Pope Leo XIV marks 56th anniversary of moon landing with observatory visit, call to Buzz Aldrin
After praying the Sunday Angelus at his summer retreat in Castel Gandolfo, Leo headed to the astronomical observatory located in the Pontifical Villas, where he took a close look at the telescopes that have supported celestial exploration from a faith-based perspective for decades.
The pontiff was accompanied by astronomers and students participating in the traditional summer school organized by the observatory.
This was Pope Leo's first visit to the observatory, founded in 1891 by Leo XIII. The first vision of it, however, can be traced back to the establishment by Pope Gregory XIII of a commission aimed at studying the scientific data and implications of the calendar reform that took place in 1582.
The Vatican Observatory has generated top-notch research from its scientist-clerics, drawing academics to its meteorite collection, which includes bits of Mars and is considered among the world's best.
Later Sunday, the pope called astronaut Buzz Aldrin, who shared with Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins the historic 1969 moonwalk.
'This evening, 56 years after the Apollo 11 moon landing, I spoke with the astronaut Buzz Aldrin,' Pope Leo wrote on his X account. 'Together we shared the memory of a historic feat, a testimony to human ingenuity, and we reflected on the mystery and greatness of Creation.'
There are a few precedents of papal calls to "space.'
In 2011, Pope Benedict XVI rang the space station and asked about the future of the planet and the environmental risks it faced.
Before Benedict, Pope Paul VI sent a radio message to astronauts Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins after their moonwalk, calling them 'conquerors of the Moon.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Democratizing space' is more than just adding new players – it comes with questions around sustainability and sovereignty
'India is on the Moon,' S. Somanath, chairman of the Indian Space Research Organization, announced in August 2023. The announcement meant India had joined the short list of countries to have visited the Moon, and the applause and shouts of joy that followed signified that this achievement wasn't just a scientific one, but a cultural one. Over the past decade, many countries have established new space programs, including multiple African nations. India and Israel – nations that were not technical contributors to the space race in the 1960s and '70s – have attempted landings on the lunar surface. With more countries joining the evolving space economy, many of our colleagues in space strategy, policy ethics and law have celebrated the democratization of space: the hope that space is now more accessible for diverse participants. We are a team of researchers based across four countries with expertise in space policy and law, ethics, geography and anthropology who have written about the difficulties and importance of inclusion in space. Major players like the U.S., the European Union and China may once have dominated space and seen it as a place to try out new commercial and military ventures. Emerging new players in space, like other countries, commercial interests and nongovernmental organizations, may have other goals and rationales. Unexpected new initiatives from these newcomers could shift perceptions of space from something to dominate and possess to something more inclusive, equitable and democratic. We address these emerging and historical tensions in a paper published in May 2025 in the journal Nature, in which we describe the difficulties and importance of including nontraditional actors and Indigenous peoples in the space industry. Continuing inequalities among space players Not all countries' space agencies are equal. Newer agencies often don't have the same resources behind them that large, established players do. The U.S. and Chinese programs receive much more funding than those of any other country. Because they are most frequently sending up satellites and proposing new ideas puts them in the position to establish conventions for satellite systems, landing sites and resource extraction that everyone else may have to follow. Sometimes, countries may have operated on the assumption that owning a satellite would give them the appearance of soft or hard geopolitical power as a space nation – and ultimately gain relevance. In reality, student groups of today can develop small satellites, called CubeSats, autonomously, and recent scholarship has concluded that even successful space missions may negatively affect the international relationships between some countries and their partners. The respect a country expects to receive may not materialize, and the costs to keep up can outstrip gains in potential prestige. Environmental protection and Indigenous perspectives Usually, building the infrastructure necessary to test and launch rockets requires a remote area with established roads. In many cases, companies and space agencies have placed these facilities on lands where Indigenous peoples have strong claims, which can lead to land disputes, like in western Australia. Many of these sites have already been subject to human-made changes, through mining and resource extraction in the past. Many sites have been ground zero for tensions with Indigenous peoples over land use. Within these contested spaces, disputes are rife. Because of these tensions around land use, it is important to include Indigenous claims and perspectives. Doing so can help make sure that the goal of protecting the environments of outer space and Earth are not cast aside while building space infrastructure here on Earth. Some efforts are driving this more inclusive approach to engagement in space, including initiatives like 'Dark and Quiet Skies', a movement that works to ensure that people can stargaze and engage with the stars without noise or sound pollution. This movement and other inclusive approaches operate on the principle of reciprocity: that more players getting involved with space can benefit all. Researchers have recognized similar dynamics within the larger space industry. Some scholars have come to the conclusion that even though the space industry is 'pay to play,' commitments to reciprocity can help ensure that players in space exploration who may not have the financial or infrastructural means to support individual efforts can still access broader structures of support. The downside of more players entering space is that this expansion can make protecting the environment – both on Earth and beyond – even harder. The more players there are, at both private and international levels, the more difficult sustainable space exploration could become. Even with good will and the best of intentions, it would be difficult to enforce uniform standards for the exploration and use of space resources that would protect the lunar surface, Mars and beyond. It may also grow harder to police the launch of satellites and dedicated constellations. Limiting the number of satellites could prevent space junk, protect the satellites already in orbit and allow everyone to have a clear view of the night sky. However, this would have to compete with efforts to expand internet access to all. What is space exploration for? Before tackling these issues, we find it useful to think about the larger goal of space exploration, and what the different approaches are. One approach would be the fast and inclusive democratization of space – making it easier for more players to join in. Another would be a more conservative and slower 'big player' approach, which would restrict who can go to space. The conservative approach is liable to leave developing nations and Indigenous peoples firmly on the outside of a key process shaping humanity's shared future. But a faster and more inclusive approach to space would not be easy to run. More serious players means it would be harder to come to an agreement about regulations, as well as the larger goals for human expansion into space. Narratives around emerging technologies, such as those required for space exploration, can change over time, as people begin to see them in action. Technology that we take for granted today was once viewed as futuristic or fantastical, and sometimes with suspicion. For example, at the end of the 1940s, George Orwell imagined a world in which totalitarian systems used tele-screens and videoconferencing to control the masses. Earlier in the same decade, Thomas J. Watson, then president of IBM, notoriously predicted that there would be a global market for about five computers. We as humans often fear or mistrust future technologies. However, not all technological shifts are detrimental, and some technological changes can have clear benefits. In the future, robots may perform tasks too dangerous, too difficult or too dull and repetitive for humans. Biotechnology may make life healthier. Artificial intelligence can sift through vast amounts of data and turn it into reliable guesswork. Researchers can also see genuine downsides to each of these technologies. Space exploration is harder to squeeze into one streamlined narrative about the anticipated benefits. The process is just too big and too transformative. To return to the question if we should go to space, our team argues that it is not a question of whether or not we should go, but rather a question of why we do it, who benefits from space exploration and how we can democratize access to broader segments of society. Including a diversity of opinions and viewpoints can help find productive ways forward. Ultimately, it is not necessary for everyone to land on one single narrative about the value of space exploration. Even our team of four researchers doesn't share a single set of beliefs about its value. But bringing more nations, tribes and companies into discussions around its potential value can help create collaborative and worthwhile goals at an international scale. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Timiebi Aganaba, Arizona State University; Adam Fish, UNSW Sydney; Deondre Smiles, University of Victoria, and Tony Milligan, King's College London Read more: Astronomers have warned against colonial practices in the space industry − a philosopher of science explains how the industry could explore other planets without exploiting them Astronomers have warned against colonial practices in the space industry − a philosopher of science explains how the industry could explore other planets without exploiting them The Starbase rocket testing facility is permanently changing the landscape of southern Texas Tony Milligan receives funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 856543). Adam Fish, Deondre Smiles, and Timiebi Aganaba do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Avatar: Fire and Ash': Everything to know about James Cameron's return to Pandora ahead of this week's trailer premiere
Are you ready to go back to Pandora? Titanic maestro James Cameron is here to make sure you book your round trip ticket to his alien world now. The first trailer for Avatar: Fire and Ash — due in theaters on Dec. 19 — will hit the big screen this weekend as Fantastic Four: First Steps takes flight. And unlike its predecessor, The Way of Water, we haven't had to long to wait. 13 years separated the first two Avatar adventures, but there's only been a three-year gap between the second and third installments. Still, it's understandable if you're in need of a refresher about that past, present and future of Cameron's corner of the galaxy. Here's everything you need to know about Fire and Ash before you catch the trailer in theaters. More from Gold Derby Why Carrie Coon's Emmy chances for 'The White Lotus' will be helped by 'The Gilded Age' Malcolm-Jamal Warner dead at 54: Remembering his undersung, award-winning post-'Cosby Show' career What's been happening on Pandora? First discovered by mankind in the latter half of the 21st century, the first terrestrial colonizers touched down on the Alpha Centauri System moon during the 22nd century. Among those waves of settlers is Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), an ex-Marine who has been confined to a wheelchair since injuring his spine in battle. But Jake gets the chance to walk again when he takes part in the Avatar program — a next-gen scientific operation overseen by Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) whereby human minds are uploaded into bodies cloned from Pandora's native people, the Na'vi. Jake is tasked with infiltrating a tribe of tree-dwelling Na'vi, but abandons the mission as he gets to know their culture and falls in love with the clan's best warrior, Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña). The first movie ends with the duo guiding the Na'vi to victory over Earth's corporate-backed militants — led by Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang) — and getting hitched. The Way of Water then jumps ahead 16 years and find them overseeing a brood of four kids, including adopted daughter, Kira, who has the face and voice of Dr. Augustine, who died during the course of the original film. But Earth naturally isn't about to let their intergalactic investment go to waste: A new army returns led by the dead Quaritch's own Na'vi avatar, forcing Jake and Neytiri to take their family on the run. They find temporary refuge with the aquatic Metkayina clan, overseen by Tonowari (Cliff Curtis) and Ronal (Kate Winslet), but are inevitably forced to go on the offensive. The resulting battle claims one of their own — eldest son, Neteyam (Jamie Flatters). The film ends in a stalemate as both sides mourn their losses ... and prepare for the battle to begin again. What's happening in Fire and Ash? Full details about the Fire and Ash's story are scarcer to come by than the Heart of the Ocean. But we do know that the third movie introduces us to an all-new Na'vi tribe — and this particular group is unlike any we've met before. Dubbed the "Ash Clan," they live in a particularly volcanic region of Pandora's diverse ecosystem and have little to no affinity for the planet's other residents. Their leader is Varang (Oona Chaplin, granddaughter of Charlie Chaplin best known for her role as Game of Thrones' Talisa Maegyr, slain alongside husband Robb Stark in "The Red Wedding" episode) and Cameron has warned that she's a particularly formidable opponent for our heroes. "Varang is the leader of a people who have gone through an incredible hardship. She's hardened by that," Cameron told Empire magazine earlier this year. "She will do anything for them — even things that we would consider to be evil." Gold Derby saw Varang's forces in action earlier this year during CinemaCon, when Disney screened an extended battle sequence from the film that unfolds in the skies over Pandora. The scene features Cameron's typically grand action choreography, as well as new airships and weapons. Interestingly, that footage also was projected in the high-frame-rate format that the director favors, but has proven controversial among viewers. What's happening next on Pandora? Cameron filmed the entirety of the second and third Avatar installments back-to-back in New Zealand between 2017 and 2020. But he also shot select scenes for a planned fourth film with the younger actors, as the next installment will reportedly feature a notable time jump. The still-untitled Avatar 4 is set for release on Dec. 21, 2029, followed by a fifth installment on Dec. 19, 2031. "Avatar 4 and 5 are both written," the director told The Hollywood Reporter in 2023. "We even have some of 4 in the can. We've begun a franchise at this point. We've begun a saga that can now play out over multiple films." Along with a time jump, the next part of the Avatar saga will also see a location switch. Producer Jon Landau teased to Gizmodo three years ago that the fifth film will bring the action home to Earth. "There is a section of the story where we go to Earth, and we go to it to open people's eyes, open Neytiri's eyes, to what exists [there]," he said. "Just like you're defined by the choices you make in life, not all humans are bad. Not all Na'vi are good. And that's the case here on Earth. And we want to expose Neytiri to that." (Landau died in 2024.) The next two movies will also feature a new human face in the cast: Oscar winner Michelle Yeoh joins the franchise as Dr. Karina Mogue, a scientist with ambiguous intentions. Although Yeoh was previously photographed on set during the production of Fire and Ash, Cameron later clarified that her character won't enter the frame until the fourth film. That gives us all something to look forward to during the four year break between Pandora flights. Best of Gold Derby Everything to know about 'The Batman 2': Returning cast, script finalized Tom Cruise movies: 17 greatest films ranked worst to best 'It was wonderful to be on that ride': Christian Slater talks his beloved roles, from cult classics ('Heathers,' 'True Romance') to TV hits ('Mr. Robot,' 'Dexter: Original Sin') Click here to read the full article. Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Iran sends a rocket designed to carry satellites into a suborbital test flight
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran tested one of its satellite carrying rockets with a suborbital flight on Monday, state media reported, the first such test since a ceasefire was reached after a 12-day war waged by Israel against Iran in June, which also saw the United States strike nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. The test was the latest for a program that the West says improves Tehran's ballistic missiles. A report by the official IRNA news agency said the Ghased satellite carrier test aimed at 'assessing some emerging new technologies in the country's space industry.' It said the test results will help improve the function of Iran's satellites and space systems. The report did not provide any further details on the test flight or from where the rocket was launched. Iran from time to time Iran launches satellite carriers to send its satellites to the space. Last September, Iran launched a satellite into space with a rocket built by the country's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. The Ghased, a solid and fluid fuel rocket, was first inaugurated in 2020 by the Guard when it put a military satellite in the orbit. The war in June killed nearly 1,100 Iranians, including senior military commanders and nuclear scientist. Retaliatory missile barrages by Iran killed 28 in Israel.
