancy outcome. He said, however, that some prosecutors in the state would be willing to file such charges, particularly if the woman who lost the pregnancy did not seem emotionally distressed. 'I've been to prosecutor meetings where these people were all about prosecuting women for having abortions,' he added, emphasizing the strong beliefs held by some prosecutors. While West Virginia enacted a near-total ban on abortion, state law forbids prosecutors from charging women with crimes related to their own abortion or miscarriage. However, there are no laws explicitly barring a criminal prosecution based on how the woman disposes of fetal remains. Truman said on Friday that women who report the miscarriage to authorities within 48 hours would protect themselves against a potential charge of concealing a dead body. Truman's revelation of prosecutors' intentions prompted widespread focus on state code and how it may be applied in situations involving pregnancy. On Tuesday, June 3, 2025, an attorney for Pregnancy Justice, a New York group which defends women who face criminal charges based on pregnancy, agreed that there is a push among some prosecutors throughout the U.S. to file criminal charges against women for pregnancy loss and behaviors during pregnancy. Core Natural Resources officials warn miners of impending lay-off at Itmann #5 'Prosecutors wield a lot of discretion,' said Kulsoom Ijaz, senior policy counsel for Pregnancy Justice. 'There are countless unjust and unfounded prosecutions every day in this country.' In neighboring Ohio, prosecutors in Trumbull County charged a woman who flushed her toilet after a miscarriage with felony abuse of a corpse. Later, grand jurors refused to indict her on the charge, and Ijaz said Ohio laws did not support the criminal charge. Ijaz said that the legal framework in West Virginia also does not support a prosecutor bringing a charge against a miscarrying woman who flushes or otherwise disposes of fetal remains. 'West Virginia does not have a broad fetal personhood law that grants fetuses Constitutional rights,' said Ijaz. 'Those laws cannot then be taken and extended to fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses in West Virginia.' Once again, people are asking if there are mountain lions in the Mountain State Ijaz said West Virginia pregnancy law, like Ohio, is not built around the concept of 'fetal personhood,' which is the idea that a fertilized egg or a fetus has the same legal rights as a person. Ijaz said that, as a result, West Virginia law bars women from being punished or facing criminal charges related to their own abortion, miscarriage or stillbirth. She said the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has also ruled that a woman may not be charged with child abuse if she uses substances during pregnancy. 'Miscarriage and stillbirths are medical events and tragedies, not crimes, and I think people in West Virginia understand that,' she added. 'There is no basis in the law for punishing that kind of outcome.' Ijaz said that a number of states, including Alabama, have made 'fetal personhood' the law. As a result, she said, prosecutors in those states are given legal leeway to apply existing law to cases involving fertilized eggs, zygotes, embryos and fetuses. Two minors banned after reported incident at a park in Fayette County 'This has also been the basis for taking away the right to IVF care like we saw in Alabama,' Ijaz explained. 'It's also being used to prosecute and punish pregnant people for outcomes of their pregnancy, whether that's a miscarriage or a stillbirth.' She said that a proactive step West Virginia lawmakers could take is to pass laws similar to Colorado's Reproductive Health Equity Act. 'That's what I would encourage folks in West Virginia to focus on,' she said. 'And if you are a pregnant or post-partum woman who is experiencing this kind of punishment, to please reach out to Pregnancy Justice. We may be able to help.' Truman, whose comments went viral on social media, suggested on Tuesday that public discussion regarding West Virginia's reproductive and criminal law was a positive development. Truman pointed out that, unlike neighboring Ohio, West Virginia voters have not been given an opportunity since 2022 to vote on an amendment enshrining reproductive rights in the state. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
