logo
Algeria State Media Brands US ‘Terrorist' While Militaries Cooperate Closely

Algeria State Media Brands US ‘Terrorist' While Militaries Cooperate Closely

Morocco World5 days ago

Algeria's El Chourouk newspaper has launched a blistering attack on the US, labeling America as a 'terrorist entity.'
This incendiary rhetoric comes despite Algiers' deepening military cooperation with Washington.
The lengthy editorial, published following recent US airstrikes on Iran, accuses Washington of serial violations of international law. It condemns America's 'imperialist arrogance' concerning Iraq and Iran while attacking the UN Security Council as a tool of Western powers.
This narrative, unfolding within the opaque and highly politicized security apparatus of the Islamic Republic, shows Algeria's deepening alignment with Tehran's regional axis, a reality it seeks to obscure through diversionary attacks on the US.
The piece particularly spoke about US support for Israel, framing it as evidence of America's 'Zionist-terrorist' alliance.
Yet, this vitriolic condemnation stands in stark contrast to recent actions by Algeria's own government.
Just months before the article's publication, Algerian Ambassador to Washington Sabri Boukadoum told US media that security cooperation between the two countries had 'no limits,' enthusiastically stating: 'The sky is the limit for our partnership.'
Algerian political analyst Oualid Kebir has sharply criticized this flagrant contradiction, calling Algeria 'the largest rogue state in contemporary history,' in a post on X.
'This is textbook hypocrisy,' Kebir added. 'When you call your military partner a 'terrorist entity' while conducting joint exercises and sharing intelligence, you completely undermine your credibility on the international stage.'
While Algeria's state media hysterically denounces the US as a 'terrorist state,' its regime shamelessly bankrolls and arms the Polisario Front, the separatist group in Western Sahara that has been repeatedly drawn alarm on the international stage for its acts of terrorism.
This glaring hypocrisy shows Algiers' true agenda which is to destabilize North Africa through proxy militias while posing as an anti-imperialist champion.
Even as Algeria lectures about 'international law,' it violates every principle by sheltering the Polisario, which embezzles vital humanitarian aid to the Tindouf camp refugees to maintain its anti-Morocco agenda. Tags: AlgeriatebbouneterrorismUS

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Algerian historian Mohamed Amine Belghit faces seven year sentence
Algerian historian Mohamed Amine Belghit faces seven year sentence

Ya Biladi

time2 hours ago

  • Ya Biladi

Algerian historian Mohamed Amine Belghit faces seven year sentence

In Algeria, the trial of historian Mohamed Amine Belghit is nearing its conclusion. On Thursday, June 26, the prosecution requested a seven-year prison sentence and a fine of 700,000 dinars (approximately €4,616), according to an Algerian media outlet. Belghit, who has been in custody since May 3, faces charges of «undermining national unity», «inciting hatred», and «using information technology for propaganda that undermines human dignity». These charges are linked to an interview he gave to a media outlet in the United Arab Emirates, in which he claimed the Amazigh movement was a «creation of French and Zionist intelligence services». The public prosecutor deemed these remarks contrary to constitutional values concerning national unity, state sovereignty, and social cohesion, according to a statement issued on May 3. It is worth noting that Algerian authorities have previously accused Morocco, France, and Israel of «financially and militarily supporting» separatist claims in Kabylia.

Sahrawi NGOs Condemn Polisario Attack on Es-Smara, UN Mission Launches Field Investigation
Sahrawi NGOs Condemn Polisario Attack on Es-Smara, UN Mission Launches Field Investigation

Morocco World

time3 hours ago

  • Morocco World

Sahrawi NGOs Condemn Polisario Attack on Es-Smara, UN Mission Launches Field Investigation

Rabat – A coalition of Sahrawi NGOs has strongly condemned the recent projectile attack near the southern Moroccan city of Es-Smara, calling it a 'hostile act' and a grave violation of Morocco's sovereignty and international law. The incident, which caused panic among residents but resulted in no casualties, is widely believed to be the latest in a series of attacks carried out by the Polisario Front. The explosions occurred in an uninhabited area a few kilometers outside the city, close to a MINURSO camp. Images and videos shared online showed debris from the projectiles scattered in the area. The United Nations Mission in the Sahara (MINURSO) visited the impact sites on Friday evening to conduct an on-the-ground assessment, according to local reports. The field visit, conducted in coordination with members of Morocco's Royal Armed Forces, aimed to assess the damage and collect data for a detailed report that will be submitted to UN Secretary-General António Guterres. In a statement released after the incident, the coalition of Sahrawi NGOs expressed deep concern over what it described as the Polisario Front's continued breach of the UN-brokered ceasefire agreement. It accused the group of intentionally targeting areas close to civilians in a desperate attempt to destabilize the region and spread fear. Algeria under scrutiny The coalition said local authorities recovered explosive shells near the urban center of Es-Smara, warning that such acts were aimed at harming civilians and striking at Morocco's territorial integrity. The attack 'signals an intentional targeting of a civilian urban environment in order to impose a new, unstable reality in the region,' the group said, adding that Algeria's support and silence made it complicit in the escalation. The statement blamed Algeria for allowing a non-state armed group to operate from its territory and carry out attacks against Morocco. According to the coalition, Algeria's failure to control its borders and prevent such escalations makes it fully responsible for the ongoing military provocations. It also warned that this incident reflects a pattern of indiscriminate violence and deliberate targeting of populated areas, contradicting Polisario's claims that it only strikes military sites. 'This, it argues, constitutes a breach of international law, norms, and conventions, and must be met with an appropriate international response.' The NGO coalition reiterated its solidarity with the residents of Es-Smara and called on the UN Security Council to act swiftly to preserve peace and stability in the region. It urged Algeria to support peaceful dialogue and UN-led efforts to find a political solution to the conflict, instead of backing armed provocations. This latest incident comes less than two years after a similar attack in Es-Smara in 2023, which killed one person and injured three others. In that case, Morocco's UN ambassador Omar Hilale stated that the blasts struck civilian neighborhoods and noted that the Polisario had issued a statement indirectly taking responsibility. 'There were no military installations at any of the sites,' Hilale said in a press conference after the incident, adding that 'targeting civilians is a terrorist act under international law, and those responsible will not go unpunished.' Hilale also emphasized that those behind the attacks, as well as those who arm and support them, must be held accountable. He specifically referred to Algeria, which has been hosting, financing, and fully backing the Polisario for decades. Polisario faces US pressure Meanwhile, in the United States, a bipartisan effort is underway to designate the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist organization. US Republican Senator Joe Wilson and Democratic Representative Jimmy Panetta recently introduced the bill, which cites the group's attacks on civilians and its renewed armed activities following the collapse of the 2020 ceasefire. Wilson described Polisario as a 'Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a US ally for 248 years.' The legislation cites the Polisario's indiscriminate attacks on civilians and its rearmament after the collapse of the 2020 ceasefire. Lawmakers from both parties argue that this designation would enable enhanced sanctions, travel bans, and financial restrictions against the group. The bill reflects growing US concerns over renewed violence, especially following the ceasefire ending in late 2020. Meanwhile, Morocco's Autonomy Plan for Western Sahara has been gaining significant diplomatic backing recently. Rabat's comprehensive plan currently receives support from at least 113 countries, and the momentum is quickly growing. In 2020, the US officially recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara and expressed support for the Autonomy Plan, with American officials recently reiterating this stance. In addition, France positively shifted tone in July 2024, labeling Morocco's 2007 autonomy proposal 'the only basis' for a just, lasting, UN-compliant settlement On June 1 this year, the United Kingdom became the third permanent UN Security Council member, after the US and France, to endorse Morocco's autonomy plan, calling it 'the most credible, viable and pragmatic' path forward. Tags: AlgeriaEs SmaraPolisarioSaharaWestern sahara

Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation
Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation

Morocco World

time18 hours ago

  • Morocco World

Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation

Marrakech – A fierce controversy has engulfed the upcoming World Sociology Forum in Morocco as academic organizations and activists across the country demand the immediate exclusion of Israeli researchers from the event. The prestigious fifth World Sociology Forum, set for July 6-11, at Mohammed V University in Rabat, now faces a mounting crisis after multiple Moroccan academic bodies called for a complete boycott of Israeli participants in direct protest against the ongoing genocide in Gaza perpetrated by Netanyahu's government, which faces international arrest warrants. The Moroccan Campaign for Academic and Cultural Boycott (MACBI), operating within the BDS Morocco movement, has formally demanded that the International Sociological Association (ISA) cancel all participation by Israeli academics at the forum. In a strongly worded statement released Wednesday, the BDS Morocco coordination condemned 'the participation of Israeli academics from complicit institutions' of the occupation, without 'respect for fundamental ethical conditions.' The movement pointed out that while Gaza continues to suffer under genocide since October 7, 2023, the ISA still plans to include three speakers from Israel. One presenter reportedly characterizes Hamas as a 'terrorist organization' and references the 'displacement' of Israelis following Hezbollah attacks. MACBI forcefully reminded that 'in 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank was illegal and constituted apartheid.' When confronted by MACBI regarding presenters whose communications allegedly promote the occupation's narrative, the ISA defended its stance, claiming it would 'not cancel these participations' because of its 'commitment to academic freedom' and desire to 'offer a platform for dialogue as open as courageous.' The dispute has mobilized Moroccan academics nationwide. The Progressive Current of Professors and Researchers within the National Union of Higher Education (SNE-Sup) declared 'deep concern about the repercussions of the announcement' by the ISA. The union's secretariat stated that 'the universities of the Zionist entity are partners and strategic actors in the occupation and institutionalization of apartheid, providing academic cover for ethnic cleansing policies, developing repression and espionage tools in cooperation with the occupation army.' They added that these institutions 'host military bases and security research centers, institutionalize racial discrimination against Palestinian students, and justify crimes against humanity, including famine, massacres, and genocide perpetrated in Gaza.' For the union, holding this forum in Morocco with academics from institutions 'involved in these crimes' represents 'an attack on the image of the Moroccan university, its moral and academic credibility.' Respecting national values and regional solidarity principles The Moroccan Sociological Association has issued an unequivocal rejection of Israeli participation in the forum. The association firmly stated that hosting the event in Rabat must come with 'the necessity of respecting Moroccan values and related positions, especially concerning vital issues for Morocco.' The association asserted that 'the barbaric practices committed against Palestinian civilians, which Israeli authorities intend as material and moral extermination of the Palestinian existence, drive us […] to not welcome those belonging to the usurping entity even within scientific and academic activities, out of respect for national commitments and the feelings of Moroccans, and to preserve the ties that unite us with components of the region to which we belong.' The association strongly condemned 'the Israeli attack on all the foundations of the Palestinian people' and denounced 'all forms of extermination practiced against their right to exist within an independent homeland where they can exercise their sovereignty and live with dignity.' It demanded that the international community 'take the necessary measures to stop these crimes committed against the Palestinian people, and guarantee their legitimate rights in service of global and regional peace.' The association further insisted that adherence to the academic ethics underlying the ISA's laws is 'necessary and obligatory with regard to respecting international charters and relevant resolutions, especially those related to the Palestinian cause during the selection and programming of participations.' 'An ideological and dangerous drift' However, Moroccan sociologist Jamal Fezza has criticized what he called an 'ideological and dangerous' drift. In a social media post, Fezza argued that 'sociology is a universal knowledge shaped by both Jewish and Christian thinkers, and no identity dogma can dictate its boundaries.' He added that 'the most important tools that a sociologist should be armed with is the axiological neutrality that Max Weber called for, without which sociology mixes with opinion and belief.' Expanding on his position, Fezza stated that the call to boycott the forum due to Israeli participants 'reflects a profound ignorance of the tasks entrusted to sociology, and an attempt to involve science and scientists in ideological and political polemics far removed from the nature of this science and the goals it aspires to.' 'For the person who calls for boycotting the World Forum with that argument to be fully consistent with himself, he needs only boycott sociology itself, because it is simply a science produced by Jews and some Christians. From Durkheim and Simmel through Levi-Strauss and Ezra Park, you will not find the name Ahmed or Ismail leaving their mark in the history of this great science,' Fezza concluded. Equating 'the criminal and the victim' Even so, a petition has gained momentum among Moroccan researchers rejecting the participation of Israeli academics in the forum. Researchers are withdrawing en masse from the event, with both Moroccan and international academics pulling out in a powerful show of solidarity with Palestine. Within hours of the petition's circulation, numerous participants canceled their presentations, creating a ripple effect that threatens the forum's viability. The researchers stated: 'We, researchers in social sciences, Moroccans and from the rest of the world, express our boycott of the Fifth Sociology Forum of the International Sociological Association, due to the participation of Zionist institutions involved, in one way or another, in the ongoing genocide war on Gaza, and the programming of interventions that appear from their summaries to promote the colonial narrative.' The petition signatories accused the ISA of 'violating' ethical and research standards by equating 'the criminal and the victim' on the same platform through programming topics that 'beautify the ongoing genocide war on the Palestinian people.' According to official information, more than 30 Israeli academics and researchers are scheduled to attend, representing Israeli universities that the boycott movement classifies as institutions involved in the occupation and apartheid system, including the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ben-Gurion University, Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv University, and the Open University of Israel. Academic cooperation between Morocco and Israel began in February 2021, when the education ministers of both countries agreed to launch a program for exchanging student delegations and conducting educational competitions in Arabic and Hebrew in both countries. Despite strong opposition from Moroccan anti-normalization groups, the Moroccan Minister of Higher Education, Abdellatif Miraoui, and his Israeli counterpart, Orit Farkash-Hacohen, signed the first cooperation agreement between universities and research centers in May 2022. Morocco announced the renewal of diplomatic relations with Israel on December 10, 2020, after they were suspended in 2000 following the outbreak of the Second Palestinian Intifada.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store