logo
Fact Check: ‘I'm very much alive,' says byelection candidate alleged to have died

Fact Check: ‘I'm very much alive,' says byelection candidate alleged to have died

CTV News4 days ago
Elsie Kipp, a B.C. woman, as shown in this handout photo, who is running as a candidate in Alberta's Battle River-Crowfoot byelection as part of the Longest Ballot Committee. Kipp was the subject of an online conspiracy theory that claimed she was actually a woman who died in February. THE CANADIAN PRESS/handout
An online conspiracy theory recently claimed that a candidate on the ballot in the federal byelection in Alberta's Battle River-Crowfoot riding had died in February. The source for the claim was an obituary for an unrelated woman with the same name. The real candidate told The Canadian Press that Elections Canada verified her identity before putting her name on the ballot.
The claim
There are more than 200 candidates running in the Aug. 18 Battle River-Crowfoot byelection, including Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
But according to some internet conspiracy theorists, one of them is dead.
A TikTok video posted last Saturday claimed candidate Elsie Kipp appears on the ballot despite having died in February. Its source was the online obituary of a Canadian woman with the same name.
The claim prompted other social media users on platforms including X to question Elections Canada's process for vetting candidates.
Rating: False
The Canadian Press spoke to the actual candidate, who said she is 'very much alive.'
In a phone interview this week, Kipp said she is running in the byelection as part of the Longest Ballot Committee's plan to stack the ballot with a large number of candidates — its bid to draw public attention to the issue of electoral reform.
Conservative Damien Kurek won the sprawling eastern Alberta riding with more than 82 per cent of the vote in the April general election. He resigned to allow Poilievre, who lost his seat in the Ottawa riding of Carleton, the chance to return to the House of Commons in the fall.
Kipp said she had to show her ID and take a candidate's oath on camera. Before that, she had to provide copies of her identification and other personal information.
'I did a full package to make sure that I was legally allowed on the ballot,' Kipp said.
Elections Canada said in an emailed statement that all candidates on the ballot 'have met the requirements under the Canada Elections Act, which includes providing the returning officer with appropriate ID.'
While the Longest Ballot Committee candidates aren't running typical campaigns, they need to meet the same requirements as anyone else.
Candidates must file a nomination paper, which notes they must provide proof of their identity to the returning officer.
'You can submit identification documents directly, or copies may be provided by the person filing the nomination paper, as long as the copies are signed by you,' the nomination form reads.
Required ID includes any card issued by a government agency with a name and photo, such as a driver's licence or Canadian passport.
Candidates need to sign a legal oath, referred to as a 'solemn declaration,' in front of the returning officer. This can be done over video conference, as in Kipp's case, and the candidate must show their identification.
Kipp, who lives outside Hope, B.C., said she decided to run in the Alberta byelection because 'it's strange that people can run in a riding that they don't live in.'
'The reason I put my name forward was so people would say, 'Why would you do that? You don't live there?' and I would say 'Yes, that's interesting,'' Kipp said.
In a followup message, Kipp said she wanted to highlight the 'arrogance' of a candidate running in a community they don't live in and said she doesn't want anyone to vote for her.
She also expressed her condolences and concern for the late Elsie Kipp.
'Though my only connection to the other Elsie Kipp is our shared names, I am deeply sorry that her image and obituary details are being used to spread misinformation …. It's unfortunate that conspiracy theories can take off so easily — especially when people are being intentionally misled using something as sensitive as someone's passing,' she said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025.
Marissa Birnie, The Canadian Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Justice Department to move forward on investigation into Trump-Russia probe
U.S. Justice Department to move forward on investigation into Trump-Russia probe

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

U.S. Justice Department to move forward on investigation into Trump-Russia probe

WASHINGTON — U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed that the U.S. Justice Department move forward with a probe into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation following the recent release of documents aimed at undermining the legitimacy of the inquiry that established that Moscow interfered on the Republican's behalf in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official, a person familiar with the matter said Monday. That person was not authorized to discuss it by name and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press. Fox News first reported the development. It was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury activity, where the grand jury that might ultimately hear evidence will be located or which prosecutors — whether career employees or political appointees — might be involved in pursuing the investigation. It was also not clear what precise claims of misconduct Trump administration officials believe could form the basis of criminal charges, which a grand jury would have to sign off on for an indictment to be issued. The development is likely to heighten concerns that the Justice Department is being used to achieve political ends, given longstanding grievances over the Russia investigation voiced by U.S. President Donald Trump, who has called for the jailing of perceived political adversaries. Any criminal investigation would revisit one of the most dissected chapters of modern American political history. It is also surfacing at a time when the Trump administration is being buffeted by criticism over its handling of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The investigation into Russian election interference resulted in the appointment of a special counsel, Robert Mueller, who secured multiple convictions against Trump aides and allies but did not establish proof of a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign. The inquiry shadowed much of Trump's first term and he has long focused his ire on senior officials from the intelligence and law enforcement community, including former FBI Director James Comey, whom he fired in May 2017, and former CIA Director John Brennan. The Justice Department appeared to confirm an investigation into both men in an unusual statement last month but offered no details. Multiple special counsels, congressional committees and the Justice Department's own inspector general have studied and documented a multi-pronged effort by Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on Trump's behalf, including through a hack-and-leak dump of Democratic emails and a covert social media operation aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But that conclusion has been aggressively challenged in recent weeks as Trump's director of national intelligence and other allies have released previously classified records that they hope will cast doubt on the extent of Russian interference and establish an Obama administration effort to falsely link Trump to Russia. In one batch of documents released last month, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, disclosed emails showing that senior Obama administration officials were aware in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate the votes in Trump's favor. But former U.S. president Barack Obama's administration never alleged that votes were tampered with and instead detailed other forms of election interference and foreign influence. A new outcry surfaced last week when Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a set of documents that FBI Director Kash Patel claimed on social media proved that the 'Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.' The documents were part of a classified annex of a report issued in 2023 by John Durham, the special counsel who was appointed during the first Trump administration to hunt for any government misconduct during the Russia investigation. Durham did identify significant flaws in the investigation but uncovered no bombshells to disprove the existence of Russian election interference. His sprawling probe produced three criminal cases; two resulted in acquittals and the third was a guilty plea from a little-known FBI lawyer to a charge of making a false statement. Republicans seized on a July 27, 2016, email in Durham's newly declassified annex that purported to say that Hillary Clinton, then the Democratic candidate for president, had approved a plan during the heat of the campaign to link Trump with Russia. But the purported author of the email, a senior official at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, told Durham's team he had never sent the email and the alleged recipient said she never called receiving it. Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood of Russian disinformation. The FBI's Russia investigation was opened on July 31, 2016, following a tip that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had told a Russian diplomat that Russia was in possession of dirt on Clinton. Eric Tucker And Alanna Durkin Richer, The Associated Press

Scott Moe speaks out against AI ‘deepfakes' of him circulating online
Scott Moe speaks out against AI ‘deepfakes' of him circulating online

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

Scott Moe speaks out against AI ‘deepfakes' of him circulating online

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe listens to a question from the media during the 2025 summer meetings of Canada's Premiers at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe says his government is doing whatever it can to track down the creators of so-called 'deepfakes' of him and other prominent figures. Moe's likeness, including his voice, has been used in online video ads for cryptocurrency schemes that he says he would never endorse. The premier says on his official social media that some of the videos, which are created with artificial intelligence, feature him and others, including Prime Minister Mark Carney. Moe says his government is doing its best to find the people behind the videos, but adds it can be difficult to prevent the scams. It's not the first time Moe's image has been used to market the scams — he first acknowledged them in March. Saskatchewan's consumer watchdog has been issuing warnings about the impersonation scams and urges people not to send money to companies that aren't registered in the province. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 4, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store