Transfer of endangered Brazilian monkeys to Lahore Zoo halted
The court's decision provides a temporary safeguard for the rare species, currently under the care of the Ayesha Chundrigar Foundation (ACF) Animal Rescue, an animal welfare organisation based in Karachi.
According to a report dated May 6, 2025, by the Ministry of Climate Change, the relocation plan involved shifting the monkeys to the Lahore Zoo. However, this move triggered widespread concern among environmentalists, animal rights organizations, and civil society activists, who warned of potential threats to the monkeys' wellbeing.
The petition was filed by Altamush Saeed and Ahmad Shoaib Atta, affiliated with the Environmental and Animal Rights Counsel (EARC). In their submission, the petitioners argued that the current conditions at Lahore Zoo are wholly unsuitable for housing such rare and sensitive primates.
They cited high mortality rates among animals, extreme temperatures, substandard veterinary facilities, and inadequate infrastructure—concerns that have also been validated by national and international bodies, including WWF Pakistan.
The petitioners further maintained that the monkeys would be safest in their native habitat—the Brazilian rainforest—and that no facility in Pakistan can replicate the ecological conditions necessary for their survival.
They have urged international wildlife organizations to intervene and facilitate the monkeys' repatriation to their natural habitat.
The court has issued notices to the relevant government departments and sought a formal response. The matter has been adjourned for further hearing in September 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Imran involved in May 9 conspiracy, rules LHC
Listen to article The Lahore High Court (LHC) ruled on Thursday that former prime minister Imran Khan was involved in a conspiracy behind the violent events of May 9, 2023, citing testimonies from two police officials. The court dismissed Imran's post-arrest bail petition, noting sufficient grounds for criminal conspiracy and abetment. According to the detailed order, statements by Inspector Ismat Kamal and Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Hassan Afzal place Imran as the one who perpetrated meetings held on May 4 at Chakri Rest Area, Rawalpindi, and on May 7 and 9 in Lahore. The court said this undermines the argument that Imran was in jail during the violence on May 9. 'These statements attract the provisions of Section 120-B and Section 121-A of the Pakistan Penal Code,' reads the judgment. Both sections deal with criminal conspiracy and abetment of mutiny, which carry serious legal consequences. Read: LHC rejects Imran's bail in eight May 9 cases During the hearing, the court observed that Imran's prior conviction in the Al-Qadir Trust case was uncontested. It also said that his alleged statements and actions had led to the loss of lives and damage to state property. The prosecution submitted audio and video clips, including transcripts prepared by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), which require forensic examination. The authorities had obtained court permission to conduct photogrammetry, polygraph and voice-matching tests within jail premises. However, investigators reported that Imran repeatedly refused to cooperate, hindering progress. The court concluded that the charges fall under the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which bars bail in serious offences. It found no new circumstances to justify further inquiry or release on bail. 'In collective consideration of the are not inclined to grant post-arrest bail to the petitioner,' the court stated, dismissing the petition outright.
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Support price for wheat: LHC reserves verdict on KBP's plea
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict in a petition filed by the Kissan Board Pakistan (KBP) against delay in fixing a support price for wheat. Earlier, the KBP president's counsel pleaded that the government had yet to announce a minimum support price for wheat, causing significant financial hardship for farmers. The petitioner's counsel argued that nearly 70 per cent of the country's population was directly or indirectly dependent on agriculture, making its development vital for national food security. He stated that last year, the government procured wheat at Rs 4000 per 40 kg from select regions. However, this year, due to a delay in policy announcement, wheat was sold in the market at Rs 2200 per 40 kg which was far below production cost. The counsel said the inefficiency of the government caused financial losses to farmers. The counsel argued that the delay effectively left the farmers at the mercy of private flour mill owners which could lead to exploitation and economic crisis for the agricultural community. He further contended that by not fixing the price, the government failed in its duty to protect the interests of farmers who are already burdened by rising costs and uncertain market conditions. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Shehbaz's defamation case against Imran Khan reaches SC
Listen to article The defamation case filed by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has now reached the Supreme Court. In the case, Khan has submitted a petition challenging the jurisdiction of the court hearing the matter. In the plea, the PTI founder has requested the apex court suspend proceedings in the defamation case until a decision is made on his appeal. He argues that, under the law, only a district and sessions court has the authority to hear such defamation matters. Read More: PM Shehbaz's virtual court appearance interrupted by electricity outage The petition also challenges the jurisdiction of the additional sessions judge, whose decision was previously upheld by the Lahore High Court. Khan's legal team has asked the Supreme Court to nullify the orders issued by both the additional sessions judge and the Lahore High Court. Furthermore, the petition urges the apex court to halt any further proceedings in the case until the appeal is decided. 2017 Defamation Suit In 2017, PM Shehbaz filed a defamation suit against then-opposition leader Imran Khan, accusing him of making defamatory statements that harmed his reputation and mental well-being. Sharif's defamation claim stems from Khan's allegations that Sharif offered him Rs10 billion through a common friend in exchange for withdrawing from the Panama Papers case, which was then pending before the Supreme Court. According to the suit, these "baseless and malicious" statements were widely circulated by the media, damaging Sharif's public image and causing "extreme mental torture, agony, and anxiety." Read More: PM replies to queries in defamation suit Sharif's legal team has asked the court to issue a decree for the recovery of Rs10 billion in compensation for the defamation and the harm caused by the statements. The prime minister contends that the accusations were false and led to significant reputational damage. In response, Khan filed a reply in 2021, claiming that the information had been passed to him by a friend, who had allegedly been approached by a member of the Sharif family with an offer to stop pursuing the Panama case. Khan stated that he revealed the incident in the public interest and argued that his statement did not specifically attribute any part of the allegation to Sharif.
