‘Godfather of AI' warns governments to collaborate before it's too late
Speaking at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai on Saturday, Hinton said that despite divergent national interests, no country wants AI to dominate humanity.
He noted that international cooperation is unlikely on offensive AI use – such as 'cyberattacks, lethal autonomous weapons or fake videos for manipulating public opinion.' However, nations could form a 'network of institutions' to guide the development of a highly intelligent AI 'that doesn't want to get rid of people,' Hinton added. He compared this proposed cooperation to Soviet-US collaboration on nuclear non-proliferation during the Cold War.
Hinton, often referred to as the 'Godfather of AI,' likened AI development to 'raising a tiger cub' that could become dangerous once it matures.
'There's only two options if you have a tiger cub as a pet. Figure out if you can train it so it never wants to kill you, or get rid of it,' the scientist said.
He explained that AI is likely to increasingly seek more control in order to achieve its assigned tasks as it grows more intelligent, and simply 'turning it off' when it outpaces humanity will not be an option.
'We will be like three-year-olds and they will be like adults,' Hinton said.
Speaking to the press later in the day, he noted that it should be relatively easy for 'rational' nations to cooperate on the subject, but said it may be 'difficult' for the US under 'its current administration.'
On Wednesday, the White House announced its 'action plan' to achieve 'global dominance' in AI through investments, subsidies, and the removal of legal restrictions on the technology's development.
Beijing has announced its intention to establish an organization to coordinate international cooperation on AI. 'We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said at the WAIC on Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
China urges US to ‘stop shifting blame' over Ukraine conflict
China has accused the US of playing a 'meaningless blame game' and urged it to stop shifting responsibilities over the Ukraine conflict. Speaking at the UN Security Council on Thursday, Chinese envoy Geng Shuang rejected allegations that Beijing is supporting Russia's military and called on Washington to 'play a constructive role' in ending the fighting. The remarks follow a series of escalating deadlines from US President Donald Trump. Last month, Trump gave Russia 50 days to end the conflict or face sweeping new sanctions, including 100% tariffs and penalties for its trading partners. Earlier this week, he reduced the window to 10 days. On Wednesday, he set August 8 as the final deadline. The US has already imposed a 25% tariff on India for buying Russian weapons and energy. The US claimed to the Security Council that China had become 'the most important supplier' to Russia's military campaign. Beijing strongly rejected the accusations, calling them 'false' and 'completely unacceptable.' China did not start the conflict and is not a party to it, Geng stated. Beijing has never supplied lethal weapons to either side and strictly controls the export of dual-use goods, including drones, he said. He defended China's economic ties with Moscow by noting that neither Russia nor Ukraine is under UN sanctions. 'China maintains normal trade with Russia and Ukraine, and has not violated international law or international obligations,' he said. Geng warned that China's legitimate rights 'must not be violated' and pointed to Washington's double standards 'To this day, the US still maintains trade with Russia. Why is it that the US is not allowing other countries to do what it is doing?' He further noted that the Ukraine conflict is now at a 'critical juncture, facing the prospect and hope of a political solution,' and condemned the continued 'reckless' supply of weapons to the battlefield, arguing they only extend the fighting. Geng's comments echo Moscow's long-held position that foreign military aid to Ukraine only prolongs hostilities and leads to more casualties without affecting the outcome of the conflict.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
White House makes Trump Nobel Peace Prize claim
US President Donald Trump should have received a Nobel Peace Prize years ago, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has claimed, citing his role in multiple international peace agreements. Despite several nominations during his first presidency, Trump has never won the award. At a Washington briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said Trump had intervened in conflicts such as the Thailand-Cambodia dispute by threatening to withhold US trade deals, which she claimed had led to a swift ceasefire. 'We had about one peace deal every month,' Leavitt stated. Trump has repeatedly argued he deserves the award, saying in June that he has been overlooked because 'they only give it to liberals.' Several foreign leaders have recently nominated the US president for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu handed Trump a nomination letter earlier this month, crediting his role in mediating a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Before any ceasefire talks began, however, the US launched a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities in June, aiming to cripple Tehran's capabilities. Trump later said he didn't want to cite Hiroshima or Nagasaki as examples, but claimed that just as those bombings had ended World War II, the 2025 strike had ended the Iran conflict. The comment drew sharp criticism from Japanese officials, who called it morally reckless and offensive. Cambodia's deputy prime minister also nominated Trump for his role in calming a border dispute with Thailand earlier this year. The Pakistani government publicly backed his nomination, highlighting his involvement in the India-Pakistan ceasefire talks. India, however, has firmly rejected claims of US involvement in the ceasefire, dismissing the notion of any third-party mediation. Trump had vowed to end the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours if re-elected – a promise he later walked back, suggesting a 100-day timeline instead and calling the original claim 'a little bit sarcastic.' In July, his administration approved advanced arms deliveries to Ukraine, including Patriot missiles funded by EU NATO allies. Russia condemned the move as a provocation and accused the US of escalating the conflict under the guise of support.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
India's oil trade with Russia a ‘point of irritation'
India's purchase of Russian oil is a 'point of irritation' which affects its ties with the US, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said. In an interview with Fox Radio on Thursday, Rubio said India had numerous alternate suppliers, but still chose to buy oil from Russia. 'Like anything in foreign policy, you're not going to align a hundred percent of the time on everything,' Rubio said, while calling the South Asian nation an ally and a strategic partner. 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas and things that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap and – meaning they have to – in many cases, they're selling it under the global price because of the sanctions,' he added. 'And that – unfortunately that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India – not the only point of irritation.' On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on imports from India, plus penalties for the country's economic and defense ties with Russia. He also attacked New Delhi for its ties to Moscow in a post on his Truth Social account. 'I don't care what India does with Russia,' Trump said. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world.' Additionally, the US State Department has imposed sanctions on eight Indian companies and five Indian citizens for trading in Iranian oil, petroleum products, and petrochemicals. The companies and individuals have been accused of violating US sanctions under Executive Order 13846, which punishes entities that are found to engage in significant transactions involving Iranian petroleum or petrochemical products. 'These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism,' the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi said on Thursday. India has not officially commented on these sanctions.
