'Big Beautiful Bill' means a Code Blue for Tennessee health care
The U.S. House of Representatives passed their 'Big Beautiful Bill' by a vote of 215-214. Every member of the Tennessee Congressional delegation voted yes, with the exception of 9th District U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, a Democrat. And with that vote, they put thousands of Tennesseans at risk of losing their healthcare and their food benefits.
Cuts to TennCare, our state's Medicaid program, will hurt vulnerable Tennesseans — people with disabilities, low income pregnant women, the elderly and children — who depend on this program for access to primary care, preventative care, prenatal and postpartum care and skilled nursing care.
We also face historic cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) program, right as school lets out for the summer — a time when many kids go hungry. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 57,000 Tennesseans with children stand to lose their SNAP benefits. This means children will get up and go to bed hungry all over our state.
Healthcare workers in Tennessee have been sounding the alarm bells on a number of issues for years now: COVID public health measures and vaccine outreach, threats to reproductive healthcare, and, more recently, the NIH funding cuts and the resulting loss of grant money for medical research.
Here in Middle Tennessee, one of our biggest employers, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), has announced $250 million in federal budget cuts and has already begun layoffs as a result of the funding cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). VUMC received $468 million in 2024 for medical research, the second most in the country according to Axios. Overall, Tennessee universities received $770 million in funding for research from the NIH last year alone.
250k Tennesseans could lose TennCare, private insurance under Congressional spending bill
Statewide, the cuts have also affected the University of Tennessee Health System, Meharry Medical College and St Jude Children's Research Hospital.
Meharry Medical College is an historically Black college (HBCU) in Nashville and it helps to fill the gap of underrepresented minorities in the healthcare workforce. In Memphis, St. Jude's is the hospital where parents can get treatment for their children with cancer and other diseases without fear of medically bankrupting their families. We have only just begun to feel the pain from the loss of the critical NIH funding source for these essential organizations. Eventually, medical research will slow, and breakthrough science, like the work that was done at Vanderbilt to develop the COVID vaccine, will be threatened.
Now, it's time for health care workers and advocates to answer the call for healthcare again. We need to press that Code Blue button in Tennessee, gathering our colleagues together to fight the impending federal budget cuts that threaten Medicaid and SNAP.
Inside the hospital, activating a Code Blue means there is a medical emergency and a patient in need of resuscitation. Here in Tennessee, our healthcare system is in dire straits.
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 250,000 Tennesseans will lose their healthcare coverage as a result of Medicaid cuts and other changes to the Affordable Care Act insurance marketplace. This is on top of the already over 635,000 Tennesseans lacking any healthcare coverage in 2023, about 11% of the population in our state. Because of our high uninsured rate, Tennessee has had more rural hospital closures per capita than anywhere else in the country, which has led to maternity care deserts and factors into our dismal maternal mortality rates.
This 'Big Beautiful Bill' will have far-reaching consequences for all Tennesseans, not just those who rely on TennCare and SNAP. Hospitals, especially rural ones, run on slim margins and will be at increased risk of closure due to the Medicaid cuts.
According to Becker's Hospital review, over 41% of rural hospitals in Tennessee are vulnerable. Rural hospitals in our state closing will inevitably lead to further crowding in the tertiary care hospitals in our big cities. Wait times in emergency departments will go up for everyone. Appointments to see primary care and specialists will be harder to get.
It couldn't be any clearer: when one person is denied healthcare access, it affects us all.
There is a Code Blue in Tennessee. Our patients, neighbors, hospitals and communities need our help. We cannot let heartless politicians pull the plug and flatline our safety net just to give tax cuts to billionaires. It's time to gather all hands on deck to save our healthcare system that is teetering on the brink before it's too far gone to resuscitate.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make After the Passing of Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' finally cleared the House and the Senate and was signed by the president on July 4. The bill has several policies that could impact the middle class. Making some money moves and preparing for the new changes can help you save money and grow your portfolio. Read Next: Check Out: Here are some of the top money moves the middle class should make. Also see how much the definition of middle class has changed in every state. Capitalize on Clean Energy Credits Now The bill is cycling out of energy credits, which affect electric vehicles, solar panels and other clean energy sources. Chad Gammon, CFP, owner of Custom Fit Financial, suggested making clean energy purchases before the deadline if you've been holding out. 'If you are considering any upgrades, now would be the time to do it. Some credits, such as electric vehicles, are available until September 30, 2025. Other credits, like the residential clean energy credit, will end on December 31, 2025. This can help if you anticipate higher energy bills in the years to come, and reputable installers can assist with an estimated payback period,' he said. Be Aware: Open a 'Trump Account' A 'Trump account' can give your child a head start with investing money and accumulating wealth. Gammon highlighted the promising opportunity while encouraging people to monitor how it will work before investing additional money. 'If you have a child in 2025, I'd look into opening a 'Trump account.' The federal government will give $1,000 as a starter contribution. There are options to contribute further. I'd wait for more details on that, but would set it up for the initial $1,000,' he said. Children who are born between 2025 and 2028 are eligible for a $1,000 deposit, per CNBC. The money in the account will be invested in a fund that tracks the U.S. stock market, the outlet reported. Plan Your Taxes The bill can reduce your tax burden, especially if you use the standard deduction. Gammon explained how the new bill can add more money to your wallet. 'I would also look at your estimated 2025 taxes and adjust withholdings, if needed. The standard deductions moved for [couples who are married and filing jointly] from $30,000 to $31,500, or if you are single, it went from $15,000 to $15,750. This could lower your tax liability, where you can adjust your withholdings on your W-4 and free up extra monthly cash,' he said. Seniors can also get a boosted tax deduction thanks to the bill. Seniors who are 65 or older can get an additional $6,000 tax deduction if their modified adjusted gross income is below $75,000. Married couples filing jointly can capitalize on the additional tax deduction if their combined modified adjusted gross income is below $150,000. This additional tax deduction for seniors currently applies for the tax years 2025 to 2028. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on 3 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make After the Passing of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Sign in to access your portfolio
Los Angeles Times
20 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: The market usually fails the environment when the government doesn't help
To the editor: Contributing writer Veronique de Rugy is evenhanded when it comes to government subsidies: There should be none for the private sector. Let the market determine winners and losers in the economy ('Good riddance to those green-energy tax breaks. Now keep closing other loopholes,' July 17). When it comes to consumer goods, private enterprise can be an effective allocator of resources, but the market has proved woefully deficient in other ways. It has failed to provide a decent life for all on a healthy planet. Short-term profit has overwhelmed long-term well-being. Corporate dominance has brought us a world fouled by chemical and plastic residues and climate-changing pollution. Even as renewable energy becomes practical and affordable, its relative powerlessness compared with the fossil fuel industry impedes its quick adaptation. Meanwhile China, which has embraced a major role for the government in the economy, is eating our lunch in this regard. Electric vehicle manufacturing and more sustainable artificial intelligence are just two of its recent successes. China is still a major emitter of carbon dioxide, but it leads the world in renewable energy investment. I don't want to live in authoritarian China. I want to live in a democratic USA that recognizes that the market must be supplemented by rational policy. If we don't prioritize humanistic, environmentally friendly policies via government action, they will not prevail. Grace Bertalot, Anaheim .. To the editor: De Rugy appears to present a rational argument: She wants more green energy, but subsidizing it is the wrong way to get there. She says, 'When you compare the size of green versus fossil-fuel subsidies, the difference is staggering.' Nonsense. I would assume an economist such as De Rugy would know the term 'externalities' — that is, social costs that come from economic activity. Burning fossil fuels creates horrendous externalities. Air pollution kills more than 8 million people annually. Carbon emissions from burning coal, oil and gas overheat the planet and cause more frequent and intense heat waves, droughts, floods, rising sea levels and wildfires, which all cost communities billions of dollars. I agree that subsidizing clean energy is not the most effective government policy to correct the energy marketplace. Instead of focusing on subsidies, however, De Rugy should join fellow economists, including some conservative Republicans, who call for mitigating fossil fuel externalities with a tax on carbon pollution. Caroline Taylor, Santa Barbara .. To the editor: De Rugy's support for eliminating green energy subsidies in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' omits vital context. While President Trump didn't get the $1 billion he reportedly sought from the fossil fuel industry during his 2024 campaign, he did receive more than $75 million from various interests associated with fossil fuels. That aligns with his constant 'drill, baby, drill' chants and his bizarre, debunked claims that wind turbines cause cancer. Meanwhile, the country reels from the devastating effects of climate change, from deadly floods in Texas to wildfires in California. The green energy subsidies De Rugy criticizes were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, one of the Biden administration's major successes, backing proven clean energy companies. Let's be honest: This repeal isn't about sound policy. It's about political revenge — and protecting fossil fuel donors. Mark Winkler, Studio City
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Plotting an escape from (Trump's) Alcatraz
There was a time, not long ago, when Republicans and Democrats actually got along. They considered members of the other party adversaries, not enemies and, after sparring during the day over policy disagreements, they'd often hang out together, even become friends. When I read that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum were visiting Alcatraz last week, hailing it as the site of a new federal prison, I remembered my own friendship as a Democrat with the late Tony Blankley, then one of the Republican Party's brightest stars. Born a Brit, Blankley came to the U.S. and became a force in American politics: deputy attorney general of California; speechwriter for President Reagan; staffer for Rep. Bobbi Fiedler (R-Calif.); and press secretary to House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). He loved working for Gingrich, Blankley once told me, because he was such a policy geek. He'd come in every morning, Blankley related, with at least ten new ideas he'd thought of in the shower. But only one or two of them, Blankley quickly admitted, might be viable. The rest, he'd tell the Speaker, weren't even worth considering. That's one of the most important functions of any political staffer: the willingness to tell your boss he's dead wrong. It's too bad there's nobody like that around Donald Trump. He's filled his Cabinet and White House staff with nothing but loyalists who ask, 'How high?' when he says 'Jump.' Apparently, there's nobody willing to tell him the truth. Like the truth about Trump's plan — reportedly hatched after watching a rerun of Clint Eastwood's film 'Escape from Alcatraz' — to restore Alcatraz as a maximum security federal prison. It has to be the dumbest of all the dumb ideas Trump has ever proposed as president. But, rather than tell Trump he's wrong, Bondi and Burgum, like the sycophants they are, went out to Alcatraz on July 17, trying to sell his plan. They're wasting their time. It's never going to happen. Alcatraz was shut down as a federal prison in 1963, sixty-two years ago, for good reason. Because of constant exposure to salt spray, its walls were literally falling apart and in need of support. The island had no running water and no sewer system. All food and water had to be brought in by boat every day, and trash and human waste taken out. A 1959 report indicated the prison was three times more expensive to run than the average American prison and far too expensive to maintain. At first, the Bureau of Prisons tried to make improvements, then gave it up as a lost cause. I've been there recently. It's in even worse shape today. In fact, the existing structures are beyond repair. Engineers agree that the only way to recreate a prison on the island would be to raze all existing buildings and build a new prison from scratch. According to administration officials, as Axios scooped last week, that project would cost $2 billion, take years to complete, and they'd still have to bring in food and water every day and take out the waste. No matter how badly Trump would like to see it happen, $2 billion's a lot of money to spend for a prison we don't need. In fact, 84 new federal prisons have been built since 1963, making a total of 120 facilities today. All of which have plenty of room because America's prison population is rapidly declining. According to The Atlantic, from a peak of 1.6 million inmates in 2009, the prison population declined to 1.2 million in 2023 and is expected to sink to 600,000 by 2026. Those are the facts, which everybody seems to know except Donald Trump. But, surely, the facts about Alcatraz should be enough for Burgum, Bondi or chief of staff Susie Wiles to tell the president: 'This is a dumb idea. It's too expensive, it'll take too long, and we don't need it.' And, while they're at it, maybe they could talk Trump out of a few other dumb ideas, like buying Greenland, revoking Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship or forcing the Washington Commanders to change their name back to 'Redskins.'
