The thick red line: Why India shouldn't agree with US on agri
While farmers in the US get over $61,000 in subsidies annually, their counterparts in India get just $282 a year.advertisementAs India rightly called the agriculture and dairy sectors a "big red line", it, in all likelihood and fairness, shouldn't give in to Trump's demands because doing so could jeopardise the livelihoods of nearly half the country's workforce dependent on agriculture, say the data and experts.It could expose the Indian market to heavily subsidised US farm dumping, undermine food security standards, some tied to religious and cultural practices, fear experts and reportedly the Indian government and a think tank."As far as the import of genetically modified (GM) soybean, maize and dairy products from the US is concerned, the government does not seem to be ready for it at all," agricultural expert Om Prakash tells India Today Digital.Then there are risks of cross-pollination from GM crops that could harm India's native seed varieties. There's also the matter of dietary sensitivities and consumer trust, especially in dairy, where feeding cattle animal remains clashes with Indian cultural and religious values."India is protective of its farmers, which is why they have relatively high tariffs compared to anywhere in the world," agricultural trade expert Sharon Bomer Lauritsen told Politoco."They're going to protect their farmers," added the former negotiator of the US Trade Representative.AGRICULTURE'S ROLE IN EMPLOYMENT: INDIA-US CONTRASTadvertisementFirst, let's look at the numbers. They will highlight how agriculture produces, employment, and their demand and supply vastly differ between India and the US, and why trade negotiations must acknowledge these realities with fairness.As of 2020, around 196.64 million people were employed in agriculture in India, compared to just 2.11 million in the US. Agriculture accounts for 41% of total employment in India, while in the US, it is merely 1%. At 14.6%, agriculture is one of the biggest components of India's GDP, while it contributes 0.92% to the American economy.When it comes to average farm size, the difference is stark.The average farm holding in the US is about 180 hectares, while in India, it is just 1.08 hectares.Farmers in the US also receive significantly more government support, with an average of $61,286 per farmer (2016), compared to $282 per farmer in India (2018–19), according to World Trade Organisation (WTO) data, accessed from Kisan Tak, India Today Digital's sister portal on agriculture, farmer welfare and environment.Agricultural expert Om Prakash says that India has been constrained by the WTO's discriminatory policies since the Agreement on Agriculture (AOA) came into effect on January 1, 1995. He argues, "India's farm subsidy is significantly lower, even more so when adjusted per farmer, yet the WTO continues to pressure India to reduce it even further".advertisementKisanTak's Prakash ties them directly to the WTO's flawed subsidy accounting method.The WTO's subsidy accounting method is flawed because it doesn't look at how many farmers India has. It just counts the total money given to them. On the other hand, the US, with fewer farmers, gives more money, and each farmer gets a much bigger sum. But in India, where millions of farmers get little help, it looks like India is giving more than it should, even when it's not.WHAT IF INDIA LOWERS TARIFFS ON US FARM AND DAIRY GOODS?To ring-fence its farmers and the agriculture sector, India is forced to charge much higher import tariffs on agricultural products compared to the US.On average, India puts a 39% tax on farm goods coming from other countries. But for the items that are imported the most, the tax goes up to 65%. This shows how strongly India protects its farmers by making imported farm goods more expensive. In contrast, the US keeps its agricultural import taxes lower, with a simple average of just 5% and a trade-weighted rate of 4%, according to data from the WTO.advertisementThe New Delhi-based think-tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has warned that reducing import tariffs on subsidised US agricultural products, particularly grains, could harm Indian farmers and destabilise food prices in India. Lowering tariffs could allow cheap, subsidised US grains to flood the Indian market, especially when global prices are low.This would potentially undercut local farmers and disrupt the domestic food supply in India.While staples like frozen shrimp, basmati rice, and spices still lead India's export basket, there's been a notable surge in shipments of processed cereals and other value-added food products. On the import side, India continues to source premium items from the US, with almonds, pistachios, and walnuts making up a significant share.NITI AAYOG BACKED GM IMPORTS, CONGRESS PROTESTEDA March NITI Aayog discussion paper titled Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade Under the New US Trade Regime highlighted stark productivity gaps between the two countries.It noted that "India's average soybean yield has stagnated around "one tonne per hectare", whereas in the US, it is "3.4 tonnes per hectare". Similarly, "maize yields in India are just 3.5 tonnes per hectare," compared to "11.1 tonnes per hectare in the US".advertisementThese differences, the now-withdrawn paper says, show there is "a clear scope for improvement" in India's agricultural productivity.The paper, whose withdrawal attracted Congress MP Jairam Ramesh's attack on the Centre, argued that beyond strategic trade management, "India must undertake medium-term structural reforms to improve the global competitiveness of its farm sector". These reforms should focus on "bridging the productivity gap with developed nations by embracing appropriate technologies", while also "nudging states to undertake long-pending reforms".It further called for "liberalising private sector participation", enhancing logistics, and developing "competitive value chains" to strengthen India's agricultural exports. The Centre's move to do the same suffered backlash during the farm protests of 2020-21.India is the world's biggest buyer of edible oil, and the US has a lot of soyabean oil to export, which comes from genetically modified crops. The NITI Aayog paper said India could allow some imports of this oil to reduce the trade imbalance with the US, without hurting local farmers."Except for cotton, no other GM crop is allowed to be cultivated in India. In such a scenario, the question of importing GM soybean and maize from the US for consumption simply does not arise. In essence, the US-India trade deal poses a trial by fire for the Indian government, to safeguard the interests of farmers, agriculture, and the faith of the country's vegetarian population," Om Prakash tells India Today Digital.The NITI Aayog paper also said India should try to get better access to the US market for top exports like shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. India earns about $5.75 billion every year from farm exports to the US, and this could grow if India negotiates for lower duties or special trade quotas.Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, on June 30, pointed out that the NITI Aayog working paper had been withdrawn from the think-tank's website. India Today Digital also could not access it. Ramesh alleged that the paper recommended duty-free import of GM maize and soyabean from the US. He added, "For the Modi sarkar, the interests of Midwestern American farmers and large Multinational Corporation traders are bigger than that of the maize farmers of Bihar and soyabean farmers of MP, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan".Lowering tariffs could also disrupt India's food security."In today's geopolitically unstable world, food security must remain sovereign," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava was quoted as saying by news agency PTI.However, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, in a June interview with the Financial Express, said that New Delhi will not compromise on areas that affect vulnerable domestic sectors.She said that agricultural and dairy sectors remain "very big red lines" in the talks.GOVT HOLDS FIRM ON BAN OVER ANIMAL-FED COW MILK PRODUCTSThen there are dietary, cultural and religious sensitivities that complicate the issue of dairy imports from the US, especially when it comes to genetically modified products or items derived from animals not raised according to the norms of several Indian communities. These concerns are deeply rooted and can't be dismissed as mere trade hurdles, as they touch upon dietary restrictions, traditional practices, and faith.India firmly maintains its ban on importing dairy products from cows fed animal-derived feed, according to the USRT's National Trade Estimate (NTE) Report, according to news agency ANI."Imagine eating butter made from the milk of a cow that was fed meat and blood from another cow. India may never allow that," GTRI's Srivastava said.Indians wouldn't like to compromise with milk and dairy products as they are used in religious rituals too.There are several reasons why the big red line exists when it comes to food imports. Cultural beliefs, employment, the agricultural markets, and concerns over the long-term impact are some of them. GM crops' impact on health and the environment is another concern. These are not just policy preferences but emotional and political red zones too.Agricultural trade is deeply sensitive in India too. These developments follow the massive farmer protests in 2020-21 and again in 2024. The policy shift revamping agricultural trade triggered protests and resistance, enough for the Centre to retract.Still, a way forward may be there. Sure, it'll take time, persuasion, trust-building, and change, which could be in favour of one of the two parties. But why not both?- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
F-16 intercepts plane for airspace incursion over Donald Trump's golf club in New Jersey
An F-16 fighter jet on Saturday intercepted a civilian aircraft for violating a temporary restriction of the airspace over President Donald Trump's golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, a statement by the US military said. US President Donald Trump is reportedly spending a holiday weekend in New Jersey.(REUTERS) The fighter jet, sent by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), escorted the general aircraft out of the restricted airspace, the New York Post reported. Trump is reportedly spending a holiday weekend in New Jersey. The incident marked the fifth unauthorised incursion of the temporary flight restriction (TFR) zone on Saturday, NORAD said. The F-16 reportedly performed what is called a 'headbutt' maneuver to draw the attention of the pilot of the civilian aircraft, following which it was escorted out. This is the latest in a string of such incidents in recent weeks, with NORAD urging civilian pilots to check all notifications before taking off. Similar incursion at Trump's Florida home The incident comes months after a similar incident took place in March, wherein a civilian aircraft entered restricted airspace over Trump's Florida residence. The incident had taken place right after Trump finished a round of golf at the West Palm Beach golf course. The F-16s had then deployed flares to get the pilot's attention. A day before this incursion, the jets had conducted an intercept right after Trump had arrived at the West Palm Beach course from his private Mar-a-logo club and residence. However, none of these intercepts have had an impact on Trump's schedule or security, as per officials. The flares deployed by the fighter jets are visible from the ground, but burn out quickly, NORAD said. However, NORAD had flagged the number of incursions which have taken place since Trump's inauguration in January. 'Adherence to TFR procedures is essential to ensure flight safety, national security, and the security of the President," Gen. Gregory Guillot, the commander of NORAD and US Northern Command, had said.
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Bulls to Blu-Smart: Mint's finest narrative journalism so far this year
Six years ago, I interviewed Isabelle Hasleder, a horse whisperer from Chennai. She helps business leaders communicate with, and understand, horses. A bit of 'horse quotient', she told me, could make people from the corporate world emotionally intelligent. We can learn immensely from other animals, too, as my colleague Sayantan Bera realized. You are certain to be endowed with 'bull quotient' if you read his profile of Anmol, a big bull that has fathered over 25,000 calves! He goes for morning walks, takes oil massages, eats cashews, almonds, apples, milk and eggs. The rich diet gives his coat an attractive shine, making him photogenic. This profile, an unusual one, is one of over 100 long reads Mint published in the first half of 2025. Our in-depth reportage mostly chronicles the rise and fall of businesses, and the people leading them. They also narrate the tale of ordinary people, those who get caught in a loop of greed because of the fear of missing out. For instance, in March, our ace market writer, Abhishek Mukherjee, and Sashind Ningthoukhongjam narrated the tale of newbie investors getting a dose of reality: Delhi-based insurance sector executive Prateek Verma, 37, says the biggest change his wife has noticed in him over the past few months is that he has become 'weirdly philosophical'. Can this be attributed to the joys of matrimony? The markets are a great leveller. Perhaps no corporation knows this better than HDFC Bank. For nearly four years, until a year ago, HDFC Bank's stock did not make any money for its investors. But things have started to change. In April, the bank's market valuation crossed ₹ 15 trillion, a landmark so far achieved only by Reliance Industries and Tata Consultancy Services. T. Surendar's in-depth analysis revolved around whether HDFC Bank can now shake up the pecking order of top global banks. Reliance Industries, meanwhile, is shaking up the business of soft drinks, and a new cola war is on the horizon. Soumya Gupta, who writes on consumer businesses, invoked nostalgia. Remember the Campa Cola ad from 1983, which featured Salman Khan? It positioned Campa Cola as the drink of choice for the cool, urban rich. They sang in English and partied at sea. Forty years later, everything has changed. Campa Cola is now just 'Campa'. The party boats in the ads have made way for traditional festivals, desi Indian sounds, and cheering cricket stadiums, with ordinary people sharing plastic bottles of Campa to the tagline 'Naye India Ka Apna Thanda'. This nationalist rebranding appears to have worked, the story tells us, with supporting data. Not all is well at Tata Consultancy Services, India's largest IT exporter. In fact, 2025-26 could be the company's most challenging year ever. N. Chandrasekaran, the Tata Sons chairman, once turbocharged the IT company as its CEO. In a move reminiscent of Nandan Nilekani returning to rescue Infosys, Chandra has now stepped in to fix things. Varun Sood, our ace investigative reporter, writes on the confusion within the company. The story ends with a billion-dollar question, just starting to do the rounds. You can't miss it. Yet another investigation by Sood focused on two companies, one public, the second one private. Blu-Smart, the private business, once emerged as the third alternative in the ride hailing business, which is dominated by Uber and Ola. It became my go-to cab service for airport trips. The electric cabs were clean, silent and the drivers very well behaved and disciplined. Even on the fast Noida-Greater Noida Expressway, they refused to drive at over 60 km an hour (scary when everyone else is going at 100 km/hr), which would violate company policy. And then, all of a sudden, the business spectacularly blew up. The problems began at the publicly listed Gensol Engineering Ltd. Sood reviewed financial statements and spoke to many executives to piece together a fascinating account of how Gensol's balance sheet was used to build Blu-Smart's business. A governance puzzle, in short. A third Mint investigation dived into the world of 'glowing' e-commerce reviews. Many of them are fake, written to manipulate you into buying. To understand the inner workings of this underground network, Shadma Shaikh, who writes on the app economy and digital culture, spent days observing messages being exchanged over nine Telegram and four WhatsApp groups. She found these groups to be hotspots, places where several key players in the network collaborated to manipulate product ratings. Samiksha Goel, who writes on startups, investigated the workings of Astrotalk, an astrology app. The company claims to have over 41,000 astrologers on its platform, consulting with more than 450,000 daily users. However, Astrotalk's relationship with astrologers has begun to fray. Mint's conversations with about 15 astrologers, five of whom have left the platform, revealed that in the last few months, Astrotalk has been pushing them to keep customers engaged longer, linking their incomes to their ability to have extended conversations. 'It's like a call centre now and not so much an astrology platform," said one astrologer. Despite being in an occupation involving predictions, they had all failed to foresee the unfortunate turn of events. Rich parents, meanwhile, want to cement their child's future. And they foresee an ivy league education as the starting point. But where and when do you begin preparing the kid? In January 2022, a class nine student from a school in Gurugram met a counsellor seeking guidance on how to get into a top college in the US to study medicine. After laying the groundwork in the first year, the counsellor asked the student to shadow a doctor when she was in class 10. For a reason: the student needed to get up close and personal with blood, guts, warts and faecal matter to understand if these were the sort of delights she wanted to deal with on a daily basis over her career. Devina Sengupta, who writes on workplaces and education, came up with this engrossing narrative on the rigour a student goes through to gain admission into an elite college. Don't miss an underlying commentary— on how upper-middle-class parents in India think. A well educated workforce, one that can re-skill and up-skill fast, works for Indian manufacturing, currently in the middle of a disruption because of artificial intelligence (AI). But the factory of the future isn't just built from steel, sensors, and AI—it's shaped by how thoughtfully we balance human potential and machine precision, Pankaj Mishra writes in this fascinating piece on Wipro. The company is testing a new model: 'Factories that think, workers who adapt, and automation built not to replace humans but to help them excel'. Yet another story that dived deep into the possibilities of human potential came from N. Madhavan, who writes on the macro-economy. His story, on how Tamil Nadu's government wooed Nike, Crocs, Puma and Adidas, narrates the tale of industrialization spreading to the state's hinterland. That has empowered people from districts previously ignored in India's manufacturing map, particularly women, like never before. And finally, I would like to draw your attention to the obsession with weight-loss, which is fuelling a drug market worth billions of dollars. Oprah Winfrey and Elon Musk have endorsed them. And though Indian celebrities haven't yet admitted to their use, the mystery slimming of Bollywood filmmaker Karan Johar and TV talk show host Kapil Sharma have drawn comparisons. T. Surendar and Jessica Jani recently wrote on the drama unfolding in 'GLP-1 drugs'—a high stakes patent battle, the rush for generic brands, coming price wars, and a long list of companies who could benefit from the weight-loss gold rush. There are other terrific long stories this compilation doesn't cover. Do check them out. They all provide what clickbait news does not and cannot—narrative journalism, in-depth reportage and data blended with analysis of top issues from the world of business and technology.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel hid massive damage from Iran's missile strike; satellite images reveal 5 military bases hit
A recent conflict saw Iranian missiles breach Israeli defenses. Satellite data reveals that some missiles hit military sites, including a major air base. While many missiles were intercepted, some caused damage. Iran adapted its tactics during the conflict. Casualties were reported on both sides. Human Rights Activists in Iran reported many deaths and injuries due to Israeli strikes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in International Satellite radar data from Oregon State University, analyzed by The Daily Telegraph, indicates that during the recent 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel, six Iranian missiles penetrated Israeli airspace and struck five military facilities, including a major air base, intelligence centers, and a logistics IDF did not confirm damage to its bases but stated that 'all relevant units maintained functional continuity throughout the operation'. With that, on the night of June 13th, the IDF called on the public not to publish the locations or photos of missile missiles impacted sites across Israel, in the north, south, and central regions, highlighting the widespread scope of Iran's offensive. Previously, it was believed that only civilian infrastructure was hit, but this data points to a more significant strategic impacts are in addition to at least 36 other Iranian missiles that penetrated Israel's air defense systems, which caused damage to residential and industrial most Iranian missiles were intercepted, the success rate of Iran's strikes improved as the war progressed, possibly due to improved launch tactics or the deployment of more advanced missile analysis also reveals that Iran's success in penetrating Israeli defenses with its missiles peaked at 16 per cent by the seventh day of the war, before declining data indicates that Iran adapted its attack strategy to overwhelm Israeli defenses by using fast missiles alongside slower drones to divert this, about 84–87 percent of Iranian missiles were intercepted, according to various Rights Activists in Iran (HRANA), a US-based organization, reported that more than 900 people have been killed and over 3,000 wounded as a result of Israeli strikes on Iranian health ministry has stated that the number of wounded exceeds 4,000.
