logo
Senate Holocaust education bill dies in the House -- again

Senate Holocaust education bill dies in the House -- again

Yahoo12-04-2025
Apr. 11—dbeard @dominionpost.com MORGANTOWN — The Legislature is plowing through bills as it heads to close of session midnight Saturday, but the Senate bill to require Holocaust education in the public schools will once again remain on the shelf—for the third year in a row.
House Education looked at SB 54 last week but never advanced it to the floor.
Education vice-chair Joe Statler, R-Monongalia, told The Dominion Post on Friday, "We did not take it up because after talking with the Department of Education, it is already being taught in different grade levels in the school systems across the state today."
The bill says, "In collaboration with and utilizing guidance from the West Virginia Commission on Holocaust Education ... all public schools located within this state shall give age-appropriate instruction on the Holocaust, the systematic, planned annihilation of European Jews and other groups by Nazi Germany, a watershed event in the history of humanity, to be taught in a manner that leads to an investigation of human behavior, and an examination of what it means to be a responsible and respectful person."
Such instruction would not be offered before sixth grade.
The issue Statler raised was also raised in Senate Education in March, where Sen. Craig Hart, R-Mingo, questioned the necessity of the bill, given that Holocaust education appears in other content standards.
Committee chair Amy Grady, R-Mason, said then that while current standards call for teaching on the Holocaust at some point, the bill would change code to make sure it is required somewhere from grades 6-12.
Several people who championed the bill expressed disappointment at its demise.
Lisa Hildebrand is a Boone County teacher and advocates for the bill, which was sponsored by Sen. Mike Oliverio, R-Monongalia.
She testified to House Education when it held its hearing on the bill. She told the delegates that she grew up in a diverse culture in the Philadelphia suburbs.
But in Boone County she sees a lack of diversity, she said. "With that lack of diversity is a lack of understanding, even some lack of tolerance."
Those students don't have the opportunity to interact with others or trawl outside their area, she said. She brought Rabbi Victor Urecki, of Charleston, to school several times, and for some this was their first opportunity to meet a Jew.
She received a grant to go to Poland, she said, where she met with a survivor, and visited Auschwitz and other areas. "When I came back from there, I made it my mission to have Holocaust education be put in schools. I think it would benefit everybody."
Thursday evening, discussing the bill's demise, she told The Dominion Post, "I just cannot fathom why the House chairs have a problem with the bill. Our kids deserve to know how to deal with antisemitism and associated behaviors. The not-in-my-backyard mentality is old. Our state has a serious population problem. Brain-drain. They leave and are unprepared for what is seen on college campuses and city streets."
The state education standards are limited in their requirement to teach the Holocaust, she said. "I've been a teacher for about a decade, and nowhere are there sources for educators to teach how to combat antisemitism and related behaviors. This bill offers resources to help educators achieve this goal."
The committee held the hearing on SB 54 but never put it back on its agenda for markup and passage.
Laurent Levy is an emeritus member of the Holocaust Education Commission. He told The Dominion Post, "Obviously, we are extremely disappointed by the failure of the House Education Committee to even take up this bill, which passed the Senate unanimously. This marks at least the third time that the Senate has passed similar legislation only to have it go nowhere in the House.
"What makes this year's failure so bitter, " he said, "is that the committee did not even bother to debate the bill or go on record as to what their opposition could possibly be. What could be so objectionable about joining nearly 30 other states, including Alabama, South Carolina, and Florida to name a few, that have come to realize the crucial importance of Holocaust education ?"
Levy said the bill asked for no state funding, no enforcement, and made no encroachment on local school board authority. "It simply sought to recognize the importance of the profound lessons of the Holocaust by utilizing the resources of the Commission on Holocaust Education my mother [the late Edith Levy, of Morgantown ] helped to establish over 25 years ago. That Commission stands ready to provide the vital resources and the pedagogical tools teachers need to effectively present this difficult subject in an age-appropriate manner. It was established precisely in anticipation of fulfilling the requirements of SB 54."
But they won't give up, he said. "Rest assured we will be back again next year, again confidently assured of Sen. Oliverio's support and leadership and hopefully with enlightened leadership on the Education Committee."
Oliverio could not be reached for comment on Friday.
While SB 54 is technically alive until the Legislature adjourns Saturday night, it's practically dead. To have a chance, it would need to be successfully discharged from committee and have the House rules suspended to have three readings in a single day in order to go to a vote.
Last year, this bill was SB 448 and died on second reading on the Senate floor. In 2023, a different bill with different sponsors, SB 216, called for education on the Holocaust and other genocides. It passed the Senate and was approved in House Education but died in House Finance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemitic
Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemitic

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemitic

President Trump said he was unaware that the term 'shylock' is considered antisemitic, after using it during his Iowa speech Thursday to describe lenders that add too many conditions on their loans. Trump said he 'never heard it that way' and did not recognize that it was an offensive term for Jewish people. The word comes from a Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice,' in which a Jewish lender requires a debtor hand over a pound of flesh as interest. 'To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates,' he told reporters after returning to Washington. 'I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' His use of the term came during a speech celebrating the passage of his 'big, beautiful bill,' which is full of his domestic priorities — from major spending cuts to tax breaks. The House and Senate, following weeks of infighting and debate, sent the legislation to Trump's desk a day ahead of his self-imposed July 4 deadline. The president will sign the megabill into law Friday at the start of a Fourth of July picnic. Trump in one part of his remarks, while touting many of the provisions, referred to a measure that would protect family farmers by allowing them to pay reduced estate taxes. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker, and in some cases, shylocks and bad people,' Trump said. 'They destroyed a lot of families, but we did the opposite.' The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a nonprofit with the mission to combat antisemitism, condemned the remarks, calling them 'troubling and irresponsible.' 'The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous,' the ADL wrote early Friday on the social platform X. 'President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' 'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country,' the group added. 'Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' It is not the first time the president, who has made fighting antisemitism a focus in his second term, has found himself in the middle of controversy regarding Jewish people. During his time on the campaign trail, Trump claimed any Jew who votes for Democrats 'hates their religion' and was criticized in 2022 for dining with Nick Fuentes, an outspoken white supremacist who is known for antisemitic rhetoric. The pushback also comes more than a decade after former President Biden, while vice president, used the term during a speech in 2014 to describe moneylenders who issued loans with bad conditions to members of the military. He later apologized, calling it a 'poor choice of words.' The Associated Press contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic
Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic

The Hill

timea day ago

  • The Hill

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic

President Trump said he was unaware that the term 'shylock' is considered antisemitic, after using it during his Iowa speech Thursday to describe lenders that add too many conditions on their loans. Trump said he 'never heard it that way' and did not recognize that it was an offensive term for Jewish people. The word comes from a Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice,' in which a Jewish lender requires a debtor to hand over a pound of flesh as interest. 'To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates,' he told reporters after returning to Washington. 'I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' His use of the term came during a speech celebrating the passage of his 'big, beautiful bill,' which is full of his domestic priorities — from major spending cuts to tax breaks. The House and Senate, following weeks of infighting and debate, sent the legislation to Trump's desk a day ahead of the July 4 deadline. The president will sign the megabill into law Friday at the start of a Fourth of July picnic. Trump in one part of his remarks, while touting many of the provisions, referred to a measure that would protect family farmers by allowing them to pay reduced estate taxes. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker, and in some cases, shylocks and bad people,' Trump said. 'They destroyed a lot of families, but we did the opposite.' The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a nonprofit whose mission is to combat antisemitism, condemned the remarks, calling them 'troubling and irresponsible.' 'The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous,' the ADL wrote early Friday on social platform X. 'President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' 'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country,' the group added. 'Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' It is not the first time the president, who has made fighting antisemitism a focus in his second term, has found himself in the middle of controversy regarding Jewish people. During his time on the campaign trail, Trump claimed any Jew who votes for Democrats 'hates their religion' and was criticized in 2022 for dining with Nick Fuentes, an outspoken white supremacist who is known for antisemitic rhetoric. The pushback also comes more than a decade after former President Biden, while vice president, used the term during a speech in 2014 to describe moneylenders who issued loans with bad conditions to members of the military. He later apologized for the gaffe, calling it a 'poor choice of words.' The Associated Press contributed.

Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic
Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic

Los Angeles Times

timea day ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic

WASHINGTON — President Trump says he didn't know the term 'shylock' was considered antisemitic when he used it in a speech to describe unscrupulous moneylenders. Trump told reporters Friday after returning from an event in Iowa that he had 'never heard it that way' and 'never heard that' the term was considered an offensive stereotype about Jews. Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice' who demands a pound of flesh from a debtor. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to combat antisemitism, said in a statement that the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' Joe Biden, while vice president, said in 2014 that he had made a 'poor choice' of words a day after he used the term in remarks to a legal aid group. Trump's administration has made cracking down on antisemitism a priority. His administration said it is screening for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits and its fight with Harvard University has centered on allegations from the White House that the school has tolerated antisemitism. But the Republican president has also had a history of playing on stereotypes about Jewish people. He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that 'you want to control your politicians' and suggested the audience used money to exert control. Before he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump drew widespread criticism for dining at his Florida club with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist. Last year, Trump made repeated comments accusing Jewish Americans who identify as Democrats of disloyalty because of Democratic leaders' criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Critics said it perpetuated an antisemitic trope about Jews having divided loyalties and there being only one right way to be Jewish. On Thursday night in his speech in Iowa, Trump used the term while talking about his signature legislation passed by Congress this week. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people,' he said. When a reporter later asked about the word's antisemitic association and his intent, Trump said; 'No, I've never heard it that way. To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' The Anti-Defamation League said Trump's use of the word 'underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' Price writes for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store