Starmer 'still facing 50-strong revolt' on welfare curbs despite humiliating climbdown amid frantic Labour haggling ahead of crunch vote tomorrow
Around 50 MPs look set to defy the PM in a crunch vote tomorrow in what could be a devastating blow to his authority. It might even still be enough to overturn Labour's huge majority.
Ministers are due to lay out details of the concessions that were announced last week, including guarantees that no current health or disability benefit claimants will be worse off.
That is expected to wipe out more than half the £5billion of savings Rachel Reeves was hoping for from the package, raising the threat of more tax rises in the Autumn.
Sir Keir has blamed the G7 in Canada and Nato summit in The Hague last week for failing to address the Labour revolt earlier.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is pledging that if MPs pass the Bill at second reading tomorrow it will be amended at committee stage.
The original plans restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit.
The changes to Pip will now only apply to new claims from November 2026.
Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been blunted, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms.
Details of a review of the Pip assessment, to be led by disabilities minister Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people, will also be published.
Draft regulations for the 'right to try', to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment, will also be laid in Parliament.
The Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on.
'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it.
'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.'
Some £300million in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years.
Those with severe conditions who are unlikely to recover – about 200,000 people – will not be called for a reassessment of universal credit.
From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation.
Ms Kendall had confirmed concessions to the plans after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at its first Commons hurdle.
That is now expected to be withdrawn after the move appeased some rebellious MPs.
But others are still committed to backing a similar amendment.
Labour MP Rachael Maskell said she would sign the new amendment aiming to stop the Bill, saying it was not clear how the promised concessions would be brought in.
'There's no confidence… we're being asked to sign a blank check even with these changes,' she said.
Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a Labour whip over the reforms, told The Guardian there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement' and that she had not decided how to vote.
Olivia Blake, a Labour MP with a disability, told the paper the changes could create 'an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently'.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called the concessions 'the worst of all worlds'.
The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against and have called for the Government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
Deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Liberal Democrats simply cannot support any measures that make things harder for unpaid carers, disabled people who rely on support with daily tasks in order to stay employed, and those whose disabilities mean that they will never be able to work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
6 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned
Shirley-Anne Somerville was commenting after the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill passed its first legislative hurdle at Westminster. Ahead of the crunch vote, Sir Keir Starmer ditched a mainstay of his welfare reform agenda as he battled to get the draft laws through the House of Commons. In a major concession as MPs prepared to vote, the Prime Minister shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. Under Scotland's devolved social security system, Pip is currently being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment. Shirley-Anne Somerville (Jane Barlow/PA) Reacting to events at Westminster, Ms Somerville reiterated the Scottish Government's pledge not to cut that benefit. 'Despite the panicked, last-minute concessions they have made, if the UK Government presses ahead with cuts to disability support they will plunge more people into poverty,' said the SNP MSP. 'That is unconscionable. 'Their approach also risks creating a deeply unfair two-tier system, pushing the impact of cuts onto future applicants for disability benefits. 'The UK Government needs to stop balancing the books on the backs of some of the most vulnerable people in society. 'They need to properly listen to the overwhelming criticism their proposals have generated and do the right thing by disabled people by abandoning this bill entirely. 'I want to reassure disabled people in Scotland, that the Scottish Government will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment, we will not let disabled people down as the UK Government has done.' The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted. The legislation passed by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Despite the late concession, there were 49 Labour rebels, the largest revolt so far of Sir Keir's premiership.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Did my MP vote against Starmer's plan to cut benefits?
Sir Keir Starmer 's welfare bill has managed to scrape past its second reading as he fended off what is believed to be the most significant rebellion since he became prime minister a year ago. The bill passed its second reading by 335 ayes to 260 noes, a majority of 75, with 49 Labour MPs voting against the welfare cuts which have caused controversy. Disability minister Sir Stephen Timms announced a last-ditch concession that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) – which had been the central pillar of the government's reforms – would not take place until after a review of the benefit had concluded. The government had initially planned to change the eligibility criteria for disability benefits for all new claimants from November 2026 but now the new system will not come into force until the review has concluded. It comes just days after the government watered down the legislation for the first time on Thursday, excluding all existing claimants from changes to PIP in a chaotic U-turn. Sir Keir's welfare bill has continuously caused controversy as a growing rebel camp, led at the time by Dame Meg Hillier, putting forward an initial amendment which forced the government to U-turn from its initial plans. While she voted to back the legislation, almost 50 Labour MPs expressed their discontent with the bill still. One key voice in the 'noes' was MP Ms Maria Tidball, born with a congenital disability affecting all four limbs, who broke down in tears as she delivered an impassioned speech criticising the welfare cuts. Another key rebel, Rachel Maskell, said disabled people will have been worried watching the debate. The MP for York Central said: 'I'm obviously really sad that the Bill went through but I think my greatest sadness is that disabled people will have been looking on and seeing Parliament debating their futures, and I think they'll be incredibly distressed when they see the way that Parliament was today. 'That's the thing that tugs at me, because I think ultimately we've got huge responsibility to disabled people and they weren't served well by the department today.' Sir Stephen Timms later said, in response to concerns over a two tier system, that it was 'completely normal in social security.' 'PIP replaced DLA (disability living allowance) in 2013 but half a million adults are still on DLA today. That doesn't cause problems. Parallel running is normal, and actually it's often the fairest way to make a major change.' Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said welfare reform was particularly 'difficult' for Labour because the party cared 'passionately' about the subject. Asked what the main lessons were from the backbench rebellion over proposed cuts, she told broadcasters: 'Welfare reform is always really difficult, perhaps especially for Labour governments. 'It's something we care passionately about.'
Powys County Times
7 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
The welfare reform vote: All you need to know
MPs have backed a Government proposal to reform welfare payments for sick and disabled people, but only after significant concessions saw much of Sir Keir Starmer's plan abandoned. Below, the PA news agency looks at what happened, what it means for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit, and what might come next. – What have MPs agreed to? MPs voted on Tuesday to allow the Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to advance to the next stage in becoming law. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had previously threatened to vote against the legislation, enough to block its passage through the Commons, but in the end only 49 did so. But ministers were forced to offer a series of concessions to persuade the rebels to back the Government. – What concessions did the Government make? Last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn aimed at heading off the rebellion that included three key points. Firstly, changes to Pip eligibility would only come into effect in November 2026, and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules, instead of imposing the changes on everyone. Secondly, people claiming the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would see their incomes protected in real terms. Thirdly, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would conduct a review of the Pip assessment, 'co-produced' with disabled people. But during Tuesday's debate, Sir Stephen offered a further concession, saying any changes to Pip eligibility would only be introduced after his review had concluded, further delaying them. – What do the concessions mean for the Government's proposals? The decision to push back Pip changes to an unspecified date, and leave uncertain the details of what those changes will be, removes a major part of the Government's reform plans. The proposed changes to universal credit remain, raising the standard allowance while halving the health element for most new claimants from April 2026. But the concessions will also pose a problem for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will need to find extra money now the expected savings from welfare reform are no longer expected to materialise. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by 2029/30, a key year for Ms Reeves' fiscal targets. – What happens next? The Government has pledged to make the necessary amendments to remove the Pip changes from the Bill when it returns to the Commons next week. It is then likely to continue through Parliament, becoming law after it has been approved by both MPs and peers. But wider questions remain for the Government. Not only does Ms Reeves face a fiscal headache, but the Prime Minister could face a political one too as he seeks to repair fractured relations with his backbenchers. And uncertainty will continue to surround the Government's plans for welfare reform.
