&w=3840&q=100)
Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly stripped American visas of Brazil's eight Supreme Court judges in a show of support for the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian leader with strong ties with US President Donald Trump is on trial for allegedly masterminding a murderous plot to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Brazil's current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Bolsonaro is expected to be convicted by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the coming weeks and might face a jail sentence of up to 43 years. As the day of sentencing nears, Trump has been increasing pressure on Brazil to help out his 'friend'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In light of this, Trump announced on July 9 that he would impose 50% tariffs on all Brazilian imports as of August 1. The threat triggered nationalist sentiments in Brazil, with Lula threatening reciprocal tariffs. The Brazilian president went on to describe Trump's move as 'unacceptable blackmail'.
Who got their visa stripped?
On Friday, Brazil's federal police raided Bolsonaro's house and ordered him to wear an ankle tag in a bid to stop him from absconding. Soon after that, Rubio announced further moves in support of the former Brazilian president, who claimed that the case against him is a 'political witch hunt'.
Rubio announced the move in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He said that he had ordered visa revocations for the judge leading the investigation into Bolsonaro, Alexandre de Moraes, as well as 'his allies on the court' and their family members.
.@POTUS made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) July 18, 2025
While the secretary of state did not mention the names of other judges, Brazilian newspaper Globo identified them as Luís Roberto Barroso, José Antonio Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flávio Dino, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, Luiz Edson Fachin and Gilmar Ferreira Mendes.
Interestingly, two other judges who were nominated to the court during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 presidency, André Mendonça and Kassio Nunes Marques, reportedly avoided the sanction along with a third judge, Luiz Fux.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Lula hits back
Meanwhile, the Brazilian president denounced what he described as 'another arbitrary and completely groundless measure from the US government'.
'Interference in another country's justice system is unacceptable and offends the basic principles of national sovereignty and respect between nations,' the president said on Saturday, adding: 'I'm certain that no kind of intimidation or threat – from whoever it may be – will compromise the most important mission of our nation's powers and institutions, which is to act permanently to defend and safeguard the democratic rule of law.'
Meanwhile, Trump's Alex Bruesewitz welcomed Rubio's announcement, describing Bolsonaro's treatment in the country as 'sick and wrong'.
Bolsonaro's son, Eduardo, went on to thank Rubio for his decision. 'Thank you very much for this fight in favour of free speech, we do believe in the same values,' tweeted Eduardo, who has been living in the US since February and has reportedly been lobbying officials there over his father's plight," Eduardo said in the post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
Russia open to peace in Ukraine war but achieving goals is priority, Kremlin says after Trump's 50-day ultimatum
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said President Vladimir Putin still wanted a peaceful resolution to the war but reiterated that Russia's conditions for a deal had not changed read more Russia is open to a peace settlement with Ukraine but achieving its military and political objectives remains a top priority, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Sunday (July 20), days after US President Donald Trump warned Moscow to agree to a ceasefire within 50 days or face stiffer sanctions. Speaking to state TV journalist Pavel Zarubin, Peskov said President Vladimir Putin still wanted a peaceful resolution to the war but reiterated that Russia's conditions for a deal had not changed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'President Putin has repeatedly spoken of his desire to bring the Ukrainian settlement to a peaceful conclusion as soon as possible. This is a long process, it requires effort, and it is not easy,' Peskov said. 'The main thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear,' he added. Russia has demanded that Ukraine withdraw from the four regions Moscow annexed in September 2022 but does not fully control. It also wants Ukraine to abandon its bid to join Nato and to accept strict limits on the size and capabilities of its armed forces– conditions that Kyiv and its Western allies have rejected. Peskov and other Russian officials have denied stalling negotiations, though Moscow continues to escalate its long-range strikes on Ukrainian cities. Analysts say drone attacks in particular are becoming more frequent, with Russia recently launching more drones in a single night than during some full months in 2024. Trump's warning to Moscow On July 14, Trump hardened his stance towards Moscow, announcing a 50-day deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire or face 'severe tariffs'. The US president, who had previously expressed frustration over failed negotiations, also said the new measures would target Russia's trading partners in an effort to further isolate the Kremlin economically. Trump also unveiled plans to accelerate US military support for Ukraine, stating that European allies would purchase 'billions and billions' of dollars' worth of American defence equipment to transfer to Kyiv. The package is expected to include Patriot air defence systems, which Ukraine has identified as a key priority to counter Russian missile and drone attacks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Pentagon had paused some military shipments earlier this year due to concerns over diminishing US stockpiles, prompting doubts over Washington's ability to maintain steady support for Ukraine. With inputs from AP
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Kremlin says open to peace with Ukraine; but insists on achieving its goals
Russia is open to peace with Ukraine, but achieving its goals remains a priority, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Sunday, days after US President Donald Trump gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face tougher sanctions. Peskov and other Russian officials have repeatedly rejected accusations from Kyiv and its Western partners of stalling peace talks. Meanwhile, Moscow continues to intensify its long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities, launching more drones in a single night than it did during some entire months in 2024, and analysts say the barrages are likely to escalate. President Putin has repeatedly spoken of his desire to bring the Ukrainian settlement to a peaceful conclusion as soon as possible. This is a long process, it requires effort, and it is not easy, Peskov told state TV reporter Pavel Zarubin. The main thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear, he added. The Kremlin has insisted that any peace deal should see Ukraine withdraw from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured. It also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces demands Kyiv and its Western allies have rejected. US President Donald Trump threatened Russia on July 14 with steep tariffs and announced a rejuvenated pipeline for American weapons to reach Ukraine, hardening his stance toward Moscow after months of frustration following unsuccessful negotiations aimed at ending the war. The direct Russia-Ukraine negotiations in Istanbul resulted in several rounds of prisoner exchanges but little else. Trump said he would implement severe tariffs unless a peace deal is reached within 50 days. He provided few details on how they would be implemented, but suggested they would target Russia's trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy. In addition, Trump said European allies would buy billions and billions of dollars of US military equipment to be transferred to Ukraine, replenishing the besieged country's supplies of weapons. Included in the plan are Patriot air defense systems, a top priority for Ukraine as it fends off Russian drones and missiles. Doubts were recently raised about Trump's commitment to supply Ukraine when the Pentagon paused shipments over concerns that US stockpiles were running low.
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mumbai advocate moves Supreme Court against Raj Thackeray over ‘anti-Hindi' remarks
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking criminal proceedings against Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray for allegedly inciting violence and spreading linguistic hatred against Hindi-speaking citizens in Maharashtra. The petition was filed by Bombay High Court advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay on Friday (July 18, 2025) and is expected to come up for hearing in the coming week. It calls for strict legal action under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and aims to curb what the petitioner describes as 'language-based chauvinism' that threatens India's constitutional values. The PIL alleges that Mr. Thackeray's recent public statements—particularly around the Marathi language—violate multiple sections of the IPC: Section 153A for promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of language and place of birth, Section 295A for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage feelings and Section 505(2) for making statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill-will between classes. The 114-page petition includes multiple news reports as evidence and alleges that Mr. Thackeray, along with his political party and its workers, has been involved in repeated incidents of mob violence and physical assault targeting individuals from other States residing in Maharashtra—particularly in cities such as Mumbai, Thane, Pune, and Raigad. The petition accuses Mr. Thackeray and his party of engaging in acts of aggression based on caste, creed, and language, labels such actions as anti-national. It further claims that these activities pose a serious threat to the sovereignty, integrity, and unity of India, and have continued unchecked and with impunity. Row over three-language policy On April 16 and June 17, 2025, the Government of Maharashtra issued resolutions introducing a three-language policy in primary schools. These decisions brought together two long-time political rivals—cousins Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray—who united in opposition to the inclusion of Hindi as the third language in schools. While their alliance is rooted in regional language concerns, the broader issue at hand reflects a long-standing debate over adopting Hindi as a national language. According to the petitioner, given that Hindi is widely spoken across many regions and relatively easy to learn, proponents argue it is a natural candidate to serve as India's national language. 'It is, however, disheartening to note that even after 78 years of Independence, Hindi has yet to be officially recognised as such. The petitioner therefore urges the Government of India to take necessary steps to declare Hindi as the national language in the interest of national unity,' Mr. Upadhyay said. The petition alleges that Mr. Raj Thackeray, in a bid to gain political ground ahead of the upcoming local body elections—particularly in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, one of the wealthiest civic bodies in the country, sought to exploit the controversy surrounding the introduction of Hindi as the third language in Maharashtra's primary schools. It claims that, in doing so, he has delivered a series of provocative speeches targeting Hindi-speaking migrants from States such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, who have settled in cities such as Mumbai, Thane, Raigad, and Pune. The petition accuses Mr. Thackeray of actively promoting enmity between communities based on place of birth, residence, and language—actions that not only disrupt social harmony but also threaten the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of the nation. 'Threat of violence' 'Mr. Thackeray's speeches have incited public unrest, turning what began as opposition to Hindi into the forceful imposition of Marathi on non-Marathi speakers in Maharashtra. At a rally held around July 5, 2025, titled Awaj Marathicha, Mr. Thackeray allegedly endorsed physical violence, stating that those who don't speak Marathi should be struck 'below the eardrums'. He reportedly mocked Hindi-speaking States like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan as economically backward, questioning how Hindi could resolve problems in Maharashtra if it hadn't done so in those regions,' Mr. Upadhyay said. The PIL further claimed that Mr. Thackeray named Union Home Minister Amit Shah in his speech, misrepresenting his stance on language and employment. The petition accuses Mr. Thackeray of encouraging his party workers to assault and intimidate Hindi-speaking migrants, engage in incidents of mob violence, vandalism of shops, and targeted attacks in cities such as Mumbai, Thane, Pune and Raigad. Mr. Upadhyay said, 'One such case cited involves a businessman from Rajasthan who was allegedly beaten up in Mira-Bhayander for not speaking Marathi—an incident that sparked widespread protests from the local business community.' He is accused of publicly warning that such incidents were 'just trailers', threatening further violence if the use of Hindi is not curbed in Maharashtra. The petition alleges that in recent months, at Mr. Thackeray's behest, MNS workers began inspecting offices and business establishments to check if operations were being conducted in Marathi. In one instance, they allegedly stormed a bank and assaulted an employee for not speaking Marathi. Similar incidents reportedly involved a security guard and a Zomato delivery worker. 'Politically motivated' The petition further claimed that Mr. Thackeray's so-called 'Marathi pride' is politically motivated, aimed at consolidating votes ahead of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation elections—where a massive ₹74,427 crore budget is at stake. It accuses the MNS chief and his supporters of systematically targeting, intimidating, and humiliating Hindi-speaking migrants. 'Despite a formal complaint dated July 10, 2025, addressed to the Prime Minister, Union Home Minister, Maharashtra CM, Election Commission of India, and police authorities—urging FIR registration and even cancellation of MNS' recognition—no action has been taken,' Mr. Upadhyay said.
