
Russia not worried over Trump's nuke submarines threat? Lawmaker urges ‘agreement' to stop World War 3 talks
"The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones," a senior Russian lawmaker, Viktor Vodolatsky, was quoted as saying by TASS.
He added that the submarines that US President Donald Trump ordered to be "redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their [Russian nuclear submarines] control."
"So, no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required," Vodolatsky said.
Vodolatsky's statement came after Trump wrote on his Truth Social post that he had ordered the redeployment of US submarines "to appropriate regions" allegedly over "extremely provocative statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is also the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council.
"Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now," the Russian lawmaker said.
"A fundamental agreement that must be concluded between Russia and America so that the whole world calms down and stops talking about the beginning of World War III," he added.
Meanwhile, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, said that Trump's nuclear submarine statement should not be taken seriously for now.
"Trump, as we know, runs his own channel and reacts, so to speak, emotionally, humanely and spontaneously. I think that the armed forces, the naval forces of the United States read this with great surprise," Lukyanov told local private news channel RBC TV.
"If this exchange of opinions continues, and Trump continues to be drawn into it, then, one way or another, he will probably have to take some action. In my opinion, so far this is only at the level of words," Lukyanov said.
Following the American leader's statements, the Moscow Exchange index plummeted 2,709.26 points (0.99%) by 08:01 pm Moscow time (10:31 pm IST) on Friday.
Earlier, responding to a media question over US State Department Secretary Marco Rubio's recent interview with Fox News, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia agrees with the US administration that a direct military confrontation between Moscow and Washington must not happen.
"While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO and preparing for potential conflict with Russia, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided," Lavrov said.
"We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue," Lavrov said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
'Actively involved' in India-US BTA talks: Govt tells Parliament amid spat with Trump over tariff
Regarding the efforts being taken by the government to protect critical industries such as agriculture, Prasada stated that international trade agreements allow for the inclusion of sensitive, negative, or exclusion lists - groupings of commodities that get restricted or no tariff concessions read more President Trump has threatened to hike tariffs on India 'substantially' for importing Russian oil, accusing New Delhi of benefitting from Moscow's fuel during the continuing war in Ukraine. File image/Reuters India is 'actively involved' in discussions for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the United States, with the goal of expanding trade and investment and deepening the commercial relationship to promote growth, national security, and job creation, said Jitin Prasada, Minister of Commerce, in a written response to the Lok Sabha on August 5. The answer came only hours after India issued a strong statement in response to US President Donald Trump's social media post threatening New Delhi with extra tariffs on its oil trade with Moscow. President Trump has threatened to hike tariffs on India 'substantially' for importing Russian oil, accusing New Delhi of benefitting from Moscow's fuel during the continuing war in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Trump administration has yet to elaborate on the extra taxes. Negotiations for a trade agreement between India and the United States began in March 2025, and five rounds of discussions have been place thus far, the most recent in July. Talks for a mini-version of a deal before August 1 appear to have failed, as divergences continued, particularly on agriculture. Regarding the efforts being taken by the government to protect critical industries such as agriculture, Prasada stated that international trade agreements allow for the inclusion of sensitive, negative, or exclusion lists - groupings of commodities that get restricted or no tariff concessions. On August 5, Prasada said, 'In addition, in case of surge in imports and injury to the domestic industry, a country is allowed to take recourse to trade remedial measures such as anti-dumping and safeguards on imports within the periods as mutually agreed to by the parties under FTAs.' On July 30, Trump declared a 25 percent tax and an undisclosed fine on India for acquiring Russian energy supplies and defence equipment. Responding to the ongoing trade discussions with the United States, MoS for Agriculture Ramnath Thakur stated that the government has always prioritised farmers' livelihoods and interests, as well as food security concerns, while negotiating deals with international partners, including the United States.


Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Can't we say ‘good genes' anymore? The backlash to the Sydney Sweeney jeans ad explained
When clothing retailer American Eagle launched its new ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney, it was merely trying to revive its declining fortunes and appeal to its consumer base of predominantly young women. However, it found itself at the centre of the latest public debate surrounding an ad featuring the blonde-haired, blue-eyed actress. The offending ad drew concerns from critics for the language used, who claimed that it was a racial dog whistle, intentional or otherwise. 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour,' Sweeney says in the ad as the camera pans over her denim jeans and jacket. 'My jeans are blue.' And just as the company attempted to play down the controversy, the White House decided to weigh in with its full strength. Spokesperson Steven Cheung characterised the criticism as 'cancel culture run amok', Vice President JD Vance called Sweeney an 'All-American beautiful woman', and President Donald Trump on Monday (August 4) wrote, 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the HOTTEST ad out there.' Is it a bad thing to say someone has good genes? The phrase 'good genes' is used today often to compliment someone's physical attributes. However, it has a complicated history with direct ties to eugenics and white supremacist propaganda. Eugenics is a discredited scientific theory which argues for selective breeding, meaning intentional human reproduction to increase the presence of genetic traits viewed as 'desirable'. The term was coined in Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development (1883) by Francis Galton, a British natural scientist who drew on Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection. Darwin's theory suggests that as species evolve, individuals with traits that can adapt to their environmental requirements are more likely to survive and reproduce, thus passing these traits on to their offspring. Galton advocated for selective breeding to give 'the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable'. In the US, eugenics was introduced by Charles Davenport, who founded the Eugenics Record Office on Long Island, New York, in 1910 to 'improve the natural, physical, mental, and temperamental qualities of the human family', according to its brochure. What was initially an academic interest in identifying 'undesirable' traits, like dwarfism, mental ability, and criminality, extended into a larger social movement in the 1920s and '30s. This had political implications too, with states such as Indiana and California implementing sterilisation laws targeting the poor and disabled, as well as Native Americans, Latin Americans, and Black people. Between 1907 and the 1970s, more than 60,000 people across 32 states were forcibly sterilised for being 'mentally deficient'. In 2003, then-California Governor Gray Davis apologised for the state's role after it was revealed that the state's forced sterilisation campaign had inspired Nazi Germany's efforts at ethnic cleansing of its minorities, predominantly Jews, ethnic communities like the Sinti and Roma, LGBTQ+ people, and people with disabilities. And the Nazis most infamously presented the archetype of the blonde-haired, blue-eyed, white person as having 'pure blood' and therefore, aspirational. Eugenics as an idea lost popularity in the 1940s after the actions of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler came to be reviled. However, subtler practices, such as involuntary sterilisation, forced institutionalisation and social ostracisation, have continued in the decades post-WWII. Such policies disproportionately targeted women and people of colour. Writing in The Conversation in 2020, academic Alexandra Minna Stern noted that Black women were sterilised over three times the rate of white women and over 12 times the rate of white men between 1950 and 1966. Federal programs like Medicaid funded forced sterilisation between the 1960s and 1970s, impacting over 100,000 Black, Latino and Indigenous women, Stern wrote. According to critics, the wordplay in the ad is malicious when viewed with the composite actions of the Trump administration, including its unprecedented crackdown on immigration. Since January, the president has imposed a national emergency at the country's shared border with Mexico, denied entry to asylum-seekers, authorised nationwide immigration raids, aggressively pushed for self-deportations, and has stepped up the ante on third-country deportations, despite legal challenges. This, coupled with other actions by the administration, such as the repeal of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, has caused concern that the administration has stepped beyond serving its primarily white, conservative, MAGA voter base. The president has been at the forefront of such messaging, telling a rally of his supporters that they had 'good genes'. Last October, he said that illegal immigrants who commit murder have 'bad genes.' Along the campaign trail, the president also claimed that illegal immigrants were 'poisoning the blood of our country', using language that directly echoed Adolf Hitler's 1925 autobiography, Mein Kampf. Such language has been endorsed by two-thirds of Republican voters across the country, according to an October 2024 poll by the University of Massachusetts. In recent years, conservative commentators, ranging from TV host Tucker Carlson to billionaire CEO Elon Musk, have also leaned into the controversial Great Replacement Theory, coined by French writer Renaud Camus in 2010. According to the theory, white Americans face the threat of becoming a minority and losing their jobs to non-white immigrants. The Republican Party leaned into such messaging in the run-up to the 2024 election, claiming that the Democratic Party was importing immigrants to win the election.


News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
Donald Trump Declares Sydney Sweeney's Ad 'HOTTEST,' Alams 'Woke' Taylor Swift US News
American President Donald Trump has taken to social media to praise actor Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad campaign, while simultaneously criticizing pop star Taylor move comes after Trump learned that Sweeney is a registered Republican. In his post on Truth Social , he called Sweeney's ad the "HOTTEST" and said the jeans were "flying off the shelves." News18 Mobile App -