
Donald Trump signs ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' into law. Who benefits the most? What's concerning?
If your income falls below $58,000, you may lose access to key benefits like Medicaid, ACA health insurance subsidies, SNAP, and student aid.
For those earning under $20,000, this can mean a loss of up to $885 or 5.4% of income.
For those earning from $20,000 and $58,000, this can mean this can mean a loss of up to $1,090 or 2.3% of income.
For those earning from $58,000 and $105,000, this can mean this can mean a loss of up to $45 or 0.1% of income, according to the Penn Wharton Budget model.
Starting in 2026, the bill introduces a requirement for able-bodied adults aged 19–64 without dependents to work or participate in approved activities (like volunteering) for at least 80 hours per month to maintain Medicaid coverage. Recipients earning above the federal poverty level (roughly $15,500 for a single person) would face increased costs, with an additional $35 copays for certain medical visits.
Moreover, States will now be required to verify Medicaid eligibility every six months, instead of the current once-a-year schedule.
Medicaid funding would be cut off from any clinic, such as Planned Parenthood, that provides abortion services. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million people could lose Medicaid coverage over the next 10 years due to these changes, according to a report by USA Today.
The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, and the bill would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, mainly due to reductions in Medicaid and food aid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version.
Work requirements would now apply to adults ages 55 to 64, expanding beyond the previous limits. According to the Congressional Budget Office, a similar proposal in 2023 could have led to a reduction of 3 to 3.5 million people from the program. States would now be required to help fund food assistance benefits, shifting some of the financial burden from the federal government.
The bill raises the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, allowing taxpayers to write off up to $40,000, up from the previous $10,000 limit starting in 2025.
This higher cap applies to individuals with incomes up to $500,000 and will increase by 1% annually to account for inflation. However, the cap is scheduled to revert to $10,000 in 2029, according to a report by USA Today.
Additionally, the legislation revives a tax loophole for pass-through entities, enabling them to deduct state and local taxes and effectively bypass the SALT cap for individual owners.
Along with adjustments to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), these changes are projected to cost $325 billion over time, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, USA Today reported.
The bill introduces a new tax deduction allowing car buyers to deduct up to $10,000 per year in car loan interest if the vehicle they purchase is made in the United States.
However, this deduction is gradually phased out for individuals earning between $100,000 and $150,000, and for joint filers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000.
The bill provides an additional $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 and older, available through 2028. However, this extra deduction begins to phase out for seniors with incomes starting at $75,000.
The bill expands the estate tax exemption, allowing individuals to pass on up to $15 million to their heirs tax-free, preventing the current nearly $14 million exemption from expiring in 2025 and reverting to just over $7 million.
It also increases the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,200, with the amount set to be adjusted for inflation starting in 2026.
The legislation introduced special savings accounts for children under age 8, providing each child with a $1,000 initial deposit. Families can contribute up to $5,000 per year tax-free to these accounts until the child turns 18, with the funds available for use after that age.
The bill introduces a graduated tax on endowments held by private colleges with at least 3,000 tuition-paying students. The tax rate increases with the size of the endowment per student: schools with endowments between $500,000 and $750,000 per student will face a 1.4% tax, those between $750,000 and $2 million will be taxed at 4%, and institutions with endowments exceeding $2 million per student will pay an 8% tax on their endowment earnings, according to a report by USA Today.
The bill boosts defence spending by $153 billion, which includes $25 billion allocated for the development of the 'Golden Dome' missile defence system and $7.5 billion for improving housing, health care, child care, and education for service members and their families.
The bill allocated a $150 billion increase in border security funding, with $50 billion dedicated to completing the wall along the southern border. It also sets aside $45 billion for the expansion and maintenance of detention centres, $8 billion to hire more immigration officers, and $27 billion to support and carry out deportation efforts.
The highest-earning 20% of Americans receive approximately 65% of the tax benefits from the extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), while the remaining 80% get only about 35% of the advantages.
The tax cuts largely benefit high-income families, particularly those in the top 5%, who experience the greatest reductions relative to their after-tax income. Households in the 95th to 99th income percentiles enjoy average tax cuts equal to 3.0% of their after-tax income, whereas other groups receive smaller proportional gains.
The top 20% of American households by income receive about 65% of the total tax savings from the TCJA extension. This means if the total tax cut amounts to $100, the wealthiest 20% get $65 of that benefit.
The bottom 80% of households share the remaining 35% of the tax savings, so collectively they get $35 out of every $100 in tax cuts.
Other income groups receive comparatively smaller benefits. For example, middle-income households may see tax reductions amounting to around 1% or less of their after-tax income. For a family earning $75,000 after taxes, this would translate to a tax cut of about $750.
The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, while the poorest people could lose $1,600 a year.
Meanwhile, some lower-income households could end up worse off after 2027, as certain provisions expire or are offset by cuts to programs such as Medicaid or SNAP.
(With inputs from agencies and USA Today)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Take it or leave it': Donald Trump says US tariff letters ready for 12 countries ahead of July 9 deadline; will be sent out from...
The US president and his senior officials had initially planned to engage in tariff rate discussions with many countries. (AI image) Donald Trump's tariff deadline: Ahead of his self-imposed deadline on reciprocal tariffs, US President Donald Trump has said that 12 countries will be getting letters Monday onwards detailing their tariff rates. It is yet unclear which twelve countries have been finalized by the US for new reciprocal tariff rates, which will reportedly be effective from August 1, 2025. Trump's announcement comes at a time when India and the US are in discussions to finalise a trade deal. Indian officials, on a visit to Washington for trade deal talks, have returned. India has also indicated that it does not believe in agreeing to trade deals based on deadlines. During his journey to New Jersey on Air Force One, Trump spoke to journalists but withheld the names of the recipient countries, stating this information would be revealed on Monday. Also Read | India-US trade deal: 'Don't make deals based on deadlines, national interest paramount', says Piyush Goyal as Donald Trump's tariff date nears Initially, Trump had indicated to reporters that the first set of letters would be distributed on Friday, which was a national holiday in the United States, but this timeline was subsequently altered. Donald Trump's Tariff Plan: 'Take it or leave it' "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said according to a Reuters report when questioned about his tariff strategy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." According to the report, Trump's letters will be sent with the American side indicating a 'take it or leave it' offers. Amidst a global trade conflict that has disrupted financial markets and prompted policymakers to protect their economies, Trump introduced in April a baseline 10% tariff rate plus supplementary charges for most nations, with some reaching up to 50%. Subsequently, all rates above the 10% baseline were temporarily suspended for 90 days to facilitate negotiation opportunities. Also Read | 'Reserve the right to suspend...': Amidst trade deal talks, India proposes retaliatory duties against US at WTO; here's what the issue is about This suspension period concludes on July 9, though Trump indicated early on Friday that tariffs could now potentially reach 70%, with most taking effect from August 1. Challenges in Finalising Trade Deals The US president and his senior officials had initially planned to engage in tariff rate discussions with many nations. However, after facing multiple challenges with major trading allies, including Japan and the European Union, Trump has become less enthusiastic about this approach. On Friday evening, he briefly commented to journalists: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He remained silent regarding his earlier forecast about finalising broader trade deals before July 9. Also Read | What is Donald Trump's net worth? Billionaire US President has a big portfolio of cryptocurrencies, stocks & more - top details This alteration in the White House's approach highlights the difficulties in finalising comprehensive trade agreements, particularly concerning tariffs, non-tariff barriers including agricultural import restrictions, especially when working within tight time constraints. Previous trade agreements have historically required extensive negotiation periods spanning multiple years. To date, only two successful trade agreements have been established. The first, with Britain in May, maintained a 10% rate and provided special considerations for specific industries, notably automobiles and aircraft engines. The second agreement, with Vietnam, reduced tariffs on numerous Vietnamese products from 46% to 20%, whilst allowing many American goods to enter Vietnam without duties. The anticipated agreement with India has not come to fruition yet, and European Union diplomats reported on Friday that discussions with the Trump administration have reached an impasse. They are now considering extending current arrangements to prevent increases in tariff rates. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Punjab deserves rule of law, not the rule by propaganda…': Punjab LoP Partap Singh Bajwa
Marred by factionalism and bitter war words among its leaders in public, Congress in Punjab has several challenges ahead of the 2027 Assembly polls. However, Leader of Opposition Partap Singh Bajwa terms the factionalism as a 'manufactured narrative' and claims no Congress leader has spoken in favour of former minister and Akali leader Bikram Singh Majithia who has been arrested in a disproportionate assets case. Intense factionalism has once again reared its head in Punjab Congress and was visible in Ludhiana byelection. Questions are now being raised on the ability of Congress to win 2027 elections amidst bitter infighting. Your comments The so-called factionalism in Punjab Congress is more of a manufactured narrative, driven by sections of the media and amplified by vested interests. What we are witnessing is a deliberate attempt by the BJP, a party that survives by dividing people on the basis of religion, caste, language, and region. They have mastered the politics of polarisation across India, and now they are trying to inject that same poison into Punjab's political environment. AAP has become a willing partner in this deception. BJP and AAP are two sides of the same coin when it comes to exploiting people's emotions for political gains. Congress, on the other hand, stands united in its commitment to Punjab's peace, prosperity, and Punjabiyat. We will expose these divisive forces, and I am confident that in 2027, the people will reject hate and confusion. AAP has targeted Congress leadership for speaking in favour of Bikram Majithia in the recent Vigilance Bureau case. Every senior Congress leader had attacked Majithia in the past so how do you justify speaking in his favour? Once again, a section of the media has chosen to amplify the false narrative crafted by AAP's publicity machinery. No Congress leader has spoken in favour of Majithia or asked investigative agencies to shield anyone involved in the drug trade. Our stand has been consistent: whoever is guilty, irrespective of their party, position, or background, must face the full force of the law. But at the same time, agencies must function within the framework of the law, not under political pressure or for media spectacle. Let's also expose AAP's hypocrisy. They registered the FIR under provisions related to disproportionate assets — not under NDPS Act. This is classic 'shoot and scoot' politics by AAP — make noise, defame people, and later quietly apologise, as their so-called 'Supreme Leader' has done many times before. Punjab deserves rule of law, not rule by propaganda. And Congress will always stand for lawful, transparent governance — not for misuse of agencies to score political points. After Ludhiana now there are two more bypolls to be held in Banga and Tarn Taran. What will be the Congress strategy following the adverse performance in Ludhiana West? There was no adverse performance by Congress in Ludhiana West. What actually happened was a systematic misuse of police, administration, and state machinery by AAP to intimidate voters and suppress democratic participation. The voter turnout speaks volumes. People were not convinced by AAP's governance, and many chose to stay away from the polls due to fear of harassment and repercussions. Congress is not deterred. In the upcoming byelections in Banga and Tarn Taran, we will ensure that people are able to exercise their right to vote freely, without fear or manipulation. Our strategy will focus on strengthening the organisation at the grassroots, exposing AAP's misgovernance, and ensuring every voter knows they have a voice — free from fear, free from pressure. Given your recent concerns about rising crime and gang-related activities in Punjab, what steps do you think are necessary to strengthen law enforcement and ensure public safety? Punjab today is witnessing complete collapse of law and order. Gangsters are not hiding anymore — they are running extortion rackets, threatening people openly. Lawrence Bishnoi gave an interview from a CIA facility with the clear connivance of police authorities. What bigger proof of administrative failure do you need? We've already paid a heavy price — the brutal murder of Sidhu Moosewala exposed the government's incompetence. Let's not forget — the police force reflects the leadership at the top. And today, that leadership is missing. Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, who also holds the Home portfolio, is busy in social media photo-ops while gangsters expand their control over the state. We need serious reforms — depoliticized policing, modern intelligence systems, strict jail accountability, and dismantling of criminal networks — not hollow slogans. Punjab deserves safety, not a government addicted to headlines. Punjab is grappling with a high debt burden. What are your suggestions for improving the state's fiscal health without burdening the common man? How can the state balance welfare schemes with the need for financial discipline? Punjab, once the economic engine of India and the symbol of the Green Revolution, now finds itself struggling under a crippling debt burden. With debt levels projected to reach Rs 4 lakh crore by March 2026, the situation is alarming. The hard facts are sobering. Punjab's share in country's GDP has steadily declined — from over 4% in the 1980s to barely 2.5% today. Our per capita income, once among the highest, has now been overtaken by states like Haryana, Gujarat, and Karnataka. Agriculture, which was once the backbone of our economy, is under severe stress. Landholdings have shrunk below 3 acres per family, and rising input costs have made farming increasingly unsustainable for the average farmer. We must reinvent Punjab's economy with urgency, clarity, and vision. The way forward requires bold steps. Punjab has immense potential to become a hub for food processing, agro-technology, and precision manufacturing — particularly in producing agricultural implements for farmers across the world. With proper infrastructure, our youth can also drive growth in IT, startups, and green technology, just like their peers from Punjab have done abroad. We must diversify our economic base, protect our environment, and embrace modern, sustainable industries.


The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Modi will bow to Donald Trump: Rahul Gandhi attacks Prime Minister as deal deadline approaches
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday (July 5, 2025) attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the Indo-U.S. trade deal, after Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal claimed that India would not enter into an agreement under deadlines. Mr. Goyal had on Friday (July 4, 2025)claimed that India would accept the proposed trade deal with the U.S. only when it is fully finalised, and in the national interest. "Piyush Goyal can beat his chest all he wants, mark my words, Modi will meekly bow to the Trump tariff deadline," Mr. Gandhi said in a post on X. Piyush Goyal can beat his chest all he wants, mark my words, Modi will meekly bow to the Trump tariff deadline. — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) July 5, 2025 The Congress has been attacking the Prime Minister for remaining silent and not countering U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated claims of bringing a halt to hostilities between India and Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack. The Free Trade Agreements are possible only when both sides benefit and involve a win-win agreement, Mr. Goyal told reporters when asked about the proposed interim trade agreement with the U.S. "National interest should always be supreme. Keeping that in mind, if a deal is made, then India is always ready to deal with developed countries," he said. Mr. Trump has set a deadline of July 9 to finalise the trade agreement with India.