China's ‘interference' blamed on resignation of Solomon Islands minister from group critical of Beijing
Solomon Islands' rural development minister Daniel Waneoroa announced his resignation from the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) on Sunday to support the ruling government.
Mr Waneoroa said he was stepping down from his role as one of the co-chairs of IPAC to contribute to national political stability.
'This decision reflects my personal conviction and unwavering commitment to the principles of democracy, transparency, and accountability,' Mr Waneoroa said in a statement.
China's embassy in the Solomon Islands denied the allegation of interference as 'baseless'.
Ipac is an international and cross-party group of lawmakers from democratic countries who work together to counter the Chinese government's growing global influence. It has raised concerns about Beijing's actions in regions like Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong.
China's influence increased significantly during the term of prime minister Jeremiah Manele's predecessor, with the country switching diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China and striking a secret security pact.
It thrust the Pacific archipelago of 700,000 into international spotlight as the alliance raised fears of China's security forces gaining a foothold in the region long dominated by the US, Australia, and New Zealand.
The resignation has drawn swift condemnation from Ipac and non-profit organisation Transparency Solomon Islands, which blamed China for its interference in politics on the island.
The Ipac accused China of 'bullying behaviour' and said Beijing has issued a "direct and shocking challenge" to the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, according to ABC Australia.
The Transparency Solomon Islands (TSI) called on the Chinese embassy in Solomon to not 'create further political instability in our country for your own interests'.
'The people of Solomon Islands have endured enough political turmoil. We need a stable government that can focus on addressing our developmental, economic, and social challenges.'
Mr Waneoroa resigned from Ipac just 10 days after he was appointed rural development minister. He has served as the chair of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Climate Change and Environment at the Ipac.
Mr Waneoroa's decision came after the Chinese embassy requested a meeting with the minister over his affiliations with the Ipac, which angered China with its strong links with Taiwan and its efforts to mount international pressure on Beijing for its alleged human rights violations in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, according to Transparency Solomon Islands.
It said: "The People's Republic of China must understand: Solomon Islands is not a satellite state like Hong Kong.
"No embassy has the right to issue political demands or threats to our sovereign nation.'
China's embassy said in a statement: "China will never interfere in Solomon Islands' internal affairs, and also firmly oppose any other countries' interference in Solomon Islands' internal affairs."
"[The] Chinese embassy firmly opposes such baseless allegation, and reiterates its support to the political stability of Solomon Islands."
It comes a month after China was accused of forcing two African nations Malawi and The Gambia to quit IPAC through 'extreme diplomatic coercion'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australia politics live: only four out of 19 Closing the Gap targets improving, latest report shows
Update: Date: 2025-07-30T20:32:14.000Z Title: Content: Without changing the approach to Closing the Gap, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people will continue to 'pay the price', Indigenous organisations say. Just four of the 19 Closing the Gap targets are on track to be met, according to the latest data from the Productivity Commission, the Australian Associated Press reports. But key targets, including adult imprisonment rates, children in out-of-home care, suicide and childhood development are continuing to worsen. While there have been improvements in Year 12 attainment, tertiary education and housing access, these are not on track to meet deadlines. Update: Date: 2025-07-30T20:28:34.000Z Title: Welcome Content: Good morning and welcome to our live politics blog. I'm Martin Farrer with the top overnight stories and then it will be Krishani Dhanji with the main action. The latest Closing the Gap report has been released this morning and it shows that progress is being made on only four of the 19 targets. Indigenous groups and advocates say governments need to do more. More details coming up. Anika Wells, the communications minister, appeared on 7.30 last night to explain the government's decision to restrict children's YouTube access. More details coming up on that as well.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Albanese's unprecedented act of political ruthlessness
Few Australians would be upset about the PM cutting the number of political staffers paid for by taxpayers. But what if he only did it to the Opposition - and not his own team? Would that feel like he's just seeking an advantage for his party? Because that's exactly what Albo has done. He's cut the number of shadow ministerial advisers the Coalition gets by 20 per cent without instituting a similar cut to the number of staffers in his own ministerial ranks. It's a blatant attempt to diminish the Coalition so that it's a less competitive opposition. It's also an unprecedented act of political ruthlessness. The number of staff allocated to the federal Opposition has long been a routine exercise, done with bipartisan acceptance and little controversy. For the better part of three decades, Oppositions (Coalition and Labor alike) have been given 21 per cent of the staffing allowance made available to the PM and his ministers. The rules began when Labor knew it was heading towards a massive defeat in 1996. So it put in place a policy to guarantee that an opposition, irrespective of how it performed, was guaranteed a set number of political advisers for its shadow ministry relative to what the government had. John Howard honoured the rule, despite his massive majority matching Albo's thumping majority today. Every other PM until now also honoured the convention, irrespective of the size of their victory. So what Albo has delivered on staff resourcing is a significant and targeted cut to the Opposition's capacity to do its job. And make no mistake, this isn't just a bureaucratic adjustment: It is a choice designed to weaken parliamentary accountability, thereby undermining the very principles that underpin democratic governance. Albo has unilaterally cut 20 roles from the Coalition's total, including 16 senior adviser positions. These are key roles for an opposition. They help build a substantive alternative policy agenda. It's retribution dressed up as reform. I've long held the view that the rise in political staffing positions across the parliament (government, opposition, crossbench) is an unnecessary waste of taxpayer money. But cuts to this wastage shouldn't deliberately disadvantage parliamentary opponents. It's hard to take seriously the government's excuses for making the change. Labor won't disclose its own staffing numbers, which it would have done were they proportionally curtailed to match the cuts to the Coalition. It's even possible that Labor's staff has increased , widening the gap between the government and opposition. So much for transparency. Labor's other suggestion, that this is simply about proportional representation in Parliament (courtesy of the reduction in Coalition MPs and Senators at the election), misses the point entirely. The size of the Shadow Cabinet (23 senior members, plus seven outer shadow ministers) hasn't changed. Their responsibilities haven't shrunk, only their resources have. The staffing allocation provided for the last 30 years is for opposition frontbenchers, and the size of that team doesn't change when election results deliver larger or smaller backbench teams. Ministers have entire departments to support their work. Opposition spokespeople, by contrast, rely almost entirely on a handful of advisers at best. Take those advisers away, and you don't just hamstring the individuals, you dilute the Parliament's ability to interrogate, contest and improve public policy. You don't have to be a partisan to see how corrosive this all is. Excessive centralisation of power within the executive not only marginalises the public service, it erodes parliamentary scrutiny as well. Cutting Opposition staff disproportionately to the allocation the government gets is a decision that may look tactical, but carries serious institutional consequences. It's also a poor reflection on a government that claimed it would do politics differently. Labor promised to restore decency to the political process. Instead, it has used its large majority to gut the Opposition's capacity, and worse still it tried to do so under the radar, knowing full well that staffing allocations don't command much attention outside the Canberra bubble. It's the kind of cynical move that feeds public mistrust in politics. This decision also runs counter to well-established democratic principles. Political theorists from John Stuart Mill to Bernard Crick have long stressed the indispensable role of a strong Opposition in a functioning democracy. As Crick put it: 'democracy is not simply majority rule, but rule that permits opposition'. That principle is weakened when the capacity to hold government accountable is structurally undermined by the government itself. The Westminster tradition thrives not merely on government competence, but on adversarial scrutiny. You can't have that if one side is starved of resources while the other operates with the full weight of the public service, ministerial staff, and political machinery behind it. This is especially true in modern policymaking, where legislation is more complex, timeframes are tighter and ministerial spin is more carefully managed than ever before. Throw in the decline of the Fourth Estate in a challenging media environment and concern with Albo's one-sided resourcing only grows. The PM may think he has scored a tactical win. But in the long run, this kind of decision corrodes the checks and balances that prevent majority rule from becoming majoritarianism. Albanese should reverse course, not because it's convenient for the Opposition, but because it's essential for Australian democracy.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
US to share biometric data with Chile 'to track criminals,' Homeland Security's Noem says
The United States will deploy biometric technologies in partnership with Chile to control migration and disrupt criminal networks, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Wednesday during a visit to the South American nation. 'This arrangement is going to serve as a bridge to help Chile and the United States work towards bringing criminals to justice and knowing who is in our countries perpetuating crimes,' Noem said while signing the preliminary agreement with Chile's Security Minister Luis Cordero and Justice Minister Jaime Gajardo. 'This increased cooperation between our countries is extremely important to track criminals, terrorists and dangerous individuals,' she added from the capital of Santiago, while nearby thousands of residents heeded tsunami warnings to evacuate along the the country's Pacific coast. The plan comes as the Trump administration seeks to bolster regional cooperation in its clampdown against transnational criminal groups, including Tren de Aragua, a notorious Venezuelan gang designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the White House. The bilateral agreement allows Chilean officials to identify potentially dangerous migrants entering or exiting the country and share their biometric data, such as fingerprints and iris scans, with the Department of Homeland Security to prevent their travel to the U.S. "That information will be incredibly important as we go after these criminal activities," Noem said, praising past cooperation between the countries' intelligence agencies. Tren de Aragua has wreaked havoc across once-peaceful Chile in recent years — smuggling undocumented migrants across borders, running prostitution rings, trafficking drugs and terrorizing the population with grisly crimes. But Chilean authorities have fought back, bringing a number of gang members to trial in recent months. After spreading across Latin America on the heels of illegal migration, Tren de Aragua infiltrated the U.S. and inflamed domestic politics. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Chile most recently teamed up to disrupt South American criminal networks allegedly responsible for a string of burglaries targeting the multimillion-dollar homes of high-profile celebrities and professional athletes in the U.S. and Europe. The suspects, among them Chilean nationals, are now facing charges in Florida.
