Epic Games' latest court win against Google will transform the Play Store forever
The ongoing Epic Games vs Google legal battle is nearing its end and the Fortnite maker is emerging as the winner. Following its court wins from 2023 and 2024, Epic has now amassed its latest victory as the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Google's appeal to the previous rulings.
This means Google will now be forced to allow third-party app stores to be publicly visible within the Play Store and operate freely with full access to its app catalog over the next three years.
App developers can also set up and use alternative billing systems for apps and subscriptions, bypassing Google's own payment system and its 30% app tax. In addition, developers will be able to freely link users to download options outside of the Play Store.
Google is also prohibited from offering device makers or carriers any form of money or perks to deter them from pre-installing third-party app stores on devices.
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney confirmed that the Epic Games Store for Android is coming to Google Play as soon as possible.
Google's regulatory affairs chief, Lee-Anne Mulholland, issued a statement following the court decision, claiming it would 'significantly harm user safety' and 'undermine the innovations that make Android competitive'. Google is expected to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court but it will still have to begin implementing the new changes.
Source (PDF)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
7 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
T-Mobile has fallen: the undoing of the un-carrier
T-Mobile is rising across the United States at a rapid pace. Unfortunately, it seems that the carrier — or the 'un-carrier' as it calls itself — has taken this to mean that it can impose unwanted changes willy-nilly. As much as it sucks to admit, I have to say that T-Mobile is no longer the company that it once was. While it's made some very controversial changes these last few months, the final nail in the coffin got hammered in just a few days ago. But first, a recap. T-Mobile wants you on its side. | Image credit — The New York Times The company originally marketed itself as the antithesis of other carriers in the U.S. T-Mobile actively called out AT&T and Verizon for hidden fees scattered about their confusing contracts. This was when it began its 'un-carrier' campaign, where it claimed that it was here to disrupt an industry rife with malpractice. The campaign was a massive success, and customers across the country sang T-Mobile 's praises. T-Mobile skyrocketed in popularity, and is now perhaps the most popular network Stateside, and it continues to climb the ranks to dethrone Verizon one day in subscriber count. The 'un-carrier' marketing campaign's remnants can still be seen today, like when T-Mobile mocked rivals recently, after it launched its satellite program for the public. Funnily enough, Starlink went down mere hours later. But the thing is, aside from ironic twists of fate, these ads don't hit like they once used to. T-Mobile's decisions drove customers out of stores. | Image credit — T-Mobile T-Mobile 's public perception began unravelling a few months back, when the company began to make major changes that users were adamantly opposed to. First, T-Mobile started to force its customers to use the T-Life app, which many deemed a broken mess. The public outcry was so severe that people walked out of T-Mobile stores in protest, and front-facing representatives took the brunt of their anger. But then came what is perhaps the most controversial change of them all: T-Mobile increased prices for plans that had once been marketed as price-locked. The company denied any wrongdoing, of course, but users weren't buying it. This ordeal lasted for weeks, as customers took to social media to complain, with some even digging up old ads that T-Mobile had removed after the change. Then, to make matters even worse, T-Mobile phased out plans that included taxes and additional fees. This was, for many, the point where they seriously began to consider switching carriers. Those who had stuck around after the price hikes, said that this was too much. Accusations thrown around blamed everything, from the current CEO to plain old greed. Things got quite nasty down in the comments. And now, T-Mobile has made another decision. A decision which has prompted me to say: T-Mobile has fallen. Exciting news! No, I don't think so. | Image credit — T-Mobile T-Mobile is moving users to new plans, without their consent. Customers no longer have the right to stay on the plan that they signed up for. The company promises that no changes will be made, but I think that users that were on price-locked plans a few months ago would like to disagree. Make no mistake, T-Mobile is still a pretty reliable carrier, if we're strictly speaking about network coverage. But it can no longer be ignored that the company will continue to make changes to your plans, whether you like it or not. Hidden fees? Confusing contracts? T-Mobile is no longer the 'un-carrier'. It is not the carrier that it once was, when people would choose it for the simplicity and ease that it brought. Now, if you're choosing between T-Mobile , AT&T , or Verizon , you might as well just wear a blindfold and throw darts, or ask the magic 8 ball. Or, better yet, just see which carrier provides the best coverage in your area. And when you move? Switch. It'd be wiser to just keep hopping from one network to another every couple of years to benefit from deals for newcomers, at least you'll save some money in the process. It is painful to see what has become of the carrier that once promised the world. And, according to a survey about network companies, it seems that MVNOs are the future anyway.
Phone Arena
37 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
Hot rumor has TSMC starting 2nm production in U.S. earlier than expected
The largest contract chip manufacturer in the world plans on having one of its U.S. fabs in Arizona, P3, produce cutting-edge chips made on the company's 2nm process node by 2028 at the earliest and by 2030 at the latest. TSMC has a client list made up of top tech firms like Apple, Qualcomm, AMD, MediaTek, Nvidia, and more. The fab has reportedly been under construction, and according to a report by the Chinese language Commercial Times website, we could see TSMC manufacturing 2nm chips in the U.S. earlier than expected. The Commercial Times says that TSMC could produce 2nm chips in Arizona as soon as next year. If true, this would take place just one year after 2nm production started in Taiwan. It is important to point out that the Commercial Times report does not match the official TSMC timeline. Having such advanced chips built in the U.S. is a huge advantage for the States, especially when you consider that China's top foundry, SMIC, is currently limited to building chips using a process node no lower than 7nm. However, there is speculation that SMIC could be producing chips using a 5nm process node by the end of this year. Since U.S. and Dutch officials prevent China from obtaining the latest lithography technology, SMIC is limited to using older lithography machines and multi-patterning techniques. The latter runs a silicon wafer through the etching process at least four times with the proper alignment to capture the correct transistor density and features. When TSMC started building and staffing its first fab in Arizona, the project seemed doomed by cultural differences between U.S. employees hired to work at the fab and Taiwan-based employees who were assigned to work in the U.S. to help the fab get off to a good start. Originally, 5nm chips were supposed to roll off the assembly lines in the U.S. by 2024 That was changed to 4nm chips (which are still considered in the 5nm class) by 2025. Eventually, 4nm chips started shipping during the fourth quarter of 2024, and this year shipments will be ramped up. As we noted above, officially, TSMC isn't supposed to start producing 2nm chips in the U.S. until 2028-2030. However, with tariffs taxing imports from nearly all of America's trade partners, there is a sense of urgency in moving some cutting-edge chip manufacturing to the States. Once all six fabs planned for Arizona are completed, TSMC expects to produce 30% of its advanced chips in the U.S. Getting cutting-edge chips built in the U.S. is one thing that President Donald Trump wanted, and regardless of how you feel about him, this is a situation where you have to give credit where credit is due. Kudos to President Trump. The U.S. now has the opportunity to run with this and truly become a global leader in cutting-edge chip manufacturing.
Phone Arena
6 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Boost Mobile's turnaround confirmed even though parent EchoStar might not survive
In March 2024, EchoStar and Dish Network made their first combined filing with the SEC following EchoStar's purchase of Dish at the end of 2023. At the time of the filing, Dish had an option to buy 13.5MHz of low-band 800MHz spectrum from T-Mobile for $3.59 billion. Because of Dish's perilous financial situation, it continued to ask for an extension on the length of the option, which T-Mobile granted multiple times. Unable to buy the spectrum, Dish let the option expire; because it couldn't find another buyer, T-Mobile was left holding on to the airwaves . When it filed with the SEC to explain why it wouldn't be exercising the option on the airwaves, EchoStar/Dish was forced to admit that there was concern about the company's ability to operate. The large amount of debt due in 2024 and worries that the company would be burning through cash over the following 12 months raised "substantial doubt about [the company's] ability to continue as a going concern." Eventually, EchoStar was able to improve its financial position enough that it was not required to include the warning with its financial releases. However, the worries have now returned as EchoStar is experiencing a cash crunch. In a 10-Q filing with the SEC, the company wrote, "We currently do not have the necessary cash on hand, projected future cash flows, or committed financing to fund our obligations over the next twelve months, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern." Trying to survive this liquidity crunch, EchoStar stated that it is in "active discussions with funding sources to raise additional capital and/or restructure our outstanding debt." Phillip Burnett, an analyst with New Street Research, says that the "going concern" disclosure should not be seen as a surprise considering EchoStar's current cash situation and the $3.4 billion in debt that comes due over the next year. On July 30th, EchoStar made an interest payment that was due July 1st, temporarily preventing the company from filing for bankruptcy. But EchoStar has paused the buildout of its 5G network due to uncertainties over its spectrum rights. A report this past week says that FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has urged EchoStar to sell its AWS-4 (2GHz) spectrum holdings in what Carr said was his ""best and final offer." The FCC is looking to strip EchoStar of this spectrum because SpaceX, owned by Elon Musk, wants it for Musk's plan to connect SpaceX satellites to smartphones. SpaceX claims that EchoStar has been hoarding this spectrum, and it should be re-allocated or put up for auction again. John Swieringa, EchoStar's president of technology and COO, said during the earnings call ,"Until this matter is resolved, we're focused on continuing to optimize the network infrastructure in place and continuing to add customers to our network." EchoStar said in the 10-Q filing that it is in talks with the company is also working on a direct-to-device (D2D) low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite project. The service using EchoStar's global S-band/2GHz spectrum rights will deliver global talk, text, and broadband services to 5G devices. The project will cost $5 billion, with service scheduled to start in 2029. The service will be sold to wholesalers who will deal with consumers. -Craig Moffett, Analyst, MoffettNathanson EchoStar President and CEO Hamid Akhavan says that the LEO network could force carriers to get rid of "hundreds of thousands or potentially millions of cell sites" that are not cost effective. Despite the return of the "going concern disclosure," there is good news to report. It seems that, finally, EchoStar's Boost Mobile is turning around. Last week, we told you that Boost Mobile's Q2 earnings report could show a sign that the carrier finally has traction. After watching its 9.4 million subscribers fall to 7.2 million since Boost Mobile was sold to Dish, Boost reported its third consecutive net quarterly gain in subscribers this past Friday. For Q2, Boost added 212,000 net subscribers, crushing a gain of 88,000 expected by analysts. It was also a huge improvement over the loss of 16,000 net subscribers reported during the same quarter last year. Wireless churn declined 24 basis points on an annual basis. This is big because it seems that the new Boost Mobile is finally showing signs of being accepted as the nation's fourth-largest carrier.
