logo
How a rising progressive lawmaker thinks Dems should frame debate

How a rising progressive lawmaker thinks Dems should frame debate

Axios3 days ago

U.S. Rep. Greg Casar has become a national foot soldier for the progressive policies that once powered his rise through local Austin politics.
Why it matters: As chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Casar is helping to shape what it means to be left-wing as fellow Democrats seek a way out of the electoral wilderness.
Driving the news: The surprise victory of democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor this week underscores the enthusiasm for the party's progressive ideas, particularly among younger voters.
Yes, but: Casar's caucus title comes with a lot of exposure — but not necessarily a lot of leverage, especially in a Washington controlled by the GOP.
In his second term representing a district that stretches from East Austin to San Antonio, Casar has appeared in town halls far from home to call out Republican colleagues for not meeting with constituents.
He also organized an effort — panned in some quarters — at a Trump speech to Congress in which he and other Democrats held signs saying "Musk Steals" and "Save Medicaid."
And he's been making appearances on U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders' "Fighting Oligarchy" tour.
Between the lines: A former labor organizer and Austin City Council member, Casar, 36, has found himself subtly tailoring his politics to the moment as he tries to focus his message on working-class economic issues.
We caught up with Casar in East Austin last week, as he addressed the young graduates of an apprenticeship program at a union hall.
What they're saying: He urged the attendees to hold politicians accountable for favoring policies that benefit the rich and keep wages low — an echo of a Democratic talking point during last year's presidential campaign that didn't resonate as much as the party had hoped.
"How much people get paid, how many hours you have to work, whether you have health care and a pension — a lot of that gets decided in the political arena," he said.
He also took a shot at Elon Musk — who happens to be the CEO of a major employer in his district. "The richest man on Earth, who's got his factory here up the street ... he wouldn't have a pen if it weren't for the men and women that build those factories, that build those rocket ships, that maintain everything in this town."
What's next: Casar ruled out a run for U.S. Senate or governor in a recent interview with Spectrum News' "Capital Tonight."
Our interview is condensed for clarity.
You mentioned Musk in your speech — do you have any relationship with him?
"I've been invited to his factory. But my first action as a newly elected member of Congress was asking for an OSHA investigation into a worker death there. And ultimately, OSHA found that Tesla was liable for that worker being killed."
"As a member of Congress, we should advocate for jobs in our district. But that doesn't mean that you have to kiss a billionaire's ass. Elon Musk can easily afford to pay people in my neighborhoods a lot more — and have them not work so many hours in dangerous conditions — and Musk wouldn't even notice. So I think it's my job to fully advocate for my neighborhoods, not advocate for them just a little bit because I'm scared I might tick off somebody with a lot of money."
What's the metric of success in the 2026 election?
"Democrats need to retake the House with a resounding mandate, on an anti-billionaire, pro-worker agenda that reenergizes the Democratic base and brings more moderate, independent and conservative voters back into the Democratic Party at the same time."
"That's what's going to be necessary for us to win the presidential election, and that's what's going to be necessary for us to start bringing places like Texas back into the Democratic fold.
For people who've been watching you locally for a long time, are your politics the same as they were when you started?
"I'd be a terrible leader if I didn't learn from mistakes. People have watched me, you know, trip over and fall and take a political beating, and I don't want the party to take more of a political beating."
So what sort of thing have you learned?
"For us to protect vulnerable people, we can't just be champions of the vulnerable. We have to be the champions of the rights of everybody. We have to win elections — that's the only way we're ever going to be able to protect vulnerable people."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ranked choice voting promised more moderates. It delivered extremists instead.
Ranked choice voting promised more moderates. It delivered extremists instead.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Ranked choice voting promised more moderates. It delivered extremists instead.

Ranked choice voting further loosens party control and gives the activists within either party more say in the process. And voters in the middle suffer the consequences. In one of my first published columns ever, I advocated for ranked choice voting, which was at the time a lesser-known alternative way to conduct elections in which you rank several candidates in order of preference. I have since changed my view. Since then, the idea has grown in popularity, even making its way into New York City's Democratic Party primary election on Tuesday, June 24. Ranked choice made headlines as state lawmaker Zohran Mamdani won that primary. The promise of ranked choice voting producing more moderate candidates has been undermined by extreme candidates. American politics are better off under more traditional voting systems. What is ranked choice voting? Ranked choice voting seeks to solve the issue of strategic voting ‒ when voters cast their ballot not for their top choice in a crowded field, but rather their preference between one of the two candidates with a high chance of winning. One of the central arguments in favor of ranked choice is that, because people can express their true preferences, it is more likely to produce more moderate candidates. However, in practice, it rarely accomplishes this goal. Take New York's mayoral primary race, for example. The city's ranked choice system led to the election of Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as the Democratic nominee to be the next mayor, giving him the inside track at the job. Now, part of that issue is candidate quality. Mamdani's opponent was Andrew Cuomo, who is best known for resigning the New York governorship in disgrace in 2021 due to numerous sexual harassment claims and mismanagement of COVID-19. But that dilemma goes even further to the point of ranked choice voting not producing better outcomes than an ordinary ballot system. The New York election is not the sole arbiter of this system's effectiveness, however. Other municipalities that have adopted ranked choice have seen more extreme candidates prevail. Researchers have found that 'as an electorate grows more polarized, candidates located at the median are less likely to be elected under IRV (another term for ranked choice voting) because they simply are not the first choice of enough voters.' In our polarized political environment, ranked choice voting may make matters even worse by favoring more extreme candidates, thus widening the partisan divide in races. Ranked choice voting weakens political parties One fact that many in the news media are reluctant to admit (but may agree with privately) is that voters are extraordinarily bad at selecting good candidates. This is why America is better off with strong political parties. Strong political parties, with more influence over who their nominees are, limit the extent to which voters can influence a party to nominate a candidate outside of the mainstream opinion. Political parties have grown weaker in recent years as populist movements in both parties grow, and the result is a rise in extreme candidates in response to American political polarization. More extreme candidates acting outside the structure of parties is a major reason for this. Ranked choice voting reduces the amount of sway that a political party has over its nominee. Ordinarily, in a primary election, there is a uniform sequence of dropouts that build coalitions among two and three candidates by the time Election Day rolls around. This typical procession gives parties plenty of opportunities to interject their preferences into the race, and to help boost their preferred candidate. Still, the existence of a primary system in the first place entails that, from time to time, the voters will override the preferences of the internal party structure, such as Donald Trump's initial nomination in the 2016 presidential election. That problem has worsened as activists have captured the primary system to promote their candidates, rather than those of the median partisan. Ranked choice voting further loosens party control and gives the activists within either party more say in the process. These activists are only further likely to produce more extreme candidates, and the voters in the middle suffer the consequences. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.

Trump slams Israel's prosecutors over Netanyahu corruption trial
Trump slams Israel's prosecutors over Netanyahu corruption trial

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Trump slams Israel's prosecutors over Netanyahu corruption trial

U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday lashed out at prosecutors in Israel over the corruption trial that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced, saying Washington, having given billions of dollars worth of aid to Israel, was not going to "stand for this". Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. On Friday, the court rejected a request by Netanyahu's lawyers to delay his testimony for the next two weeks because of diplomatic and security matters following the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran this month. He is due to take the stand on Monday for cross-examination. "It is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu," Trump said in a Truth Social post, asserting that the judicial process was going to interfere with Netanyahu's ability to conduct talks with Palestinian militant group Hamas, and Iran. A spokesperson for the Israeli prosecution declined to comment on Trump's post. Netanyahu on X retweeted Trump's post and added: "Thank you again, @realDonaldTrump. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!" Trump's second post over the course of a few days defending Netanyahu and calling for the cancellation of the trial went a step further to tie Israel's legal action to U.S. aid. "The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar [sic] a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this," Trump said. Netanyahu "right now" was in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, Trump said, without giving further details. On Friday, the Republican president told reporters that he believed a ceasefire was close. Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end it if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of the U.S. and Israeli bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities.

Trump Reacts to 'Great, Big, Beautiful Bill' Senate Vote
Trump Reacts to 'Great, Big, Beautiful Bill' Senate Vote

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Reacts to 'Great, Big, Beautiful Bill' Senate Vote

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has hailed the Senate's narrow vote to advance his flagship legislation, celebrating it as a "great victory" for his agenda as Republicans rush to deliver the legislation by July 4. The U.S. Senate voted 51-49 to open debate on the One Big Beautiful Bill, bringing it one step closer to landing on Trump's desk ahead of the self-imposed deadline. "Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate with the "GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL," but, it wouldn't have happened without the Fantastic Work of Senator Rick Scott, Senator Mike Lee, Senator Ron Johnson, and Senator Cynthia Lummis," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. The $4 trillion package would permanently extend $3.8 trillion in expiring benefits while dedicating $350 billion in spending to fund Trump's hardline mass deportation plans. However, proposed cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs have sparked public fractures within GOP ranks. Two Republican senators, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky, defied Trump and joined all Democrats in voting against it. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters on Friday, June 27, 2025, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters on Friday, June 27, 2025, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington. Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP This is a developing story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store