Mother Engaging Maid No Ground To Deny Child Custody, Says Bombay High Court
The court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother.
The Bombay High Court recently observed that the mere act of a mother engaging a maid to assist in caring for a young child cannot be used to deny her custody rights.
Dismissing a father's objection in a child custody battle, the court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother.
The case stemmed from a dispute between a married couple over the custody of their infant son, born in June 2023. After leaving the matrimonial home, the mother filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act before the family court seeking permanent custody of the child. She also sought interim custody, which was granted on January 30, 2024.
The father challenged this interim order before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad bench, arguing that the mother was not personally attending to the child and had instead delegated care to a maid. He submitted that this, combined with her alleged postnatal mental health issues, warranted the reversal of the custody decision.
However, the bench of Justice RM Joshi rejected the argument, noting that engaging domestic help is a normal and practical decision for many mothers managing infant care, especially in urban households. The court observed:
'Even if it is accepted that a maid servant is engaged by respondent, it is not uncommon for a maid servant to be engaged where there is small child in the house. In such circumstances, the said fact even if it is accepted to be true will not become a ground to cause interference in the impugned order."
Furthermore, the bench emphasised that the father had failed to bring any substantive material to show that the child's custody with the mother was harmful or against the child's welfare.
The bench observed that anxiety and depression after childbirth are not uncommon and do not by themselves prove the mother is incapable of nurturing her child. The court cited the family court's finding that the respondent appeared well-functioning, held a valid driving licence, moved around independently in Pune, and exhibited no signs of harmful behaviour. It noted that the medical certificate furnished by the respondent affirmed her ability to care for the baby.
Strengthening the mother's case, the court noted that the child had been in her custody for around eight months, and no concerns about the child's health, safety, or development had been raised during that period.
In fact, medical records indicated that the child was in normal physical and mental health.
The father had also argued that the family court, by granting custody at the interim stage, had effectively given final relief. The high court, however, clarified that the custody order was provisional and made pending a final decision on the mother's primary petition for permanent custody. It found no procedural irregularity in the family court's approach.
In conclusion, the high court found no merit in the father's plea and upheld the family court's order granting interim custody to the mother.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
Fadnavis opposes immediate closure of Mumbai's kabutarkhanas, suggests curbs to mitigate health risks
Action against kabutarkhanas (pigeon shelters) following a Bombay High Court order is likely to get hampered after Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Tuesday opined against their immediate closure and suggested formulating rules on specific time for feeding pigeons kept in them. On July 31, the Bombay High Court directed the closure of kabutarkhanas citing health risks involved and based on it, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) covered the kabutarkhana in Dadar. Several Jain organisations objected to it citing their century-old tradition and were supported by minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha. In the wake of the opposition, Fadnavis called a meeting of officials on Tuesday. Fadnavis has directed the authorities to conduct a study on the health issues caused by kabutarkhanas. 'He also mentioned that immediate closure of kabutarkhanas is not appropriate. Instead, there can be fixed timings for giving them food so control feeding is possible. He also directed the civic body to look for machines to clean pigeon faeces, which turns out to pose a health risk,' said a government official. Sources said the chief minister asked his Government and the municipal corporation to prepare for a legal battle if necessary. Lodha said after the meeting that the BMC would restore the water connection and remove the cover on the Dadar kabutarkhanas. 'As far as health risks are concerned, CM Fadnavis has strictly directed that all precautions such as cleaning and restricted feeding will be taken. People's health is of utmost importance to us,' he said.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
The End Of Mumbai's Kabutarkhanas: History, Health Risks, Opposition
Mumbai: The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has sealed 51 kabutarkhanas (pigeon houses) across Mumbai, acting on a Bombay High Court directive. Among them is the Dadar Kabutarkhana, a heritage site and one of the city's most well-known pigeon-feeding locations. History Of The Dadar Kabutarkhana Established in 1933, the Dadar Kabutarkhana is considered a Grade-II heritage structure. Members of the Jain community and other bird enthusiasts feed pigeons there daily. The area has also been used for small religious activities and community engagement. Why Are Mumbai Kabutarkhanas Closed? On July 31, the Bombay High Court ordered the closure of all kabutarkhanas in Mumbai, saying they posed a threat to public health. The authorities were also instructed to file FIRs under Sections 223, 270, and 271 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against those violating the order. Avoid demolishing heritage Kabutarkhana structures but ensure they are sealed to prevent further activity, the court said. In line with this order, the BMC sealed the Dadar Kabutarkhana on August 2 using plastic tarpaulins and bamboo structures. The site's electricity supply was also cut off, and surveillance was deployed to prevent further feeding. Health Risks Cited According to the BMC and health authorities, materials such as pigeon droppings, feathers, and nesting debris can spread through the air and cause respiratory illness. The primary concern is "Pigeon Lung," a condition that can affect elderly individuals, children, people with asthma or existing respiratory conditions. Symptoms reported include shortness of breath, allergies, and eye irritation. The KEM Hospital and other health institutions have been asked by the court to submit evidence on health risks caused by pigeon-related pollution. The Maharashtra Human Rights Commission has asked the BMC and health department to submit a detailed report on the health risks within eight weeks. What Happened After It Was Sealed? Pigeons have moved to surrounding streets, especially a 300-metre stretch between Dadar Station and the Kabutarkhana, waiting for food. This has led to traffic disruption and increased accident risks. Jain community members and bird volunteers are now attempting to clear the roads to prevent harm to the birds. The BMC has begun issuing fines of Rs 500 each and has registered at least 16 cases so far. The first FIR under the new directive was filed in Mahim. Authorities are also reportedly penalising shopkeepers found selling grains for pigeon feeding. Public And Religious Reaction Members of the Jain community have opposed these steps, saying that pigeon feeding is part of their religious practice and ethical duty. The kabutarkhanas are mostly located outside Jain premises, such as hostels or derasars (temples). Community leaders and monks argue that sudden closures have led to food scarcity for pigeons. Article 51(A)(g) of the Indian Constitution directs citizens to show compassion toward animals. The Jain community has announced that if feeding is not allowed by August 10, they will go on a hunger strike. Alternative Feeding Zones Under Consideration In response to public concern, BJP MLA Mangal Prabhat Lodha has requested the BMC to identify safe, alternative feeding locations. Proposed options include the Bandra-Kurla Complex, Aarey Colony, and Sanjay Gandhi National Park. No decision has been made yet.
Scroll.in
5 days ago
- Scroll.in
Mumbai civic body can file FIRs against those feeding pigeons despite ban, says HC
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation can register first information reports against those who continue to feed pigeons despite directives against it. A bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Arif Doctor, in response to petitions by animal welfare activists, said that the subject at hand was that of a public health hazard affecting children and the elderly. The High Court allowed the municipal corporation to file cases against those feeding pigeons under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to public nuisance, negligent acts likely to spread infectious diseases and malignant acts likely to spread life-threatening diseases. Play The court took note of news reports and photographs of the Dadar kabootarkhana, or pigeon feeding spot, and said that they were quite 'telling' that the matter needed immediate action. The counsel for the municipal corporation also said that in some cases, pigeon feeders were refusing to pay fines when caught by civic officials. The court said this showed that merely filing non-cognisable reports against violators was not sufficient. 'This is now compounded with an emerging situation of utter disregard for law, by those who defiantly continue to feed pigeons in the teeth of our earlier order rejecting pleas supporting any such feeding and congregation of pigeons and now obstruction to civic officials from discharging their duties in this regard,' the bench said. In addition to allowing the municipal corporation to file FIRs against violators, the court told the civic body to install closed-circuit television cameras at places where pigeon feeding was still taking place. The bench verbally said that if pigeon feeders 'don't want to follow the rule of law, then the law should catch up with them', The Indian Express reported. The case will be heard further on August 7. On July 3, the Maharashtra government told the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to begin the process of shutting down pigeon feeding points in the city. The High Court, however, told the civic body not to demolish heritage kabootarkhanas.
