Rich Americans flock to apply for New Zealand's ‘golden visas' after rules relaxed
New Zealand's coalition government in February loosened the requirements for its Active Investor Plus visa – commonly known as the golden visa – offering residency to wealthy foreigners in a bid to boost the flagging economy.
The new rules, which came into effect in April, lowered investment thresholds, removed English-language requirements and cut the amount of time applicants must spend in the country to establish residency from three years to three weeks.
Immigration New Zealand says the scheme has attracted 189 applications, representing 609 people, under the new rules. Prior to the changes, the visa attracted 116 applications over 2.5 years.
Nearly half the investors who have applied hail from the US, representing 85 applications, followed by China, 26, and Hong Kong, 24. Residents from countries across Asia and Europe make up the rest of the applicants.
'Nearly everyone who is applying is applying because of the changes they're seeing under the Trump administration,' said Stuart Nash, a former Labour party minister, who now runs Nash Kelly Global, an immigration and relocation consultancy.
Under the new rules, 149 applied under the visa's 'growth' category, which requires a minimum $5m investment over three years, and 40 applied under the 'balanced' category, which requires a minimum $10m investment over five years.
Immigration has approved 100 applications in principle and seven have transferred their funds – netting New Zealand $45m.
There has been a significant increase in interest in the visa since the changes, with investors drawn to New Zealand's stability and innovation in sustainable business and technology, said Benny Goodman, New Zealand Trade and Enterprise's general manager for investment.
'This is a rare combination, and one that deeply resonates with investors thinking about legacy, not just returns,' he said.
Global instability makes New Zealand – with its stable democracy, independent judiciary and safe banking system – an attractive destination, particularly to Americans, Nash said.
'We are seeing more people looking for a safe haven than a tax haven – and that's what we have got here in New Zealand, Nash said.
It is not the first time New Zealand has attracted the interest of Trump-weary Americans and other wealthy foreigners seeking to make New Zealand their 'bolthole' at a time of societal division.
Following Trump's 2016 election, visits to the country's immigration website rose almost 2,500%. After the supreme court decision removing abortion rights, New Zealand's immigration site visits quadrupled to 77,000. After Trump's 2024 election win, New Zealand's property market saw a surge of interest from the US.
Meanwhile, billionaires acquiring residency or citizenship in New Zealand have been subject to political controversy in the past. In 2017, news broke that Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal, was granted citizenship despite spending only 12 days in the country, prompting former Labour prime minister Jacinda Ardern to tighten the rules on investment visas and foreign home ownership in 2018.
The loosening of the visa rules is one of a number of Ardern-era policies the right-wing coalition has wound back in its bid the boost the economy. Earlier this year it relaxed other more restrictive visa settings to attract so-called 'digital nomads' to New Zealand.
New Zealand's economy suffered as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and the country experienced the biggest contraction in GDP of any developed country in the world in 2024, due to high interest rates and unemployment.
In a statement on Monday, economic growth minister Nicola Willis said so far the visa could represent 'a potential $845 million of new investment in New Zealand business'.
'New investors don't just bring their dollars to our shores, they also bring skills, knowledge and experience that will drive future economic development,' Willis said. 'It's a win-win.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: My friend has put thousands into a mysterious new company promising unrealistic returns
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. A.M. writes: My friend has recently invested a few thousand pounds with Al-Tabbaa & Hackett, which promises unrealistic returns. She is now thinking of investing more. It seems to be a company recently formed by one individual, with an address at serviced offices in Covent Garden in London. I would be grateful if you could investigate. Tony Hetherington replies: Let's start by looking at Al-Tabbaa & Hackett Limited. It was set up on February 19 this year, with its owner and sole director named as 55-year-old Hasan Al-Tabbaa from Grimsby. Al-Tabbaa is an interesting character. He describes himself as an entrepreneur and inventor. Several years ago he appealed on Twitter for money to start a bank, promising shares worth ten times whatever investors gave him. His LinkedIn page describes him as having been chief executive of a technology company since 1986, when he was 16. But here's a funny thing. On July 7, a few days after I started asking awkward questions, all mention of Al-Tabbaa vanished from Companies House records. Al-Tabbaa & Hackett Limited now has no founder, no shareholder, no director, and probably no future. The man himself has not offered any explanation or comment, and officials at Companies House rarely discuss individual cases, but it is possible he did not in fact form the company. In the past year or so, Companies House says over 52,000 people were named in company formations without their consent. So, setting Al-Tabbaa completely aside, let's look at the website that persuaded your friend to part with thousands of pounds. The website was set up on May 1. It offers various deposit accounts, starting with the basic easy access account which claims to offer a 'guaranteed 2 per cent return per month'. Any scheme that claims to pay interest at 2 per cent a month has to involve huge risks, but the website says 'there is no risk involved' for the fund as the firm 'protects the capital for their investors'. That's hardly a convincing argument, so I fired off some questions via email. Firstly, I questioned a claim on review website Trustpilot under the heading 'Written by the company' that says the firm is 'one of the largest savings organisations in the UK and Europe'. When I asked for evidence of this, back came an email from Ibrahim Jemal, telling me: 'We do not claim to be one of the largest savings organisations in the United Kingdom and Europe'! Well how about the glowing reviews on Trustpilot, including one supposedly from a saver who has put money into the firm over the past couple of years, when its website is just two months old? The helpful Jemal suggested the customer might be from another country, yet Trustpilot says he is from Britain. In fact, the earliest review of the firm is dated May 19 this year. Jemal went further, insisting: 'We do not serve customers within the UK.' Really? The website says that in the event of any dispute, UK laws apply and 'the seat of arbitration shall be Manchester'. The phone number provided is a UK one. Since I started investigating, Jemal and his website have suggested that they are really in the UAE, and outside the jurisdiction of the UK Financial Conduct Authority. I have passed all of this over to the FCA, so we shall see. Meanwhile, your friend should try to get her cash out pronto. I suspect the real location for this bunch is Fantasy Island. RBS account mix-up C.Y. writes: I have received a letter from the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), saying my business account interest rate is dropping. I do not have any account with RBS, nor have I ever had one. Trying to discuss this by phone is impossible as they want the account number, and I have no such account. Tony Hetherington replies: You called the bank, you emailed the bank, and you tried to chat with the bank's online digital assistant. But every time, you ran up against the same stumbling block, which was that you could not tell them the number of the account for which you were supposed to be a signatory. To their credit, staff at RBS got to the bottom of this mystery within a day of my contacting them. You really were named on an RBS account. It belongs to an Army charity, and you are an Army veteran. In 2012, you were briefly a volunteer signatory on the charity's current account before switching roles within the organisation. However, although statements have always gone to the charity's treasurer, the bank was not asked to delete you as a signatory. You have now been taken off the account, so you should not hear from RBS again. But the bank has gone one surprisingly pleasant step further. Because it could not help you when you made contact, it has sent you what you have told me is a remarkably generous hamper of goodies. All in all, well done RBS!
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
CITY OF LONDON INVESTMENT TRUST: On a roll for 59 years and counting
Like the UK stock market, investment trust City of London is on something of a roll, much to the delight of its shareholders. Despite its inherent investment conservatism, the £2.5 billion fund continues to outperform its benchmark, the FTSE All-Share Index. Over the last year, it has delivered a total return, comprising a mix of income and share price gain, of 22.4 per cent, comfortably beating the 15.3 per cent return generated by the FTSE All-Share Index. It has also beaten its benchmark over the past three and five years. The trust's focus on income from a portfolio of UK shares makes it a popular choice among retail investors. When the final quarterly dividend for the financial year just gone is paid at the end of next month, the FTSE 250-listed trust will have racked up 59 consecutive years of income increases. No other investment trust has such a long-standing record, although nine others have grown their income for at least half a century. In pounds and pence, the trust's income payments in the last financial year tot up to 21.3p a share, 3.4 per cent ahead of the previous year and equivalent to an annual dividend yield in excess of four per cent. To put these payments into context, the shares now stand at just below £5, although last week they briefly breached £5 for the first time in the trust's 134-year history. For the past 34 years, City of London – one of 11 from the Janus Henderson stable of investment trusts – has been managed by Job Curtis with David Smith jumping on board four years ago as his deputy. Understandably, Curtis is proud of the trust's record and the conservative slant of the 79-strong portfolio. This conservatism comes through in many ways. For a start, most of the holdings are cash generative businesses with a propensity to pay a growing dividend. Also, most – 80 per cent plus - are FTSE 100 listed companies with businesses that span the globe. Some 60 per cent of the revenues that the trust's holdings earn are overseas. Although the FTSE 100 surpassed 9,000 in recent days, Curtis believes there is more to come. He says: 'The UK stock market still provides excellent value compared to other global markets. In effect, like the trust, it provides investors with the opportunity to get exposure to some attractive global companies at a discount.' In the past year and a half, Curtis has increased the trust's holdings in UK-listed banks: HSBC, NatWest and Lloyds are all among the fund's top ten positions. It has proved a profitable decision, and he believes there are more gains and dividends up for grabs. 'A big change, prompted by government, is taking place in the regulation of UK banks,' he says. 'The emphasis is now less on whether the banks are sufficiently capitalised, and more on enabling them to increase their lending, fuel economic growth, improve profits and deliver dividend growth.' Other attractive features of this trust include low annual charges, totalling 0.37 per cent. To put this figure into perspective, the average for the UK equity income sector is 0.56 per cent. The fees (in percentage terms) will reduce when the trust grows to £3 billion. Also, the shares currently trade at a small premium to the underlying assets, unlike many rivals. Curtis says: 'The trust's board takes the view that investors value stability. This means shares will be bought back if they trade at a discount above 2 per cent.' The trust's stock market ticker is CTY and identification code 0199049.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US
TOKYO, July 26 (Reuters) - Japan's $550 billion investment package agreed in this week's U.S. tariff deal could help finance a Taiwanese firm building semiconductor plants in the U.S., Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Saturday. Japan agreed to the sweeping U.S.-bound investment initiative, which includes equity, loans and guarantees, in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the U.S. However, the structure of the scheme remains unclear. "Japan, the United States, and like-minded countries are working together to build supply chains in sectors critical to economic security," Akazawa told public broadcaster NHK. To that end, he said projects eligible for financing under the package are not limited to U.S. or Japanese firms. "For example, if a Taiwanese chipmaker builds a plant in the U.S. and uses Japanese components or tailors its products to meet Japanese needs, that's fine too," he said, without specifying companies. The U.S. is significantly reliant on Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab for advanced chip manufacturing, raising economic security concerns due to geographic proximity to China. TSMC announced plans for a $100 billion U.S. investment with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in March, on top of $65 billion pledged for three plants in the state of Arizona, one of which is up and running. Japan will use state-owned Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the investments. A recent law revision has enabled JBIC to finance foreign companies deemed critical to Japan's supply chains. Akazawa told NHK that equity investment would account for just about 1-2% of the $550 billion, suggesting that the bulk will come in the form of loans and guarantees. When asked about the White House statement that the U.S. would retain 90% of the profits from the package, he clarified that the figure refers only to returns on equity investment, which would represent a small fraction of the total. While Japan initially hoped to secure half of the returns, a loss from the concession on the profit-sharing would be marginal compared to the roughly 10 trillion yen ($67.72 billion) in tariff costs that could be avoided under the deal, he said. He added that Japan aims to deploy the $550 billion investments during Trump's current term. ($1 = 147.6600 yen)
