R.I. to create government-run venture capital fund for startups
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The maximum investment will be $250,000. Rogue Ventures must match that amount with at least equal private investment, according to Martin.
Advertisement
In Rhode Island, venture capital funding is not as prominent as other states. The Providence area, for instance, brought in $169 million in venture capital in 2023, according to PitchBook, a platform that provides private market data. By comparison,
The
Related
:
Advertisement
The Rhode Island Venture Capital Fund will not focus on specific industries, Commerce spokesman Matthew Touchette told the Globe. It is also expected that most, if not all, of the initial $2 million in funds will be invested by June 30, 2026, he said.
It's not yet clear when businesses can apply for investment.
Most of venture capital investments are done in the private market. Outside of Rhode Island, government-backed venture capital funds aren't anything new.
In the Bay State, MassVentures
Related
:
In recent years, venture capital in the private market has also faced
While Commerce's board of directors voted unanimously to establish the fund, board member Donna M. Sams told Rogue Ventures co-founder and managing director Thomas Sperry that she wants regular updates on the status of the fund.
Oftentimes 'you look at the data that's out there, and these small businesses mostly stay the same size for a very long time, they aren't getting any bigger, and yet we keep investing money,' said
Advertisement
'That needs to change,' added Sams. 'They should be getting bigger. That's what economic development means.'
Alexa Gagosz can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute
The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump formalizes high tariffs as he tries to reshape the global economy
President Donald Trump on Thursday formalized the array of high tariff levels and trade deals he's announced in recent weeks. In an executive order, the president made official his agreements with prominent trading partners such as the European Union, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. Trump's order, which came hours before a self-imposed deadline for trade deals, also unilaterally sets rates for countries that did not reach agreements with him. For example, Israel, Switzerland and Taiwan. Switzerland's rate will be set higher than previously threatened at 39%, while Taiwan's will be set lower at 20%. It's effectively a reset of the world's trade relations, one that is ostensibly designed to benefit the United States with expensive tariff rates not seen in nearly a century. Trump has touted the $125 billion in revenue his already-existent import taxes have brought in, with hundreds of billions more pledged by a handful of nations in the form of investments. Yet it's come at the cost of slower economic growth and the prospect of already stubborn inflation reheating. Trump's order Thursday says that the new duties will not take effect until Aug. 7. Goods shipped by vessel will not be affected by the new tariff rates until Oct. 5. Those items account for more than half of U.S. imports, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. This week, Trump and top administration officials had insisted there would be no further delays after the 12:01 a.m. ET Friday deadline. In fact, just hours before the White House released Thursday's executive order Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shouted to reporters outside the White House that there would be 'no extension' to the deadline. But earlier Thursday, Trump did agree to a 90-day extension on talks with with Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum. Mexico is the United States' largest individual trading partner. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also told CNBC Thursday morning that he would be discussing with the president an extension of China's tariff deadline, which is coming up on Aug. 12. With the newly signed tariffs not taking effect for some time, uncertainty will likely linger for consumers and businesses trying to plan for the rest of the year and beyond. 'Some will argue higher tariffs will be compensated by lower uncertainty,' analysts with Bank of America wrote in a note to clients this week upon the announcement of an agreement with the European Union. 'And yes, uncertainty could come down in the near term, but we doubt it will go away.'
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Sets 10% Minimum Global Tariff, Raises Canada Rate to 35%
President Donald Trump announced a slew of new tariffs, including a 10% global minimum and 15% or higher duties for countries with trade surpluses with the US, as he forged ahead with his effort to reshape international commerce. The baseline rates for many trading partners remain unchanged from the duties Trump imposed in April, which will come as a relief to investors after the president had previously said it could go higher. Yet his move to raise tariffs on Canadian goods to 35% threatens to inject fresh tensions into an already strained relationship.
