Repeat offender jailed after claiming girl (5) made call that breached safety order
A repeat offender who breached a safety order by calling his former partner and tried to blame a five-year-old girl for dialling the number has been jailed for three months.
The man, who is in his 30s, had pleaded not guilty under Section 33(1) of the Domestic Violence Act 2018 after the court heard the woman was put in fear by the phone call, which came while she was at home with their children.
The woman told Tallaght District Court she was getting the children ready for school when her phone rang on July 2, 2024.
'I was afraid. I just left the house with the kids,' she said. 'Usually when he rings, something bad happens. I felt it was unsafe to stay.' She said she didn't answer the call, but that it was enough to put her in fear.
Under cross-examination from defence solicitor John O'Leary, she accepted she didn't know what the caller had intended to say, as she hadn't picked up.
Tallaght district court.
News in 90 Seconds - Saturday July 12
Garda Shane McCabe told the court that the complainant attended the Garda station on the evening of July 2 to report a possible breach of a safety order. He said she appeared agitated when giving her statement.
Garda McCabe also told the court that the accused had six previous convictions, including assault, driving without insurance, and three prior breaches of safety and protection orders.
The accused told the court he had been in a car when the call was made.
He said he had given the phone to a child in the car and claimed she must have dialled the number.
He told the court he had previously deleted the complainant's number but was using a new phone and had inserted a SIM card that still contained the number
He said he hadn't realised it was saved and only discovered the call had been made after checking the dialled numbers on the phone when the child returned it to him.
Prosecuting solicitor Tom Conlon, for the DPP, suggested the explanation was too convenient.
'So it just so happened that a five-year-old took your phone and made a call - coincidentally - to the very person you're barred from contacting under a court order?' he asked.
Mr Conlon also asked whether the accused had given that explanation to Gardaí at the time.
'I think I did, yeah,' the man replied.
Mr O'Leary, in mitigation, said his client had been in an on-and-off relationship with the complainant for many years and 'loves her to bits". Counsel said the man was getting on well in custody, working in the prison kitchen, and wanted to put the matter behind him.
Judge Shalom Binchy said there was nothing in the defence's mitigation to suggest the accused was addressing his issues with violence towards women.
'It's clear from his previous convictions that there's a difficulty in relation to violence and his attitude towards women,' she said. 'And not only that - he's now blaming a five-year-old girl for this breach.'
She noted that the case had been contested and that the accused had three prior breaches of protection orders.
She sentenced him to six months in prison, with the final three months suspended for 18 months.
The man must enter a bond of €300 and attend the MOVE (Men Overcoming Violence) programme within three months of his release.
Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man jailed after claiming five-year-old girl made call that breached safety order
The woman told Tallaght District Court she was getting the children ready for school when her phone rang on July 2, 2024 A repeat offender who breached a safety order by calling his former partner and tried to blame a five-year-old girl for dialling the number has been jailed for three months. The man, who is in his 30s, had pleaded not guilty under Section 33(1) of the Domestic Violence Act 2018 after the court heard the woman was put in fear by the phone call, which came while she was at home with their children. The woman told Tallaght District Court she was getting the children ready for school when her phone rang on July 2, 2024. 'I was afraid. I just left the house with the kids,' she said. 'Usually when he rings, something bad happens. I felt it was unsafe to stay.' She said she didn't answer the call, but that it was enough to put her in fear. Under cross-examination from defence solicitor John O'Leary, she accepted she didn't know what the caller had intended to say, as she hadn't picked up. Garda Shane McCabe told the court that the complainant attended the Garda station on the evening of July 2 to report a possible breach of a safety order. He said she appeared agitated when giving her statement. Garda McCabe also told the court that the accused had six previous convictions, including assault, driving without insurance, and three prior breaches of safety and protection orders. The accused told the court he had been in a car when the call was made. He said he had given the phone to a child in the car and claimed she must have dialled the number. He told the court he had previously deleted the complainant's number but was using a new phone and had inserted a SIM card that still contained the number. He said he hadn't realised it was saved and only discovered the call had been made after checking the dialled numbers on the phone when the child returned it to him. Prosecuting solicitor Tom Conlon, for the DPP, suggested the explanation was too convenient. 'So it just so happened that a five-year-old took your phone and made a call - coincidentally - to the very person you're barred from contacting under a court order?' he asked. Mr Conlon also asked whether the accused had given that explanation to Gardaí at the time. 'I think I did, yeah,' the man replied. Mr O'Leary, in mitigation, said his client had been in an on-and-off relationship with the complainant for many years and 'loves her to bits". Counsel said the man was getting on well in custody, working in the prison kitchen, and wanted to put the matter behind him. Judge Shalom Binchy said there was nothing in the defence's mitigation to suggest the accused was addressing his issues with violence towards women. 'It's clear from his previous convictions that there's a difficulty in relation to violence and his attitude towards women,' she said. 'And not only that - he's now blaming a five-year-old girl for this breach.' She noted that the case had been contested and that the accused had three prior breaches of protection orders. She sentenced him to six months in prison, with the final three months suspended for 18 months. The man must enter a bond of €300 and attend the MOVE (Men Overcoming Violence) programme within three months of his release. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme Tallaght district court. Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 16th
RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Coroner rejects calls to refer death of farmer to gardaí
A coroner has rejected calls to refer the circumstances of the death of a 75-year-old Offaly farmer on the day after he got married to gardaí for a detailed forensic investigation. The application was made at the conclusion of a three-day inquest into the death of Joe Grogan, who died at his home in Screggan, Tullamore, Co Offaly, on 15 April 2023. He died just 24 hours after he got married to his part-time carer, Lisa Flaherty, in a registry office, Mr Grogan's relatives were unaware of the wedding and also unaware the couple were even in a relationship. Mr Grogan was well known in Irish farming circles for hosting the National Ploughing Championships between 2016 and 2018 and the farm will also stage this year's event in September. The inquest at Offaly Coroner's Court in Tullamore, heard that Ms Flaherty - a special needs assistant and mother of three who was 26 years junior to her husband - stands to inherit the 220-acre farm which is valued at €5.5 million as his widow. It had previously heard that the cause of Mr Grogan's death could not be determined because his body was embalmed before a post-mortem examination could be carried out which restricted the tests that could be conducted by a pathologist. Mr Grogan had been diagnosed with Stage IV Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (a form of blood cancer) in January 2023 and had responded well to treatment, although Ms Flaherty gave evidence that he believed he was dying. Counsel for three cousins of the deceased - Alo, Margaret and Seán Grogan - Damien Tansey SC, called on the coroner, Raymond Mahon, not to return a verdict and to refer the matter to the DPP for a forensic examination of Mr Grogan's death by gardaí. Mr Tansey said it would be most unfair to the farmer's memory and to his family if the request was declined. Separately, Peter Jones, a solicitor for Teresa Mooney, an aunt of Mr Grogan, also asked the coroner to refer the death to gardaí and to return an open verdict. Mr Jones claimed the inquest had left "an awful lot of unanswered questions" and the circumstances of Mr Grogan's death could only be challenged by trained personnel used to investigating "suspicious deaths". However, Mr Mahon returned a narrative verdict based on extensive evidence and claimed Mr Grogan's death was probably due to an infection on the balance of probabilities. He noted that Mr Grogan had a Stage IV high grade cancer who was receiving chemotherapy treatment with a compromised immune system who had also suffered "significant weight loss". Mr Grogan's weight went from 79kg in June 2022 to 67.6kg at the time he was diagnosed with cancer and to 51kg at the time of his death. The coroner said evidence from witnesses of Mr Grogan's "slow, elongated decline" lent support to his view that Mr Grogan's death was caused by an infection. He rejected the suggestion of Mr Tansey that a verdict of unlawful killing could be considered as the evidence was not "anywhere near the level of proof" required to support such a finding. Referring to a claim by Mr Jones that Mr Grogan had been "left to die," Mr Mahon said there was valid criticism about the way Mr Grogan's care was managed following his last session of chemotherapy. However, Mr Mahon, who retired as coroner following the case, noted that Mr Grogan had repeatedly told people he did not want to go to hospital and a relative had stated that it was obvious he was dying. In a submission, Mr Tansey said there was disquiet in the area where Mr Grogan lived over the circumstances of his death, which had been significantly added to by the evidence heard at the inquest. He claimed that the coroner also appeared "sufficiently troubled" to repossess the body after it had been embalmed to allow an examination to be carried out to try and establish the cause of death. Mr Tansey said the pathologist Charles D'Adhemar, was working in impossible circumstances due to the "irreparable damage" caused by the embalming process. However, he noted that Dr D'Adhemar had been able to detect the presence of three drugs in the body which, if used in a combination of large quantities, could cause respiratory depression. Mr Tansey accused Ms Flaherty of telling "porkies" by putting out a false narrative that Mr Grogan was at the end stage of life and requiring palliative care. He observed that Ms Flaherty had not tried to explain that she was in an "on-off relationship" with Mr Grogan when she gave evidence that their relationship had been over 16 years, but later having to admit that she had another partner up to 2020. Mr Tansey said another troubling issue was the secrecy surrounding the couple's marriage about which even Ms Flaherty's sister and best friend were unaware. He also observed she had not called any doctor to see Mr Grogan for the ten days he had been at home before his death after being discharged from hospital after chemotherapy. The barrister claimed Ms Flaherty had also called an undertaker with "indecent haste" and had tried to "ensnare" a doctor in her scheme for getting Mr Grogan's body released. There was a gasped reaction among the large crowd attending the inquest when Mr Tansey reminded the coroner that a verdict of unlawful killing was open to him. He pointed out that Mr Grogan was clearly ill in the days before his death and there was going to be "a dreadful end" if there was no appropriate medical intervention. However, he said the only time Mr Grogan was taken from his house during that period was to go to a registry office "to hurriedly and secretly arrange a marriage". In his submission, Mr Jones said the most solid evidence at the inquest came from doctors who had never given a direction that Mr Grogan required palliative care as suggested by Ms Flaherty. He noted an oncologist had stated his death was not inevitable and Mr Jones said it would be a travesty to suggest otherwise. The solicitor remarked that a "reign of secrecy" had prevailed over Mr Grogan's final days, while adding that his death was not due to cancer, heart failure or any infection. However, he claimed the inquest, despite the coroner's best efforts, had not come any nearer to establishing the cause of death. Mr Jones also noted the "cruelty" of members of the Grogan family being excluded and only being told of his death by a friend. He argued the only people who could "get to the bottom of this" would be An Garda Síochána and a further investigation would "satisfy public disquiet". The solicitor said Mr Grogan wanted to live and had "everything to live for". However, counsel for Ms Flaherty, Stephen Byrne BL, claimed the inquest had been used to attack her good name and reputation. Mr Byrne said one submission had just stopped short of accusing her of causing Mr Grogan's death. He claimed the fact that gardaí had not taken any further steps to date "must carry some weight". Mr Byrne reminded the coroner that one of Mr Grogan's own relatives, Enta Conroy, had given evidence that he was fading and approaching the end of his life. He pointed out that no member of the Grogan family had contacted any doctor if they were so concerned about his health. The barrister said he struggled to find the relevance of the marriage to the inquest, while the coroner had directed that its validity was not open for discussion. He also sharply criticised the approach adopted by the Grogan family to the inquest and how they thought it fit and appropriate that Ms Flaherty should have been asked if her marriage had ever been consummated. The previous two days of evidence of the inquest had also been dominated by heated exchanges between the legal representatives after the validity of the marriage was questioned, despite a marriage certificate being produced at the hearing. There were further heated exchanges after Mr Tansey claimed previous evidence of Ms Flaherty which stated her relationship with the deceased started when she was 16 "puts it in the realm of being a paedophile". Offering his commiserations to all parties at the conclusion of the inquest, the coroner said it had been "a very difficult case for everyone". Speaking afterwards, Seán Grogan said his family had just wanted to find that "our cousin was treated properly in his dying days" after concerns were first raised when his funeral arrangements had been "chopped and changed". Mr Tansey said the Grogans had been surprised and concerned to find out that no medical personnel had been contacted by Ms Flaherty in the ten days before his death when it was clear he was suffering some infection from his last session of chemotherapy. The barrister said the focus "from here on in will be the merit and circumstances of that marriage".
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
New ‘isolated' ex-gangland enforcer chief suspect details in dad's chilling murder amid ‘people know what he did' plea
A FORMER gangland enforcer is the chief suspect in the murder of dad-of-two Paul Byrne, the Irish Sun can reveal. Paul was just 20 Advertisement 4 An ex-gangland enforcer is the chief suspect in the murder of dad-of-two Paul Byrne 4 He disappeared just weeks after discovering partner Martina McQuillan was pregnant 4 Paul's mother Ashley Dempsey, with Martina and Abbey Credit: Niall Marshall/News Group Newspapers Ltd His skeletal remains were found in a wooded area near Blessington, He disappeared just weeks after discovering he was to Advertisement Shortly after his disappearance, his family were also subjected to a campaign of intimidation when leaflets about his disappearance were vandalised. At the time, gardai also confirmed that the dad-of-two wasn't involved in organised As the Garda investigation continues, Paul's killer is still being hunted by gardai. The prime suspect Advertisement And just days after he was released, he was caught with a huge stash of drugs. Before his arrest for Paul's murder, he had been regarded as an enforcer operating in the Tallaght area. One source said: 'This individual is a violent criminal who's suspected of killing Paul Byrne. 'VERY ISOLATED' 'He has been ostracised by many in the criminal world and is now very isolated. 'There are people who know what he did but he's longer in a position to terrorise people.' Advertisement Meanwhile, Paul's mother Ashley Dempsey told of her family's ongoing pain. She said: 'We have been through hell and no family should have to experience such a living nightmare. 'BRUTALLY TAKEN' 'Paul was a precious son and we all just miss him so much. 'He was brutally taken from us and it's awful to think that we had to wait such a long time before we were able to give him a Christian burial. 'We will never forget Paul and he will always keep his memory alive.' Advertisement The grieving mum also said: 'This terrible murder has had a horrendous effect on my family - the pain will never go away. 'DESERVES TO HAVE JUSTICE' 'He deserves to have justice and that means those responsible for his murder being brought to justice. 'My son was killed without ever getting to meet his daughter.' Although five people have been arrested over the murder, no one has ever been charged. Following Paul's disappearance, the local gang suspected of killing him imploded. Advertisement 'MURDER DIVIDED THE GANG' Since then, the suspects have been involved in criminality but aren't part of any major crime gang. One local resident told us: 'Any hold these individuals may have had in the Tallaght area is now gone. 'They were a local gang and they went their own way after Paul's murder. 'The murder divided the gang and when new groups came to the fore they no longer posed the same type of threat. 'SLEEPLESS NIGHTS' 'The chief suspect was an enforcer and used violence in the past and he has gone on to lead a very isolated and chaotic life. Advertisement 'Paul's murder must have caused many sleepless nights to those involved and his family deserve justice.' 'He was brutally taken from us and it's awful to think that we had to wait such a long time before we were able to give him a Christian burial." Ashley Dempsey Paul's mother They also said: 'Paul would have known some of these people but he was keeping his distance from them in the weeks before he went missing.' At present, the ongoing case is being run by Det Insp Seamus Ryan and the team at Blessington Garda station. FAMILY 'DEEPLY AFFECTED' The senior officer said: 'Paul's family have been deeply affected by his murder. 'They are anxious that he's not forgotten and our investigation is active and ongoing. Advertisement 'I have no doubt that there are people in the Tallaght community who have information on this callous murder but have yet to come forward. 'There are people who know what he did but he's longer in a position to terrorise people.' Irish Sun source 'I want to reassure anyone who has information that they will be treated in a sensitive and confidential manner. 'Relationships and allegiances may have changed over the years so it's never too late for people to come forward with the slightest bit of information, no matter how insignificant they think it might be. 'Paul's family are anxious for the investigation to progress so that it can bring them some closure.' 4 Paul's family and friends 'are anxious that he's not forgotten' Credit: Niall Carson/PA Wire Advertisement
