Scottish Government challenged to explain Israel relationship
The details were revealed by The Ferret and the Sunday National after a months-long FoI battle.
Green MSP Ross Greer has tabled a written question asking if the [[Scottish Government]] would still describe Scotland as a critical friend of Israel, adding SNP ministers have 'let themselves down' over the lack of transparency on the issue.
In August last year, it was revealed that External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson had met the Israeli ambassador Daniela Grudsky and that the [[Scottish Government]] had tried to set up an earlier meeting with First Minister John Swinney and the ambassador while talking itself up as a 'critical friend' of Israel.
Following a 10-month Freedom of Information battle, The Ferret was able to reveal that the Scottish Government had taken the lead from the Israeli government over the lack of transparency from the meeting's minutes between Robertson and Grudsky.
READ MORE: Palestine Action gets green light for ban challenge
Greer has now challenged the Scottish Government to clarify its relationship with Israel after it 'fought hard' to hide the details of the meeting.
The MSP for West Scotland said the SNP Government has said the 'right things' in public but has failed to take meaningful action, like scrapping public funding for companies which sell arms to Israel.
(Image: PA)
'It's depressing but not surprising that the Scottish Government fought so hard to hide the details of their meeting with the Israeli embassy,' Greer said.
'The images of Palestinian children starving to death or blown apart are horrific beyond description.
'To suggest that our country could be any sort of 'friend' of the apartheid regime responsible for these crimes is frankly offensive.
'The [[Scottish Government]] has said the right things in public about Israel's genocidal assault on Palestine, but they have let themselves down with what they've said directly to the Israelis, and with their own actions, such as continued public funding for those who sell arms to Israel.'
Following public anger around the meeting last year, Swinney said that it had been 'accepted on the basis it would provide an opportunity to convey our consistent position on the killing and suffering of innocent civilians in the region'.
However, the Scottish Government had published a statement prior saying that the attendees had also discussed 'areas of mutual interest, including culture, renewable energy, and engaging the country's respective diasporas'.
In the redacted minutes much of the section on 'Israel/Scotland relations' was blacked out, The Ferret reported earlier this month.
'The public deserve absolute clarity on what was said at this meeting,' Greer said.
'Does our government really believe that Scotland should be a 'critical friend' to Israel as it commits genocide? If so, who made that decision? If that is no longer the position, when did it change, and what happened in the last 10 months that was somehow worse than the first year of this genocide?'
(Image: Hatem Khaled, REUTERS)
Following the backlash, Robertson faced calls for him to resign from his ministerial role from SNP members and grassroots campaigners.
Greer added that it's not just the public that need to know what happened as he said: 'Many people in the SNP have stood with us in defence of the Palestinian cause for decades.
'I know how deeply upset they were by this meeting. They deserve more answers and less evasion from their leadership.'
In response to Greer's comment, Robertson said the Scottish Government is 'unequivocal' that it would not be appropriate to meet with the Israeli Government until progress is made towards peace.
He said: 'More than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza, a truly horrific figure – and many more are now being left to starve at the hands of the Israeli Government.
'Civilians who queue to access what little humanitarian aid is permitted to enter Gaza are frequently shot at and killed by Israeli Defence Forces. We are strongly focused on doing whatever we can to help the people of Gaza and the First Minister discussed the issue with President Trump when he met him this week.
(Image: PA)
'We have repeatedly called for the recognition of a sovereign Palestinian state within a two-state solution but recognition should not be conditional and must be backed by sanctions against Israel if the violence continues.
'As the rhetoric of Israeli politicians has become increasingly extreme in recent months, the Scottish Government is unequivocal that it would not be appropriate to meet with the Israeli Government.
'This will remain our position until real progress has been made towards peace and Israel cooperates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Labour's 'cruel' asylum returns deal with France comes into force
The treaty was published by the Home Office on Monday morning and it sets out how migrants will be detained on arrival in England to be sent back to France. In return, France will send over asylum seekers to the UK, if they pass security and eligibility checks, including having documentation. The trial will run until June 2026 and only some people arriving in small boats on the southern coast of England will be at risk of being returned. It has led to accusations that Labour are 'just as unprincipled and impractical' as the Tories before them, while concerns have also been raised about the effect of detaining people who have already fled wars and torture. Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty International UK's refugee and migrants' rights director, said: 'When it comes to asylum policy, this Government is proving to be just as unprincipled and impractical as its predecessor.' (Image: Supplied) He argued that rather than 'smashing the gangs', as Labour have pledged, the policy only further entrenches the role of people-smugglers in the asylum system. 'A returns deal with France that makes access to safety in the UK – even for those with close family or connections here – dependent on someone else risking their life to cross the Channel only cements the role of smugglers in how people fleeing war and persecution must seek asylum in the UK,' said Valdez-Symonds. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. READ MORE: Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians 'The UK shares the same duty as other countries to provide asylum. But instead of facing that responsibility, this Government continues to swap one unworkable gimmick for another – aligning itself with the smugglers and the chaos they exploit. 'If the aim is to truly reduce dangerous journeys and the profits of organised criminal gangs, the answer is clear: we need safe accessible routes between countries not miserable deals that trade in human lives.' Natasha Tsangarides, associate director of advocacy at Freedom from Torture, said the policy relied 'on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution'. She added: 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' In a statement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the deal was the result of 'months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model'. He added: 'This government has been fixing the foundations of the broken asylum system we inherited and today we send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France.' Not all those who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, however. It is estimated that around 50 arrivals per week will be returned, which is around one in 17 of all people who make the crossing at the current rate, according to Politico.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Report for 'doomed to fail' minimum income guarantee cost £1.3m as SNP exercise branded 'waste of time'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers spent £1.3 million on a report into introducing a new welfare system despite knowing the scheme was 'doomed to fail'. The Scottish Government commissioned an expert panel to look at how it might implement a policy of bringing in a minimum income for all Scots. Findings from the Minimum Income Guarantee Expert Group included giving single parents in Scotland up to £28,000 in benefits without working. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh | PA However, sources close to the project insist there is little appetite to introduce the scheme, branded an 'absurd' policy by opposition parties. Now figures, released under Freedom of Information rules, show the costs for the expert group's final report were £280,000. The group was supported by a government secretariat of five civil servants, making their salary costs over the time of generating the report around £260,000 a year. It took from August 2021 to May 2025 - three years and ten months - to develop the findings. This is despite the fact the Holyrood Government does not have devolved all the reserved powers necessary to introduce a minimum income guarantee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A recommendation of the report is the Scottish and UK governments should set up a "co-operation commission" to work out what powers would be needed. An SNP insider said the report was a 'waste of time' and 'doomed to fail'. The source said: 'This report is going to be used as a springboard for charities to lobby government for a minimum income guarantee - despite the fact it is impossible to see how we could afford to pay for it. 'We've paid a significant sum for a report we don't agree with and that was doomed to fail, are now likely to distance ourselves from and now are going to be lobbied to implement it. It's not just a waste of time and money, but also a disappointment for the charities involved.' On publication of the minimum income guarantee report, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the Government would consider the findings after the Holyrood recess. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP Minister Shirley-Anne Somerville hoped to sort housing emergency (Picture: Jeff) Shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy said the report was a 'shocking waste of taxpayers' money'. He said: 'Especially when it was to explore a half-baked policy that everyone knew would be unaffordable and damaging. It's typical that the SNP's reaction is now to try to bury the issue and dodge responsibility. 'They should immediately rule out a minimum income guarantee – an absurd and eye-wateringly expensive policy that they have no powers to introduce. But they also owe Scots an explanation for why they ever devoted public money and civil servants' time to this idea, and a detailed account of how so much taxpayers' cash was wasted on this ridiculous report.' The Scottish Government initially declined The Scotsman's FOI request but, on appeal, gave a partial response. Using the pay bands of each civil servant in the secretariat, the salary costs per year would amount to around £260,000 annually. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A plan to bring in a minimum income for all Scots has been under consideration for several years. Supporters claim it would make for a fairer society with a reduced level of poverty if every Scot had a definite basic income, with the suggestion it would 'would effectively end poverty for those in receipt'. Opponents, however, claim it is too expensive a policy to implement and raise concerns that people would not work if they did not have to earn additional income. The report from the independent expert group, which included representatives from 16 groups such as social mobility organisations, universities and charities, recommended the base income be £11,500 for a single adult. A couple would receive £20,000 while a couple with one child or a lone adult with two children would receive £28,000. As their earnings rose to exceed the minimum income threshold, the payments would taper off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The group laid out a series of plans to be rolled out over the next decade that would pave the way for Scotland to introduce a minimum income guarantee from 2036. At the launch of the report in June, Satwat Rehman, one of the members of the group and chief executive of One Parent Families Scotland, said: 'A minimum income guarantee would provide a lifeline, ensuring no single-parent household falls below a dignified minimum income – whether in or out of work, studying or training – and ensure families and children thrive and not just survive.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Benjamin Netanyahu set to push for full occupation of Gaza
Israeli television network Channel 12 is reporting that Netanyahu will convene a limited meeting of security officials later today, with the country's defence minister, strategic affairs minister, the Israeli Defence Forces chief of staff and operations directorate set to attend. The military's chief of staff is expected to present Netanyahu with several options for continuing the war in Gaza, with the PM preferring a wide-scale military incursion into the entire Gaza Strip to reoccupy it again. Finalising a plan to present to a broader cabinet meeting later this week is reportedly the aim of today's meeting. READ MORE: Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians The meeting comes as Israel continue to deepen its operations in Gaza City. This has triggered huge concerns among Palestinians, who are suffering not just from the repeated displacement and bombardment, but also from the ongoing deterioration of their humanitarian conditions. Israel's blockade and military offensive have made it nearly impossible to safely deliver aid, causing the country's plunge into famine. Dozens of Palestinians were killed or wounded on Monday as desperate crowds headed toward food distribution points and airdropped parcels in the Gaza Strip. Aid groups say Israel's week-old measures to allow more aid in are far from sufficient. Families of hostages in Gaza fear starvation affects them too, but blame Hamas. Several hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since May while heading toward food distribution sites and aid convoys, according to witnesses, local health officials and the United Nations human rights office. The military says it has only fired warning shots and disputes the toll. As international alarm has mounted, several countries have airdropped aid over Gaza. The UN and aid groups call such drops costly and dangerous for residents, and say they deliver far less aid than trucks. Many food parcels dropped by air have splashed into the Mediterranean Sea or landed in so-called red zones from which Israel's military has ordered people to evacuate. In either case, Palestinians risk their lives to get flour and other basic goods. READ MORE: What reparations should Palestine receive? The Fringe show where you decide On Monday, Palestinians cheered as pallets of aid were parachuted over Zuweida in central Gaza. Associated Press footage showed a desperate scramble when the parcels hit the ground, with hundreds of people racing toward them. Fistfights broke out and some men wielded batons. 'I wish they would deliver it through the (land) crossings,' Rabah Rabah said earlier as he waited for the airdrop. 'This is inhuman.' At least one parcel fell on a tent where displaced people had been sheltering, injuring a man who was taken to a hospital. His condition was not immediately known.
