logo
'Adds insult to injury': Windrush campaigners urge the government to save Notting Hill Carnival

'Adds insult to injury': Windrush campaigners urge the government to save Notting Hill Carnival

ITV News7 days ago

Campaigners have urged the Government to step in to protect the future of Notting Hill Carnival as they mark Windrush Day.
The west London carnival is in jeopardy, its chairman Ian Comfort said in a letter on Wednesday, when he asked Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to provide urgent funding to save the event.
Jacqueline McKenzie, a campaigner and human rights lawyer who helped victims of the Windrush scandal, said the carnival holds 'huge national and international significance'.
'The Government needs to recognise this and act urgently to protect it,' Ms McKenzie said.
In the late 1950s, Notting Hill became home to many people from the Caribbean who arrived in Britain on Windrush and accompanying ships, and the carnival was founded by pioneers of that generation.
Ms McKenzie said the carnival being at risk 'adds insult to injury' for victims of the Windrush scandal.
'It should not be lost on us that these funding concerns coincide with Windrush Day on Sunday,' she said.
'To see this celebration in jeopardy whilst so many of the Windrush generation continue to fight for justice following the Home Office scandal only adds insult to injury.
'Carnival embodies the fundamental role of Black and Caribbean communities in Britain, and the Government should be upholding the Windrush legacy instead of undermining it.'
The carnival attracts around two million people over the August bank holiday, and Susan Hall, leader of the Conservatives on the London Assembly, previously said the event was a 'victim of its own success' and a 'disaster waiting to happen' because of the large number of attendees.
City Hall said it has been working with partners to ensure the safety of carnival-goers, which it described as 'paramount'.
Professor Patrick Vernon, a cultural historian and Windrush campaigner, said: 'Notting Hill Carnival is far more than a street event — it is a vital cultural institution with both national and international significance.
'As the second-largest carnival in the world, second only to Rio de Janeiro, it underscores London's position as a leading global capital of diversity, creativity and cultural exchange.'
Professor Vernon campaigned for a national Windrush Day following the 2018 scandal when it was revealed thousands of British people, mainly of Caribbean origin, were wrongly classed as illegal immigrants – with many deported while others faced difficulty securing work, accessing healthcare or housing.
'The injustice faced by the Windrush Generation in recent years makes the threat to Notting Hill Carnival all the more painful,' Professor Vernon said.
'It is a celebration born of resistance, resilience, and unity – a legacy that should be upheld, not undermined. To allow this cornerstone of Black British identity to fall into jeopardy is to further betray the communities who have already given so much.
'As we approach the 70th anniversary of this extraordinary event, we are reminded that Notting Hill Carnival represents the very best of Britain: unity in diversity, creativity in adversity, and joy in community. Now more than ever, these are values worth defending.'
Glenda Caesar, director of the Windrush National Organisation, also urged the Government to step in to save the event, adding: 'In the face of historical and ongoing injustices experienced by people of colour, the carnival stands not only as a celebration of resilience, heritage and identity but also as a powerful symbol of unity and inclusion.
'Supporting this event affirms the UK's commitment to embracing diversity, acknowledging its multicultural roots, and fostering a society where all communities feel seen, valued and empowered.'
A Government spokesman said: 'Notting Hill Carnival is an important community event, and we recognise that for many it is a moment to come together and celebrate.
'We all want this to go ahead, and event organisers should work with local authorities and the police to keep it safe for everyone attending.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip
Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip

The National

time25 minutes ago

  • The National

Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip

Wes Streeting was interviewed on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme by Victoria Derbyshire, who was filling in for Kuenssberg, about the UK Government's proposed cuts to welfare, which have been described as a 'two-tier disability system' by campaigners. The UK government confirmed on Friday evening that it will make major changes to its planned welfare cuts, aiming to avoid a rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers. Under the new plan, people already receiving Personal Independence Payments (Pip) or the health element of Universal Credit will keep getting them. However, the cuts will apply to future claimants. READ MORE: Police 'examining' Kneecap and Bob Vylan Glastonbury Festival performances When pressed by Derbyshire, Streeting was forced to admit that the Labour Government is planning on having fewer people able to claim disability benefits by reforming the welfare system. During the interview, Derbyshire said: 'Members of the cabinet, you on this program this morning, and the Prime Minister have said it previously, the current system is not sustainable. 'But even after your review, the bottom line is you want fewer people in receipt of Pip, fewer disabled people in receipt of Pip, don't you?' Streeting replied: 'Well, we want to make sure we're getting the line in the right place in terms of.' To which Derbyshire cut him off and asked: 'So, the answer is yes. You want fewer disabled people claiming Pip.' (Image: BBC) Streeting continued: 'I think 1000 more people, coming on every day, like it's not sustainable in its current form, it's just not. 'And unless we address that issue, we've got to do it in a fair way. 'We've got to do it in the right way.' Derbyshire interrupted Streeting again saying: 'But you won't say that out loud. Why not?' Streeting replied: 'Well I just did.' Derbyshire then asked for clarification that there will be fewer disabled people able to claim Pip. To which Streeting replied: 'I literally just said, we've got to make sure that in terms of where we are, where we draw the line, where we get it right, that it is sustainable for the longer term.' MPs are expected to vote on the welfare reform bill on Tuesday at Westminster which the UK Government will be hoping to pass after it offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Keir Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'.

After criticism from MAGA world, Amy Coney Barrett delivers for Trump
After criticism from MAGA world, Amy Coney Barrett delivers for Trump

NBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • NBC News

After criticism from MAGA world, Amy Coney Barrett delivers for Trump

WASHINGTON — As President Donald Trump reveled in a major Supreme Court victory that curbed the ability of judges to block his policies nationwide, he had special praise for one of the justices: Amy Coney Barrett. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly,' he said at a White House press conference soon after Friday's ruling. Barrett's majority opinion in the 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, which at least temporarily revived Trump's plan to end automatic birthright citizenship, is a major boost to an administration that has been assailed by courts around the country for its broad and aggressive use of executive power. It also marks an extraordinary turnaround for Barrett's reputation among Trump's most vocal supporters. Just a few months ago, she faced vitriolic criticism from MAGA influencers and others as she sporadically voted against Trump, including a March decision in which she rejected a Trump administration attempt to avoid paying U.S. Agency for International Development contractors. CNN also reported that Trump himself had privately complained about Barrett. That is despite the fact that she is a Trump appointee with a long record of casting decisive votes in a host of key cases in which the court's 6-3 conservative majority has imposed itself, most notably with the 2022 ruling that overturned the abortion rights landmark Roe v. Wade. One of those outspoken critics, Trump-allied lawyer Mike Davis, suggested that the pressure on Barrett had the desired effect. 'Sometimes feeling the heat helps people see the light,' he said in a text message. Quickly U-turning, MAGA influencers on Friday praised Barrett and turned their anger on liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson instead. They seized upon language in Barrett's opinion in which she gave short shrift to Jackson's dissenting opinion, in which the President Joe Biden appointee characterized the ruling as an 'existential threat to the rule of law.' Barrett responded by accusing Jackson of a 'startling line of attack' that was based on arguments 'at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself.' Jack Posobiec, a conservative firebrand who a few months ago called Barrett a ' DEI judge,' immediately used similar language against Jackson, who is the first Black woman to serve on the court. In an appearance on Real America's Voice, a right-wing streaming channel, he call Jackson an ' autopen hire' in reference to the unsubstantiated allegation from conservatives that Biden's staff was responsible for many of his decisions. He then described Barrett as 'one of the nicest people. She's not some flame-throwing conservative up there.' It is not just the birthright citizenship case in which the Trump administration has claimed victory at the Supreme Court in recent months. The court, often with the three liberal justices in dissent, has also handed Trump multiple wins on emergency applications filed at the court, allowing various policies that were blocked by lower courts to go into effect. In such cases, the court does not always list exactly how each justice voted, but Barrett did not publicly dissent, for example, when the court allowed Trump to quickly deport immigrants to countries they have no connection to or ended temporary legal protections for 500,000 immigrants from four countries. Barrett defenders dismiss suggestions she would be influenced by negative comments from MAGA world, with Samuel Bray, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, saying her ruling that limited nationwide injunctions simply shows her independent qualities as a judge. 'It should reinforce the sense that she's her own justice and she's committed to giving legal answers to legal questions. We shouldn't be looking for political answers to political questions,' he said. Barrett, via a Supreme Court spokeswoman, did not respond to a request for comment. More broadly, legal experts said that in the Supreme Court term that just ended, Barrett showed that on many traditional conservative issues she is 'solidly to the right,' Anthony Kreis, a professor at Georgia State University College of Law. There were fewer examples of her going her own way than in the previous term, when which she staked out her own path in some significant cases. On Friday alone, she was part of a conservative 6-3 majority in three of the five rulings, including the birthright citizenship case. The others saw the court rule in favor of religious conservatives who objected to LGBTQ story books in elementary schools and uphold a Texas restriction on adult-content websites. 'I don't think we can say she was ever drifting left, but she was occupying a center-right position on the court that occasionally made her a key swing vote,' he added. 'This term's docket at the end just wasn't that.' One notable wrinkle in the birthright citizenship case is that Barrett, as the most junior justice in the majority, would not have been expected to write it. Often, Chief Justice John Roberts, who gets to assign cases when he is in the majority, will write such rulings himself. Carolyn Shapiro, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law, said the assignment suited Barrett, who is known for her expertise on legal procedure. But she also wondered if Roberts might have considered the impact of the complaints against Barrett and wanted to 'give her a place to shine from the perspective of the right.' Even if that were a consideration in Roberts' thinking, Shapiro added, 'I don't see much evidence that she is doing things that she wouldn't have done if not for the criticism she received.'

Alexander in Taiwan for talks
Alexander in Taiwan for talks

Edinburgh Reporter

timean hour ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Alexander in Taiwan for talks

The MP for Lothian East, Douglas Alexander, is in Taiwan for talks in his role as Trade Minister on Sunday and Monday. The visit is part of the UK's longstanding although unofficial relationship with Taiwan and is aimed at improving bilateral trade, worth £9.3 billion in 2024. It comes a week after the Government announced its new Trade Strategy intended to secure UK business and trading relationships. Mr Alexander said: 'We share a long-standing trade relationship with Taiwan and our trade reached an all-time high last year, but we know there are still more opportunities for British businesses to take advantage of opportunities in this dynamic economy. 'The new Enhanced Trade Partnership (ETP) Pillars will help us boost trade in some of our growth-driving sectors, delivering economic growth and helping put more money in people's pockets as part of the Plan for Change.' Digital trade pilots were completed with UK wafer company Clas-SIC Wafer Fab and the Kimbland Distillery in Orkney and Skene Scotch Whiskey as the UK tries to streamline trade with Taiwan. Mr Alexander will witness the signing of a trade agreement between the two countries which will be conducted by British Representative Taipei, Ruth Bradley-Jones, and the Representative at the Taipei Representative Office, Vincent Chin-Hsiang Yao. Douglas Alexander photographed when he was Scottish Labour Party candidate for Lothian East in 2024 Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store