Pam Bondi drops case against doctor accused of destroying COVID-19 vaccines
Bondi, in a statement posted on X, said Michael Kirk Moore Jr., of Salt Lake County, Utah did not deserve the jail time he was facing. Moore was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2023, and his trial had begun earlier this month.
"Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today," Bondi said.
COVID-19 vaccine skeptics have been embraced by the Trump administration. The Pentagon, for example, has sought to re-enlist servicemembers who were ousted for refusing to be vaccinated during the pandemic.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who for decades has sown doubt about the safety of vaccines contrary to evidence and research by scientists, wrote on X in April: "Dr. Moore deserves a medal for his courage and his commitment to healing!"
According to a 2023 statement from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Utah, Moore allegedly ran the false certifications out of a plastic surgery center. His activities allegedly included administering saline shots to minors, at the request of their parents, so the children would think they were receiving COVID-19 vaccines, the statement said.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a U.S. lawmaker from Georgia and staunch Trump supporter, had championed dropping the case against Moore, who she called a hero in a statement on Saturday.
"We can never again allow our government to turn tyrannical under our watch," she said in a post on X.
The latest move by Bondi comes amid scrutiny of her firings of senior Justice Department officials who worked on investigations into Trump, stoking accusations of political retribution in a department whose mission is to enforce U.S. laws.
(Reporting by Phil Stewart and Barghav Acharya; Editing by Don Durfee and Alistair Bell)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Republicans Block Epstein Files Release As Backlash From Some Top MAGA Figures Dwindles
Some Republicans on Monday blocked a measure to release documents detailing the federal government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, while others in his base suggested they'd move on from the controversy surrounding the Justice Department's decision to withhold the files. President Donald Trump waves as he walks from Marine One to board Air Force One at Joint Base ... More Andrews, Maryland on July 15, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Seven Republicans on the House Rules Committee opposed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., that would have required Congress to vote whether to release the documents, while one Republican, Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., voted with the five Democrats on the committee in favor of the measure. Democrats have seized on the anger among some in Trump's base over the Justice Department's announcement last week that it would not release any new details on the Epstein probe, despite suggestions from some top Trump officials that more information was forthcoming. Some of the right-wing backlash—which included calls for Attorney General Pam Bondi to resign—has died down since Trump urged his supporters over the weekend to move on from the controversy and defended Bondi. Right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, who previously called for the purported Epstein list to be released, said Monday he is 'done talking about Epstein for the time being' and would trust Trump's administration to 'solve it,' watering down his criticism last week of the Trump administration's handing of the memo. Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza also told his viewers it was 'time to move on' from the Epstein probe and unify behind Trump by 'recognizing you can't win 'em all.' Republican leaders in Congress have also echoed Trump, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who told reporters Monday 'I think the president's expressed his views on it, and so I'll just leave it at that,' while House Majority Leader Mike Johnson, R-La., also said 'the White House has a lot more information about that than I'm privy to . . . so I'll have to trust that they'll make the right decision.' 'We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Saturday, calling the Epstein files 'Radical Left inspired Documents' written by Democrats. Contra Not all Republicans in Congress have fallen in line with Trump's messaging strategy. Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., told Axios 'I don't understand why they're hiding what they're hiding,' while Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, told the outlet 'there's just some things that don't pass the sniff test.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., also continued to express disappointment over the Justice Department decision, telling The New York Times 'it's definitely a full reversal on what was said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it,' referring to previous statements from administration officials suggesting the documents would be released. The Justice Department in a memo last week said it would not release any more files on its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It also repeated its determinations that Epstein died by suicide in jail and that no so-called 'Epstein list' of clients exists. Trump's base has largely targeted Bondi over the agency's refusal to release the documents, with some calling for her termination, after she said in a Fox News interview earlier this year the purported list was on her desk. The White House walked back the statement last week and said Bondi was referring to the documents in their entirety. Further Reading Tucker Carlson Blasts Pam Bondi For 'A Bunch Of Ludicrous Claims' About Epstein Files—As Backlash Mounts (Forbes) Trump Sounded Hesitant About Releasing Epstein Files In Newly Resurfaced Interview (Forbes) Pam Bondi Under Fire From MAGA —Megyn Kelly, Laura Loomer And More—Over Epstein Probe (Forbes)
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US tariffs on Brazil could hit Embraer revenue like COVID-19, says CEO
SAO PAULO (Reuters) -The 50% tariff that U.S. President Donald Trump plans to impose on Brazilian exports starting in August could have an impact on the revenues of planemaker Embraer similar to that of the COVID pandemic, its CEO said on Tuesday. Chief Executive Francisco Gomes Neto told reporters that the tariffs could trigger canceled orders, deferred deliveries, lower investments and possible job cuts. He said a 50% tariff would be essentially a trade embargo on commercial jets, making exports to U.S. airlines "unfeasible." Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
LOL: NYT writer admits that shaming right-wing family members failed
One of my favorite recurring features in the mainstream media — maybe it's a favorite of yours as well — is when some progressive liberal in The New York Times or The Atlantic or elsewhere writes a column on how to avoid your conservative family members during Thanksgiving, or Christmas, or even the Fourth of July. The premise of these articles is always the same: The toxic rightwing views of your grandma, or your Uncle Steve, or your great aunt Betty, constitute a form of emotional labor that you, a good, moral, upstanding progressive should not have to be subjected to. Some of these entries don't merely suggest that liberals should avoid and shun rightwing family members and friends — they actually suggest that you should belittle or mock them. You may remember a ghastly Los Angeles Times column with this title: ' Mocking anti-vaxxer's COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes — but necessary.' Indeed, COVID vaccine skeptics were a favorite target of liberal op-ed writers year after year. But now, one card-carrying member of the liberal establishment, former Obama speechwriter David Litt, thinks that showing conservatives and covid vaccine skeptics was, in fact, a mistake of sorts. And he has a new piece in The New York Times that makes that case. It's called 'Is It Time to Stop Snubbing Your Right-Wing Family?' I'd say it was never time to snub your family over politics in the first place. But better late than never, I suppose. In his op-ed, Litt explains how for years he sort of tried to avoid making conversation with his brother-in-law, Matt, an ardent Joe Rogan fan who possesses contrarian, non-mainstream opinions that aren't universally right-wing but are definitely non-progressive. Matt, importantly, declined to get the COVID vaccine, a choice that David disdained. He wrote the following in his New York Times column: 'We were on opposite sides of a cultural civil war. The deepest divide was vaccination. I wasn't shocked when Matt didn't get the COVID shot. But I was baffled. Turning down a vaccine during a pandemic seemed like a rejection of science and self-preservation. It felt like he was tearing up the social contract that, until that point, I'd imagined we shared. Had Matt been a friend rather than a family member, I probably would have cut off contact completely. As it was, on the rare and always outdoor occasions when we saw each other, I spoke in disapproving snippets.' To David's credit, he admits in the column that he's decided he was wrong to snub his vaccine-hesitant relative. David says that this siloing effect, whereby we start only interacting with people with whom we totally agree, is unhealthy for the country. He writes, 'When we cut off contacts, or let algorithms sort us into warring factions, we forget that not so long ago, we used to have things to talk about that didn't involve politics. Shunning plays into the hands of demagogues, making it easier for them to divide us and even, in some cases, to incite violence.' I agree with that, and I'm glad David no longer thinks that it's a good idea to shun people over politics as a general principle. He's sorry he did that and admits he was wrong. But here's the thing: Shouldn't David also admit that his main beef with his relative — the thing that so riled him up about right-wing people — was a fervent belief that David ended up being wrong about, namely the importance of the COVID vaccine? Nowhere in his column does this progressive New York Times writer — who was willing to shun someone for not getting the jab — acknowledge that as it turned out, getting that vaccine is a personal choice that doesn't have much bearing on other people's health. David writes that choosing not to get the vaccine was shredding the social contract. Actually, no, forcing people to get the COVID vaccine on pain of losing their jobs — now that was shredding the social contract. And it's exactly what former President Joe Biden tried to do, until the Supreme Court stopped him. So while I'm happy to see New York Times liberals admit that it's bad form to lose friends and family members over politics, I'd also like to see them admit that when it came to this issue, specifically, they were really, really wrong. But don't worry. To any liberal friends and family members, I'm certainly not going to shun you because of it.
