Rachel Reeves says she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons tears
Reeves unexpectedly joined the prime minister and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, at the launch of the NHS 10-year plan at a health centre in east London, receiving hugs from both colleagues.
Her brief speech at the event gave no mention of Wednesday's prime minister's questions, at which she was visibly tearful, with the chancellor talking only about the fiscal foundations of the NHS plan.
But, speaking to reporters afterwards, Reeves said the reason for her upset was a personal issue unconnected to politics, insisting she was now fine.
'Clearly, I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that,' she said. 'My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government and that's what I tried to do.
'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.'
She rejected suggestions that her upset was connected to an interaction with Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, or with a government colleague.
'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job,' she added.
During a Q&A session with Starmer after his speech at the NHS event, a number of reporters directed questions to Reeves – but without reply.
Starmer also refused to discuss what prompted Reeves's upset: 'She has made clear on a number of occasions that yesterday was a personal issue, and I am certainly not going to say anything more about that. I think it's fantastic that she is here, and none of this would be happening if she hadn't taken the decisions that she's taken.'
Asked if he should have noticed what was happening during PMQs and consoled the chancellor, Starmer said that was unrealistic given the format of the Commons exchanges.
'I didn't appreciate what was happening because, as you'll probably appreciate, PMQs is pretty wired,' he said. 'It goes from question to question and I am literally up, down, question, looking at who is asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it.'
He added: 'It wasn't just yesterday. No prime minister ever has had side conversations in PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there is a bit more time, but in PMQs it is bang, bang, bang, bang.
'That is what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber.'
Reeves has been under intense pressure, with her task of balancing already tight public finances made even harder after the government's concessions to Labour MPs over plans to reform welfare, which has obliterated the planned-for £5bn savings a year.
Downing Street has insisted that Reeves's position is not under any threat. Speculation that she might resign or be forced out had pushed up borrowing costs and led the pound to fall against the dollar and euro, with markets rallying after Starmer publicly backed her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
23 minutes ago
- Scotsman
The former Edinburgh councillor drafted in to see off 'near existential threat' to Tories
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Those of us who endured typing classes may remember hammering out 'Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party', but it's more familiar as a cliché when it comes to political rescue jobs. Sir Keir Starmer may be looking out for anyone who might come to his aid and restore his reputation – men, women or guide dogs – after his Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was gutted into pointlessness to stave off a crushing Commons defeat. So many U-turns, so much political capital burnt, his Chancellor in tears, and all he has to show for it is approval ratings plunging further into the red along with his government's balance sheet, and rebel MPs, notably Alloa MP Brian Leishman, emboldened to speak in terms which under normal circumstances would warrant summary expulsion. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He is not alone in having his troubles to seek and, before this week's debacle, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch was tying with him on minus 34 in pollster YouGov's approval ratings. His are unlikely to have improved, but Ms Badenoch might get a lift from doing what the Opposition is supposed to do: oppose and put the government under pressure. Former Edinburgh councillor Mark McInnes, who has just been appointed chief executive of the UK Conservative party, is one of the Tories' most effective political strategists | Jane Barlow Tories on track for 46 seats There is, of course, a long, long way to go, with YouGov's poll of 11,000 voters last week to mark the Labour government's first anniversary showing the Conservatives on track for a previously unimaginable 46 seats, a loss of 75. That Sir Keir was on course to lead his party to a catastrophic collapse to 178 seats, a drop of 233, would be of no solace if Reform was able to pick up the predicted 271 constituencies to be the biggest single party in a hung parliament. But coming to the aid of the party is Mark McInnes, aka Lord McInnes of Kilwinning, widely regarded as a lot more than a good man, but one of the Conservatives' most effective political strategists in recent memory and this week appointed as the UK party's new chief executive, having had his arm twisted by influential figures like Lord Steve Gilbert with whom he worked closely after being appointed as Scottish party director in 2011 when still plain old Morningside councillor Mark McInnes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In that role he was key to the Scottish Conservatives' change in fortunes through the referendum era, forming a tight team with leader Ruth Davidson delivering the charisma, the savvy David Mundell MP supplying the political nous, and Eddie Barnes the media and communications strategy, all underpinned by his forensic analysis and deep understanding of voting patterns and behaviours, and sharp management of the grassroots party. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch needs to find a way to fight back against the threat posed by Reform UK (Picture: House of Commons/UK Parliament) | PA Wire Better Together stalwart When Mark spoke at party conferences and conventions, delegates didn't just dip in but listened intently because they knew they would learn something. If Ruth fired the shots, Mark supplied the ammunition. Elevated to a peerage in 2016 in recognition of his work during the 2014 independence referendum campaign to sharpen Better Together's messaging after a lacklustre start, he was instrumental in delivering the huge gains in Scotland at the 2016 Holyrood and 2017 general elections, and to hold the Scottish Parliament seats in 2021, after which he went south to bolster the Downing Street team. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wisely taking a step back after Liz Truss's election to party leader in 2022, the last time I spoke to him he was on a study trip on a Turkish archaeological site and as far out the loop of British politics as he could make himself, which wasn't far away at all and he supported Kemi Badenoch's leadership campaign. No one doubts the enormity of the challenge he faces, with one friend describing his first job being 'to see how much life there is left in the patient', but another was more pointedly critical of the current leadership, and identified the need to strip back to core values of hard work, personal responsibility and 'appeal to people for whom aspiration is not a dirty word'. Reform support expected to plateau Further, there is a need to reconnect with 'constituencies of purpose' like the business community and farmers disillusioned by Labour's tax raids, only set to increase after the welfare climbdown wiped out hoped-for savings. With Tories now polling in the teens, one analyst said it will be tough just to reach the mid-20s, but there is a belief that Reform will plateau, and arguing to turn either more to the right or left was a 'false dichotomy' when a clear appeal to all right-of-centre voters was needed. 'And anyway, how many parties has Nigel Farage been through before there's a fall-out?' one observed hopefully. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But who better to judge the new chief's chances than the person with whom he worked the closest, Ruth Davidson. "Appointing Mark McInnes is probably the smartest political move Kemi Badenoch has ever made. If there is anyone in the Conservative party that understands how to build votes against all odds, it is Mark,' she said. 'Smart, talented, hardworking and living in the real world, he's spent decades confounding the odds in Scotland where the party's last rites have been read many, many times. He knows what it means to fight for every vote and – crucially – how to win them. But appointing Mark is not enough on its own to see off the near existential threat facing the Conservatives. Ms Badenoch and her team actually have to listen to him, work to his tempo and pace and implement his ideas. Time will tell if she's prepared to do that."
Scotsman
24 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Labour incompetence created welfare Bill disaster – and worse is to come
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As a former Chief Whip, I often tell colleagues that the first rule of politics is to know how to count. You have to be able to add up the votes on your side of the aisle and the numbers on the opposite side – and make sure that your figures add up. That may appear to be a pretty low bar to clear but it is one that Keir Starmer's government has spectacularly failed to pass this week. Incompetence at the top of the government created utter chaos over the welfare Bill – but there may be far worse yet to come. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A Bill that set out to cut back support for people with disabilities and health challenges was always likely to meet resistance from both inside and outside of Labour. That is why it is astonishing that the government only began to realise the scale of its miscalculation towards the end of last week, when more than 100 Labour members – led by several senior, moderate MPs – signed an amendment which would have brought down the Bill entirely. Chancellor Rachel Reeves was clearly emotional as Keir Starmer was grilled about the Labour rebellion over the welfare Bill (Picture: House of Commons/UK Parliament) | PA Wire High-handed ministers In one fell swoop, the massive Labour majority in the House of Commons was gone – and all because of the high-handed, contemptuous approach taken by those at the top. For a government to be blindsided in this way is a total failure of party management. It suggests that whips are either not doing their job, or are being ignored by those above them. Above all, it smacks of a government that thinks it is a lot cleverer than it really is, and that does not believe it is accountable to the MPs who make up their majority. What is so concerning about this week's debacle is that ministers appear to be unwilling to make the case for their policies, either with the public or with their own MPs. To govern, after all, is to choose. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sometimes cuts have to be made, tough decisions taken. If the planned cuts in the welfare budget were so necessary, as the government claimed up to the last minute, why were ministers so unwilling to win the argument with their colleagues? A lack of conviction This matters, because now that the government has shown that it cannot control its own party, every difficult vote becomes that much more difficult. The rebels have had a taste of successful rebellion – why would they stop here? What we are witnessing is a government that does not have the courage of its convictions. It may, in truth, not even have convictions to begin with – and a government that has neither the ideas nor the votes has a rocky road ahead of it. All indications, however, are that this poor management is going to continue. Just hours after the government turned tail on the welfare Bill, anonymous messages were circulating from the higher-ups, threatening that the two-child limit on benefits – one of the greatest drivers of child poverty in this country – would have to be kept in place to teach a lesson to rebellious MPs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If the government think they have the numbers to bully their MPs, they may have another thing coming. The first rule of politics is to know how to count.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Rachel Reeves resembled a sad, startled owlet. Heaven knows how this can be sustained...
All hail the embalmer's art. Labour spinners, in emergency reconstruction mode, paraded a remodelled Rachel Reeves at a London health-centre event. At least we were told it was the Chancellor. Madame Tussaud's might want to check that one of the waxworks hasn't done a runner. Twenty-three hours earlier Ms Reeves was in a state of quivering distress in the Commons. Now she was smiling. And smiling. Her cheeks were two beach balls, the skin as stretched and twangy as prophylactic latex. Her teeth were bared in a mad smile. Her eyes crinkled at the edges even if the jellies themselves looked lifeless in their sockets. The poor creature had been wheeled out as warm-up artiste for one of Sir Keir Starmer 's scintillating speeches, this time about some 10-year health plan. The PM was at his whizziest, clapping his hands, projecting at least 25 per cent too much heartiness. He kept saying 'fung-tastic'. No one does artificial delight more clunkily - except, perhaps, poor Rachel. Watching her was pretty fair agony. It being a medical facility, nurses stood in a crescent behind the Chancellor. They watched her with close interest. It is always good to have professionals in attendance, horse syringes at the ready in case a patient goes tonto. She made a two-minute speech. Houston, this is progress. It may not yet be the 60 minutes required at a budget but there are months before that. At present it is a matter of taking each hour as it comes and, with luck, limping to the end of the week. On Wednesday she would not have been able to manage more than a few words without Stan Laurel whimpering. Two minutes was an achievement. If they could save the Bionic Man, perhaps the miracle can be repeated. Her delivery? Odd. But then she has never been exactly a fluent orator. 'It's great to be here today,' she Daleked, pushing the air past those terrifying (terrified?) teeth. Her eyebrows did a lot of jumping. Trotting out some words about how 'proud' she was of 'the health of our nation's finances', she held that smile. Here was Ophelia cast in a Palladium chorus line. Or imagine a beaten boxer the morning after a fight, bruises disguised by the corner-men. As she finished her remarks there were insistent whoops led by a few partisans at the back. It felt forced. Coercive. Prime ministers and Chancellors have occasionally concocted stunts to show they do not completely hate one another. Gordon Brown and Tony Blair visited an ice-cream van. Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson went to a bar. Even so, the sight of Sir Keir and his damaged colleague at a health centre counter evoked notions of a man delivering a friend to the local psychiatric ward. Sir Keir had been programmed to say that he was 'in lockstep' with his Chancellor. This was the line he kept uttering in his own speech and in broadcast interviews. His health plan came with a document entitled 'Fit For The Future'. He insisted that Ms Reeves was up to the job. She was going to be Chancellor 'into the next election and beyond it'. This was perhaps no more delusional than the rest of his guff about how he had fixed the economy and how we were now safe in the hands of 'stable' Labour. Towards the end of an event that was all about optics, Sir Keir averred: 'I don't believe in performative politics. I don't believe in rhetorical speeches with nothing to back them up.' This was said with the usual immense self-regard. He really does think he is tremendously good at being prime minister. Most unaccountably, however, voters seem to consider him a steaming dud. He and Ms Reeves had an awkward hug. Cameras caught her face, still plumped by unhappiness, gazing upwards, pop-eyed. The supposedly assured pilot of our nation's finances resembled a sad, startled owlet.
