logo
Why scientists are so excited about the highest-energy 'ghost particle' ever seen

Why scientists are so excited about the highest-energy 'ghost particle' ever seen

Yahoo16-05-2025
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Earlier this year, an underwater detector in the Mediterranean Sea found the most energetic neutrino to date. And scientists are still talking about it because, well, this discovery could be a really big deal. Not only could this neutrino, also known as a "ghost particle," have been fleeing a gamma-ray burst or a supermassive black hole, but it could also have been produced by an ultra-powerful cosmic ray interacting with the cosmic microwave background (CMB).
That latter bit which we'll get to soon, could be huge. Moreover, the detector that pinpointed this particle isn't even totally built yet — once put together, who knows what it can accomplish. "We're excited to have observed this event and we're hungry and curious for more," KM3NeT's spokesperson, Paul de Jong of the University of Amsterdam, told Space.com
For some background, the neutrino was detected on February 13, 2023 by the European Union-funded KM3NeT, the Cubic Kilometre Neutrino Telescope. Neutrinos are ghostly particles because they have very little mass and rarely interact with other forms of matter, making them very difficult to detect. Trillions of neutrinos are passing through your body every second, yet you cannot tell. Scientists have to be patient to spot even one neutrino.
Modern neutrino detectors are placed in water, and particularly in the dark. Sometimes that water is held in a tank, as was the case with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada, as well as with Super-Kamiokande in Japan. Other times, that water is frozen in the ground, as in the case of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole. But it's also possible for neutrino detectors to literally be dipped into the sea, as is the case with KM3NeT, which extends as deep as 2.17 miles (3.5 kilometers) below the waves.
The reason water is so important is that, occasionally, a neutrino will interact with a molecule of water. The energies involved can be so great that the collision smashes the water molecule apart into a bunch of daughter nuclei and particles, specifically muons. The muons travel quickly, almost as fast as light in a vacuum, and definitely faster than light through water — the refractive index of water slows light down to approximately 738,188,976 feet per second (225,000,000 meters per second) compared to 983,571,056 feet per second (299,792,458 meters per second) in a vacuum. Because the muons travel faster than light in water, they give off the equivalent of a sonic boom in the form of a flash of light. This light is called Cherenkov radiation.
KM3NeT consists of two detectors. The first, called ORCA, is 8,038 feet (2,450 meters) deep off the coast of France and is designed to study how neutrinos oscillate between different types of neutrinos. The other, aka the detector that spotted the new energetic neutrino — which has been catalogued as KM3-230213A — is called ARCA and is located off the coast of Sicily.
Both ARCA and ORCA are still under construction. When complete, ARCA will feature 230 vertical detection lines descending into the sea. Each will be lined with 18 optical modules containing 31 photomultiplier tubes that can spot flashes of Cherenkov radiation in the darkness at those depths. At the time that ARCA detected KM3-230213A, only 21 of its detection lines were in operation.
The muon ARCA detected had an energy of 120 PeV (1,000 trillion, or quadrillion, electronvolts), which implies the neutrino that produced it must have had a record-breaking energy of 220 PeV. This is 100 quadrillion times more energetic than visible-light photons, and 30 times more energetic than the neutrino that held the previous energy record.
Muons can travel several miles through the sea before being absorbed, and KM3NeT detected the muon traveling horizontally rather than straight down to the sea floor.
"The horizontal direction on the muon is very relevant," said de Jong.
Muons can also be formed in cosmic-ray spallation, wherein a cosmic ray enters Earth's atmosphere and collides with a molecule or atom, smashing it apart into a shower of subatomic particles. Muons formed in this manner can either reach the surface or enter the ocean while traveling straight down — not horizontally. To have been moving horizontally, the muon must have instead "been created close to the detector, and the only realistic scenario is that it was created by a high-energy neutrino," said de Jong.
A neutrino of 220 PeV is unprecedented. No environment or object known in our Milky Way galaxy could have produced a neutrino with so much energy. That means its origin must be extragalactic, perhaps created in the violence of a star exploding and producing a gamma-ray burst, or a supermassive black hole ripping a star or gas cloud to shreds with its titanic gravitational tidal forces. Because neutrinos are not deflected by magnetic fields or by gravity, their direction of travel leads back to their source.
"The muon direction is almost identical to the direction of the original neutrino, so we can play the game of pointing it back to its cosmic origin," said de Jong.
That origin is somewhere in the direction of the constellation of Orion, the Hunter. However, while there are numerous active galaxies with supermassive black holes in that region, none of them was displaying activity at the time that could explain the neutrino, nor was a gamma-ray burst detected from that direction at that time.
But another intriguing possibility is that KM3-230213A is the first "cosmogenic" neutrino to be discovered, produced when an ultra-high-energy cosmic ray smashes into a photon belonging to the cosmic microwave background, which is the residual light released 379,000 years after the Big Bang.
It would take an extremely energetic cosmic ray to be able to produce a neutrino like KM3-230213A. Cosmic rays in excess of 100,000 PeV have been detected by the likes of the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina. Their origins are uncertain, but, in theory every time such a cosmic ray encounters a CMB photon, the collision can produce neutrinos as energetic as KM3-230213A.
The greater the cosmic-ray energy, the greater its interaction cross-section, meaning it is more likely to interact with CMB photons. The constant interactions between cosmic rays and CMB photons slows the cosmic ray, limiting their kinetic energy. This is called the Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin (GZK) limit.
Related Stories:
— Scientists detect highest-energy ghost particle ever seen — where did it come from?
— Black holes snacking on small stars create particle accelerators that bombard Earth with cosmic rays
— Einstein wins again! Quarks obey relativity laws, Large Hadron Collider finds
The possibility of a cosmogenic neutrino excites de Jong. "It would be the very first observation of a cosmogenic neutrino, and it would be the first confirmation of the GZK cut-off outside charged cosmic rays — and even there the proof is ambiguous," he said.
Furthermore, the energy of cosmogenic neutrinos can reveal the properties of these ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. This parameter is key for discovering whether such phenomena are made of just protons or heavier atomic nuclei — and, therefore, what produces them. Although KM3-230213A was the only extremely high energy neutrino detected by KM3NeT, there will undoubtedly be many more passing through Earth that go undetected. Does KM3NeT's early detection with ARCA bode well for finally being able to detect such neutrinos more regularly?
"We certainly hope so!" said de Jong. "But realistically, other experiments such as IceCube have been taking data for longer and have not observed such an event, so we could simply have been lucky."
The discovery was described in a paper published on Feb. 12 in the journal Nature.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I have great plans and ambitions': Noah Hawley's multi-season vision for 'Alien: Earth' has me counting down like it's Christmas
'I have great plans and ambitions': Noah Hawley's multi-season vision for 'Alien: Earth' has me counting down like it's Christmas

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'I have great plans and ambitions': Noah Hawley's multi-season vision for 'Alien: Earth' has me counting down like it's Christmas

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Ask literally anyone in my life what I talk about most, and I'd bet 100 facehuggers they'll say 'Alien.' Considering this is my favorite franchise and a full-blown obsession at this point, 'Alien: Earth' is naturally my most anticipated series of the year. The sci-fi horror show is fast approaching. We're now just under a month out and with the world premiere happening at San Diego Comic-Con next week, the marketing has kicked into high gear. That includes the latest issue of SFX magazine, which features 'Alien: Earth' on the cover and showrunner Noah Hawley sharing more about his vision for the series' future. He said (h/t GamesRadar Plus): 'With Legion, I had a three-act structure. I didn't know if that was going to take three seasons or five seasons, but I knew what the three major thoughts of the story were. And here, I feel like I have that as well." Hawley continued: 'We created it as a recurring series, and I have great plans and ambitions for it as such. On the film side, I've had some conversations with them. 'This is not a Kevin Feige Marvel Universe moment. I'm not saying that in success, that we shouldn't be coordinating or thinking big picture about that – the show has to be a hit before you can really have those conversations.' I didn't know my excitement could grow for 'Alien: Earth,' but here we are. The fact that Hawley has long-term plans already shows he has faith in the series, where it's headed, and how it can tie into the larger universe. In fact, when speaking with Vanity Fair about the possibility of it merging with the original source material, he stated, 'I do know that at a certain point, the Weyland-Yutani Corporation is going to divert the Nostromo to that planet [LV-426].' You know, the charming little rock where curiosity gets you violently killed. Honestly, I feel like a kid counting down to Christmas. Only instead of presents, I'm waiting for Xenomorphs, corporate cover-ups, and even more otherworldly threats. If I could climb into a hypersleep pod and wake up on release day, I would. 'Alien: Earth' is set to premiere on FX on Hulu in the U.S. on August 12, and Disney Plus in the U.K on August 13. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide How to watch the 'Alien' movies in order 5 new to Hulu movies with 90% or higher on Rotten Tomatoes The most surreal noir thriller of the year landed on Hulu

Astronomers discover monster exoplanet hiding in 'stellar fog' around young star
Astronomers discover monster exoplanet hiding in 'stellar fog' around young star

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Astronomers discover monster exoplanet hiding in 'stellar fog' around young star

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers have spotted a monster-sized planet that could be up to ten times the size of Jupiter emerging from the stellar fog surrounding a young star. Prior observations of the roughly 13 million-year-old star MP Mus (also known as PDS 66) located around 280 light-years away had failed to distinguish features in the swirling cloud of gas and dust, or protoplanetary disk, that surrounds it. However, when astronomers reexamined the apparently featureless protoplanetary disk of this star using combined data from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the European Space Agency (ESA) Gaia mission, they found it may not be quite so lonely after all. The team detected a huge gas giant dwelling in the protoplanetary disk of MP Mus, which had been previously hidden. This represents the first time Gaia has spotted an extrasolar planet or "exoplanet" sitting in a protoplanetary disk, the disks of material around young stars that birth planets. Such detections have typically been tough due to interference from the gas and dust of the protoplanetary disk. Until now, astronomers have only made three strong detections of planets within protoplanetary disks. This new finding could help astronomers hunt more recently formed planets around infant stars. Young exoplanets get into the groove Planets form within protoplanetary disks through a process called core accretion, when larger and larger particles stick together via gravity, forming planetesimals, asteroids, and eventually planets. As material from the protoplanetary disk is swallowed up by this process, the planets created begin to carve channels in the disk, akin to the grooves in a vinyl record. When this team initially observed the protoplanetary disk around MP Mus in 2023 with ALMA, these were the kind of structures they had expected to see. Structures that were missing. "We first observed this star at the time when we learned that most discs have rings and gaps, and I was hoping to find features around MP Mus that could hint at the presence of a planet or planets," team leader Álvaro Ribas from Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy said in a statement. What the team found instead was a seemingly lonely star surrounded by a featureless disk of gas and dust that had none of the hallmarks of forming planets. "Our earlier observations showed a boring, flat disc," Ribas said. "But this seemed odd to us, since the disc is between seven and ten million years old. "In a disc of that age, we would expect to see some evidence of planet formation." With their curiosity piqued, the team set about relooking at MP Mus again using ALMA, but in longer wavelengths of light. This allowed them to probe deeper into the disk, revealing a cavity in the disk close to the young star and two further "holes" further out, all of which were absent in the prior observations. Further evidence of a planetary companion to MP Mus was about to be delivered. More than just a first for Gaia As Ribas and colleagues were examining MP Mus with ALMA, European Southern Observatory (ESO) researcher Miguel Vioque was looking at the young star using the now-retired star tracking spacecraft Gaia. What Vioque discovered was that this young star is "wobbling." This is something that would usually be the effect of a planet in orbit gravitationally tugging on a star, but Vioque was aware that MP Mus' protoplanetary disk had, until that point, come up empty in terms of planets. "My first reaction was that I must have made a mistake in my calculations, because MP Mus was known to have a featureless disc," Vioque explained. "I was revising my calculations when I saw Álvaro give a talk presenting preliminary results of a newly-discovered inner cavity in the disc, which meant the wobbling I was detecting was real and had a good chance of being caused by a forming planet." The researchers came together, combining the Gaia and ALMA data with some computer modeling assistance to determine that the wobbling is likely caused by a gas giant with a mass between three and ten times that of Jupiter. This giant planet appears to orbit MP Mus at a distance of between one and three times the distance between Earth and the sun. "Our modelling work showed that if you put a giant planet inside the newfound cavity, you can also explain the Gaia signal," Ribas said. "And using the longer ALMA wavelengths allowed us to see structures we couldn't see before." As well as being the first time Gaia has spotted a planet within a protoplanetary disk, this is the first time an embedded exoplanet has been indirectly discovered by combining precise star movement data from Gaia with deep observations of the disk courtesy of ALMA. "We think this might be one of the reasons why it's hard to detect young planets in protoplanetary discs, because in this case, we needed the ALMA and Gaia data together," said Ribas. "The longer ALMA wavelength is incredibly useful, but to observe at this wavelength requires more time on the telescope." Related Stories: —The James Webb Space Telescope has discovered its 1st exoplanet and snapped its picture (image) —Could nearby stars have habitable exoplanets? NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory hopes to find out —NASA exoplanet-hunting spacecraft and citizen scientists discover a cool new alien world Ribas is hopeful that future ALMA upgrades, in addition to forthcoming telescopes, could be used to probe even deeper into protoplanetary disks. This would not only reveal a hitherto undiscovered population of young embedded exoplanets, but it could help us understand how the solar system came to be around 4.5 billion years ago. The team's research was published on Monday (July 14) in the journal Nature Astronomy. Solve the daily Crossword

JWST finds unusual black hole in the center of the Infinity Galaxy: 'How can we make sense of this?'
JWST finds unusual black hole in the center of the Infinity Galaxy: 'How can we make sense of this?'

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

JWST finds unusual black hole in the center of the Infinity Galaxy: 'How can we make sense of this?'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), astronomers have discovered an oddball galaxy, dubbed the Infinity Galaxy, that could be host to a "direct collapse black hole." That is, a black hole originally created directly from a vast cloud of collapsing gas and dust rather than a dying star. The Infinity Galaxy gets its name from the fact that its shape resembles an infinity symbol (a sideways 8) with two red lobes or "nuclei." This shape is thought to have arisen because the Infinity Galaxy was formed as two disk galaxies engaged in a head-on collision. What makes this highly unusual is the fact that this black hole sits between the two colliding galaxies in a vast cloud of gas, rather than in either respective nucleus. From its perch between these galaxies, the black hole now feeds greedily on that gas, but researchers think that same cloud also once birthed it. That would make this the first observational evidence of the direct collapse pathway of black hole birth. The researchers behind these findings uncovered the Infinity Galaxy while examining images from the JWST's 255-hour treasury COSMOS-Web survey. In addition to the suspected direct collapse black hole that sits between the colliding galaxies, the team found that each nucleus of those galaxies also contains a supermassive black hole! "Everything is unusual about this galaxy. Not only does it look very strange, but it also has this supermassive black hole that's pulling a lot of material in," team leader and Yale University researcher Pieter van Dokkum said in a statement. "The biggest surprise of all was that the black hole was not located inside either of the two nuclei but in the middle. "We asked ourselves: How can we make sense of this?" van Dokkum explained that finding a black hole not in the nucleus of a massive galaxy isn't, in itself, unusual. What is strange is the question of how that black hole got there. "It likely didn't just arrive there, but instead it formed there," van Dokkum said. "And pretty recently. In other words, we think we're witnessing the birth of a supermassive black hole – something that has never been seen before." This discovery could solve an intriguing mystery regarding the observation of supermassive black holes with masses millions or billions of times that of the sun, less than 1 billion years after the Big Bang. Black holes could skip stellar deaths and supernovas Since it began operating three years ago, the JWST has delivered something of a conundrum to cosmologists; observations that show supermassive black holes seem common as early as 500 million years after the Big Bang. That's a problem because it was previously proposed that supermassive black holes form through successive mergers of smaller black holes. However, beginning this process with so-called stellar-mass black holes would require waiting for the first generation of stars to form, live their lives, then collapse in supernova explosions. The resulting black holes would have to undergo a series of mergers and periods of intense feeding upon interstellar gas and dust. This process would take at least a billion years to "grow" a black hole to supermassive status. Thus, seeing a multitude of supermassive black holes before the universe was 1 billion years old is problematic. That is, unless these bodies got a head start by skipping the stellar life and birth stage of this process. "How supermassive black holes formed is a long-standing question. There are two main theories, called 'light seeds' and 'heavy seeds.' In the light seed theory, you start with small black holes formed when a star's core collapses and the star explodes as a supernova," van Dokkum explained. "That might result in a black hole weighing up to about 1,000 suns. You form a lot of them in a small space, and they merge over time to become a much more massive black hole." As mentioned above, the problem with that is the time this process would take and the JWST's discovery of incredibly massive black holes at early stages of our 13.8 billion-year-old universe. Black holes could have heavy seeds Alternatively, the heavy seed theory sees supermassive black hole growth kickstarted with a much larger black hole, maybe up to one million times the mass of the sun. This forms directly from the collapse of a large gas cloud. "You immediately form a giant black hole, so it's much quicker. However, the problem with forming a black hole out of a gas cloud is that gas clouds like to form stars as they collapse rather than a black hole, so you have to find some way of preventing that. It's not clear that this direct-collapse process could work in practice," van Dokkum said. "By looking at the data from the Infinity Galaxy, we think we've pieced together a story of how this could have happened here." The researchers suggest that as the two disk galaxies collided, a ring structure of stars, visible in the JWST image, was formed. During this collision, gas within these two galaxies would have been shocked and compressed. They think this compression may have been so extreme that it formed a "dense knot" in the gas, which then collapsed into a black hole. As van Dokkum explained, there is a wealth of circumstantial evidence for this formation channel for the black hole in the Infinity Galaxy. "We observe a large swath of ionized gas, specifically hydrogen that has been stripped of its electrons, that's right in the middle between the two nuclei, surrounding the supermassive black hole," he continued. "We also know that the black hole is actively growing – we see evidence of that in X-rays from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and radio from the Very Large Array. Nevertheless, the question is, did it form there?" There are two possible explanations that don't involve a direct collapse black hole forming at the intersection of these merged galaxies. "First, it could be a runaway black hole that got ejected from a galaxy and just happens to be passing through," van Dokkum said. "Second, it could be a black hole at the center of a third galaxy in the same location on the sky. If it were in a third galaxy, we would expect to see the surrounding galaxy unless it were a faint dwarf galaxy. However, dwarf galaxies don't tend to host giant black holes. "If the black hole were a runaway, or if it were in an unrelated galaxy, we would expect it to have a very different velocity from the gas in the Infinity Galaxy." To test this, the team intends to measure the velocity of the gas and the velocity of the black hole and compare them. Should those velocities be close, within around 30 miles per second (50 kilometers per second), then van Dokkum asserts that it will be hard to argue that the black hole is not formed from that gas. Related Stories: —The James Webb Space Telescope has discovered its 1st exoplanet and snapped its picture (image) —Astronomers discover origins of mysterious double hot Jupiter exoplanets: 'It is a dance of sorts' —NASA exoplanet-hunting spacecraft and citizen scientists discover a cool new alien world "Our preliminary results are exciting. First, the presence of an extended distribution of ionized gas between the two nuclei is confirmed. Second, the black hole is beautifully in the middle of the velocity distribution of this surrounding gas, as expected if it formed there. This is the key result that we were after!" van Dokkum continued. "Third, as an unexpected bonus, it turns out that both galaxy nuclei also have an active supermassive black hole." Though the team can't say definitively that they discovered a direct collapse black hole, they can state with confidence that this JWST data strengthens the case for this being a newborn black hole, while eliminating some of the counter-explanations to the direct collapse pathway. "This system has three confirmed active black holes: two very massive ones in both of the galaxy nuclei, and the one in between them that might have formed there," van Dokkum said. "We will continue to pore through the data and investigate these possibilities." Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store