Insurance dispute costs Bridgeport man potentially life-saving treatment
A report from NBC News on Thursday night spoke about Eric Tennant, a Bridgeport resident who works at the West Virginia Office of Miners' Health Safety and Training and suffers from a rare cancer found in his bile ducts. He was diagnosed at stage 4 in 2023 and wasn't expected to survive a year, dropping below 100 pounds at one point.
In fall 2024, following nearly two years of chemotherapy treatment, Tennant's wife, Rebecca, learned of a way to potentially aid his condition through a 'relatively new' procedure known as histotripsy, NBC News reported. The procedure would use ultrasound waves to target tumors in Tennant's liver and could potentially extend his life.
His insurance declined to cover the $50,000 treatment.
Tennant is insured under West Virginia's Public Employee Insurance Agency (PEIA), and despite receiving a recommendation for the procedure from his oncologist, PEIA cited the treatment as 'not medically necessary,' NBC News reported.
West Virginia woman who traveled 6 hours for life-saving abortion calls for issue to be placed on voter ballot
After learning of PEIA's denial, NBC News reported that the Tennant family attempted to appeal the agency four separate times, all to no avail. Along the way, they were faced with other roadblocks such as UMR, a subsidiary of United Healthcare that manages PEIA plans through a contract with West Virginia, as well as MES Peer Review Services, a Massachusetts-based company that upheld PEIA's decision in March, saying that histotripsy is 'unproven in this case and is not medically necessary.'
NBC News interviewed the Tennants in April and noted that after it and KFF Health News reached out to PEIA with questions for its story, the agency changed its tune.
PEIA officials told NBC News that the agency had 'consulted with medical experts to further evaluate the case' and that Tennant was now, seemingly out of nowhere, approved for a histotripsy. PEIA Director Brent Wolfingbarger told the outlet that the decision to approve Tennant 'reflects a rare and exceptional situation' and doesn't represent a change in PEIA's overall coverage policies.
Despite the sudden approval, Rebecca Tennant told NBC News that it may be too late. She said that since Eric was evaluated in February, his health has declined significantly, resulting in him having to spend five days in the hospital in late May and early June due to lung and heart complications.
As a result of his health declining, Rebecca told NBC News that Eric is no longer considered a viable candidate for a histotripsy. She said she's hopeful that he will be viable once again after his health improves, but blames PEIA for 'wasting months' of their time.
'Time is precious,' she said. 'They know he has stage 4 cancer, and it's almost like they don't care if he lives or dies.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Roger Williams, Our Lady of Fatima hospitals sale to move forward. Here's why
PROVIDENCE – Attorney General Peter Neronha announced Thursday, July 31 an amended decision to facilitate the sale of Roger Williams Medical Center and Our Lady of Fatima Hospital. The decision – the second amended in the sale process – reduces the cash-on-hand requirement for the Centurion Foundation, a Georgia-based nonprofit, from $80 million to $45 million for closing the deal. The reduction of cash-on-hand, explained Neronha at a press conference, was due to Centurion having difficulties selling bonds to raise funds for the purchase of the hospitals. But the amended decision also requires Centurion and CharterCARE to secure an additional $35 million within 90 days, bringing the funds back to $80 million. Neronha said the parties have given him assurances on their ability to raise funds post-sale that, in his judgment, could be relied on. The attorney general also said he secured the remaining $50 million – from an original $80 million in an escrow account – to create a hospital fund as part of the transaction. Additional conditions have also been attached to the sale, among them: A requirement for the parties to spend at least $50 million on capital expenses at the hospitals within three years of the transaction A requirement for the parties to not contest the attorney general's right to file a petition for the appointment of a receiver in case of insolvency The detainment of a consultant, at the expense of the parties, to report on the financial and operation state of the hospitals 'While this is a complicated process, our goal is simple: make sure our safety net hospitals are in the best position possible to serve our communities for as long as possible,' Neronha said in a written statement following the press event. Neronha explained that the hospitals were not yet entirely out of danger but that progress has been made: the hospitals are staying provisionally open, are shifting from for-profit to nonprofit and the attorney general's office will have levers to pull in case of an insolvency. 'I don't want to stand here and gaslight Rhode Islanders and make them believer, or have them believe, that all the problems have been solved. They haven't,' Neronha said at the July 31 press conference. 'But we have made some steps forward.' The attorney general added that Rhode Island's chronic low reimbursement rates from public and private insurance need to be addressed to treat the health system's ailments. 'Until we make a Rhode Island patient mean the same financially as a Massachusetts or a Connecticut patient, our hospital systems and our providers and our workers are always going to be at a state of disadvantage,' Neronha said. The anticipated closing date for the sale – pending approval by a bankruptcy court in Texas – is sometime in late August or mid-September. The full amended decision is available here. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Roger Williams, Our Lady of Fatima hospital sales moving forward Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bat flies into woman's mouth in Arizona, costing her nearly $21,000 in medical bills
A Massachusetts woman was bitten by nearly $21,000 in medical bills after a bat flew into her mouth during a freak incident while vacationing in Northern Arizona, the unlucky traveler said Friday. Erica Kahn, now 33, had recently lost her job as a biomedical engineer when she traveled to the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in last August, she told NBC News. Kahn, whose woman-vs.-animal story was first reported Thursday by KFF News, was snapping pictures of the night sky when a bat approached and got caught in between her camera and face. Then a part of the bat got into her mouth. "It was kind of dark out and we were out on a cliff, so I was looking down and at my camera, I didn't really see it coming," she said Friday. "When it got kind of tangled between my face and the camera, it was probably just like a few seconds. But it felt like a lot longer." While there are highly effective drugs for rabies, it can be fatal if not treated before symptoms are felt. At the urging of her travel partner and father, a doctor, the symptom-less Kahn sought care for rabies — but only after jumping online to buy new medical insurance. After Kahn lost her job, she declined to pay for her former employer's insurance for $650 a month through COBRA, the federal continuation of health coverage law. The unemployed Massachusetts woman figured she could roll the dice as a healthy woman in her early 30s or at worst, could hastily buy private health insurance in a pinch, Kahn said. Kahn went online, bought a policy and then went to get rabies vaccinations and treatment in Arizona, Colorado and Massachusetts, believing she was in the clear. Then the bills started pouring in, asking for a total of $20,749, because her policy had a 30-day waiting period before she could receive treatments covered by the plan, she said. "I felt so powerless against these companies," she said. "It should be a human right to have lifesaving care covered. In most other countries, like in Europe, you just go to the hospital, you get your rabies vaccines and you pay nothing." Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said most plans kick in on the first of the month after enrollment. It's generally not instantaneous. 'The insurance companies — for good reason — don't want people to wait to sign up for coverage until they are sick,' Corlette told KFF. Kahn is now employed again and has health insurance, she's burdened by the bills. Kahn said looking back, she should have secured private health insurance as soon as she was laid off. "I should have done COBRA, even though it was very expensive," Kahn said. "But yeah, hindsight is 20/20." The near-$21,000 burden will probably lead to fewer vacations and a delay in having central air conditioning installed at her place, Kahn said. She said she hopes others can learn from her misstep. "It was my fault. I took the risk of not doing COBRA and that's forever on me," she said. "But if one person gets covered because they saw this story, then I would be happy about that." This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors
Proponents have said the ban is an important way of protecting children from treatments they believe to be harmful and irreversible. But opponents say the new law discriminates against transgender youth, removing treatments they view as life saving, and interfering with doctors' ability to make appropriate medical decisions with families. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Violations of the new law will go before New Hampshire's board of medicine, which can take administrative disciplinary action. Advertisement The new law also allows someone who was harmed by receiving this care to bring a lawsuit against the person who provided the care and violated the law. The new ban comes as legislative efforts targeting transgender people have grown in recent years. Last year, New Hampshire lawmakers passed a bill banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors, even though providers have said such procedures are exceedingly rare in New Hampshire. All of the other New England states have laws protecting access to gender-affirming care, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a Colorado-based think tank that promotes equality. Advertisement Some New Hampshire families with transgender children have been warily watching as the bill advanced and, in some cases, have been Republican lawmakers in New Hampshire who championed the ban were encouraged by a But some attorneys say there are still avenues for pursuing a possible legal challenge of New Hampshire's new law. That could include a challenge based on the New Hampshire constitution, arguing that the intent of the law was to harm transgender people, or a challenge on the basis of parental rights, according to Chris Erchull, a senior staff attorney at GLAD law. Ayotte also signed a second bill banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors. The bill explicitly prohibits 'transgender chest surgery' for minors as part of a gender transition. Violating the law is classified as unprofessional conduct and would be subject to discipline by the board of medicine. The law also allows minors to sue for damages if they received such a treatment in violation of the law. And the attorney general can bring a suit to enforce compliance with the law. Amanda Gokee can be reached at
