Trans people ‘excluded in heart of democracy' after Holyrood toilet rule change
The Scottish Trans and Equality Network hit out after the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body – which makes decisions on the accommodation at Holyrood – announced the permitted use of 'all facilities designated as male or female' will be based on 'biological sex'.
It comes in the wake of the recent landmark Supreme Court ruling which made clear the terms 'woman' and 'sex'' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
An update from the Equality and Human Rights Commission issued afterwards stated that in workplaces which are open to the public, trans people should not be permitted to use facilities which correspond with their identified gender.
Holyrood Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone said: 'As Scotland's legislature, it is vital that the Parliament fulfils its legal responsibilities.
'Our officials therefore took immediate steps following the publication of the judgment to review it in detail and to consider its implications for services and facilities at Holyrood.'
In an email sent to those working at Holyrood, she said that from Monday May 12 the Parliament would 'provide male-only and female-only facilities as well as gender-neutral and accessible facilities'.
Ms Johnstone added: 'We believe it is important to take these interim steps now not only to ensure we fulfil our legal responsibilities, but to give clarity to all those using the building.
'Such clarity is an important element in offering all individuals confidence, privacy and dignity when using our facilities.
'Everyone working in, or visiting, Holyrood should feel welcome in the building and be confident there is a suitable facility for them.'
But the Scottish Trans and Equality Network branded the move 'rushed, unworkable and exclusionary'.
Scottish Trans manager Vic Valentine said: 'If banning trans women from women's toilets and trans men from men's toilets turns out to be a genuine requirement of the recent Supreme Court judgment once the statutory code of practice is in place, then we do not expect Parliament to ignore or to flout the law.
'But we do expect parliamentarians to be honest and to show leadership when laws are clearly unjust, and cause harm to groups of people.
'We cannot understand why this decision has been described as one that will bring 'confidence, privacy and dignity' to everyone.
'It will not do so for trans people. It will exclude us and segregate us in the heart of Scotland's democracy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government still reforming ‘utterly broken' welfare system
The Scottish Secretary has said the UK Government is still working to reform the 'utterly broken' welfare system, following the substantial concessions made in Parliament earlier this week. Ian Murray also said the Cabinet is in a 'resolved' mood following the tearful appearance of Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the House of Commons. Mr Murray, a former publican, visited Belhaven Brewery in East Lothian on Thursday – where he poured a pint which then had his face imprinted on the foam by a machine at the bar. Speaking almost a year on from Labour's general election win, Mr Murray said his party had achieved 'a lot', adding: 'We've had 30 Bills through Parliament, the most that have ever been passed in the history of a new government. 'We've given 200,000 Scots the biggest pay rise, we've been able to set up GB Energy, we've stabilised the economy.' On Tuesday, Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle. Ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Mr Murray said 'everybody agrees' the welfare system needs reform and too many people are 'locked out of the workplace because of the way the welfare system works'. He said the Timms review would examine the Pip system and the Government is confident the 'journey' of reform would continue. Pressed on whether substantial parts of the reform had been dropped, he said: 'A thousand people a day are going into personal independence payments, that's 371,000 a year. 'That's completely unsustainable.' He added: 'This whole system is completely and utterly broken and it's unsustainable and that's what we're trying to resolve. 'The one thing that unites everybody in this debate is the fact they know the system is broken and it has to be reformed.' The Scottish Secretary was asked if the Chancellor's Budget choices would affect the devolved Scottish Government budget, with Mr Murray noting the Spending Review had given Edinburgh a further £9.1 billion over two years. He said: 'The Budget will be set in October as it is in any budget. 'Of course, with things fluctuating so quickly, we wouldn't speculate now what would happen then, because things can change so quickly. 'But we've already said there'd be no change to the Scottish Government's budget.' Mr Murray said the mood in Cabinet is 'one of resolve' following Ms Reeves' appearance in the Commons and markets had responded positively to the Prime Minister's show of support in her.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Welfare system will 'explode' without reform, says Ian Murray
The UK's welfare system will "explode" and become unaffordable if it is not reformed, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray has Keir Starmer's government has been forced into a series of climbdowns on its benefits bill by Labour backbenchers at insisted that "really positive, progressive" changes were being made to fix a "broken" comes after First Minister John Swinney accused the UK government of taking an "absolutely appalling" approach to reform. Labour ministers were forced to U-turn on some cuts to Universal Credit and plans to introduce stricter eligibility rules for personal independence payment (Pip) changes to Pip would not have directly applied in Scotland, where the benefit is being phased out for a devolved alternative but could have affected the amount of money allocated to Holyrood. Despite being gutted of its most significant measures, Murray said the bill would make important changes to Universal Credit and employability support, and that Pip would be reformed after the publication of a government review late next year."These are really positive progressive reforms," he told BBC Scotland News."If we don't reform the welfare system it will explode in terms of there being unsustainable financially for the taxpayer, but also we're writing hundreds of thousands of people out of the workforce."More than 120 Labour MPs - including 12 from Scotland - had threatened to vote down the bill until initial concessions were Scottish Labour MPs - Brian Leishman, Irene Campbell, Tracey Gilbert and Euan Stainbank - ultimately voted against the final bill, which was further watered down. Asked what he would say to Scottish Labour rebels, Murray replied: "The one thing that unites us all is that the welfare system is broken and it needs to be reformed and therefore we have to do that properly." He said that involved helping people back into work while "looking after those who could never work and have the most severe disabilities". "Those are two key Labour value principles," Murray told the BBC. "We are the party of work, we need to make sure we've got a system in place that doesn't trap people on benefits, trap people in poverty, and gives them those pathways back into work."The Scottish secretary accepted that it had been a "very difficult" year for the Labour administration, but said that the hard choices taken since last July would bear fruit and that people would feel the difference in their added he was "100%" confident the prime minister and chancellor would be in their jobs come the next general election. How much does welfare cost? Treasury spending on working-age benefits is forecast to rise by £27bn to £75.7bn by 2030. The UK government says that is original welfare reforms were expected to save £5bn a year by the end of the decade. The last-minute concessions are expected to have significantly reduced any savings, and may have added some additional costs. The Scottish government is also facing questions about how it will fund its more generous social security system. Holyrood spending on social security is already £1.2bn higher than the block grant funding it receives from the Treasury. The gap is forecast to grow to £2bn by 2030. Swinney said the UK government's handling of the welfare reforms had been "shocking".He said the original reforms would have "essentially preyed on some of those vulnerable within our society".The first minister called for Labour ministers to find other ways to raise funds, suggesting changes to income tax or the Treasury's self-imposed fiscal rules. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to come back before the Commons next rebels have warned they could still vote it down if the government does not follow through on its concessions.
Scotsman
14 hours ago
- Scotsman
Scottish Trans warns 'urgent' UK gender law change needed if single-sex guidance not revised
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The organisation representing transgender people in Scotland has called for the law to be "urgently' amended if the UK's equalities watchdog refuses to set out how trans people can be protected under updated guidance. Scottish Trans has responded to a consultation launched by the Equalities and Human Rights Committee (EHRC) in the wake of the Supreme Court judgment in April that defined a woman in the Equality Act as referring to a biological woman. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad People taking part in a trans rights demonstration in Edinburgh | PA Scottish Trans has starkly warned the EHRC that it 'would be failing to uphold its statutory duties if it did not urgently alert the UK government that the ruling has resulted in an equality and human rights framework that will leave trans people facing discrimination, inequality and human rights violations'. It added that 'this would need to be rectified with primary legislation'. In response to the judgment, the EHRC issued a controversial 'interim update' that included guidance that in some settings such as hospitals, trans women 'should not be permitted to use the women's facilities", but also claimed that 'in some circumstances' trans women should not be able to use men's facilities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The head of the EHRC, Baroness Falkner, who was appointed by Liz Truss in 2020, said trans people should themselves campaign for 'third spaces'. Last week, the EHRC was forced to revise its interim guidance, abandoning a previous recommendation that employers must provide single sex toilets. Campaigners celebrate the Supreme Court ruling about the definition of the word 'woman' (Picture: Henry Nicholls) | AFP via Getty Images In response to the EHRC consultation ahead of its new code of practice, Scottish Trans has told the organisation that the proposals will 'cause trans people significant harm' and "significantly increase the inequality and discrimination that trans people face'. The response adds: 'Trans people would frequently be segregated from others or excluded from services – particularly where these are provided on a separate or single-sex basis, as a huge range of critical services and facilities are. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The totality of these impacts would certainly, in our view, result in trans people's human rights being breached, and indeed sometimes the human rights of others.' Manager of Scottish Trans, Vic Valentine, told The Scotsman that if the EHRC's proposals were to be adopted by services and organisations, 'trans people's lives would be made very much worse'. They added: 'It would turn back the clock at least 30 years to a time where trans people could not go to work safely, use services that meet our needs, or use public spaces freely. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'If we are constantly treated as our 'biological sex', excluded from services and spaces that align with who we truly are, or segregated from others, this will have massive impacts on our wellbeing, safety, and just our general quality of life.' Valentine added that the proposals 'throw up questions about how we're supposed to use services everyone needs – like toilets and hospital wards' and 'would also make Scotland and the UK an outlier when it comes to how it treats trans people'. They said: 'The EHRC will be failing to properly protect the rights of everyone, as it is required to do, if it does not include just as much information in the code about how to include us as it does about how to exclude us.
