DC Attorney General investigating strip club owners accused of violating workers' rights
The D.C. attorney general has filed a lawsuit against Cloakroom strip club for sexual harassment, wage theft, and mistreatment of employees.
Female workers at the club were allegedly harassed, assaulted, and underpaid, with management turning a blind eye.
The club is accused of stealing tips, underpaying for overtime, and using a fake "Cloak bucks" system to scam customers.
The lawsuit seeks to hold the club accountable, recover lost wages, and ensure compliance with workplace laws.
WASHINGTON - D.C.'s Attorney General is cracking down on what they're calling abusive and illegal practices at a popular adult entertainment venue in Mount Vernon Triangle.
The 32-page lawsuit is graphic and details some disturbing allegations against the owners of the Cloakroom and its business practices as a whole, especially in relation to their female workers.
While a representative of the company reportedly denies the claims and says they run an upstanding business, the AG'S report tells a much different story.
"These allegations are particularly troubling. They violations of a panoply of workers' rights," said Dennis Corkery, the D.C. OAG Assistant Chief of Workers' Rights and Antifraud.
Cloakroom is a multi-level adult entertainment venue located in on K Street, near 5th Street in Mount Vernon Triangle. Its name is widely recognized in the industry and in 2021 it was named Washington City Paper's "Best of DC Adult Entertainment" winner.
But according to the recent lawsuit from the D.C. OAG and an in depth investigation, the company's practices are coming into question with allegations of an environment of "daily hostility and exploitation of the clubs female employees" and claims that the owners "not only tolerated the abuse but perpetuate the abuse themselves"
"There are situations of extreme sexual harassment, including verbal assaults, physical assaults, sexual touching that happened there," Corkery says.
The lawsuit goes on to claim that there was a system of quid pro quo when it came to requesting time off.
"They were not given sick leave at all, but when they tried to access time off — whether paid or unpaid — there would be situations where managers would ask for sexual favors in exchange for giving that time off," Corkery said.
The OAG's investigators say the Cloakroom also cheated its dancers out of hundreds of thousands of dollars throughout the years.
"Extreme wage theft, like having a system like 'the Cloak Bucks' where it was tips customers believed were going to entertainers and should have been going to the entertainers but instead went back to pad the pockets of the Cloakroom," said Corkery.
The OAG applauds the women for coming forward since workers who spoke up were allegedly punished and retaliated against. those who live and work in the area had this to say:
"I'm hoping that this is a perfect example of we're finally starting to stand up for ourselves, women are starting to stand up for ourselves and men are standing up for women as well," one neighbor said.
FOX 5 made multiple attempts to speak with the Cloakroom's owner but they denied those requests.
If these allegations are proven in court, Cloakroom could be ordered to pay workers up to three times the amount of wages and tips stolen from them and be ordered by the court to change many of their practices.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
25-06-2025
- CBS News
Three Maryland drivers rack up more than $200k in unpaid traffic citations
Three Maryland drivers are facing lawsuits after racking up hundreds of traffic citations. Combined, the drivers owe more than $200,000 to the District of Columbia. The lawsuits were announced by the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General and come as part of Attorney General Brian Schwalb's efforts to crack down on reckless driving. Ashley Kibler, of Temple Hills, racked up 414 citations for alleged traffic infractions. 366 of Kibler's citations were for excessive speeding, including 223 for driving 30 mph or more over the speed limit. 66 of the citations were for driving 21–30 mph over the speed limit, 101 were for driving 16–20 over the speed limit, and 170 were for driving 11–15 mph over the speed limit. In total, her citations amounted to $83,100 in unpaid fines, penalties, and fees. The District filed another lawsuit against Andrea Reid, of Silver Spring. The state's attorney's office said she was issued 206 citations for alleged traffic violations, totaling $56,010 in unpaid fines. 164 of the fines were for excessive speeding, and 21 were for running red lights in D.C. Terrell Jenkins, of Brentwood, received 102 traffic citations, 75 of which were for speeding. He is accused of failing to pay $33,432 in traffic fines. The lawsuits were filed under the STEER Act, which enables the OAG to hold individuals accountable for violating traffic laws even if they do not live in the District. "These STEER Act lawsuits are part of our continued commitment to putting an end to drivers speeding through our city, ignoring our laws and putting people's lives at risk," Attorney General Schwalb said. "Deaths from traffic crashes have reached historically high levels in recent years, and holding lawless drivers accountable is essential to reversing that trend." Maryland cracks down on reckless driving In Maryland, lawmakers have continued to crack down on reckless driving offenses. The Sergeant Patrick Kepp Act, signed into law by Governor Wes Moore in May 2025, significantly strengthens penalties for reckless, negligent, and aggressive driving. The measure adjusts Maryland's driver point system, assigning 2 points for negligent driving and 6 points for speeding 30 mph or more over the limit.
Yahoo
01-06-2025
- Yahoo
Texas budget bill passes with crime victim compensation fix sparked by KXAN
AUSTIN (KXAN) – The Texas budget bill, following conference committee agreement, has passed the legislature and will soon head to Gov. Greg Abbott for consideration. Included in Senate Bill 1 is a fix to the performance reporting process of the state's Crime Victims' Compensation Program sparked by a KXAN investigation. EXPLORE: KXAN's Crime Victims' Compensation fund investigations In 2022, KXAN began reporting on the impact of delayed payments by the CVC program, which is run by the Office of Attorney General. Amid that investigation, KXAN found the OAG was reporting an inaccurate picture of its performance to state officials and lawmakers. KXAN discovered the office was using a flawed formula that mixed two different types of payments in its calculation: victim claims and sexual assault examination reimbursements, the latter of which take just days and are paid directly to hospitals. That method made it appear crime victims and their loved ones were paid much faster for items like funeral expenses and medical restitution, on average, than the months-long reality our team documented through victim interviews and related records. After KXAN's reporting, the OAG acknowledged to lawmakers that the measurements weren't accurate. The budget bill directs the measurements be split apart, and it provides a 90-day average goal for victims' first payments. The bill also indicates the OAG 'shall submit a report detailing the expenditure of funds' for victim assistance. That report – which is to be submitted within 100 calendar days after the close of each fiscal year to the Legislative Budget Board, governor, Senate Finance Committee and House Appropriations Committee – will include 'audit and oversight activities conducted' related to the grants, thus increasing transparency and accountability for victims under the program. SB 1 next heads to the State Comptroller for certification. The comptroller will confirm the spending bill does not exceed the amount of revenue available. After certification, the bill heads to the governor for approval. The governor does have the power to line-item veto specific appropriations in the bill. Once signed, the bill becomes law. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16-05-2025
- Yahoo
Travis, El Paso County attorneys, district attorneys sue Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The county and district attorneys of Travis and El Paso counties filed a lawsuit Friday against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his office (OAG) over rules introduced in 2024 that require them to send sensitive case records to his office. 'The challenged rules exceed Defendants' authority for rulemaking and invade privacy rights of third parties without statutory justification while at the same time requiring prosecutors to disclose information they are statutorily required to keep confidential,' the lawsuit states. KXAN reached out to Paxton and the OAG and will update this story when we receive his response. When we previously reported about the rule, Paxton said in a press release that it would 'ensure accountability and promote public safety.' 'In many major counties, the people responsible for safeguarding millions of Texans have instead endangered lives by refusing to prosecute criminals and allowing violent offenders to terrorize law-abiding Texans. This rule will enable citizens to hold rogue DAs accountable,' he said. Paxton announces new reporting rule for district, county attorneys The rule, Texas Administrative Code Chapter 56, applies to counties with more than 400,000 residents and would allow the OAG to initiate the dismissal of an attorney found not in compliance. It requires those counties to send 'entire case files,' including: privileged communications; private personal information about law enforcement officers, crime victims, arrestees, criminal defendants, and witnesses; protected information such as grand jury testimony and materials, medical, mental health, and substance abuse disorders and treatments; sexually explicit images of both adults and children; juvenile records; and, law enforcement investigation materials obtained by prosecutors to prosecute crimes. 'Even if Defendants had the authority to impose the Challenged Rules, the rules are so vague that Plaintiffs cannot determine what statistical information and case files must be transmitted—and the purported consequence is possible removal from office,' the lawsuit reads. The plaintiffs asked the court to issue a temporary injunction against the rule during the case, and ultimately a permanent injunction. The full lawsuit can be read below: Travis-County-District-Court-D-1-GN-25-003445Download Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.