Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies
The court imposed an administrative stay in the case at the request of the Trump administration. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice to provide a written dissenting opinion.
At issue is a ruling by California-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, who ruled in May that while the president can seek to make changes, there are limits when done wholesale.
"Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress," she wrote.
The justices made clear Tuesday that their order is not about the legality of any individual agency reduction in force or reorganization plan, only the legality of Trump's executive order and an administration memo related to workforce plans.
In her dissenting opinion, Jackson wrote, "this decision is not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.'
The decision affects 19 federal agencies as well as the White House-adjacent Office of Management and Budget, Office of Personnel Management and U.S. DOGE Service.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers that Illston's ruling is based on the "indefensible premise" that the presidents needs permission from Congress to carry out his duties as delineated in Article II of the Constitution.
"Controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland of this authority," he wrote. "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers."
The legal challenge was brought by various unions and nonprofit groups, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, as well as certain local jurisdictions including the cities of Chicago and Baltimore.
Their lawyers said that if the court granted Trump's request "statutorily required and authorized programs, offices, and functions across the federal government will be abolished" with some departments "radically downsized." As such, they urged that the court allow the litigation to conclude before deciding whether Trump can implement his plan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protesters gather at Disneyland as JD Vance visits resort with family
Protesters gathered at the Disneyland resort in Anaheim during Vice President JD Vance 's family holiday. The demonstrations took place amid ongoing immigration raids across California. Jane Fleming Kleeb, Chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, shared footage of the protest on X. Kleeb indicated the protest aimed to express support for immigrants and challenge Vance's and Trump's perceived negative stance towards California and Disney. Watch the video above.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump is attending the FIFA Club World Cup final
President Donald Trump on Sunday will attend the FIFA Club World Cup final, a match that will offer Trump a preview of the globe's premier soccer tournament that North America will host next year. Trump and first lady Melania Trump will travel from their golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, to East Rutherford 40 miles (64 kilometers) away to watch the final match of the U.S.-hosted tournament between Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea at MetLife Stadium. Trump's trip Sunday falls on the first anniversary of the assassination attempt he survived in Butler, Pennsylvania, while campaigning for president. The president did not have any public plans to mark the date beyond participating in a taped Fox News Channel interview with his daughter-in-law Lara Trump that aired Saturday night. Sporting events have made up the bulk of Trump's trips in the U.S. since taking office this year. In addition to his visit this weekend to the soccer tournament, he's attended the Super Bowl in New Orleans, the Daytona 500 in Florida, UFC fights in Miami and Newark, New Jersey, and the NCAA wrestling championships in Philadelphia. The president, who has a warm relationship with FIFA President Gianni Infantino, has said he plans to attend multiple matches of the World Cup tournament next year.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Taliban's grim ultimatum to man, 45, who married six-year-old girl
A 45-year-old man who married a six-year-old girl shocked the Taliban with his abhorrent wedding ceremony, with the militant extremists handing down a grim order The world has been left sickened by reports that a 45-year-old man has married a six-year-old girl, in an act so abhorrent, even the Taliban have condemned it. It's understood that the wedding took place in the Marjah district of Afghanistan, at a time of great concern over the rise of child marriages in the country. Shockingly, there is no longer a codified minimum marriage age in Afghanistan, with Taliban forces rolling back the age limit of 16 previously established after the 2001 Western invasion. However, this recent child marriage has proven abhorrent even to those who have played an active role in stripping away the rights of Afghan women and girls. As reported by US-based Afghan outlet the Taliban has taken some action against this man, who reportedly already has two wives. They've issued a grim order - the man has to wait until the child turns nine before he can take her home. Under Taliban rule, a girl's 'marriageable age' is decided by Islamic law interpretation, with the Hanafi jurisprudence determining puberty to be the "threshold for readiness". The girl's own choice does not come into it. Devastatingly, this is an issue which is all too prevalent in a country where women have virtually been removed from public life, while struggling families are often forced to sell their own daughters to keep food on the table. In a recent interview with The Afghan Times, an activist who lives in a rural village shared: "There are many families in our village who have given away their daughters for money. No one helps them. People are desperate." As detailed in the publication's report, this practice, which has surged since the Taliban retook power in 2021, is known as 'walwar' and involves girls being exchanged for cash based on factors such as looks, health and education level. In this particular instance, the groom paid the child's family money in exchange for her. He and the girl's father were later arrested, but not charged. According to statistics given by the organisation Girls Not Brides, 28.7 per cent of Afghan girls marry before the age of 18, while 9.6 per cent marry before they turn 15. As per a United Nations (UN) report published last year, systematic oppression has sparked an alarming 25 per cent rise in child and forced marriages. This comes at a time when women in Afghanistan are forbidden from speaking in public or even showing their faces outside of the family home. Forced to wear full-body coverings, these women are banned from places where they may once have met with friends and opened up about any difficulties, including gyms, female-only public baths, and even beauty salons. As for the women of the future, girls have been forbidden from pursuing secondary education, cutting off their chances of economic independence, destroying their potential, and putting them at risk of early forced marriages. In a statement released in March this year, as a new school year began in Afghanistan, UNICEF said: "As a new school year begins in Afghanistan, it marks three years since the start of the ban on girls' secondary education. This decision continues to harm the future of millions of Afghan girls. If this ban persists until 2030, over four million girls will have been deprived of their right to education beyond primary school. 'The consequences for these girls - and for Afghanistan - are catastrophic. The ban negatively impacts the health system, the economy, and the future of the nation. With fewer girls receiving an education, girls face a higher risk of child marriage, with negative repercussions on their well-being and health. In addition, the country will experience a shortage of qualified female health workers. This will endanger lives. "With fewer female doctors and midwives, girls and women will not receive the medical treatment and support they need. We are estimating an additional 1,600 maternal deaths and over 3,500 infant deaths. These are not just numbers; they represent lives lost and families shattered. 'For over three years, the rights of girls in Afghanistan have been violated. All girls must be allowed to return to school now. If these capable, bright young girls continue to be denied an education, then the repercussions will last for generations. Afghanistan cannot leave half of its population behind."
