logo
Australian artists Khaled Sabsabi, Michael Dagostino recommissioned for Venice Biennale after shock sacking

Australian artists Khaled Sabsabi, Michael Dagostino recommissioned for Venice Biennale after shock sacking

Sky News AU02-07-2025
Australian artists Khaled Sabsabi and Michael Dagostino have been recommissioned by to represent the country at the 2026 Venice Biennale, following their controversial sacking.
A review of the governance of Creative Australia, Australia's arts funding body, found there had been 'a series of missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities' in the decision-making process around their dismissal.
Mr Sabsabi and Mr Dagostino were selected for as the artistic team for the Australian Pavilion at the prestigious 2026 Venice Biennale, an internationally-renowned art show.
But in February, the pair were controversially removed from the art show after questions were raised over previous artworks by Mr Sabsabi.
Two of them - one featuring Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and another video featuring footage of 9/11 and a clip of President George W. Bush saying 'thank you very much' - were attributed as the cause of the initial cancellation.
Opposition arts spokeswoman Claire Chandler brought up the artworks in parliament at the time, and hours later the creative agency had backflipped on the pair's appointment.
Acting Creative Australia Board Chair Wesley Enoch said the review was 'emphatic' in finding a 'unique set of circumstances' that the agency's board had to address.
'The Board has considered and reflected deeply on all relevant issues to find a path forward,' Mr Enoch said in a statement.
'The Board is now of the view that proceeding with the Artistic Team, Khaled Sabsabi and Michael Dagostino represents the preferred outcome.'
'The Board's decision reflects its commitment to the important principle of freedom of artistic expression, supported by a strong, transparent, and accountable governance framework.
'The decision the Board took in February has weighed heavily on many people, most particularly the artistic team and for that we are sorry.
'We want to be clear that the decision was not a reflection on the artistic team and their remarkable body of work.'
The two artists released a joint statement on social media accepting the reinvitation.
'We accept this invitation and welcome the opportunity to represent our country on this prestigious international stage,' the statement read.
'This decision has renewed our confidence in Creative Australia and in the integrity of its selection process.
'It offers a sense of resolution and allows us to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant personal and collective hardship.'
Mr Sabsabi and Mr Dagostino said that they extended their 'deepest and heartfelt thanks' to their supporters.
Julian Leeser, the Coalition arts spokesman, condemned the decision as in opposition to Australian values.
'Australia's representation on the world stage should reflect our values,' Mr Leeser said.
'To reinstate an artist and give them taxpayer funds, after they have glorified the leaders of listed terrorist organisations, flies in the face of these values.
'This has been a deeply flawed process from the beginning and has now led to a ridiculous outcome. It diminishes the power of Australian art as a tool of soft diplomacy.
'Tony Burke has serious questions to answer about the credibility of his agency, Creative Australia, in the wake of this saga.
'Australia's arts sector should be a powerful tool to present Australia and its values to the world.
'When the government gives a wink and a nod to decisions like this, it sends a signal that undermines our laws, weakens social cohesion and risks dividing Australians at home, while damaging our reputation abroad.'
South Australian Green Senator Sarah Hanson-Young welcomed the artists' reinstatement and called for the board to be held further accountable.
'The reinstatement of artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as Australia's artistic team for the Venice Biennale is a win for freedom of artistic expression but it highlights just how much of a farce this whole situation has been,' Ms Hanson-Young said.
'It is clear that the leadership of Creative Australia needs a clean out in order to rebuild trust within the artistic community and the Australian public.'
Originally published as Sacked Aussie artists Khaled Sabsabi, Michael Dagostino reinstated for Venice Biennale
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on
Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on

Sydney Morning Herald

time33 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on

The Greens co-founder booted from the party on the weekend has hit back, accusing the organisation of becoming 'too weird and unlikeable' for electoral success and urging the federal leader to intervene. Drew Hutton, who helped found the Greens in 1991, was expelled from the party on Sunday in part for refusing to delete comments made by others on his Facebook page deemed to be transphobic. Hutton, 78, told this masthead he was considering his legal options and urged new federal party leader Larissa Waters to intervene. 'She should be using her stature to say to the Australian Greens, no more expulsions, no more bullying of green people who have given sometimes decades to the party over this gender issue,' he said. 'And secondly, she should be calling for inquiry into all of the processes of the Greens and to ensure that the principle of democracy is embedded in them. Loading 'Now she's got to show that she's got the character and the courage to do that – if she doesn't do it, the Greens risk becoming, in the view of most Australian electors, just weird and unlikable.' Waters backed her party's processes, which she said showed 'nobody is above the rules'. 'Good governance means that people can put their case forward, including the right to appeal a decision. In this case the appeal was unsuccessful,' she said.

The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result
The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result

Sydney Morning Herald

time33 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result

Gisele Kapterian, the unsuccessful Liberal candidate for Bradfield, says at least 56 ballot papers were wrongly rejected in the final recount of the ultra-marginal seat, while 95 were incorrectly allowed, prompting her to ask the High Court to overturn the result and declare her the winner. Kapterian last week ended weeks of speculation and lodged a petition with the High Court, which sits as the Court of Dispute Returns to hear election challenges, in a bid to be declared victorious in Bradfield instead of teal MP-elect Nicolette Boele. Boele, who will give her inaugural speech to federal parliament on July 28, won the once blue-ribbon Liberal seat after a recount of the northern Sydney seat in which she finished 26 votes ahead of Kapterian. In her petition, Kapterian says the Australian electoral officer (AEO) – who is the electoral commission's manager in each state – 'wrongly rejected at least 56 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the petitioner ahead of the first respondent'. Boele is listed as the first respondent. 'In each such case the ballot paper was not informal and should not have been rejected,' the petition says, referencing examples such as the officer 'not being satisfied that the figure 1 in one square was distinguishable from the figure in another square'. Kapterian has not seen the ballot papers, and her legal team will be provided with them once the AEC hands them to the court. However, her concerns were formed based on feedback and notes taken by scrutineers overseeing the final recount. The AEO was tasked with reviewing and making rulings on 795 reserved ballot papers. As well as the rejected ballots, Kapterian's petition says the AEO 'wrongly admitted at least 95 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the first respondent ahead of the petitioner'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store